In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor herein presents summaries of determinations regarding eligibility to apply for trade adjustment assistance for workers (TAW) number and alternative trade adjustment assistance (ATAA) by (TAW) number issued during the period of December
By application dated November 1, 2006, a company official requested administrative reconsideration of the Department of Labor's Notice of Negative Determination Regarding Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance, applicable to workers and former workers of the subject firm. The Notice of Affirmative Determination Regarding
In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2273), and Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974 (26 U.S.C. 2813), as amended, the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance on June 1, 2006, applicable to workers of Optical
In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2273), and Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974 (26 U.S.C. 2813), as amended, the Department of Labor issued a Certification Regarding Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance on September 20, 2006, applicable to workers
In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor herein presents summaries of determinations regarding eligibility to apply for trade adjustment assistance for workers (TAW) number and alternative trade adjustment assistance (ATAA) by (TAW) number issued during the period of December
Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on November 14 2006 in response to a petition filed on behalf of workers at Everett Charles Technologies, a subsidiary of Dover Corporation, FSG San Jose, San Jose, California.
The petition regarding the investigation has been deemed invalid. One of
Petitions have been filed with the Secretary of Labor under Section 221 (a) of the Trade Act of 1974 (``the Act'') and are identified in the Appendix to this notice. Upon receipt of these petitions, the Director of the Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance, Employment and Training Administration, has instituted investigations pursuant to
In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2273), and Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974, (26 U.S.C. 2813), as amended, the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance on April 7, 2005, applicable to workers of
Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on November 13, 2006 in response to a worker petition filed the Colorado Department of Labor and Employment on behalf of workers of Employment Solutions employed at Water Pik, Inc, Loveland, Colorado.
The workers of Employment Solutions employed at
Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on November 21, 2006 in response to a petition filed on behalf of workers of Ford Motor Company, St. Louis Assembly Plant, Hazelwood, Missouri.
The petitioning group of workers is covered by an earlier petition filed on November 24, 2006 (TAW60,478)
Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on November 15, 2006, in response to a worker petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers at Hi Specialty America, Division of Hitachi Metals America, Ltd., Irwin, Pennsylvania.
The petitioner has requested that the petition be
In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C 2273), and Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974 (26 U.S.C 2813), as amended, the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance on October 25, 2006, applicable to workers of Kentucky
Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on December 8, 2006, in response to a petition filed on behalf of workers of Lee Middleton Original Dolls, Inc., Belpre, Ohio.
The petition has been deemed invalid. The petition contained petitioner information for three workers but was not signed
Petitions have been filed with the Secretary of Labor under Section 221 (a) of the Trade Act of 1974 (``the Act'') and are identified in the Appendix to this notice. Upon receipt of these petitions, the Director of the Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance, Employment and Training Administration, has instituted investigations pursuant to
By application of November 1, 2006, a petitioner representative requested administrative reconsideration of the Department's negative determination regarding eligibility for workers and former workers of the subject firm to apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA). The denial notice was signed on September 29, 2006 and published in the
Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on December 11, 2006 in response to a petition filed on behalf of workers at Senco Products, Plant 1, Cincinnati, Ohio (TAW60,572) and Senco Products, Plant 2, Cincinnati, Ohio (TAW60,572A).
The petitioning workers are covered by a certification of
By application of October 20, 2006 a petitioner requested administrative reconsideration of the Department's negative determination regarding eligibility for workers and former workers of the subject firm to apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance (ATAA). The denial notice was signed on October
Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(C) an application for administrative reconsideration was filed with the Director of the Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance for workers at United Auto Workers, Local 969, Columbus, Ohio. The application did not contain new information supporting a conclusion that the determination was erroneous, and also did not
By application dated November 27, 2006, the Carpenter's Industrial Council, United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America (Union), requested administrative reconsideration of the Department of Labor's Notice of Negative Determination Regarding Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance, applicable to workers of the subject
Applicant/Location: Southern Monterey County Memorial Hospital/King City, California.
Principal Product: The loan, guarantee, or grant
Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on November 15, 2006 in response to a petition filed by a company official on behalf of Jennifer Niemela of Northern Hardwoods, South Ridge, Michigan.
The company official explained that the worker is engaged in stamping wood components within the
Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on November 20, 2006 in response to a petition filed jointly by the Carpenters and Joiners of America Local 2784 and a company official on behalf of workers of Roseburg Forest Products, Coquille, Oregon.
The petitioners have requested that the
Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on September 28, 2006 in response to a petition filed by a Company Official on behalf of workers at Wright and Lato, Inc., East Orange, New Jersey.
The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been
14 CFR Part 39 40 CFR Part 52 14 CFR Part 71 33 CFR Part 165 50 CFR Part 679 26 CFR Part 1 40 CFR Part 180 47 CFR Part 73 50 CFR Part 17 33 CFR Part 117 44 CFR Part 67 50 CFR Part 648 14 CFR Part 97 33 CFR Part 100 40 CFR Part 63 26 CFR Part 301 50 CFR Part 622 39 CFR Part 111 40 CFR Part 300 44 CFR Part 65 50 CFR Part 660 40 CFR Part 271 40 CFR Parts 52 and 81 47 CFR Part 64 50 CFR Part 665 49 CFR Part 571 44 CFR Part 64 14 CFR Part 23 47 CFR Part 76 50 CFR Part 229
