Federal Register: April 19, 2002 (Volume 67, Number 76)
DOCID: FR Doc 02-9490
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Environmental Protection Agency
CFR Citation: 40 CFR Part 52
GA ID: [GA-46-200221(a); FRL-7172-7]
ACTION: Air quality implementation plans; approval and promulgation; various States:
DOCUMENT ACTION: Direct final rule.
Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans Georgia: Approval of Revisions to State Implementation Plan
DATES: This direct final rule is effective June 18, 2002 without further notice, unless EPA receives adverse comment by May 20, 2002. If adverse comment is received, EPA will publish a timely withdrawal of the direct final rule in the Federal Register and inform the public that the rule will not take effect.
The EPA is approving the State Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions submitted by the State of Georgia through the Georgia Environmental Protection Division (GAEPD) on August 9, 1999. These revisions pertain to Rules for Air Quality Control and Rules for Enhanced Inspection and Maintenance.
On August 9, 1999, the GAEPD submitted revisions to the Georgia
SIP. The revisions pertain to Chapter 39131 Rules for Air Quality
Control and Chapter 391320 Enhanced Inspection and Maintenance. The
revisions were the subject of a public hearing held on May 12, 1999,
and became State effective on July 8, 1999. The revisions are described below.
II. Analysis of State's Submittal
Rules for Air Quality Control Chapter 39131.01 Definitions
Rule 39131.01(yy) Particulate Matter Emissions
A statement is being added that states that the term ``Particulate Emissions'' as used in the Rules for Air Quality Control has the same meaning as the term ``Particulate Matter Emissions.''
Rule 39131.01(llll) Volatile Organic Compound (VOC)
The definition of VOC is being amended to be consistent with the
EPA definition by adding methyl acetate to the list of chemicals which
are designated to have negligible photochemical reactivity. Various technical corrections were made.
Rules for Enhanced Inspection and Maintenance
Rule 391320.01 Definitions
The definition for ``I/M Test Manual'' is updated to the version dated April 9, 1999.
Rule 391320.05 Emission Standards. Amended
Paragraph (2)(b) is being amended to extend the use of ASM startup exhaust emission standards until the EPA concludes a confirmation of the stringency of final exhaust emission standards and GAEPD establishes a new effective date for the final standards.
Rule 391320.21 Inspection Fees. Amended
Subparagraph (3)(c) is being amended to extend through July 31, 1999, the $25.00 fixed test fee and the issuing of an administrative fee credit of $6.30 to an inspection station owner for each ASM test performed.
III. Final Action
EPA is approving the aforementioned changes to the Georgia SIP because they are consistent with the Clean Air Act and Agency requirements.
The EPA is publishing this rule without prior proposal because the [[Page 19336]]
Agency views this as a noncontroversial submittal and anticipates no adverse comments. However, in the proposed rules section of this Federal Register publication, EPA is publishing a separate document that will serve as the proposal to approve the SIP revision should adverse comments be filed. This rule will be effective June 18, 2002 without further notice unless the Agency receives adverse comments by May 20, 2002.
If the EPA receives such comments, then EPA will publish a document withdrawing the direct final rule and informing the public that the rule will not take effect. All public comments received will then be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule published elsewhere in this Federal Register. The EPA will not institute a second comment period. Parties interested in commenting should do so at this time. If no such comments are received, the public is advised that this rule will be effective on June 18, 2002 and no further action will be taken on the proposed rule published elsewhere in this Federal Register. Please note that if we receive adverse comment on an amendment, paragraph, or section of this rule and if that provision may be severed from the remainder of the rule, we may adopt as final those provisions of the rule that are not the subject of an adverse comment.
IV. Administrative Requirements
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' and therefore is not subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget. For this reason, this action is also not subject to Executive Order 13211, ``Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001). This action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and imposes no additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. Accordingly, the Administrator certifies that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because this rule approves preexisting requirements under state law and does not impose any additional enforceable duty beyond that required by state law, it does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 1044).
This rule also does not have tribal implications because it will not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This action also does not have Federalism implications because it does not have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government, as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999). This action merely approves a state rule implementing a Federal standard, and does not alter the relationship or the distribution of power and responsibilities established in the Clean Air Act. This rule also is not subject to Executive Order 13045 ``Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks'' (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997), because it is not economically significant.
In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. In this context, in the absence of a prior existing requirement for the State to use voluntary consensus standards (VCS), EPA has no authority to disapprove a SIP submission for failure to use VCS. It would thus be inconsistent with applicable law for EPA, when it reviews a SIP submission, to use VCS in place of a SIP submission that otherwise satisfies the provisions of the Clean Air Act. Thus, the requirements of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply. This rule does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by June 18, 2002. Filing a petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: April 8, 2002.
A. Stanley Meiburg,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4.
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
2. Amend Sec. 52.570(c) by revising table entries 3913.01 and 391320 to read as follows:
Sec. 52.570 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
EPA Approved Georgia Regulations State citation Title/subject State effective date EPA approval date Comments 39131.01........................... Definitions............ 7/8/99 4/19/02 * * * * * * * 391320.............................. Enhanced Inspection and 7/8/99 4/19/02 Maintenance.
* * * * * * * [FR Doc. 029490 Filed 41802; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 656050P
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
Scott Martin 404-562-9036. Email: email@example.com.