Federal Register: October 30, 2002 (Volume 67, Number 210)
DOCID: FR Doc 02-27558
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration
NOTICE: NOTICES
ACTION: Agency information collection activities:
SUBJECT CATEGORY:
Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request
DOCUMENT SUMMARY:
Periodically, the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) will publish a summary of information collection requests under OMB review, in compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35). To request a copy of these documents, call the SAMHSA Reports Clearance Officer on (301) 4437978.
National Evaluation of the Comprehensive Community Mental Health Services for Children and Their Families Program, Phase Two(OMB No. 09300192, Revision)SAMHSA's Center for Mental Health Services (CMHS) is conducting Phase II of this national evaluation project. Phase II collects data on child mental health outcomes, family life, and service system development and performance. Child and family outcomes of interest include the following: child symptomatology and functioning, family functioning and material resources, and caregiver strain. Delivery system variables of interest include the following: system of care development, adherence to system of care principles, coordination and linkages among agencies, and congruence between services planned versus those received.
To address the research questions in the national evaluation, a longitudinal quasiexperimental design is being used that includes data collection in all grantee sites and comparison sites (where services are delivered in a more traditional manner). This multilevel evaluation is comprised of several major components. Data collection methods include interviews with caregivers and youth, site visits, case record reviews, service diaries, and provider surveys.
Data collection for this evaluation will be conducted over a six year period. The length of time that families will participate in the study ranges from 18 to 36 months depending on when they enter the evaluation. The average annual respondent burden is estimated below; this represents an annual average burden reduction of 6,237 hours from the level currently approved by the Office of Management and Budget.
This revision to the currently approved data collection activities
involves: (1) Reducing the number of sites where data collection will
occur from 27 to 25, (2) extending the time frame for data collection
by an additional 18 months, (3) adding a treatment effectiveness study
in two sites including assessment of outcomes, treatment fidelity, and
interaction of the treatment with the larger system of care, (4) adding
a survey of clinicians/practitioners on their use of evidencebased
treatments, and (5) adding a study of how systems of care are sustained after program funding ends.
Average
number of Total Annual
Instrument Respondent Number of total Hours per burden burden
respondents responses/ response hours hours
respondent Systemlevel Assessment:
Interview Guides and Data Collection Key site informants..................... 1 325 2 5 1.000 1,625 250 FormsRound One Sites.
Interview Guides and Data Collection Key site informants..................... 1 350 2 4 1.000 1,400 215 FormsRound Two Sites.
Services and Costs Study:
No respondent burden is associated with na...................................... na na na na na this study.
Crosssectional Descriptive Study:
Descriptive Interview Questionnaire (DIQ) Caregiver............................... 3 5,550 4 6 0.166 5,528 850 Child and Family Outcome Study:
[[Page 66164]]
Restrictiveness of Living Environment and Caregiver............................... 5,550 6 0.083 2,764 425 Placement Stability Scale (ROLES).
Child and Adolescent Functional Caregiver............................... 5550 6 0.333 11,089 1,706 Assessment Scale (CAFAS)subscales or
Preschool and Early Childhood Functional
Assessment Scale (PECFAS).
Education Questionnaire (EQ)formerly Caregiver............................... 5,550 6 0.166 5,528 850 one of the CAFAS subscales.
Behavioral and Emotional Rating Scale Caregiver............................... 5,550 6 0.166 5,528 850 (BERS).
Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) or CBCL Caregiver............................... 5,550 6 0.333 11,089 1,706 Ages 23.
Family Assessment Device (FAD)........... Caregiver............................... 5,550 6 0.166 5,528 850
Family Resource Scale (FRS).............. Caregiver............................... 5,550 6 0.166 5,528 850
Caregiver Strain Questionnaire (CGSQ).... Caregiver............................... 5,550 6 0.166 5,528 850
Delinquency Survey (formerly one of CAFAS Youth................................... 5 3,330 6 0.083 1,658 255 subscales).
Substance Abuse Survey A and B (formerly Youth................................... 3,330 6 0.166 3,317 510 one of CAFAS subscales).
Youth SelfReport (YSR).................. Youth................................... 3,330 6 0.333 6,653 1,024
Family Assessment Device (FAD)........... Youth................................... 3,330 6 0.166 3,317 510 Interventionlevel Assessment:
Family Satisfaction Questionnaire Caregiver............................... 5,550 6 4 0.116 2,575 396 Abbreviated (FSQA).
Multisector Service Contacts (MSSC)..... Caregiver............................... 5,550 4 0.250 5,550 854
Service Experience Questionnaire (SEQ)... Caregiver............................... 7 1,012 4 0.333 1,348 207
Experience with Service System Caregiver............................... 1,012 4 0.250 1,012 156 Questionnaire (ESSQ).
Service and Support Diary and Interview.. Caregiver............................... 8 200 9 9 0.500 900 138
Youth Satisfaction Questionnaire Youth................................... 3,330 4 0.083 1,106 170 Abbreviated (YSQA).
Service Experience Questionnaire (SEQ)... Youth................................... 607 4 0.250 607 93
Provider Service Log and Interview....... Provider................................ 10 200 9 0.500 900 138
Provider Attitudes and Practices Survey Provider................................ 11 480 12 2 0.166 159 25 (PAPS).
Treatment Effectiveness Study:
Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Caregiver............................... 13 300 1 0.500 150 23 Children.
DSMIV Structured Interview for Caregiver............................... 300 14 4 0.166 199 31 Disruptive Behavior Disorders.
Eyberg Child Behavior Inventory (ECBI)... Caregiver............................... 200 4 0.166 133 20
Dyadic ParentChild Ineteraction Coding Caregiver............................... 200 15 2 0.250 100 15 System II (DPICSII).
Dyadic ParentChild Interaction Coding Child................................... 200 15 2 0.250 100 15 System II (DPICSII).
SutterEyberg Student Behavior Inventory Teacher................................. 200 4 0.166 133 20 Revised (SESBIR).
PCIT Caregiver Integrity Checklist... Caregiver............................... 100 12 0.050 60 9
PCIT Therapist Integrity Checklist... Clinician............................... 100 12 0.050 60 9
Caregiver Session Review Form............ Caregiver............................... 200 12 0.033 79 12
Therapist Session Review Form............ Clinician............................... 200 12 0.033 79 12
Therapy Procedures Checklist (TPC)....... Caregiver............................... 200 1 0.083 17 3
Therapy Procedures Checklist (TPC)....... Clinician............................... 200 1 0.166 33 5
System of Care Practice Review (SOCPR)... Caregiver............................... 60 1 1.000 60 9
System of Care Practice Review (SOCPR)... Child................................... 60 1 0.750 45 7
System of Care Practice Review (SOCPR)... Clinician............................... 60 1 1.000 60 9
System of Care Practice Review (SOCPR)... Informal Helper......................... 60 1 0.250 15 2 Evidencebased Treatment Survey:
Evidencebased Treatment Survey.......... Clinicians.............................. 1,000 1 0.250 250 38 Sustainability Survey:
Sustainability Survey (Web survey)....... Local Site Informants................... 16 204 1 0.750 153 23
Sustainability telephone followup Local site and Statelevel Informants... 17 153 1 1.000 153 24 interview.
Total................................ ........................................ ........... ........... ........... 92,116 14,164
1 An average of 25 stakeholders per grantee site. Round One has 11 grantee sites (some grantees have multiple service sites that are assessed) and two
comparison sites. Round Two has 14 grantee sites (no multiple sites) and no comparison sites. These stakeholders will include site administrative
staff, providers, agency representatives, and family representatives.
2 Round One sites participate in system assessment site visits annually. Round Two sites are assessed every 18 months. [[Page 66165]]
3 Number of respondents across 23 grantees and 2 comparison sites. Average based on a 5 percent attrition rate at each data collection point. These data
are collected as part of the grantees' routine intake processes. Hence, burden is calculated only for the subset of the Crosssectional Descriptive
Study sample that also participates in the Child and Family Outcome Study.
4 Average number of responses per respondent based on 7 data collection points for children recruited in year 2, 6 for children recruited in year 3, and 4 for children recruited in year 5 (of grantee funding).
5 Based on Phase I finding that approximately 60 percent of the children in the evaluation were 11 years old or older.
6 Based on an average length of time in services of 18 months, respondents will complete satisfaction and service measures at intake, 6month, 12month, and 18month data collection points.
7 Includes respondents in 2 grantee and 2 comparison sites.
8 Based on 50 families each from 2 grantee and 2 comparison sites.
9 Data collection will occur once at baseline and then biweekly for 16 weeks.
10 Providers of 50 families each from 2 grantee and 2 comparison sites.
11 An estimated 120 providers each from 2 grantee and 2 comparison sites will complete the survey.
12 Data collection will be conducted in years 5 and 6 (of grantee funding).
13 Assumes that onethird of children screened will not meet criteria.
14 Caregivers will complete at intake, 3month, 6month, and 9month data collection points.
15 Fifteen minute observation of caregiverchild interaction while engaged in 3 five minute tasks at intake and at 3 months (pre and posttreatment).
16 Includes four site level respondents (i.e., current or former project director, key mental health representative, family representative, agency representative) at 51 Phase I and Phase II sites.
17 Includes two sitelevel and one statelevel respondent for all 51 sites included in the sustainability survey from Phase I and Phase II.
Written comments and recommendations concerning the proposed
information collection should be sent within 30 days of this notice to:
Allison Herron Eydt, Human Resources and Housing Branch, Office of
Management and Budget, New Executive Office Building, Room 10235, Washington, DC 20503.
Dated: October 23, 2002.
Richard Kopanda,
Executive Officer, SAMHSA.
[FR Doc. 0227558 Filed 102902; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 416220P
SUMMARY:
Submission for OMB review; comment request,
DOCUMENT BODY 2:
Periodically, the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) will publish a summary of information collection requests under OMB review, in compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35). To request a copy of these documents, call the SAMHSA Reports Clearance Officer on (301) 4437978.
National Evaluation of the Comprehensive Community Mental Health Services for Children and Their Families Program, Phase Two(OMB No. 09300192, Revision)SAMHSA's Center for Mental Health Services (CMHS) is conducting Phase II of this national evaluation project. Phase II collects data on child mental health outcomes, family life, and service system development and performance. Child and family outcomes of interest include the following: child symptomatology and functioning, family functioning and material resources, and caregiver strain. Delivery system variables of interest include the following: system of care development, adherence to system of care principles, coordination and linkages among agencies, and congruence between services planned versus those received.
To address the research questions in the national evaluation, a longitudinal quasiexperimental design is being used that includes data collection in all grantee sites and comparison sites (where services are delivered in a more traditional manner). This multilevel evaluation is comprised of several major components. Data collection methods include interviews with caregivers and youth, site visits, case record reviews, service diaries, and provider surveys.
Data collection for this evaluation will be conducted over a six year period. The length of time that families will participate in the study ranges from 18 to 36 months depending on when they enter the evaluation. The average annual respondent burden is estimated below; this represents an annual average burden reduction of 6,237 hours from the level currently approved by the Office of Management and Budget.
This revision to the currently approved data collection activities
involves: (1) Reducing the number of sites where data collection will
occur from 27 to 25, (2) extending the time frame for data collection
by an additional 18 months, (3) adding a treatment effectiveness study
in two sites including assessment of outcomes, treatment fidelity, and
interaction of the treatment with the larger system of care, (4) adding
a survey of clinicians/practitioners on their use of evidencebased
treatments, and (5) adding a study of how systems of care are sustained after program funding ends.
Average
number of Total Annual
Instrument Respondent Number of total Hours per burden burden
respondents responses/ response hours hours
respondent Systemlevel Assessment:
Interview Guides and Data Collection Key site informants..................... 1 325 2 5 1.000 1,625 250 FormsRound One Sites.
Interview Guides and Data Collection Key site informants..................... 1 350 2 4 1.000 1,400 215 FormsRound Two Sites.
Services and Costs Study:
No respondent burden is associated with na...................................... na na na na na this study.
Crosssectional Descriptive Study:
Descriptive Interview Questionnaire (DIQ) Caregiver............................... 3 5,550 4 6 0.166 5,528 850 Child and Family Outcome Study:
[[Page 66164]]
Restrictiveness of Living Environment and Caregiver............................... 5,550 6 0.083 2,764 425 Placement Stability Scale (ROLES).
Child and Adolescent Functional Caregiver............................... 5550 6 0.333 11,089 1,706 Assessment Scale (CAFAS)subscales or
Preschool and Early Childhood Functional
Assessment Scale (PECFAS).
Education Questionnaire (EQ)formerly Caregiver............................... 5,550 6 0.166 5,528 850 one of the CAFAS subscales.
Behavioral and Emotional Rating Scale Caregiver............................... 5,550 6 0.166 5,528 850 (BERS).
Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) or CBCL Caregiver............................... 5,550 6 0.333 11,089 1,706 Ages 23.
Family Assessment Device (FAD)........... Caregiver............................... 5,550 6 0.166 5,528 850
Family Resource Scale (FRS).............. Caregiver............................... 5,550 6 0.166 5,528 850
Caregiver Strain Questionnaire (CGSQ).... Caregiver............................... 5,550 6 0.166 5,528 850
Delinquency Survey (formerly one of CAFAS Youth................................... 5 3,330 6 0.083 1,658 255 subscales).
Substance Abuse Survey A and B (formerly Youth................................... 3,330 6 0.166 3,317 510 one of CAFAS subscales).
Youth SelfReport (YSR).................. Youth................................... 3,330 6 0.333 6,653 1,024
Family Assessment Device (FAD)........... Youth................................... 3,330 6 0.166 3,317 510 Interventionlevel Assessment:
Family Satisfaction Questionnaire Caregiver............................... 5,550 6 4 0.116 2,575 396 Abbreviated (FSQA).
Multisector Service Contacts (MSSC)..... Caregiver............................... 5,550 4 0.250 5,550 854
Service Experience Questionnaire (SEQ)... Caregiver............................... 7 1,012 4 0.333 1,348 207
Experience with Service System Caregiver............................... 1,012 4 0.250 1,012 156 Questionnaire (ESSQ).
Service and Support Diary and Interview.. Caregiver............................... 8 200 9 9 0.500 900 138
Youth Satisfaction Questionnaire Youth................................... 3,330 4 0.083 1,106 170 Abbreviated (YSQA).
Service Experience Questionnaire (SEQ)... Youth................................... 607 4 0.250 607 93
Provider Service Log and Interview....... Provider................................ 10 200 9 0.500 900 138
Provider Attitudes and Practices Survey Provider................................ 11 480 12 2 0.166 159 25 (PAPS).
Treatment Effectiveness Study:
Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Caregiver............................... 13 300 1 0.500 150 23 Children.
DSMIV Structured Interview for Caregiver............................... 300 14 4 0.166 199 31 Disruptive Behavior Disorders.
Eyberg Child Behavior Inventory (ECBI)... Caregiver............................... 200 4 0.166 133 20
Dyadic ParentChild Ineteraction Coding Caregiver............................... 200 15 2 0.250 100 15 System II (DPICSII).
Dyadic ParentChild Interaction Coding Child................................... 200 15 2 0.250 100 15 System II (DPICSII).
SutterEyberg Student Behavior Inventory Teacher................................. 200 4 0.166 133 20 Revised (SESBIR).
PCIT Caregiver Integrity Checklist... Caregiver............................... 100 12 0.050 60 9
PCIT Therapist Integrity Checklist... Clinician............................... 100 12 0.050 60 9
Caregiver Session Review Form............ Caregiver............................... 200 12 0.033 79 12
Therapist Session Review Form............ Clinician............................... 200 12 0.033 79 12
Therapy Procedures Checklist (TPC)....... Caregiver............................... 200 1 0.083 17 3
Therapy Procedures Checklist (TPC)....... Clinician............................... 200 1 0.166 33 5
System of Care Practice Review (SOCPR)... Caregiver............................... 60 1 1.000 60 9
System of Care Practice Review (SOCPR)... Child................................... 60 1 0.750 45 7
System of Care Practice Review (SOCPR)... Clinician............................... 60 1 1.000 60 9
System of Care Practice Review (SOCPR)... Informal Helper......................... 60 1 0.250 15 2 Evidencebased Treatment Survey:
Evidencebased Treatment Survey.......... Clinicians.............................. 1,000 1 0.250 250 38 Sustainability Survey:
Sustainability Survey (Web survey)....... Local Site Informants................... 16 204 1 0.750 153 23
Sustainability telephone followup Local site and Statelevel Informants... 17 153 1 1.000 153 24 interview.
Total................................ ........................................ ........... ........... ........... 92,116 14,164
1 An average of 25 stakeholders per grantee site. Round One has 11 grantee sites (some grantees have multiple service sites that are assessed) and two
comparison sites. Round Two has 14 grantee sites (no multiple sites) and no comparison sites. These stakeholders will include site administrative
staff, providers, agency representatives, and family representatives.
2 Round One sites participate in system assessment site visits annually. Round Two sites are assessed every 18 months. [[Page 66165]]
3 Number of respondents across 23 grantees and 2 comparison sites. Average based on a 5 percent attrition rate at each data collection point. These data
are collected as part of the grantees' routine intake processes. Hence, burden is calculated only for the subset of the Crosssectional Descriptive
Study sample that also participates in the Child and Family Outcome Study.
4 Average number of responses per respondent based on 7 data collection points for children recruited in year 2, 6 for children recruited in year 3, and 4 for children recruited in year 5 (of grantee funding).
5 Based on Phase I finding that approximately 60 percent of the children in the evaluation were 11 years old or older.
6 Based on an average length of time in services of 18 months, respondents will complete satisfaction and service measures at intake, 6month, 12month, and 18month data collection points.
7 Includes respondents in 2 grantee and 2 comparison sites.
8 Based on 50 families each from 2 grantee and 2 comparison sites.
9 Data collection will occur once at baseline and then biweekly for 16 weeks.
10 Providers of 50 families each from 2 grantee and 2 comparison sites.
11 An estimated 120 providers each from 2 grantee and 2 comparison sites will complete the survey.
12 Data collection will be conducted in years 5 and 6 (of grantee funding).
13 Assumes that onethird of children screened will not meet criteria.
14 Caregivers will complete at intake, 3month, 6month, and 9month data collection points.
15 Fifteen minute observation of caregiverchild interaction while engaged in 3 five minute tasks at intake and at 3 months (pre and posttreatment).
16 Includes four site level respondents (i.e., current or former project director, key mental health representative, family representative, agency representative) at 51 Phase I and Phase II sites.
17 Includes two sitelevel and one statelevel respondent for all 51 sites included in the sustainability survey from Phase I and Phase II.
Written comments and recommendations concerning the proposed
information collection should be sent within 30 days of this notice to:
Allison Herron Eydt, Human Resources and Housing Branch, Office of
Management and Budget, New Executive Office Building, Room 10235, Washington, DC 20503.
Dated: October 23, 2002.
Richard Kopanda,
Executive Officer, SAMHSA.
[FR Doc. 0227558 Filed 102902; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 416220P