Browse: Departments Dates Agencies
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Environmental Protection Agency
CFR Citation: 40 CFR Part 180
RIN ID: RIN 2070-AB78
OPP ID: [OPP-301043; FRL-6740-9]
NOTICE: RULES
ACTION: Pesticides; tolerances in food, animal feeds, and raw agricultural commodities:
DOCUMENT ACTION: Final rule.
SUBJECT CATEGORY:
Sodium o-nitophenolate, sodium p-nitrophenolate, sodium 5- nitroguaiacolate, and the End-Use Product Atonik
DATES: This regulation is effective November 3, 2000. Objections and requests for hearings, identified by docket control number OPP301043, must be received by EPA on or before January 2, 2001.
DOCUMENT SUMMARY: This regulation establishes an exemption from the requirement
of a tolerance for residues of the active ingredients (a.i.) sodium o
nitophenolate, sodium pnitrophenolate, sodium 5nitroguaiacolate, on
all food commodities when used as Plant Growth Regulators on growing
crops. These three a.i. comprise the enduse product ATONIK
SUMMARY: Sodium o-nitophenolate, etc.,
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
I. General InformationA. Does this Action Apply to Me?
You may be affected by this action if you are an agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer. Potentially affected categories and entities may include, but are not limited to: Examples of Categories NAICS codes potentially affected entities Industry 111 Crop production 112 Animal production 311 Food manufacturing 32532 Pesticide manufacturing
This listing is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides
a guide for readers regarding entities likely to be affected by this
action. Other types of entities not listed in the table could also be
affected. The North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS)
codes have been provided to assist you and others in determining
whether or not this action might apply to certain entities. If you have
questions regarding the applicability of this action to a particular
entity, consult the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
B. How Can I Get Additional Information, Including Copies of this Document and Other Related Documents?
1. Electronically. You may obtain electronic copies of this document, and certain other related documents that might be available electronically, from the EPA Internet Home Page at http://www.epa.gov/. To access this document, on the Home Page select ``Laws and Regulations,'' ``Regulations and Proposed Rules,'' and then look up the entry for this document under the ``Federal RegisterEnvironmental Documents.'' You can also go directly to the Federal Register listings at http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/.
2. In person. The Agency has established an official record for this action under docket control number OPP301043. The official record consists of the documents specifically referenced in this action, and other information related to this action, including any information claimed as Confidential Business Information (CBI). This official record includes the documents that are physically located in the docket, as well as the documents that are referenced in those documents. The public version of the official record does not include any information claimed as CBI. The public version of the official record, which includes printed, paper versions of any electronic comments submitted during an applicable comment period is available for inspection in the Public Information and Records Integrity Branch (PIRIB), Rm. 119, Crystal Mall #2, 1921 Jefferson Davis Hwy., Arlington, VA, from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The PIRIB telephone number is (703) 3055805. II. Background and Statutory Findings
In the Federal Register of July 8, 1998 (63 FR 36901) (FRL57916), EPA issued a notice pursuant to section 408 of the FFDCA, 21 U.S.C. 346a(e), as amended by the FQPA (Public Law 104170) announcing the filing of a pesticide tolerance petition by ASAHI Manufacturing Company, Ltd., c/o Chemical Consultants International, Inc., West 98\th\ Terrace, Suite 100, Overland Park, KS, 66212. This notice included a summary of the petition prepared by the petitioner ASAHI Manufacturing Company, Ltd. There were no comments received in response to the notice of filing.
New section 408(c)(2)(A)(i) of the FFDCA allows EPA to establish an
exemption from the requirement for a tolerance (the legal limit for a
pesticide chemical residue in or on a food) only if EPA determines that
the exemption is ``safe.'' Section 408(c)(2)(A)(ii) defines ``safe ''
to mean that ``there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result
from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical residue, including
all anticipated dietary exposures and all other exposures for which
there is reliable information.'' This includes exposure through drinking water and in
[[Page 66179]]
residential settings, but does not include occupational exposure.
Section 408(b)(2)(C) requires EPA to give special consideration to
exposure of infants and children to the pesticide chemical residue in
establishing a tolerance and to ``ensure that there is a reasonable
certainty that no harm will result to infants and children from
aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical residue....''
Additionally, section 408(b)(2)(D) requires that the Agency consider
``available information concerning the cumulative effects of a
particular pesticide's residues'' and ``other substances that have a common mechanism of toxicity.''
EPA performs a number of analyses to determine the risks from aggregate exposure to pesticide residues. First, EPA determines the toxicity of pesticides. Second, EPA examines exposure to the pesticide through food, drinking water, and through other exposures that occur as a result of pesticide use in residential settings.
III. Toxicological Profile
Consistent with section 408(b)(2)(D) of the FFDCA, EPA has reviewed the available scientific data and other relevant information in support of this action and considered its validity, completeness and reliability and the relationship of this information to human risk. EPA has also considered available information concerning the variability of the sensitivities of major identifiable subgroups of consumers, including infants and children.
The Biopesticide and Pollution Prevention Division (BPPD) has
reviewed submitted data to assess the potential hazards and exposures
that might result from the proposed use of ATONIK
The Tier I data was submitted on the enduse product,
ATONIK
1. The noobservedadverseeffect levels (N0AEL) from dietary administration of the a.i. are 56 times higher than that of the developmental toxicity study (1,589 and 1,723 milligrams/kilograms/day (mg/kg/day) for males and females compared with 300 mg/kg/day in pregant rats).
2. The acute toxicity of the enduse product is classified into
Toxicity Category IV for the oral (LD
3. No developmental effects were noted at dose up to 600 mg/kg/day highest dose tested (HDT).
4. Studies on the three components of the manufacturing use product (MUP) showed no mutagentic activity.
5. The low concentration of the a.i. in the end use product (0.6%).
6. There is a low application rate (< 20 g a.i. per acre). IV. Aggregate Exposures
In examining aggregate exposure, section 408 of the FFDCA directs EPA to consider available information concerning exposures from the pesticide residue in food and all other nonoccupational exposures, including drinking water from ground water or surface water and exposure through pesticide use in gardens, lawns, or buildings (residential and other indoor uses).
A. Dietary Exposure
No toxicity endpoints for dietary, occupational or nonoccupational
risk characterizations were indicated in subchronic toxicity,
developmental toxicity or mutagenicity studies on ATONIK
1. Food. The enduse product, ATONIK
Further, due to the rapid uptake and metabolism of the three a.i. in plants, it is unlikely that any of the residue would be available for potential exposure.
2. Drinking water exposure. Similarly, exposure to humans from consumption of water would be equally unlikely.
B. Other NonOccupational Exposure
Using the previously mentioned criteria, the Agency believes that nonoccupational exposures via other routes would be highly unlikely. There is no allowed use of the product containing the three a.i. on lawns, rightsofway, golf courses, or other areas where human exposure is likely to occur. Therefore, for all practical purposes, exposure from these areas would be nonexistent.
V. Cumulative Effects
Exposure through other pesticides and substances with the same mode of toxicity is not likely. What little toxicity that was observed is only detected at extremely high concentrations of these a.i.. VI. Determination of Safety for U.S. Population, Infants and Children
The three a.i. in the EndUse Product, ATONIK
VII. Other Considerations
A. Endocrine Disruptors
EPA is required under the FFDCA, as amended by FQPA, to develop a
screening program to determine whether certain substances (including
all pesticide active and other ingredients) ``may have an effect in
humans that is similar to an effect produced by a naturally occurring
estrogen, or other such endocrine effects as the Administrator may
designate.'' Following the recommendations of its Endocrine Disruptor
Screening and Testing Advisory Committee (EDSTAC), EPA determined that
there was scientific basis for including, as part of the program,
androgen and thyroid hormone systems, in addition to the estrogen
hormone system. EPA also adopted EDSTAC's recommendation that the
program include evaluations of potential effects in wildlife. For [[Page 66180]]
pesticide chemicals, EPA will use FIFRA and, to the extent that effects
in wildlife may help determine whether a substance may have an effect
in humans, FFDCA authority to require the wildlife evaluations. As the
science develops and resources allow, screening of additional hormone
systems may be added to the Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program (EDSP).
When the appropriate screening and/or testing protocols being considered under the EDSP have been developed, sodium onitrophenolate, sodium pnitrophenolate, and sodium 5nitoguaiacolate, may be subjected to additional screening an/or testing to better characterize effects related to endocrine disruption. Based on the weight of the evidence of available data, no endocrine systemrelated effect have been identified.
B. Analytical Method(s)
Adequate data for the enduse product, ATONIK
nitrophenolate, and sodium 5nitoguaiacolate, were submitted with the initial registration and petition for tolerances.
C. Tolerance Reassessment
The foregoing is a reassessment of the tolerances for Sec. 180.1139 Sodium 5nitoguaiacolate, and Sec. 180.1140 Sodium onitrophenolate, and Sec. 180.1141 Sodium pnitrophenolate. This reassessment revises these tolerances to include all food commodities when used as plant growth regulators.
D. Codex Maximum Residue Level
No known international tolerances have been granted for this
pesticide. Therefore, based on the completeness and reliability of the
toxicity data from the published literature and conservative exposure
assessment, the Agency concludes that there is a reasonable certainty
that no harm will result from aggregate exposure to residues of
ATONIK
VIII. Objections and Hearing Requests
Under section 408(g) of the FFDCA, as amended by the FQPA, any
person may file an objection to any aspect of this regulation and may
also request a hearing on those objections. The EPA procedural
regulations which govern the submission of objections and requests for
hearings appear in 40 CFR part 178. Although the procedures in those
regulations require some modification to reflect the amendments made to
the FFDCA by the FQPA of 1996, EPA will continue to use those
procedures, with appropriate adjustments, until the necessary
modifications can be made. The new section 408(g) provides essentially
the same process for persons to ``object'' to a regulation for an
exemption from the requirement of a tolerance issued by EPA under new
section 408(d), as was provided in the old FFDCA sections 408 and 409.
However, the period for filing objections is now 60 days, rather than 30 days.
A. What Do I Need to Do to File an Objection or Request a Hearing?
You must file your objection or request a hearing on this regulation in accordance with the instructions provided in this unit and in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, you must identify docket control number OPP301043 in the subject line on the first page of your submission. All requests must be in writing, and must be mailed or delivered to the Hearing Clerk on or before January 2, 2001.
1. Filing the request. Your objection must specify the specific provisions in the regulation that you object to, and the grounds for the objections (40 CFR 178.25). If a hearing is requested, the objections must include a statement of the factual issues(s) on which a hearing is requested, the requestor's contentions on such issues, and a summary of any evidence relied upon by the objector (40 CFR 178.27). Information submitted in connection with an objection or hearing request may be claimed confidential by marking any part or all of that information as CBI. Information so marked will not be disclosed except in accordance with procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2. A copy of the information that does not contain CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the public record. Information not marked confidential may be disclosed publicly by EPA without prior notice.
Mail your written request to: Office of the Hearing Clerk (1900), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460. You may also deliver your request to the Office of the Hearing Clerk in Rm. C400, Waterside Mall, 401 M St., SW., Washington, DC 20460. The Office of the Hearing Clerk is open from 8 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Office of the Hearing Clerk is (202) 2604865.
2. Tolerance fee payment. If you file an objection or request a hearing, you must also pay the fee prescribed by 40 CFR 180.33(i) or request a waiver of that fee pursuant to 40 CFR 180.33(m). You must mail the fee to: EPA Headquarters Accounting Operations Branch, Office of Pesticide Programs, P.O. Box 360277M, Pittsburgh, PA 15251. Please identify the fee submission by labeling it ``Tolerance Petition Fees.''
EPA is authorized to waive any fee requirement ``when in the judgement of the Administrator such a waiver or refund is equitable and not contrary to the purpose of this subsection.'' For additional information regarding the waiver of these fees, you may contact James Tompkins by phone at (703) 3055697, by email at tompkins.jim@epa.gov, or by mailing a request for information to Mr. Tompkins at Registration Division (7505C), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460.
If you would like to request a waiver of the tolerance objection fees, you must mail your request for such a waiver to: James Hollins, Information Resources and Services Division (7502C), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460.
3. Copies for the docket. In addition to filing an objection or hearing request with the Hearing Clerk as described in Unit VIII.A., you should also send a copy of your request to the PIRIB for its inclusion in the official record that is described in Unit I.B.2. Mail your copies, identified by docket control number OPP301043, to: Public Information and Records Integrity Branch, Information Resources and Services Division (7502C), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460. In person or by courier, bring a copy to the location of the PIRIB described in Unit I.B.2. You may also send an electronic copy of your request via email to: oppdocket@epa.gov. Please use an ASCII file format and avoid the use of special characters and any form of encryption. Copies of electronic objections and hearing requests will also be accepted on disks in WordPerfect 6.1/8.0 file format or ASCII file format. Do not include any CBI in your electronic copy. You may also submit an electronic copy of your request at many Federal Depository Libraries.
B. When Will the Agency Grant a Request for a Hearing?
A request for a hearing will be granted if the Administrator
determines that the material submitted shows the following: There is a
genuine and substantial issue of fact; there is a reasonable
possibility that available evidence identified by the requestor would,
if established resolve one or more of such issues in favor of [[Page 66181]]
the requestor, taking into account uncontested claims or facts to the
contrary; and resolution of the factual issues(s) in the manner sought
by the requestor would be adequate to justify the action requested (40 CFR 178.32).
IX. Regulatory Assessment Requirements
This final rule establishes an exemption from the tolerance requirement under FFDCA section 408(d) in response to a petition submitted to the Agency. The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted these types of actions from review under Executive Order 12866, entitled Regulatory Planning and Review October 4, 1993 (58 FR 51735). This final rule does not contain any information collections subject to OMB approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq., or impose any enforceable duty or contain any unfunded mandate as described under Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) (Public Law 1044). Nor does it require any prior consultation as specified by Executive Order 13084, entitled Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments May 19, 1998 (63 FR 27655); special considerations as required by Executive Order 12898, entitled Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and LowIncome Populations February 16, 1994 (59 FR 7629); or require OMB review or any Agency action under Executive Order 13045, entitled Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks April 23, 1997 (62 FR 19885). This action does not involve any technical standards that would require Agency consideration of voluntary consensus standards pursuant to section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (NTTAA), Public Law 104113, section 12(d)(15 U.S.C. 272 note). Since tolerances and exemptions that are established on the basis of a petition under FFDCA section 408(d), such as the exemption in this final rule, do not require the issuance of a proposed rule, the requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) do not apply. In addition, the Agency has determined that this action will not have a substantial direct effect on States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government, as specified in Executive Order 13132, entitled Federalism August 10, 1999 (64 FR 43255). Executive Order 13132 requires EPA to develop an accountable process to ensure ``meaningful and timely input by State and local officials in the development of regulatory policies that have federalism implications.'' ``Policies that have federalism implications'' is defined in the Executive Order to include regulations that have ``substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.'' This final rule directly regulates growers, food processors, food handlers and food retailers, not States. This action does not alter the relationships or distribution of power and responsibilities established by Congress in the preemption provisions of FFDCA section 408(n)(4).
X. Submission to Congress and the Comptroller General
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of this final rule in the Federal Register. This final rule is not a ``major rule '' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: October 6, 2000.
Janet L. Andersen,
Director, Biopesticides and Pollution Prevention Division.
Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is amended as follows: PART 180[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346(a) and 374.
2. In subpart D Sec. 180.1139, 180.1140, and 180.1141 are revised to read as follows:
Sec. 180.1139 Sodium 5nitroguaiacolate; exemption from the requirements of a tolerance.
The biochemical sodium 5nitroguiacolate is exempted from the
requirement of a tolerance when used as a plant growth regulator in
enduse products at a concentration of 0.1% by weight and applied at an
application rate of 20 g of a.i. per acre or less per application, in or on all food commodities.
Sec. 180.1140 Sodium onitrophenolate; exemption from the requirement of a tolerance.
The biochemical sodium onitrophenolate is exempted from the
requirement of a tolerance when used as a plant growth regulator in
enduse products at a concentration of 0.2% by weight and applied at an
application rate of 20 g of a.i. per acre or less per application, in or on all food commodities.
Sec. 180.1141 Sodium pnitrophenolate; exemption from the requirement of a tolerance.
The biochemical sodium pnitrophenolate is exempted from the
requirement of a tolerance when used as a plant growth regulator in
enduse product at a concentration of 0.3% by weight and applied at an
application rate of 20 g of a.i. per acre or less per application, in or on all food commodities.
[FR Doc. 0028277 Filed 11200; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 656050S
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT By mail: Richard King, c/o Product Manager (PM) 90, Biopesticides and Pollution Prevention Division (7511C), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460; telephone number: (703) 3088052; email address: king.richard@epa.gov.
Common CFR Searches
14 CFR Part 39 40 CFR Part 52 14 CFR Part 71 33 CFR Part 165 26 CFR Part 1 50 CFR Part 679 40 CFR Part 180 47 CFR Part 73 33 CFR Part 117 50 CFR Part 17 44 CFR Part 67 50 CFR Part 648 14 CFR Part 97 33 CFR Part 100 40 CFR Part 63 26 CFR Part 301 50 CFR Part 622 39 CFR Part 111 40 CFR Part 300 50 CFR Part 660 44 CFR Part 65 40 CFR Parts 52 and 81 40 CFR Part 271 47 CFR Part 64 14 CFR Part 23 14 CFR Part 25 21 CFR Part 522 50 CFR Part 665 47 CFR Part 76 27 CFR Part 9