Browse: Departments Dates Agencies
Docket ID: [GC Docket No. 00-219; FCC 00-392]
SUBJECT CATEGORY: Exempt Presentations
DOCUMENT SUMMARY: The Commission proposes to amend its regulations specifying
presentations that are treated as exempt under the ex parte rules.
Under the current rule, presentations to or from the Department of
Justice and the Federal Trade Commission regarding telecommunications
competition matters are treated as exempt. The item would expand the
scope of the exemption to include the Competition Directorate of the
European Commission and other international and foreign bodies with analogous functions. The item would clarify that the term
``telecommunications competition matters'' in the existing rule was
intended to be construed broadly and was not limited to common
carriers. The intended effect of this proposal is to enhance the
Commission's ability to consult with relevant agencies concerning
mergers and other significant competition matters.
SUMMARY: Exempt presentations,
1. By this notice of proposed rulemaking, the Commission proposes
to modify 47 CFR 1.1204(a)(6), one of the rules governing the
permissibility of ex parte presentations in Commission proceedings. The
current rule provides that the following type of presentation is exempt:
(6) The presentation is to or from the United States Department of
Justice or Federal Trade Commission and involves a telecommunications
competition matter in a proceeding which has not been designated for
hearing and in which the relevant agency is not a party or commenter
(in an informal rulemaking or Joint board proceeding) Provided , That,
any new factual information obtained through such a presentation that
is relied on by the Commission in its decisionmaking process will be
disclosed by the Commission no later than at the time of the release of
the Commission's decision; The Commission proposes to broaden the scope
of this exemption to include international and foreign governmental
bodies that exercise similar jurisdiction over relevant matters.
2. The rule was intended to ``promote the public interest through the exchange of information between the Commission and the other principal agencies responsible for promoting or ensuring competition in the telecommunications industry.'' Amendment of the Commission's Ex Parte Rules, 9 FCC Rcd 6108 para. 2 (1994). See also Amendment of 47 CFR 1.1200 et seq., 12 FCC Rcd 7348, 7368 para. 61 (1997), recon. denied, 14 FCC Rcd 18831 (1999), modified, DA 992788 (Dec. 17, 1999). The Commission continues to believe that the public interest will be served by permitting free consultation between the agencies with principal jurisdiction over telecommunications competition matters. Indeed, the need for effective, expedited, and consistent governmental response to issues of competition is especially acute in the present environment of major structural reorganizations within the telecommunications industry, accelerated technological change, and increased globalization.
3. The current Sec. 1.1204(a)(6), however, fails to take into account an important dimension in the oversight of telecommunications competition, namely the increased globalization of telecommunications competition issues. The entities and services involved in, for example, mergers may well be international, rather than national in character, and the oversight of such cases potentially involves not only the Commission, the DOJ, and the FTC, but also their foreign and international counterparts. This situation has prompted antitrust and competition policy officials of the United States to develop close relationships with their foreign and international counterparts with respect to notifications, consultations, and coordination. In this regard, formal bilateral agreements have been reached between the United States and several countries, and informal relationships exist with other countries. Because the public interest requires the effective, expedited, and consistent exercise of authority on the international as well as national scale, presentations by the appropriate foreign and international agencies should also be exempt under the Commission's ex parte rules.
4. As an additional matter, the Commission takes this opportunity
to clarify that the term ``telecommunications competition matter'' in
the current rule was intended to be broadly construed to include the full extent of the respective agencies' jurisdiction over
communications competition matters. It was not intended to be limited to specific types of competition matters involving
``telecommunications'' as that term may be technically defined by the Act.
5. Section 603 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, as amended, requires a preliminary regulatory flexibility analysis in a notice and comment rulemaking proceeding unless we certify that ``the rule will not, if promulgated, have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.'' 5 U.S.C. 605(b). We believe that the rule we propose today will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
6. As noted above, in proposing to revise the ex parte rules we are expanding the scope of presentations treated as exempt. The proposed rule does not impose any additional compliance burden on persons dealing with the Commission, including small entities. The new rule would not significantly affect the rights of persons participating in Commission proceedings. There is no reason to believe that operation of the new rule would impose significant costs on parties to Commission proceedings.
7. Accordingly, we certify, pursuant to Section 605(b) of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, as amended by the Contract with America Advancement Act of 1996 (CWAAA), Public Law 104121, 110 Stat. 847 (1996), that the rules will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. 5 U.S.C. 605(b). The Commission shall send a copy of this Notice of Proposed rulemaking, including this certification, to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the SBA. 5 U.S.C. 605(b). A copy of this certification will also be published in the Federal Register.
Administrative practice and procedure, Radio, Telecommunications, Television.
Federal Communications Commission.
Magalie Roman Salas,
Secretary.
Part 1 of Title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations is proposed to be amended as follows:
1. The authority citation for part 1 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 47 U.S.C. 151, 154, 303, and 309(j) unless otherwise noted.
2. Section 1.1204 is amended by revising paragraph (a)(6) to read as follows:
Sec. 1.1204 Exempt ex parte presentations and proceedings
(a)* * *
(6) The presentation is to or from The United States Department of
Justice, The United States Federal Trade Commission, or a foreign or
international agency, including but not limited to the Competition
Directorate of the European Commission, with responsibility for the
oversight of competition matters similar to the foregoing United States
agencies, and the presentation involves a telecommunications
competition matter. This exemption applies to proceedings which have
not been designated for hearing and in which the relevant agency is not
a party or commenter (in an informal rulemaking or Joint board
proceeding). Any new factual information obtained through such a
presentation that is relied on by the Commission in its decisionmaking
process shall be disclosed by the Commission no later than at the time of the release of the Commission's decision;
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 0032788 Filed 122200; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 671201P
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT David S. Senzel, Office of General Counsel (202) 4181720.
14 CFR Part 39 40 CFR Part 52 14 CFR Part 71 33 CFR Part 165 50 CFR Part 679 47 CFR Part 73 26 CFR Part 1 40 CFR Part 180 33 CFR Part 117 50 CFR Part 17 44 CFR Part 67 50 CFR Part 648 14 CFR Part 97 33 CFR Part 100 40 CFR Part 63 50 CFR Part 622 44 CFR Part 65 50 CFR Part 660 26 CFR Part 301 39 CFR Part 111 40 CFR Part 300 6 CFR Part 5 40 CFR Part 271 47 CFR Part 64 40 CFR Parts 52 and 81 50 CFR Part 665 44 CFR Part 64 10 CFR Part 50 49 CFR Part 571 47 CFR Part 76