By application of July 12, 2003, a petitioner requested administrative reconsideration of the Department's negative determination regarding eligibility for workers and former workers of the subject firm to apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA). The denial notice applicable to workers of Agilent Technologies, Inc., Information Technology

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR : Employment and Training Administration

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on October 14, 2003 in response to a worker petition filed on behalf of workers at Agilent Technologies, Loveland, Colorado.

The petitioning group of workers is covered by an earlier petition filed on October 7, 2003 (TAW53,164) that is the subject

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR : Employment and Training Administration

By application of August 26, 2003, a petitioner requested administrative reconsideration of the Department's negative determination regarding eligibility for workers and former workers of the subject firm to apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA). The denial notice was signed on August 12, 2003, and published in the Federal Register on

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR : Employment and Training Administration

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on October 1, 2003, in response to a petition filed by the company on behalf of workers at Arland Tool and Manufacturing, Inc., Sturbridge, Massachusetts.

The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR : Employment and Training Administration

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, an investigation was initiated on September 24, 2003 in response to a worker petition which was filed on behalf of workers at Chicago Cold Rolling, Portage, Indiana.

An active certification covering the petitioning group of workers is already in effect (TAW51,241I, as amended). Consequently,

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR : Employment and Training Administration

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on August 18, 2003, in response to a worker petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers at Delta International Machinery, Pentair Tool Group, Tupelo, Mississippi.

The petitioning individual of the company has requested that this

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR : Employment and Training Administration

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, an investigation was initiated on October 1, 2003 in response to a worker petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers at DuPont Teijin Films, Florence, South Carolina.

The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR : Employment and Training Administration

Petitions have been filed with the Secretary of Labor under section 221(a) of the Trade Act of 1974 (``the Act'') and are identified in the Appendix to this notice. Upon receipt of these petitions, the Director of the Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance, Employment and Training Administration, has instituted investigations pursuant to

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR : Employment and Training Administration

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on October 6, 2003 in response to a petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers of Fishing Vessel (F/V) TriK, Palmer, Alaska.

The investigation revealed that the subject firm did not separate or threaten to separate a significant

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR : Employment and Training Administration

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on October 6, 2003, in response to a worker petition filed by the United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America (UAW), Local 714, on behalf of workers at FMC Measurement Solutions, Erie, Pennsylvania.

The Department

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR : Employment and Training Administration

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on September 24, 2003 in response to a petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers at Gary Works, a subsidiary of United States Steel Corporation, Gary, Indiana. [[Page 65952]]

The petitioner has requested that the petition be

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR : Employment and Training Administration

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on September 15, 2003 in response to a worker petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers at JanSew Manufacturing, Crossville, Tennessee.

The petitioning worker group is included in a petition filed on September 15, 2003 (TAW53,092)

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR : Employment and Training Administration

Petitions have been filed with the Secretary of Labor under section 221(a) of the Trade Act of 1974 (``the Act'') and are identified in the Appendix to this notice. Upon receipt of these petitions, the Director of the Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance, Employment and Training Administration, has instituted investigations pursuant to

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR : Employment and Training Administration

By application of August 1, 2003, a petitioner requested administrative reconsideration of the Department's negative determination regarding eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA), applicable to workers and former workers of the subject firm. The denial notice was signed on July 11, 2003, and published in the Federal

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR : Employment and Training Administration

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on August 11, 2003 in response to a petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers of the Corey Farmer Set Net Operation, Eagle River, Alaska.

The investigation revealed that the subject firm did not separate or threaten to separate a

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR : Employment and Training Administration

By application of June 24, 2003, a petitioner requested administrative reconsideration of the Department's negative determination regarding eligibility for workers and former workers of the subject firm to apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA). The denial notice was signed on March 30, 2003 and published in the Federal Register on June

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR : Employment and Training Administration

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on September 26, 2003 in response to a petition filed on by a company official on behalf of workers of Modern Packaging, Inc., Deer Park, New York.

The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR : Employment and Training Administration

By application of August 6, 2003, a petitioner requested administrative reconsideration of the Department's negative determination regarding eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA), applicable to workers and former workers of the subject firm. The denial notice was signed on July 22, 2003, and published in the Federal

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR : Employment and Training Administration

By application of August 18, 2003, a petitioner requested administrative reconsideration of the Department's negative determination regarding eligibility for workers and former workers of the subject firm to apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA). The denial notice was signed on July 25, 2003 and published in the Federal Register on

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR : Employment and Training Administration

By application of June 14, 2003, petitioners requested administrative reconsideration of the Department's negative determination regarding eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA), applicable to workers and former workers of the subject firm. The denial notice was signed on June 6, 2003, and published in the Federal Register

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR : Employment and Training Administration

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on September 17, 2003 in response to a worker petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers at Progress Casting Group, Inc., Plymouth, Minnesota.

The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR : Employment and Training Administration

Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on September 24, 2003 in response to a petition filed by a State agency representative on behalf of workers at Old Time Cutting, also known as R&S Cutting, Passaic, New Jersey.

The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn.

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR : Employment and Training Administration

TAW40,521A Massillon, OH (Central Machine),
TAW40,521B Chicago, IL (Chicago Plant),
TAW40,521C Blasdell, NY (Lackawanna Plant),
TAW40,521E Massillon, OH (Hot Rolled Plant),
TAW40,521F Beaver Falls, PA,
TAW40,521G Gary, IN (E. Dune Hwy),
TAW40,521H Gary, IN (E. Seventh Ave.),
TAW40,521I Harvey, IL,
TAW40,521J Massillon, OH (Cold Finished Plant), and

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR : Employment and Training Administration

In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance on July 11, 2003, applicable to workers of Robert Bosch Fuel Systems Corporation, formerly Diesel Technology Company, a division of Robert Bosch North America, [[Page

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR : Employment and Training Administration

In accordance with section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance on July 11, 2003, applicable to workers of Robert Bosch Fuel Systems Corporation, formerly Diesel Technology Company, a division of Robert Bosch North America, Kentwood,

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR : Employment and Training Administration