Agency: Justice Department
Years: 20002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013[FR Doc 00-33351] 1.
Notice is hereby given that on December 22, 2000, a proposed Consent
[[Page 83085]]
Decree (``Decree'') in United States and State of Colorado v. Robert
Friedland, Civil No. 96 N 1213, was lodged with the United States
District Court for the District of Colorado. The United States and
State of Colorado filed this action
Published: 2000-12-29 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE : Justice Department
[FR Doc 00-33247] 2. Confidentiality in Federal Alternative Dispute Resolution Programs
This notice publishes a document entitled ``Confidentiality in Federal Alternative Dispute Resolution Programs,'' which provides guidance to assist Federal agencies in developing ADR programs. The document was created by a subcommittee of the Federal ADR Steering Committee, a group of subject matter experts from federal agencies with ADR programs.
Published: 2000-12-29 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE : Justice Department
[FR Doc 00-33249] 3.
In accordance with Departmental policy, 28 CFR 50.7, the Department of Justice gives notice that a proposed consent decree, in United States v. Petroleum Specialties, Inc., et al., Civil No. 9972421 (E.D. Mich.), was lodged with the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan on December 7, 2000, pertaining to the
Published: 2000-12-28 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE : Justice Department
[FR Doc 00-33055] 4.
In accordance with 28 CFR 50.7, 38 Fed. Reg. 19029, notice is hereby given that on December 8, 2000, a proposed consent decree in United States v. Puerto Rico Aqueduct and Sewer Authority, Civil Action No. 002554 (JAF), was lodged with the United States District Court for the District of Puerto Rico. The complaint in this
Published: 2000-12-28 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE : Justice Department
[FR Doc 00-33054] 5.
Notice is hereby given that a proposed Consent Decree in United States v. American Home Products, Corp, et al., Civil Action No. C00 4173MWB, was lodged on December 8, 2000, with the United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa.
In this action the United States sought to recover, pursuant to Section 107 of the Comprehensive
Published: 2000-12-28 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE : Justice Department
[FR Doc 00-33056] 6.
In accordance with Departmental Policy, 28 CFR 50.7, 38 Fed. Reg. 19029, and 42 U.S.C. 9622(d), notice is hereby given that two proposed consent decrees in United States v. Champion Chemical Company, Inc., Imperial Oil Company, Inc., Emil Stevens and June Stevens, DOJ # 9011 2946, Civ. No. 961521 (AET), were lodged in the United States District
Published: 2000-12-28 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE : Justice Department
[FR Doc 00-33248] 7.
Under 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby given that on December 4, 2000, a proposed Consent Decree in United States v. Columbus McKinnon Corporation, Civil Action No. C003096MWB, was lodged with the United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa.
In this action, the United State seeks civil penalties for Columbus McKinnon
Published: 2000-12-28 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE : Justice Department
[FR Doc 00-33057] 8.
Notice is hereby given that on December 18, 2000, a proposed consent decree in United States v. Hexagon Laboratories of New York, Inc., et al., Civil Action No, 96 Civ. 2911 (DAB), was lodged with the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.
In this action, the United States sought the recovery of response costs
Published: 2000-12-28 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE : Justice Department
[FR Doc 00-32216] 9.
This proposed rule would outline the authorities and powers delegated by the Attorney General to the Director of the Executive Office for Immigration Review, the Chairman of the Board of Immigration Appeals, and the Chief Immigration Judge. Members of the Board of Immigration Appeals would be designated as Appellate Immigration Judges.
Published: 2000-12-26 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE : Justice Department
[FR Doc 00-31765] 10. Authority To Compromise and Close Civil Claims
This rule restores to the Code of Federal Regulations language regarding the definition of ``gross amount of the original claim'' that appears to have been omitted through clerical error when the regulation was previously amended. This amendment added language relating to the settlement of certain customs penalty cases but inadvertently replaced,
Published: 2000-12-15 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE : Justice Department
[FR Doc 00-31769] 11.
Notice is hereby given that a proposed consent decree in United States v. Abex Aerospace Division, et al., Civil No. 0012471 CAS, was lodged on Nov. 24, 2000, with the United States District Court for the Central District of California (``Abex Decree''). The proposed Consent Decree would resolve certain claims under sections
Published: 2000-12-14 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE : Justice Department
[FR Doc 00-31771] 12.
In accordance with Department of Justice policy, 28 CFR 50.7., notice is hereby given that a proposed consent decree in the action entitled United States of America v. Chemical Leaman Tank Lines, Inc. (Civil No. 00CV5715 (SSB), was lodged on November 21, 2000, with the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey. The proposed
Published: 2000-12-14 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE : Justice Department
[FR Doc 00-31770] 13. Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree Pursuant to the Clean Water Act
Pursuant to the Clean Water Act and the categorical pretreatment standards contained at 40 CFR 414.55 and 414.111, notice is hereby given that a proposed consent decree embodying a settlement in United States v. GeorgiaPacific Resins, Inc., CIVS002531 GEBPAN (E.D. Cal.), was lodged on November 16, 2000, with the United States
Published: 2000-12-14 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE : Justice Department
[FR Doc 00-31767] 14. Notice of Lodging of Consent Decrees Pursuant to the Clean Water Act
In accordance with Departmental Policy, 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby given that a crossclaim and two consent decrees, which together would resolve all claims in Jones v. Thorne, et al., Civil Action No. CV971674ST (D. Ore.), were lodged with the United States District Court for the District of Oregon on November 30, 2000.
The first
Published: 2000-12-14 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE : Justice Department
[FR Doc 00-31768] 15.
In accordance with Departmental policy and 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby given that on Thursday, November 30, 2000, a consent decree was lodged in United States v. Ribi Immunochem Research, Inc., Civil Action No. 9855MDWM, with the United States District Court for the District of Montana.
This consent decree, between the United States, the
Published: 2000-12-14 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE : Justice Department
[FR Doc 00-31766] 16.
In accordance with Departmental policy and 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby given that on November 30, 2000, a consent decree was lodged in United States v. Sonoco Products Company and Kardon Industries, Inc., Civil Action No. 006068 with the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.
Pursuant to
Published: 2000-12-14 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE : Justice Department
[FR Doc 00-31749] 17. Privacy Act of 1974; System of Records
Pursuant to the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), and Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular No. A130, notice is hereby given that the Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), is modifying the following system of records which was last published in the Federal Register on November 25, 1998 (63 FR 65223):
The
Published: 2000-12-14 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE : Justice Department
[FR Doc 00-31693] 18. Hate Crime Statistics Data Collection in Selected Police and Sheriffs'
The purpose of this notice is to announce a change to the deadline date of the submission of proposals to the Solicitation ``Hate Crime Statistics Data Collection in Selected Police and Sheriffs' Departments'' from December 31, 2000 to January 8, 2001.
Published: 2000-12-13 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE : Justice Department
[FR Doc 00-31262] 19.
In accordance with Departmental policy, the Department of Justice
gives notice that a proposed consent decree in the case captioned
United States and the State of Indiana v. The Dow Chemical Company, Civil Action No. IP001841CT/G (S.D. Ind.), was lodged
[[Page 77041]]
with the United States District Court for the Southern District of
Indiana,
Published: 2000-12-08 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE : Justice Department
[FR Doc 00-31261] 20.
Notice is hereby given that on November 27, 2000, a proposed Consent Decree in United States v. Turtle Mountain Manufacturing Company (D. North Dakota), Civil Action No. A400139, was lodged with the United States District Court for the District of North Dakota.
This Consent Decree represents a settlement of claims brought
Published: 2000-12-08 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE : Justice Department
[FR Doc 00-31263] 21.
Notice is hereby given that a proposed consent decree in the action entitled United States v. Caribe General Electric Products, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 002482CC (D.P.R.), was lodged on November 21, 2000, with the United States District Court for the District of Puerto Rico. The proposed consent decree resolves certain claims of the
Published: 2000-12-08 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE : Justice Department
[FR Doc 00-31177] 22. Agency Information Collection Activities, Proposed Collection; Comment
The Department of Justice, Civil Rights Division has submitted the following information collection request for review and clearance in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. Office of Management and Budget approval is being sought for the information collection listed below. This proposed information collection was previously
Published: 2000-12-07 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE : Justice Department
[FR Doc 00-30607] 23. Privacy Act of 1974; Implementation
The Department of Justice is exempting a Privacy Act system of records from subsections (c)(3) and (4), (d), (e)(1), (e)(2), (e)(3), (e)(5), (e)(8), and (g) of the Privacy Act, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2), (k)(1), and (k)(2). This system of records is maintained by the Environmental and Natural Resources Division and is entitled
Published: 2000-12-01 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE : Justice Department
[FR Doc 00-30608] 24. Privacy Act of 1974; Implementation
The Department of Justice is exempting a Privacy Act system of records from subsections (c)(3) and (4); (d)(1)(2)(3) and (4); (e)(1), (2), (3), (5), and (8); and (g) of the Privacy Act, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(j) and (k). This system of records is maintained by the Office of Special CounselWaco (OSCW) and is entitled ``CaseLink Document Database
Published: 2000-12-01 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE : Justice Department
[FR Doc 00-30610] 25. Privacy Act of 1974; Implementation
The Department of Justice proposes to exempt a Privacy Act system of records from subsections (c) (3) and (4), (d), (e)(1), (e)(2), (e)(4)(G) and (H), (e)(5), (f), and (g) of the Privacy Act, 552 U.S.C. 552a. The system of records is: the ``United States Attorneys' Office, Giglio Information Files, JUSTICE/USA018.''
The ``United States
Published: 2000-12-01 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE : Justice Department
Years: 20002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013