Pages: 1
Petitions have been filed with the Secretary of Labor under section 221(a) of the Trade Act of 1974 (``the Act'') and are identified in the Appendix to this notice. Upon receipt of these petitions, the Director of the Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance, Employment and Training Administration, has instituted investigations pursuant to
Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on September 8, 2003 in response to a petition filed on behalf of workers of Biddle Precision Components, Sheridan, Indiana.
The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.
Signed
In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance on September 22, 2003, applicable to all workers of Bose Corporation, Framingham, Massachusetts. The notice will soon be published in the Federal Register.
At the
Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on September 26, 2003, in response to a petition filed on behalf of workers at Carm Newsome Hosiery, Inc., Ft. Payne, Alabama.
The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.
Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on November 5, 2003, in response to a petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers at EDM Corporation, Piqua, Ohio.
The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.
Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on October 14, 2003, in response to a petition filed on by a company official on behalf of workers of Fall River Manufacturing II, Gaffney, South Carolina.
The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation
Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on October 1, 2003, in response to a petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers of Fishing Vessel (F/V) Aquarius, Kodiak, Alaska.
The investigation revealed that the subject firm did not separate or threaten to separate a significant
Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on October 1, 2003, in response to a petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers of F/V Big Dog, Palmer, Alaska (TAW53,037) and F/V Miss Julie, Palmer, Alaska (TAW53,037A).
The investigation revealed that the subject firm did not
Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on October 1, 2003, in response to a petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers of F/V Deborah Renee, Clarkston, Washington.
The investigation revealed that the subject firm did not separate or threaten to separate a significant
Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on October 8, 2003, in response to a petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers of Fishing Vessel (F/V) Eldorado, Mt. Vernon, Washington.
All workers were separated from the subject firm more than one year before the date of the
Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on September 30, 2003, in response to a petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers of F/V Joseph Booney, Cordova, Alaska. Workers at the subject firm produce frozen salmon.
The Department of Labor issued negative determinations
Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on October 24, 2003, in response to a worker petition filed on behalf of workers at Halmode Apparel, Inc., Roanoke, Virginia.
The petitioning group of workers is covered by an earlier petition instituted on October 6, 2003 (TAW53,156), that is the
Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, an investigation was initiated on October 24, 2003, in response to a petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers at Henredon Furniture, Industries, Spruce Pine, North Carolina (TAW53,336).
The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, further
Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on September 30, 2003, in response to a worker petition filed on behalf of workers at Lucent Technologies, Phoenix, Arizona.
This investigation has revealed, through the records of the State Agency, that none of the petitioners were employed by
In accordance with section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, (19 U.S.C. 2273), the Department of Labor herein presents summaries of determinations regarding eligibility to apply for trade adjustment assistance for workers (TAW) number and alternative trade adjustment assistance (ATAA) by (TAW) number issued during the periods of
Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on November 12, 2003, in response to a worker petition filed by the company on behalf of workers at Romac Industries, Inc., Sultan, Washington.
The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been
By letter of July 22, 2003, a petitioner requested administrative reconsideration of the Department of Labor's Notice of Negative Determination Regarding Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance, applicable to workers of the subject firm. The Department's determination notice was signed on June 17, 2003. The notice was published
Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on September 12, 2003, in response to a petition filed on behalf of workers at SnapTite, Inc., Autoclave Engineers Division, Erie, Pennsylvania.
The petitioners have requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been
On November 10, 2003, the Department, on its own motion, reopened its investigation for the former workers of the subject firm.
The initial investigation was initiated on September 12, 2003, and resulted in a negative determination issued on October 21, 2003. The investigation findings showed that workers of the subject firm did not supply
Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on August 21, 2003, in response to a worker petition filed on behalf of workers at Textron, Ferndale Fastener Division, Madison Heights, Michigan.
The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been
Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, an investigation was
[[Page 66884]]
initiated on October 16, 2003, in response to a petition filed by the
TAA Division Coordinator Employment Development Department on behalf of
workers at West Coast Fashion, Inc., South El Monte, California.
The petitioner has requested that the petition be
General wage determination decisions of the Secretary of Labor are issued in accordance with applicable law and are based on the information obtained by the Department of Labor from its study of local wage conditions and data made available from other sources. They specify the basic hourly wage rates and fringe benefits which are determined to
14 CFR Part 39 40 CFR Part 52 14 CFR Part 71 33 CFR Part 165 47 CFR Part 73 26 CFR Part 1 50 CFR Part 679 40 CFR Part 180 50 CFR Part 17 33 CFR Part 117 44 CFR Part 67 50 CFR Part 648 14 CFR Part 97 40 CFR Part 63 6 CFR Part 5 33 CFR Part 100 50 CFR Part 622 50 CFR Part 660 26 CFR Part 301 44 CFR Part 65 39 CFR Part 111 40 CFR Part 271 40 CFR Part 300 47 CFR Part 64 40 CFR Parts 52 and 81 50 CFR Part 665 39 CFR Part 3020 50 CFR Part 229 44 CFR Part 64 49 CFR Part 571
