Notice of Termination of Investigation Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on November 17, 2003 in response to a petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers at Allegheny Ludlum Corporation, Brackenridge Works, Brackenridge, Pennsylvania.
The petitioning group of workers
In accordance with section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor issued a Notice of Certification Regarding Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance on November 25, 2002, applicable to workers of EHVWeidmann Industries, Inc., a subsidiary of Wicor Americas, St. Johnsbury, Vermont. The notice was
Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on November 12, 2003 in response to a petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers of F/V Exception, Homer, Alaska.
The petition regarding the investigation has been deemed invalid. In order to establish a valid worker group, there must
Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on November 3, 2003, in response to a petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers of Fishing Vessel (F/V) Patricia Diann, Cordova, Alaska.
The investigation revealed that the subject firm did not separate or threaten to separate a
In accordance with section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance on March 5, 2003, applicable to workers of Harting, Inc. of North America, Elgin, Illinois. The notice was published in the Federal Register on March 19, 2003 (68 FR
Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on October 24, 2003 in response to a petition filed on behalf of workers of L.S. Starrett Company, Inc., Alum Bank, Pennsylvania.
The investigation revealed that the subject firm did not separate or threaten to separate a significant number or
In accordance with section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2273), and
[[Page 75642]]
under section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, the Department
of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility to Apply for Worker
Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance on
September 11, 2003, applicable to workers of
Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(C) an application for administrative reconsideration was filed with the Director of the Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance for workers at Paradise Fisheries, Kodiak, Alaska. The application contained no new substantial information which would bear importantly on the Department's determination. Therefore, dismissal
Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on October 28, 2003 in response to a worker petition filed on behalf of workers at Tietex International, LTD, Rocky Mount Plant, Spartanburg, South Carolina.
Further review of the petition and information provided by one of the petitioners, finds
Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, an investigation was initiated on November 7, 2003 in response to a worker petition which was filed on behalf of workers at Weidmann Systems International, Inc., St, Johnsbury, Vermont.
An active certification covering the petitioning group of workers is already in effect (TAW42,222A, as
In accordance with section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance on October 30, 2003, applicable to workers of York International Corporation located in York, Pennsylvania. The notice was published in the Federal Register on November
Announcement Type: New. Notice of final designation procedures for grantees.
Funding Opportunity Number: SGA/DFA04100.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) Number: 17.265.
Key Dates: Deadline for Notice of Intent Part AJanuary 30, 2004. I. Funding Opportunity Description
Section 166 of the Workforce Investment Act (WIA)
In accordance with section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, (19 U.S.C. 2273), the Department of Labor herein presents summaries of determinations regarding eligibility to apply for trade adjustment assistance for workers (TAW) number and alternative trade adjustment assistance (ATAA) by (TAW) number issued during the periods of November
Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(C) an application for administrative reconsideration was filed with the Director of the Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance for workers at AK Steel Corporation, Rockport Works, Shipping, Receiving and Packaging Department, Rockport, Indiana. The application contained no new substantial information which would bear
Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(C) an application for administrative reconsideration was filed with the Director of the Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance for workers at American Suessen Corporation, Charlotte, North Carolina. The application contained no new substantial information which would bear importantly on the Department's determination.
By letter of September 5, 2003, a company official requested administrative reconsideration of the Department of Labor's Notice of Negative Determination Regarding Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance, applicable to workers of the subject firm. The denial notice was signed on August 15, 2003, and published in the Federal Register
By application of October 9, 2003, a petitioner requested administrative reconsideration of the Department's negative determination regarding eligibility for workers and former workers of the subject firm to apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA). The denial notice applicable to workers of Descartes Systems (USA) LLC, Atlanta, Georgia was
In accordance with section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance on October 17, 2003, applicable to workers of Exfo Gnubi Products Group, Inc., Addison, Texas. The notice was published in the Federal Register on November 6, 2003 (68 FR
Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(C) an application for administrative reconsideration was filed with the Director of the Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance for workers at Fishing Vessel (F/V) Bad Betty, Homer, Alaska. The application contained no new substantial information which would bear importantly on the Department's determination. Therefore,
Petitions have been filed with the Secretary of Labor under section 221(a) of the Trade Act of 1974 (``the Act'') and are identified in the Appendix to this notice. Upon receipt of these petitions, the Director of the Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance, Employment and Training Administration, has instituted investigations pursuant to section
By letter of November 6, 2003, a petitioner requested administrative reconsideration of the Department of Labor's Notice of Negative Determination Regarding Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance, applicable to workers of the subject firm. The Department's determination notice was signed on October 10, 2003 and published in the
By application of August 15, 2003, a petitioner requested administrative reconsideration regarding the Department's Negative Determination Regarding Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance, applicable to the workers of the subject firm.
The initial investigation resulted in a negative determination issued on July 22, 2003, based
Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on November 14, 2003 in response to a worker petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers at the Allegheny Ludlum Corporation, Leechburg Works, Leechburg, Virginia.
The petitioning group of workers is covered by an earlier petition
Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on November 19, 2003 in response to a petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers at the Charmilles Technologies Manufacturing Corporation, a division of Agie Charmilles Holding Corporation, Owosso, Wisconsin.
The petition is a copy of
Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, an investigation was initiated on November 10, 2003, in response to a petition which was filed by a company official on behalf of workers at Eljer Plumbingware, Inc., Salem, Ohio.
The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, further investigation in this case
14 CFR Part 39 40 CFR Part 52 14 CFR Part 71 33 CFR Part 165 50 CFR Part 679 26 CFR Part 1 40 CFR Part 180 47 CFR Part 73 50 CFR Part 17 33 CFR Part 117 44 CFR Part 67 50 CFR Part 648 14 CFR Part 97 33 CFR Part 100 40 CFR Part 63 26 CFR Part 301 50 CFR Part 622 39 CFR Part 111 40 CFR Part 300 44 CFR Part 65 50 CFR Part 660 40 CFR Part 271 40 CFR Parts 52 and 81 47 CFR Part 64 50 CFR Part 665 49 CFR Part 571 44 CFR Part 64 21 CFR Part 522 14 CFR Part 23 47 CFR Part 76
