Browse: Departments Dates Agencies
RIN ID: RIN 2115-AA97
CGD ID: [CGD13-02-008]
SUBJECT CATEGORY: Safety Zone; Seafair Blue Angels Performance, Lake Washington, WA
DOCUMENT SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone on the waters of Lake Washington, Seattle, Washington. The Coast Guard is taking this action to safeguard the participants and spectators from the safety hazards associated with the Seafair Blue Angels Performance. Entry into this zone is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the Port, Puget Sound or his designated representatives.
SUMMARY: Lake Washington, WA; safety zone,
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) has not been published for this rule and good cause exists for making it effective without publication of an NPRM in the Federal Register. The air show poses several dangers to the public including excessive noise and objects falling from any accidents. Accordingly, prompt regulatory action is needed in order to provide for the safety of spectators and participants during the event. If normal notice and comment procedures were followed, this rule would not become effective until after the date of the event. Temporary rules of similar size and duration have been in place for the past several years and have not generated significant controversy.
The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone on the
waters of Lake Washington, Seattle, Washington, for the Seafair Blue
Angels Performance. The Coast Guard has determined it is necessary to
close the area in the vicinity of the air show in order to minimize the
dangers that lowflying aircraft present to persons and vessels. These
dangers include, but are not limited to excessive noise and the risk of
falling objects from any accidents associated with low flying aircraft.
In the event that aircraft require emergency assistance, rescuers must have
[[Page 45906]]
immediate and unencumbered access to the craft. The Coast Guard,
through this action, intends to promote the safety of personnel,
vessels, and facilities in the area. Entry into this zone will be
prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the Port or his
representative. This safety zone will be enforced by Coast Guard
personnel. The Captain of the Port may be assisted by other federal, state, or local agencies.
This rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not reviewed it under that Order. It is not significant under the regulatory policies and procedures of the Department of Transportation (DOT)(44 FR 11040, February 26, 1979). We expect the economic impact of this rule to be so minimal that a full Regulatory Evaluation under paragraph 10(e) of the regulatory policies and procedures of DOT is unnecessary. This expectation is based on the fact that the regulated area established by the regulation would encompass an area near the middle of Lake Washington, not frequented by commercial navigation. The rule is established for the benefit and safety of the recreational boating public, and any negative recreational boating impact is offset by the benefits of allowing the Blue Angels to fly. For the above reasons, the Coast Guard does not anticipate any significant economic impact.
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601612), the Coast Guard considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. ``Small entities'' include small businesses, notforprofit organizations that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000. This rule will affect the following entities, some of which may be small entities: the owners or operators of vessels intending to transit this portion of Lake Washington during the time this rule is in effect. The zone will not have a significant economic impact due to its short duration and small area. The only vessels likely to be impacted will be recreational boaters and small passenger vessel operators. The event is held for the benefit and entertainment of those above categories. Because the impacts of this rule are expected to be so minimal, the Coast Guard certifies under 605(b) of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) that this final rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what degree this rule would economically affect it.
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (Public Law 104121), we want to assist small entities in understanding this rule so that they can better evaluate its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking. If the rule would affect your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please contact the person listed in the (FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT) section.
This rule would call for no new collection of information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 35013520).
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13132, Federalism, and have determined that this rule does not have implications for federalism under that Order.
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 15311538) governs the issuance of Federal regulations that require unfunded mandates. An unfunded mandate is a regulation that requires a State, local, or tribal government or the private sector to incur direct costs without the Federal Government's having first provided the funds to pay those costs. This rule would not impose an unfunded mandate. Taking of Private Property
This rule would not effect a taking of private property or otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property Rights.
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not concern an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian tribal governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the federal government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the federal government and Indian tribes.
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant energy action'' under that Order because it is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use of energy. It has not been designated by the Administrator of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs as a significant energy action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects under Executive Order 13211.
We considered the environmental impact of this rule and concluded that, under figure 21, paragraph(34)(g) of Commandant Instruction M16475.lC, this rule is categorically excluded from further environmental documentation. A ``Categorical Exclusion'' is provided for temporary safety zones of less than one week in duration. This rule establishes a temporary safety zone of limited duration that will be within the oneweek timeframe.
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons set out in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.051(g), 6.041, 6.046 and 160.5; 49 CFR 1.46.
2. From 8:30 a.m. on August 1 until 3 p.m. on August 4, 2002, a temporary Sec. 165.T13005 is added to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T13005 Safety Zone; Seafair Blue Angels Performance, Seattle, WA.
(a) Location. The following is a safety zone: All waters of Lake
Washington, Washington State, enclosed by the following points: The
northwest corner of Faben Point at 47 deg.35'34.5" N, 122 deg.15'13" W;
thence to 47 deg.35'48" N, 122 deg.15'45" W; thence to 47 deg.36'02.1"
N, 122 deg.15'50.2" W; thence to 47 deg.35'56.6" N, 122 deg.16'29.2" W;
thence to 47 deg.35'42" N, 122 deg.16'24" W; thence to the east side of
the entrance to the west highrise of the Interstate 90 bridge; thence
easterly along the south side of the bridge to a point 1130 yards east
of the western terminus of the bridge; thence southerly to a point in
Andrews Bay at 47 deg.33'06" N, 122 deg.15'32" W; thence northeast
along the shoreline of Bailey Peninsula to its northeast point at
47 deg.33'44" N, 122 deg.15'04" W; thence easterly along the eastwest
line drawn tangent to Bailey Peninsula; thence northerly along the
shore of Mercer Island to the point of origin.[Datum: NAD 1983]
(b) Regulations. In accordance with the general regulations in
Sec. 165.23 of this part, no person or vessel may enter or remain in
the zone except for participants in the event, supporting personnel,
vessels registered with the event organizer, or other vessels authorized by the Captain of the Port or his designated
representatives.
(c) Enforcement period. This section will be enforced from 8:30 a.m. until 3 p.m. (PDT) on August 1, 2, 3 and 4, 2002.
Dated: June 12, 2002.
M.R. Moore,
Captain, Coast Guard, Captain of the Port, Puget Sound.
[FR Doc. 0217473 Filed 71002; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 491015U
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT LT Alisa Praskovich, c/o Captain of the Port Puget Sound, at (206) 2176231.
14 CFR Part 39 40 CFR Part 52 14 CFR Part 71 33 CFR Part 165 50 CFR Part 679 26 CFR Part 1 40 CFR Part 180 47 CFR Part 73 50 CFR Part 17 33 CFR Part 117 44 CFR Part 67 50 CFR Part 648 14 CFR Part 97 33 CFR Part 100 40 CFR Part 63 50 CFR Part 622 26 CFR Part 301 39 CFR Part 111 40 CFR Part 300 50 CFR Part 660 44 CFR Part 65 40 CFR Parts 52 and 81 40 CFR Part 271 47 CFR Part 64 50 CFR Part 665 47 CFR Part 76 50 CFR Part 229 14 CFR Part 23 14 CFR Part 25 21 CFR Part 522