Pages: 1
Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on October 20, 2006 in response to a worker petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers at AAR Manufacturing, dba Cargo Systems, Livonia, Michigan.
The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the
Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on November 13, 2006 in response to a petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers at Dickten Masch Plastics, a subsidiary of Everett Smith Group, Hattiesburg Plant, Hattiesburg, Mississippi.
The petitioner has requested that the
In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2273), and Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974 (26 U.S.C. 2813), as amended, the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance on November 7, 2006, applicable to workers of
On August 23, 2006, the U.S. Court of International Trade (USCIT) granted the Department of Labor's consent motion for voluntary remand in Former Employees of Hercules Incorporation v. United States, Court No. 0500602.
On June 24, 2005, a duly authorized representative for the State of New Jersey filed a petition for Trade Adjustment
Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on November 15, 2006 in response to a petition filed by a company official on behalf of Jennifer Niemela of Northern Hardwoods, South Ridge, Michigan.
The company official explained that the worker is engaged in stamping wood components within the
Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on November 20, 2006 in response to a petition filed jointly by the Carpenters and Joiners of America Local 2784 and a company official on behalf of workers of Roseburg Forest Products, Coquille, Oregon.
The petitioners have requested that the
Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on September 28, 2006 in response to a petition filed by a Company Official on behalf of workers at Wright and Lato, Inc., East Orange, New Jersey.
The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been
14 CFR Part 39 40 CFR Part 52 14 CFR Part 71 33 CFR Part 165 47 CFR Part 73 26 CFR Part 1 50 CFR Part 679 40 CFR Part 180 50 CFR Part 17 33 CFR Part 117 44 CFR Part 67 50 CFR Part 648 14 CFR Part 97 40 CFR Part 63 6 CFR Part 5 33 CFR Part 100 50 CFR Part 622 50 CFR Part 660 26 CFR Part 301 44 CFR Part 65 39 CFR Part 111 40 CFR Part 271 40 CFR Part 300 47 CFR Part 64 40 CFR Parts 52 and 81 50 CFR Part 665 39 CFR Part 3020 50 CFR Part 229 44 CFR Part 64 49 CFR Part 571
