Federal Register: December 14, 2001 (Volume 66, Number 241)
DOCID: FR Doc 01-30892
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Labor Statistics Bureau
NOTICE: NOTICES
ACTION: Agency information collection activities:
DOCUMENT ACTION: Notice.
SUBJECT CATEGORY:
Proposed Collection, Comment Request
DATES: Written comments must be submitted to the office listed in the Addresses section of this notice on or before February 12, 2002.
DOCUMENT SUMMARY:
The Department of Labor, as part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, conducts a preclearance consultation program to provide the general public and Federal agencies with an opportunity to comment on proposed and/or continuing collections of information in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA95) [44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)]. This program helps to ensure that requested data can be provided in the desired format, reporting burden (time and financial resources) is minimized, collection instruments are clearly understood, and the impact of collection requirements on respondents can be properly assessed. The Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) is soliciting comments concerning the proposed extension of the ``Producer Price Index Survey.'' A copy of the proposed information collection request (ICR) can be obtained by contacting the individual listed below in the Addresses section of this notice.
SUMMARY:
Proposed collection; comment request,
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
I. Background
The Producer Price Index (PPI), one of the Nation's leading economic indicators, is used as a measure of price movements, as an indicator of inflationary trends, for inventory valuation, and as a measure of purchasing power of the dollar at the primarymarket level. It is also used for market and economic research and as a basis for escalation in longterm contracts and purchase agreements.
PPI data provide a description of the magnitude and composition of price change within the economy, and serve a wide range of governmental needs. These monthly indexes are closely followed and are viewed as sensitive indicators of the economic environment. Price data are vital in helping both the President and Congress set fiscal spending targets. Producer prices are monitored by the Federal Reserve Board Open Market Committee to help decide monetary policy. Federal policymakers at the Department of Treasury and the Council of Economic Advisors use these statistics to help form and evaluate monetary and fiscal measures, and to help interpret the general business environment. Furthermore, dollardenominated measures of economic performance, such the Gross Domestic Product, require accurate price data in order to convert nominaldollar values to constantdollar values. Inflationfree national income accounting figures are vital to fiscal and monetary policymakers when setting objectives and targets. In addition, it is common to find one or more PPIs, alone or in combination with other measures, used to escalate the delivered price of goods for government purchases.
In addition to governmental uses, PPI data are used by the private sector.
[[Page 64887]]
Private industry uses PPI data for contract escalation. For one
particular method of taxrelated LastInFirstOut (LIFO) inventory
accounting, the Internal Revenue Service suggests that firms use PPI
data for making calculations. Private businesses make extensive use of
industrialprice data for planning and operating. Price trends are used
to assess market conditions. Firms commonly compare the prices they pay
for material inputs and the prices they receive for products that they make and sell with changes in similar PPIs.
Economic researchers and forecasters also use the PPI. Price indexes are widely used to probe and measure the interaction of market forces. Some examples of research topics that require extensive price data include: The identification of varying price elasticities and the degree of cost passthrough in the economy, the identification of potential lead and lag structures among price changes, and the identification of prices which exert major impacts throughout market structures. In the end, both policy and business planning are affected by the completeness of price trend descriptions.
II. Desired Focus of Comments
The Bureau of Labor Statistics is particularly interested in comments that:
III. Current Action
Office of Management and Budget clearance is being sought for the Producer Price Index Survey.
A description of recent and projected improvements meant to improve data completeness, increase efficiency, and reduce overall respondent burden to the maximum degree possible follows.
A. DisaggregationRecent modifications made to disaggregation (i.e., item selection procedures) help to better define a publication structure that is: (1) Publishable in its entirety, (2) meets user needs, (3) continuous, and (4) permits meaningful classification of current production. In order to obtain and maintain publishability of an entire structure, data are now collected using a method where price quotation selection is spread across predetermined product categories that correspond to the publication cells for a Standard Industrial Classification (SIC). The design of the revised disaggregation method nearly guarantees that the PPI will collect enough price quotations to populate more lightly weighted cells. More heavily weighted (and populated) cells will receive slightly fewer price quotations than would have been selected under the previous method. As a result, indexes constituting the PPI's publication objectives are much more likely to remain published over time. (For a complete description, see ``Change in PPI Publication Structures for Resampled Industries Introduced in January 1997,'' PPI Detailed Report, January 1997.)
B. SamplingRecent modifications made to sampling procedures permit the PPI to update weights of industry indexes without initiating a new set of respondents. This process change is called ``recycling without resampling.'' The PPI has also made it operationally feasible to augment the sample of price quotations for a single product line within an SIC, rather than having to initiate an entirely new set of respondents when such needs arise. These capabilities are major breakthroughs, since they enable the PPI program to reduce both data collection expenses and respondent burden, while permitting efficient reallocation of program resources. Volatile, technologically sophisticated, and neverbeforesampled SICs may now be updated or introduced into the PPI in a timelier manner.
C. PublicationThe PPI mission includes a mandate requiring the program work toward publication, wherever possible, of output price indexes for every fourdigit industry defined by the SIC Manual. Historically, the PPI had been a family of indexes focusing on the mining, manufacturing, agriculture, and forestry sectors. This publication mandate has resulted in expansion of coverage into non goods producing sectors of the economy. PPI sampling and data collection methodology have permitted systematic retrieval of specific serviceindustry classifications, and have resulted in the publication of various fourdigit SIC aggregate indexes, as well as serviceline and detailed servicecategory price indexes. The PPI currently publishes about seventyfive industrybased indexes for servicesector activities. Over the preceding decade, the PPI has introduced indexes encompassing transportation, real estate, health, legal, accounting, and many other servicebased industries. Industry expansion continues on a regular basis, as funding permits. Since 1999, the PPI has introduced price indexes for SIC 6311 (Life insurance carriers), SIC 54 (Food stores), SIC 59 (Retail trade), and SIC 6211 (Security brokers, dealers, and investment banking companies).
D. NAICS ClassificationAt present, sampling and data collection are conducted according to the SIC Manual system of organization. However, the PPI survey has begun to make modifications that will permit smooth conversion to the North American Industrial
Classification System (NAICS).
E. Electronic Data CollectionThe vast majority of data collected
by the BLS is confidential respondent information. The BLS is currently
developing electronic data collection procedures that will reduce
respondent burden and increase efficiency. However, procedures must
exist to safeguard respondent information. Transmission of data by e
mail presents at least two types of security risks: The data could be
intercepted and/or altered by unauthorized persons; and the data are
subject to inadvertent disclosure by the use of incorrect group names
and accidental forwarding. Complete elimination of email for data
collection purposes likely would decrease response and is not a
feasible option. The BLS is pursuing technological solutions to
increase the security of email transmission. In the interim, however,
shortterm restrictions in email use are needed to reduce the risks of
disclosing confidential data. Effective November 16, 2001, the BLS
authorized the use of email for collection of confidential data
through a pilot test conducted by the BLS National Compensation Survey.
Policies regarding: (1) Communication of confidential respondent
information within the BLS, (2) BLS contacts with government agencies
participating in BLS statistical surveys, and, (3) BLS contacts with
respondents were also updated. These revised policies permit limited
use of email in communications pertaining to confidential respondent
information outside the BLS pilot study being conducted by National Compensation Survey. Email
[[Page 64888]]
communication between the BLS and respondents containing confidential
data can now occur if the following conditions are met: (1) It is
necessary, as a last resort, to obtain a usable response, and the
transmission contains the fewest data elements necessary. (2) Purely
logistical information, although it could tend to disclose an
individual respondent's identification, may be exchanged with
individual respondents (or potential respondents) using regular
Internet email if doing so promotes the efficiency of survey
collection and is acceptable to the respondent. (3) Email must only be
used as a data collection mechanism if it is necessary to obtain
cooperation from the respondent. (4) No group names are to be used when
addressing an email message containing confidential data. Whenever
confidential communications occur, the BLS email must include the
``BLS Statement to Respondent in the Use of Electronic Data
transmission,'' which states the inherent risks to information confidentiality.
Type of Review: Extension of a currently approved collection.
Agency: Bureau of Labor Statistics.
Title: Producer Price Index Survey.
OMB Number: 12200008.
Affected Public: Business and other forprofit.
Average Estimated
Total Total time per total
Form respondents Frequency responses response burden
(minutes) (hours)
BLS 1810A, A1, B, C, C1, and E........ 1,585 Once................... 6,340 120 12,680
BLS 473P.............................. 26,250 Monthly................ 1,260,000 18 378,000
Totals............................ 27,835 ....................... 1,266,340 ......... 390,680
Estimated Total Burden Hours: 390,680 hours.
Total Burden Cost (capital/startup): $0.
Total Burden Cost (operating/maintenance): $0.
Comments submitted in response to this notice will be summarized and/or included in the request for Office of Management and Budget approval of the information collection request; they also will become a matter of public record.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 7th day of December, 2001. Jesus Salinas,
Acting Chief, Division of Management Systems, Bureau of Labor Statistics.
[FR Doc. 0130892 Filed 121301; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 451024P
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
Amy A. Hobby, BLS Clearance Officer, telephone number 2026917628. (See Addresses section.)