Browse: Departments Dates Agencies
Docket ID: [CC Docket No. 00-175; FCC 01-261]
SUBJECT CATEGORY: 2000 Biennial Regulatory Review Separate Affiliate Requirements of Independent Local Exchange Carriers
DOCUMENT SUMMARY: This document institutes a broad-based reexamination of part 64, subpart T of the Commission's rules, which establishes safeguards for the provision of inregion interexchange services by incumbent independent local exchange carriers. In this document the Commission invites comment on whether the benefits of the separate affiliate requirement for facilitiesbased providers continue to outweigh the costs and whether there are alternative safeguards that are as effective but impose fewer regulatory costs.
SUMMARY: In-region interexchange services provided by incumbent independent local exchange carriers; special affiliate requirements; biennial regulatory review,
1. Under Sec. 64.1903 of the Commission's rules, incumbent
independent local exchange carriers (LECs) providing facilitiesbased,
inregion, interexchange service must do so through a separate
corporate affiliate. In this document the Commission invites interested
parties to comment on whether application of the separate affiliate
requirement for incumbent independent LECs continues to serve the
public interest. The Commission first asks a series of questions
intended to elicit information regarding the number of incumbent
independent LECs providing inregion, interexchange service on either a
facilities or resale basis. In addition, the Commission asks for
comment on whether or not the benefits of this separate affiliate
requirement outweigh the regulatory and economic costs involved.
Finally, the Commission seeks comment on possible alternative safeguards, including proposals for applying the
[[Page 50140]]
separate affiliate requirement to a more limited category of incumbent independent LECs.
2. As required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), as
amended,\1\ the Commission has prepared this Initial Regulatory
Flexibility Analysis (IRFA) of the expected economic impact on small
entities by the policies and rules proposed in this NPRM. Written
public comments are requested on this IRFA. Comments must be identified
as responses to the IRFA and must be filed by the deadlines for
comments on the NPRM. The Commission will send a copy of the NPRM,
including this IRFA, to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration.
\1\ 5 U.S.C. 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq., has been
amended by the Contract With America Advancement Act of 1996, Public
Law 104121, 110 Stat. 847 (1996) (CWAAA). Title II of CWAAA is the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA). Need for, and Objectives of, the Proposed Rules
3. In this NPRM, the Commission seeks comment on whether or not the benefits of its separate affiliate requirement for inregion interexchange service provided by incumbent independent LECs continues to outweigh the costs and whether or not there are alternative safeguards that are as effective but impose fewer regulatory costs.\2\ \2\ 47 U.S.C. 64.190103.
4. The legal basis for any action that may be taken pursuant to the
NPRM is contained in sections 4, 201202, 303 and 403 of the
Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154, 201202, 303,
and 403, and sections 1.1, 1.411, and 1.412 of the Commission's rules, 47 CFR 1.1, 1.411, and 1.412.
Description and Estimate of the Number of Small Entities to Which the Proposed Rules Will Apply
5. The RFA directs agencies to provide a description of and, where
feasible, an estimate of the number of small entities that will be
affected by any rules.\3\ The RFA generally defines the term ``small
entity'' as having the same meaning as the terms ``small business,''
``small organization,'' and ``small governmental jurisdiction.'' \4\
For the purposes of this order, the RFA defines a ``small business'' to
be the same as a ``small business concern'' under the Small Business
Act, 15 U.S.C. 632, unless the Commission has developed one or more
definitions that are appropriate to its activities.\5\ Under the Small
Business Act, a ``small business concern'' is one that: (1) Is
independently owned and operated; (2) is not dominant in its field of
operation; and (3) meets any additional criteria established by the
Small Business Administration (SBA).\6\ Consistent with the SBA's
Office of Advocacy's view, the Commission has included small incumbent
LECs in this RFA analysis. The Commission emphasizes, however, that
this RFA action has no effect on the its analyses and determinations in other, nonRFA contexts.
\3\ 5 U.S.C. 603(b)(3), 604(a)(3).
\4\ 5 U.S.C. 601(6).
\5\ 5 U.S.C. 601(3) (incorporating by reference the definition of ``small business concern'' in 5 U.S.C. 632).
6. Local Exchange Carriers. The most reliable source of information
regarding the number of LECs nationwide appears to be the data that the
Commission collects annually in connection with the Telecommunications
Relay Service (TRS).\7\ According to our most recent data, there are
1,335 incumbent LECs.\8\ Although some of these carriers may not be
independently owned and operated, or have more than 1,500 employees, we
are unable at this time to estimate with greater precision the number
of LECs that would qualify as small business concerns under the SBA's
definition. Consequently, we estimate that there are less than 1,335
small entity incumbent LECs that may be affected by the proposals in the NPRM.
\7\ 47 CFR 64.601 et seq.; Carrier Locator: Interstate Service
Providers, FCC Common Carrier Bureau, Industry Analysis Division (rel. Oct. 2000) (Carrier Locator).
\8\ Carrier Locator at Figure 1. The total for competitive LECs
includes competitive access providers and competitive LECs.
Description of Projected Reporting, Recordkeeping and Other Compliance Requirements
7. The Commission expects that any proposal it may adopt pursuant
this NPRM will decrease existing reporting, recordkeeping or other compliance requirements.
Steps Taken To Minimize Significant Economic Impact on Small Entities, and Significant Alternatives Considered
8. The overall objective of this proceeding is to reduce existing
regulatory burdens on small carriers to the extent consistent with the public interest.
Federal Rules That May Duplicate, Overlap, or Conflict With the Proposed Rules
9. None.
10. Pursuant to the authority contained in sections 2, 4(i)4(j), 201, and 303(r) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 152, 154(i)4(j), 201, 303(r), this NPRM is adopted.
11. The Commission's Consumer Information Bureau, Reference
Information Center, shall send a copy of this NPRM, including the
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis, to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration.
Federal Communications Commission.
William F. Caton,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 0124569 Filed 10101; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 671201P
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT Jessica Rosenworcel, Attorney Advisor, Policy and Program Planning Division, Common Carrier Bureau, (202) 418 1580.
14 CFR Part 39 40 CFR Part 52 14 CFR Part 71 33 CFR Part 165 26 CFR Part 1 50 CFR Part 679 40 CFR Part 180 47 CFR Part 73 33 CFR Part 117 50 CFR Part 17 44 CFR Part 67 50 CFR Part 648 14 CFR Part 97 33 CFR Part 100 40 CFR Part 63 26 CFR Part 301 50 CFR Part 622 39 CFR Part 111 40 CFR Part 300 50 CFR Part 660 44 CFR Part 65 40 CFR Parts 52 and 81 40 CFR Part 271 47 CFR Part 64 14 CFR Part 23 14 CFR Part 25 21 CFR Part 522 50 CFR Part 665 47 CFR Part 76 27 CFR Part 9