Browse: Departments Dates Agencies
Docket ID: [Docket No. 99-CE-77-AD; Amendment 39-12088; AD 2001-02-04]
RIN ID: RIN 2120-AA64
SUBJECT CATEGORY: Airworthiness Directives; Pilatus Aircraft LTD Model PC-6 Airplanes
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in the regulations as of March 13, 2001.
DOCUMENT SUMMARY: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD) that applies to all Pilatus Aircraft LTD (Pilatus) Model PC6 airplanes that are equipped with a certain stabilizer trim actuator. This AD requires you to inspect the lower lug of the actuator for cracks, damage, or distortion; verify that the staked bearing is correctly installed in the bore of the lug; and repair any cracked, damaged, or distorted parts and reassemble any incorrectly installed staked bearing, as necessary. This AD is the result of mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) issued by the airworthiness authority for Switzerland. The actions specified by this AD are intended to detect and correct damage, distortion, or cracks in the lower lug assembly, which could result in failure of the lower lug. Such failure could lead to loss of the stabilizer trim actuator with consequent loss of control of the airplane.
SUMMARY: Pilatus Aircraft Ltd.,
What events have caused this AD? The Federal Office for Civil Aviation (FOCA), which is the airworthiness authority for Switzerland, recently notified the FAA that an unsafe condition may exist on all Pilatus Model PC6 airplanes that are equipped with a stabilizer trim actuator, part number (P/N) 978.73.18.101, 978.73.18.102, or 978.73.18.103 (Electomech P/N EM 4831, 4832, or 4833). The FOCA reports an incident of a cracked, damaged, and distorted lower lug of the horizontal stabilizer trim actuator. Analysis of this incident reveals that the staked bearing was loose, which caused excessive wear and failure of the actuator lower lug.
What are the consequences if the condition is not corrected?
Damage, distortion, or cracks in the lower lug assembly, if not
detected and corrected, could result in failure of this part. Such failure could lead to loss of the
[[Page 8080]]
stabilizer trim actuator with consequent loss of control of the airplane.
Has FAA taken any action to this point? We issued a proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) to include an AD that would apply to all Pilatus Model PC6 airplanes that are equipped with a certain stabilizer trim actuator. This proposal was published in the Federal Register as a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) on November 2, 2000 (65 FR 65789). The NPRM proposed to require you to inspect the lower lug of the actuator for cracks, damage, or distortion; verify that the staked bearing is correctly installed in the bore of the lug; and repair any cracked, damaged, or distorted parts and reassemble any incorrectly installed staked bearing, as necessary.
Was the public invited to comment? Interested persons were afforded an opportunity to participate in the making of this amendment. No comments were received on the proposed rule or the FAA's determination of the cost to the public.
What is FAA's final determination on this issue? After careful
review of all available information related to the subject presented
above, we have determined that air safety and the public interest
require the adoption of the rule as proposed except for minor editorial corrections. We determined that these minor corrections:
Will not change the meaning of the AD; and
Will not add any additional burden upon the public than was already proposed.
How many airplanes does this AD impact? We estimate that this AD affects 7 airplanes in the U.S. registry.
What is the cost impact of this AD on owners/operators of the
affected airplanes? We estimate the following costs to accomplish the inspection :
Total cost per Total cost on U.S. airplane
Labor cost Parts cost airplane operators
1 workhour x $60 per hour = $60.. Not applicable....... $60 per airplane..... $60 x 7=$420.
If any distortion, damage, or cracks are found during the inspection, you will have to repair the actuator assembly in accordance with an FAAapproved repair scheme developed by the manufacturer. The FAA has no way of determining how much incorporating each repair scheme will cost since the damage to each airplane will be unique. Regulatory Impact
Does this AD impact various entities? The regulations adopted herein will not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, it is determined that this final rule does not have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132.
Does this AD involve a significant rule or regulatory action? For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this action (1) is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. A copy of the final evaluation prepared for this action is contained in the Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained by contacting the Rules Docket at the location provided under the caption ADDRESSES. List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by reference, Safety.
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows: PART 39AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
2. FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding a new AD to read as follows:
20010204 Pilatus Aircraft Ltd.: Amendment 3912088; Docket No. 99CE77AD.
(a) What airplanes are affected by this AD? This AD affects Model PC6 airplanes, all serial numbers, that are:
(1) Certificated in any category; and
(2) Equipped with a stabilizer trim actuator, part number (P/N)
978.73.18.101, 978.73.18.102, or 978.73.18.103 (Electomech P/N EM
4831, 4832, or 4833), or FAAapproved equivalent part number.
(b) Who must comply with this AD? Anyone who wishes to operate any of the above airplanes must comply with this AD.
(c) What problem does this AD address? The actions specified by
this AD are intended to detect and correct damage, distortion, or
cracks in the lower lug assembly, which could result in failure of
the lower lug. Such failure could lead to loss of the stabilizer
trim actuator with consequent loss of control of the airplane.
(d) What actions must I accomplish to address this problem? To address this problem, you must accomplish the following:
Action Compliance time Procedures
(1) Inspect the lower lug of Upon accumulating Accomplish the
the actuator for cracks, 500 hours timein inspection in
damage, or distortion, and service (TIS) on accordance with the
assure that the staked the airplane or ACCOMPLISHMENT
bearing is correctly within the next 100 INSTRUCTIONS
installed in the bore of hours TIS after section of Pilatus
the lug. March 13, 2001 (the Service Bulletin
effective date of No. 178, dated
this AD), whichever September 29, 1999. occurs later,
unless already
accomplished.
(2) Repair any cracked, Prior to further Accomplish any
damaged, or distorted flight after the repairs in
parts, as necessary, and inspection required accordance with an
reassemble any incorrectly by paragraph (d)(1) FAAapproved repair
installed staked bearing. of this AD. scheme obtained
from the
manufacturer.
Accomplish the
reassembly in
accordance with the
instructions in the
maintenance manual. [[Page 8081]]
(e) Can I comply with this AD in any other way? You may use an
alternative method of compliance or adjust the compliance time if:
(1) Your alternative method of compliance provides an equivalent level of safety; and
(2) The Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, approves your alternative. Submit your request through an FAA Principal
Maintenance Inspector, who may add comments and then send it to the Manager, Small Airplane Directorate.
Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in paragraph
(a) of this AD, regardless of whether it has been modified, altered,
or repaired in the area subject to the requirements of this AD. For
airplanes that have been modified, altered, or repaired so that the
performance of the requirements of this AD is affected, the owner/
operator must request approval for an alternative method of
compliance in accordance with paragraph (e) of this AD. The request
should include an assessment of the effect of the modification,
alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition addressed by this AD;
and, if you have not eliminated the unsafe condition, specific actions you propose to address it.
(f) Where can I get information about any already approved
alternative methods of compliance? Contact Roman T. Gabrys,
Aerospace Engineer, FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust,
Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri 64106; telephone: (816) 3294141; facsimile: (816) 3294090.
(g) What if I need to fly the airplane to another location to
comply with this AD? The FAA can issue a special flight permit under
sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14
CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate your airplane to a location where you can accomplish the requirements of this AD.
(h) Are any service bulletins incorporated into this AD by
reference? Actions required by this AD must be done in accordance
with Pilatus Service Bulletin No. 178, dated September 29, 1999. The
Director of the Federal Register approved this incorporation by
reference under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. You can get
copies from Pilatus Aircraft Ltd., Customer Liaison Manager, CH6371
Stans, Switzerland. You can look at copies at the FAA, Central
Region, Office of the Regional Counsel, 901 Locust, Room 506, Kansas
City, Missouri, or at the Office of the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC.
(i) When does this amendment become effective? This amendment becomes effective on March 13, 2001.
Note 2: The subject of this AD is addressed in Swiss AD HB 99 507, dated October 1, 1999.
Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on January 12, 2001. Michael Gallagher,
Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 012002 Filed 12601; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 491013P
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT Roman T. Gabrys, Aerospace Engineer, FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri 64106; telephone: (816) 3294141; facsimile: (816) 3294090.
14 CFR Part 39 40 CFR Part 52 14 CFR Part 71 33 CFR Part 165 50 CFR Part 679 26 CFR Part 1 40 CFR Part 180 47 CFR Part 73 50 CFR Part 17 33 CFR Part 117 44 CFR Part 67 50 CFR Part 648 14 CFR Part 97 33 CFR Part 100 40 CFR Part 63 50 CFR Part 622 26 CFR Part 301 39 CFR Part 111 40 CFR Part 300 50 CFR Part 660 44 CFR Part 65 40 CFR Parts 52 and 81 40 CFR Part 271 47 CFR Part 64 50 CFR Part 665 47 CFR Part 76 50 CFR Part 229 14 CFR Part 23 14 CFR Part 25 21 CFR Part 522