Browse: Departments Dates Agencies
DOCUMENT ID: [Airspace Docket No. 2000-ASW-15]
SUBJECT CATEGORY: Revision of Class E Airspace; Tulsa, OK
DOCUMENT SUMMARY: This amendment revises the Class E airspace at Tulsa, OK. The
development of a Very High Frequency Omnidirectional Range (VOR) or
Global Positioning System (GPS) Standard Instrument Approach Procedure
(SIAP), at William R. Pogue Municipal Airport, Sand Springs, OK, has
made this rule necessary. This action is intended to provide adequate
controlled airspace extending upward from 700 feet or more above the
surface for Instrument Flight Rules (IFR) operations to William R. Pogue Municipal Airport, Sand Springs, OK.
Dates: Effective 0901 UTC, November 30, 2000. Comments must be received
on or before October 27, 2000.
SUMMARY: Class E airspace,
This amendment to 14 CFR part 71 revises the Class E airspace at Tulsa, OK. The development of a VOR or GPS SIAP, at William R. Pogue Municipal Airport, Sand Springs, OK, has made this rule necessary. This action is intended to provide adequate controlled airspace extending upward from 700 feet or more above the surface for IFR operations to William R. Pogue Municipal Airport, Sand Springs, OK.
Class E airspace designations are published in Paragraph 6005 of FAA Order 7400.9G, dated September 1, 1999, and effective September 16, 1999, which is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The Class E airspace designation listed in this document will be published subsequently in the order.
The FAA anticipates that this regulation will not result in adverse or negative comment and therefore is issuing it as a direct final rule. A substantial number of previous opportunities provided to the public to comment on substantially identical actions have resulted in negligible adverse comments or objections. Unless a written adverse or negative comment, or a written notice of intent to submit an adverse or negative comment is received within the comment period, the regulation will become effective on the date specified above. After the close of the comment period, the FAA will publish a document in the Federal Register indicating that no adverse or negative comments were received and confirming the date on which the final rule will become effective. If the FAA does receive, within the comment period, an adverse or negative comment, or written notice of intent to submit such a comment, a document withdrawing the direct final rule will be published in the Federal Register, and a notice of proposed rulemaking may be published with a new comment period.
Although this action is in the form of a final rule and was not preceded by a notice of proposed rulemaking, comments are invited on this rule. Interested persons are invited to comment on this rule by submitting such written data, views, or arguments as they may desire. Communications should identify the Rules Docket number and be submitted in triplicate to the address specified under the caption ``ADDRESSES.`` All communications received on or before the closing date for comments will be considered, and this rule may be amended or withdrawn in light of the comments received. Factual information that supports the commenter's ideas and suggestions is extremely helpful in evaluating the effectiveness of this action and determining whether additional rulemaking action is needed.
Comments are specifically invited on the overall regulatory, economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the rule that might suggest a need to modify the rule. All comments submitted will be available, both before and after the closing date for comments, in the Rules of Docket for examination by interested persons. A report that summarizes each FAApublic contact concerned with the substance of this action will be filed in the Rules Docket.
Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments submitted in response to this rule must submit a selfaddressed, stamped postcard on which the following statement is made: ``Comments to Docket No. 2000ASW15.'' The postcard will be date stamped and returned to the commenter.
The regulations adopted herein will not have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the states, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, it is determined that this final rule will not have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132.
Further, the FAA has determined that this regulation is
noncontroversial and unlikely to result in adverse or negative comments
and only involves an established body of technical regulations that
require frequent and routine amendments to keep them operationally
current. Therefore, I certify that this regulation (1) is not a
``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866; (2) is
not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3) if promulgated, will not have
a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial
number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. Since this rule involves
[[Page 54953]]
routine matters that will only affect air traffic procedures and air
navigation, it does not warrant preparation of a Regulatory Flexibility Analysis because the anticipated impact is so minimal.
Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air). Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, the Federal Aviation Administration amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows:
PART 71DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, CLASS B, CLASS C, CLASS D, AND
CLASS E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIRWAYS; ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS
1. The authority citation for 14 CFR part 71 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O. 10854; 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 19591963 Comp., p. 389.
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of the Federal
Aviation Administration Order 7400.9G, Airspace Designations and
Reporting Points, dated September 1, 1999, and effective September 16, 1999, is amended as follows:
Paragraph 605 Class E airspace areas extending upward from 700 feet or more above the surface of the Earth.
* * * * *
ASW OK E5 Tulsa, OK [Revised]
Tulsa International Airport, OK
(Lat. 36 deg.11'54"N., long. 95 deg.53'18"W.
Tulsa, Richard Lloyd Jones Jr. Airport, OK
(Lat. 36 deg.02'23"N., long. 95 deg.59'05"W.)
Sand Springs, William R. Pogue Municipal Airport, OK
(Lat. 36 deg.10'31"N., long. 96 deg.09'07"W.)
Tulsa VORTAC
(Lat. 36 deg.11'47"N., long. 95 deg.47'17"W.)
Glenpool VOR/DME
That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface
within a 8mile radius of Tulsa International Airport and within 1.6
miles each side of the 089 deg. radial of the Tulsa VORTAC extending
from the 8mile radius to 11.9 miles east of the airport and within
a 6.5mile radius of Richard Lloyd Jones Jr. Airport and within a
7.2mile radius of William R. Pogue Municipal Airport and within 4.1
miles each side of the 330 deg. radial of the Glenpool VOR/DME
extending from the 7.2mile radius to 8.3 miles northwest of the airport.
* * * * *
Issued in Fort Worth, TX, on August 29, 2000.
Robert N. Stevens
Acting Manager, Air Traffic Division, Southwest Region
[FR Doc. 0023176 Filed 91100; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 491013M
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT Donald J. Day, Airspace Branch, Air Traffic Division, Southwest Region, Federal Aviation Administration, Fort Worth, TX 761930520, telephone 8172225593.
14 CFR Part 39 40 CFR Part 52 14 CFR Part 71 33 CFR Part 165 50 CFR Part 679 47 CFR Part 73 26 CFR Part 1 40 CFR Part 180 33 CFR Part 117 50 CFR Part 17 44 CFR Part 67 50 CFR Part 648 14 CFR Part 97 33 CFR Part 100 40 CFR Part 63 50 CFR Part 622 44 CFR Part 65 50 CFR Part 660 26 CFR Part 301 39 CFR Part 111 40 CFR Part 300 6 CFR Part 5 40 CFR Part 271 47 CFR Part 64 40 CFR Parts 52 and 81 50 CFR Part 665 44 CFR Part 64 10 CFR Part 50 49 CFR Part 571 47 CFR Part 76