Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on December 8, 2003 in response to a petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers of the Aaden Aaberg setnet operation, Anchorage, Alaska.
The investigation revealed that the subject firm did not separate or threaten to separate a
Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on September 11, 2003, in response to a worker petition filed on behalf of workers at Alcatel, Allen, Texas.
The petitioners did not supply information sufficient to create a valid petition. The product affected by imports was not identified.
Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, an investigation was initiated on November 13, 2003, in response to a worker petition which was filed by a company official on behalf of workers at Avery Dennison, Office Products Group, Flowery Branch, Georgia.
The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently,
Petitions have been filed with the Secretary of Labor under section 221(a) of the Trade Act of 1974 (``the Act'') and are identified in the Appendix to this notice. Upon receipt of these petitions, the Director of the Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance, Employment and Training Administration, has instituted investigations pursuant to
Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on November 29, 2003, in response to a petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers of F/V Darlin Michele, Hoonah, Alaska.
The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.
By letter of September 30, 2003, a petitioner requested administrative reconsideration of the Department of Labor's Notice of Negative Determination Regarding Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance, applicable to workers of the subject firm. The Department's determination notice was signed on August 29, 2003. The notice was
By letter of November 10, 2003, a petitioner requested administrative reconsideration of the Department of Labor's Notice of Negative Determination Regarding Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance, applicable to workers of the subject firm. The Department's determination notice was signed on October 10, 2003. The notice was
By letter of October 10, 2003, a petitioner requested
administrative reconsideration of the Department of Labor's Notice of
Negative Determination Regarding Eligibility to Apply for Worker
Adjustment Assistance, applicable to workers of the subject firm. The denial notice was signed on September 23 2003, and will
[[Page 70838]]
soon be
By letter of October 16, 2003, a petitioner requested administrative reconsideration of the Department of Labor's Notice of Negative Determination Regarding Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance, applicable to workers of the subject firm. The Department's determination notice was signed on September 24, 2003 and published in
By letter of November 17, 2003, a petitioner requested administrative reconsideration of the Department of Labor's Notice of Negative Determination Regarding Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance, applicable to workers of the subject firm. The Department's determination notice was signed on October 21, 2003 and published in the
By letter of June 27, 2003, a company official requested administrative reconsideration of the Department of Labor's Notice of Negative Determination Regarding Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance, applicable to workers of the subject firm. The denial notice was signed on May 5, 2003, and published in the Federal Register on
By letter of July 3, 2003, a petitioner requested administrative reconsideration of the Department of Labor's Notice of Negative Determination Regarding Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance, applicable to workers of the subject firm. The denial notice was signed on June 10, 2003, and published in the Federal Register on June
In notice document 0328404 beginning on page 64369 in the issue of Thursday, November 13, 2003, make the following corrections:
1. On page 64370, in the first column, under the heading ``Certification of States to the Secretary of the Treasury Pursuant to Section 3304(c) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986'', directly under the
The Employment and Training Administration interprets federal law requirements pertaining to unemployment compensation (UC) and public employment services (ES). These interpretations are issued in Training and Guidance Letters (TEGLs) to the State Workforce Agencies. The TEGL described below is published in the Federal Register in order to
Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on October 15, 2003 in response to a petition filed by a state agency representative on behalf of workers at Savane International Corporation, El Paso, Texas. The facility shut down in June of 2002
The petition regarding the investigation has been
Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on October 23, 2003 in response to a petition filed by workers at Standard Motor Company, Argos Assemblies Plant, Argos, Indiana.
The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.
Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on October 28, 2003 in response to a petition filed on behalf of workers at Teleflex Automotive Group, Warren, Michigan. The workers produced automotive cable assembly components.
All workers were separated from the subject firm more than one year
Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on October 16, 2003 in response to a petition filed by International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 1048, on behalf of workers at Thomson, Inc., Indianapolis, Indiana.
The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn.
Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on October 14, 2003 in response to a petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers at Wellington Leisure Products, Leesville, South Carolina.
The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation
Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on October 20, 2003 in response to a petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers at CannonITT Industries, Santa Ana, California.
The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been
Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on August 11, 2003 in response to a petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers of F/V Cape Lookout, Kodiak, Alaska.
The investigation revealed that the subject firm did not separate or threaten to separate a significant number or
Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on October 24, 2003 in response to a petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers of F/V W W Northland, Haines, Alaska.
The investigation revealed that the subject firm did not separate or threaten to separate a significant number or
Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, an investigation was initiated on October 1, 2003 in response to a worker petition which was filed by a company official on behalf of workers at Harlyn Textile Mills, Inc., New York, New York (TAW53,086).
The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, further
14 CFR Part 39 40 CFR Part 52 14 CFR Part 71 33 CFR Part 165 50 CFR Part 679 47 CFR Part 73 26 CFR Part 1 40 CFR Part 180 33 CFR Part 117 50 CFR Part 17 44 CFR Part 67 50 CFR Part 648 14 CFR Part 97 33 CFR Part 100 40 CFR Part 63 50 CFR Part 622 44 CFR Part 65 50 CFR Part 660 26 CFR Part 301 39 CFR Part 111 40 CFR Part 300 6 CFR Part 5 40 CFR Part 271 47 CFR Part 64 40 CFR Parts 52 and 81 50 CFR Part 665 44 CFR Part 64 10 CFR Part 50 49 CFR Part 571 47 CFR Part 76
