Pages: 1
Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on September 24, 2003, in response to a worker petition on behalf of workers at Andrew Corporation, Dallas, Texas.
The petitioners have requested that the petition be withdrawn. Therefore, this investigation has been terminated.
Signed at
Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, an investigation was initiated on August 25, 2003 in response to a worker petition which was filed by a company official on behalf of workers at Belden Wire & Cable, Richmond, Indiana (TAW52,673).
The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation
Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on August 11, 2003 in response to a worker petition filed by a union official on behalf of workers at Buffalo China, Buffalo, New York.
The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.
Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on August 28, 2003 in response to a worker petition filed by a union official on behalf of workers at Delphi Automotive Systems, Moraine, Ohio.
The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been
Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on October 28, 2003, in response to a worker petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers at Duluth, Missabe and Iron Range Railway Company, Duluth, Minnesota.
The petitioning worker group is included in a petition filed on October 15,
Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on October 27, 2003 in response to a petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers at Fairchild Semiconductor, Mountaintop, Pennsylvania.
The petitioning group of workers is covered by an earlier petition instituted on October 24, 2003
Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on September 4, 2003, in response to a petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers of Fishing Vessel (F/V) K2, Cordova, Alaska.
The investigation revealed that the subject firm did not separate or threaten to separate a significant
Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on September 22, 2003 in response to a petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers of F/V Sea Comber, Sitka, Alaska.
The investigation revealed that the subject firm did not separate or threaten to separate a significant number or
Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on September 2, 2003 in response to a petition filed on behalf of workers of General Mills Inc., Eden Prairie, Minnesota.
The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.
Signed at
Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, an investigation was initiated on August 12, 2003, in response to a worker petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers at Halliburton Energy Services, Anchorage, Alaska.
The petitioners have requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been
Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on September 3, 2003 in response to a worker petition filed on behalf of workers at Honeywell Industry Solutions, Power Generation, Phoenix, Arizona.
The petitioners have requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has
Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on September 22, 2003, in response to a petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers of Interceptor, Kodiak, Alaska.
The investigation revealed that the subject firm did not separate or threaten to separate a significant number or
Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on September 12, 2003 in response to a worker petition filed on behalf of workers at Ranco North America, Brownsville, Texas.
The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.
[[Page
Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on September 23, 2003, in response to a petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers of Rubicon, Kodiak, Alaska.
The investigation revealed that the subject firm did not separate or threaten to separate a significant number or
Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on October 30, 2003, in response to a petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers of Rubicon, Kodiak, Alaska.
The petition is a duplicate of a petition filed on September 23, 2003 (TAW52,896). Further investigation in this case would
Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an
investigation was initiated on September 23, 2003 in response to a
petition filed by a company official on behalf of the group of workers
covered by State of Alaska Commercial Fisheries Entry Commission Permit
The petition regarding the
Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on September 9, 2003, in response to a petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers at Wellington Synthetic Fibers, Leesville, South Carolina.
The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation
Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on September 4, 2003, in response to a petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers of West Point Fisheries, Kodiak, Alaska.
The investigation revealed that the subject firm did not separate or threaten to separate a significant number
Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on October 28, 2003, in response to a petition filed on behalf of workers at Zinisar Corporation, Sunnyvale, California.
This petition is a duplicate of an ongoing investigation for workers for Zinisar Corporation, Sunnyvale,
[[Page 66129]]
Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on October 24, 2003, in response to a worker petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers at Zytec America, Inc., Greensboro, North Carolina.
The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation
The Department of Labor (DOL) has submitted the following public information collection request (ICR) to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 10413, 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35). A copy of this ICR, with applicable supporting documentation,
14 CFR Part 39 40 CFR Part 52 14 CFR Part 71 33 CFR Part 165 47 CFR Part 73 26 CFR Part 1 50 CFR Part 679 40 CFR Part 180 50 CFR Part 17 33 CFR Part 117 44 CFR Part 67 50 CFR Part 648 14 CFR Part 97 40 CFR Part 63 6 CFR Part 5 33 CFR Part 100 50 CFR Part 622 50 CFR Part 660 26 CFR Part 301 44 CFR Part 65 39 CFR Part 111 40 CFR Part 271 40 CFR Part 300 47 CFR Part 64 40 CFR Parts 52 and 81 50 CFR Part 665 39 CFR Part 3020 50 CFR Part 229 44 CFR Part 64 49 CFR Part 571
