On November 9, 2004, the Department, on its own motion, reopened its investigation for the former workers of the subject facility.
The initial investigation for workers of Kincaid Furniture, Taylorsville, North Carolina resulted in a negative determination issued on September 8, 2004 and published in the Federal Register on September 23,
Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on November 17, 2004 in response to a petition filed on behalf of workers of Arista Beaver Brook Circuits, Bethel, Connecticut.
All but two workers were separated from the subject firm more than one year before the date of the petition. Section
Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on November 1, 2004 in response to a petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers at Arrow Electronics, Inc., Sun Valley, California.
The petitioner requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, further investigation would
On October 28, 2004, the Department issued an Affirmative Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration for the workers and former workers of the subject firm. The notice was published in the Federal Register on November 12, 2004 (69 FR 65456).
The Department initially denied Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) and Alternate Trade
Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on October 19, 2004 in response to a petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers at Coats American, Inc. located at the above named facilities in North Carolina, Texas and Nevada.
The petitioner has requested that the petition be
Petitions have been filed with the Secretary of Labor under Section 221(a) of the Trade Act of 1974 (``the Act'') and are identified in the Appendix to this notice. Upon receipt of these petitions, the Director of the Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance, Employment and Training Administration, has instituted investigations pursuant to
Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on October 27, 2004 in response to a worker petition filed by International Union of Electronic, Electrical, Salaried, Machine and Furniture WorkersCommunications Workers of America, Local 249, on behalf of workers at Merrow Machine Company, Newington,
In accordance with section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, (19 U.S.C. 2273), the Department of Labor herein presents summaries of determinations regarding eligibility to apply for trade adjustment assistance for workers (TAW) number and alternative trade adjustment assistance (ATAA) by (TAW) number issued during the periods of
Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on November 30, 2004 in response to a worker petition filed on behalf of workers at Cherry Electrical Products, Waukesha, Illinois.
The petitioning group of workers is covered by an active certification, (TAW55,937) which expires on November 23,
Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on November 26, 2004 in response to a petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers at Hamilton Sundstrand, Grand Junction, Colorado.
The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been
Petitions have been filed with the Secretary of Labor under section 221(a) of the Trade Act of 1974 (``the Act'') and are identified in the Appendix to this notice. Upon receipt of these petitions, the Director of the Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance, Employment and Training Administration, has instituted investigations pursuant to
Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on November 16, 2004 in response to a petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers at JVS Fabrics, New York, New York.
The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.
Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on November 26, 2004 in response to a petition filed on behalf of workers at Oxford Automotive, Alma, Michigan.
The petitioning group of workers is covered by an earlier petition (TAW56,014) filed on November 17, 2004 that is the subject of an
Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on November 22, 2004 in response to a petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers at SET Enterprises, Warren, Michigan.
The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.
Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, an investigation was initiated on October 19, 2004, in response to a petition filed by the United Steelworkers of America on behalf of workers at Thermal & Interior Vandalia Operations of Delphi Corporation, Vandalia, Ohio. Workers were engaged in employment related to the production of Wcar
Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an
investigation was initiated on November 17, 2004 in response to a worker
[[Page 76783]]
petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers at AlphaTech, Inc., Fletcher, North Carolina.
The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the
The United States Court of International Trade (USCIT) granted the Secretary of Labor's motion for voluntary remand for further investigation in Former Employees of BMC Software, Inc. v. U.S. Secretary of Labor (Court No. 0400229).
The Department's denial of the initial petition (filed on December 23, 2003) was issued on January 20, 2004.
Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(C) an application for administrative reconsideration was filed with the Director of the Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance for workers at Allegheny Ludlum, Research/ Technical Center, Natrona Heights, Pennsylvania. The application contained no new substantial information which would bear importantly on the
Petitions have been filed with the Secretary of Labor under section 221(a) of the Trade Act of 1974 (``the Act'') and are identified in the appendix to this notice. Upon receipt of these petitions, the Director of the Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance, Employment and Training Administration, has instituted investigations pursuant to
In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2273), as amended, the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance on November 1, 2004, applicable to workers of Bombardier Transportation, a subsidiary of Bombardier, Inc., Propulsion Division, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(C) an application for administrative
reconsideration was filed with the Director of the Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance for workers at Drager Medical, a Division of Dragerwerk AG, Telford, Pennsylvania.
[[Page 76016]]
The application contained no new substantial information which would
bear importantly on the
On November 18, 2004, the Department of Labor issued a Notice of Affirmative Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration for workers of the subject firm. The Notice will soon be published in the Federal Register.
The initial investigation determined that the subject worker group possesses skills that are easily transferable to
14 CFR Part 39 40 CFR Part 52 14 CFR Part 71 33 CFR Part 165 50 CFR Part 679 26 CFR Part 1 40 CFR Part 180 47 CFR Part 73 50 CFR Part 17 33 CFR Part 117 44 CFR Part 67 50 CFR Part 648 14 CFR Part 97 33 CFR Part 100 40 CFR Part 63 26 CFR Part 301 50 CFR Part 622 39 CFR Part 111 40 CFR Part 300 44 CFR Part 65 50 CFR Part 660 40 CFR Part 271 40 CFR Parts 52 and 81 47 CFR Part 64 50 CFR Part 665 49 CFR Part 571 44 CFR Part 64 21 CFR Part 522 14 CFR Part 23 47 CFR Part 76
