Browse: Departments Dates Agencies
SUBJECT CATEGORY: Office of Science Financial Assistance Program Notice 03-15; Ocean Carbon Sequestration Research Program
DOCUMENT SUMMARY: The Office of Biological and Environmental Research (OBER) of the Office of Science (SC), U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), hereby announces its interest in receiving applications for research on Carbon Sequestration in the Oceans.
SUMMARY: Ocean Carbon Sequestration Research Program,
Any viable system for sequestering carbon must have several key characteristics. It must be effective and costcompetitive with alternative means, such as renewable energy. Unintended environmental consequences must be benign compared to alternative solutions, including no action. A carbon sequestration system must be able to be monitored quantitatively and verified, because contributions to carbon sequestration almost certainly need to be measured. Research sponsored by this program could contribute to any of these goals.
This solicitation invites applications for basic research projects on the purposeful enhancement of carbon sequestration in the oceans. Although many options exist to capture and sequester carbon dioxide, the focus of this solicitation is on fundamental research that would enable: (a) the enhancement of the absorption and retention of atmospheric carbon dioxide by ocean biota; and (b) scientificallybased analyses of the viability of using the deep ocean to store carbon dioxide that has been already separated, captured, and transported. The proposed research should be fundamental in nature, and address one or more of the technical areas of interest described below. Applications that test demonstrations of engineered technologies are not relevant to this solicitation.
The ocean represents a large current sink for the sequestration of
anthropogenic CO
Much has been learned about the important role of iron in
photosynthesis over the past 15 years through both laboratory and field
experiments on iron enrichment. Iron deficiency has been shown to limit
the efficiency of photosystem II in phytoplankton. Evidence from
paleoceanographic samples also links iron supply with marine primary
production and carbon flux. However, critical questions remain: How
does iron enrichment accelerate carbon flux in high nutrient, low
chlorophyll (HNLC), low nutrient, low chlorophyll (LNLC), submixed layer and coastal ecosystems? What are the time scales of
remineralization of the fixed carbon? What are the long term ecological
and biogeochemical consequences of fertilization on surface and
midwater processes? Basic research is needed on the coupling of iron and carbon cycles in the ocean. Our understanding of the
biogeochemistry of iron (its concentrations, sources, sinks and
ligands) in marine systems is also insufficient to assess the viability
of using iron fertilization as a strategy for enhancing carbon sequestration.
The accurate measure of carbon flux following iron fertilization is critical to the objective evaluation of this strategy for carbon sequestration. We need to understand the regulation of carbon fluxes and the role of mineral ballast in export of organic carbon from the surface to the deep ocean. The potential impact of iron fertilization on the global carbon budget, as well as verification and duration of carbon sequestration are yet unknown. The complexity of marine ecosystems necessitates careful research on unintended environmental consequences of iron fertilization. These consequences may include the potential to impact key oceanic biogeochemical cycles as well as on populations of marine organisms and their trophodynamic interactions.
Research may focus on experimental/observational studies and/or predictive modeling. Integrative studies that couple experimental observations and numerical modeling approaches are encouraged. Such studies should develop, improve, and test models that can be used to simulate and predict quantities of carbon sequestered from iron fertilization. Relevant focus areas for enhancement of the biological pump through iron fertilization may include:
1. Improving the effectiveness of ocean fertilization as a strategy for long term (decades, centuries) carbon sequestration.
[sbull] Determining to what extent increased carbon fixation in
surface waters would result in an increase in carbon sequestered in the
deep ocean, and how long it would remain sequestered. This includes
quantifying the export of particulate organic carbon and particulate
inorganic carbon to the deep sea, and mineralization or dissolution of all forms at depth.
[sbull] Understanding the role of micronutrients (such as iron) and
macronutrients (such as nitrogen and phosphorus) in regulation of the
biological pump. Research on coupling of iron and carbon cycles might
include studies of photooxidation, complexation adsorption/desorption, export and mineralization.
[sbull] Developing numerical models (regional or global) for carbon
sequestration, especially those that provide a measurable output that
allows for model testing. Models might be used to predict the
efficiency of sequestration as a function of mid and deep water transport of carbon and remineralization.
2. Determining environmental consequences of long term ocean fertilization.
[sbull] Examining changes in structure and functioning of marine
ecosystems (composition of phytoplankton and zooplankton communities, ocean food webs and trophodynamics), resulting from ocean
fertilization.
[sbull] Examining changes in natural oceanic biogeochemical cycles (carbon,
[[Page 72659]]
nitrogen, phosphorus, and silicon) resulting from iron fertilization.
[sbull] Developing numerical models at an ecosystem level that
predict downstream effects of fertilization on productivity and nutrient removal.
Research proposed on iron fertilization should also support the
USGCRP Carbon Cycle Science Initiative (http://www.gcrio.org/OnLnDoc/pdf/carb_cycle_toc.html ). In particular, the proposed research should
provide the scientific foundation for assessing both the viability of
using iron fertilization to enhance sequestration and storage of carbon
dioxide and/or the potential for unintended effects of this carbon sequestration strategy.
The overarching questions for this area of research are: Can direct
CO
Research may focus on experimental/observational studies and/or predictive modeling. Integrative studies that couple both experimental and numerical modeling are encouraged, especially those incorporate feedback between experiments and models. Such projects should involve experimental studies to test and improve models, and modeling studies to help identify and design experiments needed to fill key gaps in our understanding. Examples of relevant research areas for direct injection of carbon dioxide into the deep ocean include:
1. Determining the environmental consequences of direct injection
of CO
[sbull] Understanding the effects of sustained release of
concentrated CO
[sbull] Effects of secondary of contaminants on plume and/or
hydrate physical/chemical properties, and related effects on indigenous fauna.
2. Improving the effectiveness of direct injection of CO
[sbull] Understanding the longerterm fate of carbon that is added
to the ocean including the carbonate chemistry of mid and deepocean water.
[sbull] Investigation of physicochemical behavior of a dense phase
hydrate stream. Research might focus on such characteristics as
determination of hydrate dissolution rates for a concentrated swarm,
and calculation of plume dispersion and perturbation to state variables at depth.
[sbull] Addressing weaknesses in aspects of the Ocean General
Circulation Models (OGCMs), specifically their ability to simulate
accurately western boundary currents, ocean bottom currents, plume to
eddy circulation; and testing models using natural or experimental tracers.
[sbull] Coupling nearfield with farfield effects of
CO
Applicants are encouraged to collaborate with researchers in other institutions, such as: universities, industry, nonprofit
organizations, federal laboratories and Federally Funded Research and
Development Centers (FFRDCs), including the DOE National Laboratories,
where appropriate, and to include cost sharing and/or consortia
wherever feasible. Additional information on collaboration is available
in the Application Guide for the Office of Science Financial Assistance
Program that is available via the Internet at: http://www.sc.doe.gov/production/grants/Colab.html .
It is anticipated that up to $1,500,000 (per year) will be available for awards in this area during Fiscal Year 2003, contingent upon availability of appropriated funds. An additional $1,000,000 will be available for competition by DOE National Laboratories under a separate solicitation (LAB 0315). Projects involving single investigators or small groups of investigators may be funded at a level up to $300,000 per year for up to 3 years. Integrative studies, multi investigator studies that combine experimental/observational approaches with numerical modeling may be funded at a level of up to $400,000 per year for 3 years. Applications for field experiments involving larger groups of investigators will be considered, but must be approved at a preapplication level. Multiple year funding of awards is expected, and is also contingent upon availability of funds, progress of the research, and continuing program need.
An informal preapplication may be submitted by Email. The preapplication should identify the institution, Principal Investigator name, address, telephone, fax and Email address, title of the project, and proposed collaborators. The preapplication should consist of a one to two page narrative describing the research project objectives and methods of accomplishment. These will be reviewed relative to the scope and research needs of the Ocean Carbon Sequestration Research Program. Preapplications are strongly encouraged prior to submission of a full application, especially for large, fieldbased collaborations. Notification of a successful preapplication is not an indication that an award will be made in response to the formal application. Formal Applications
Applications will be subjected to scientific merit review (peer
review) and will be evaluated against the following evaluation criteria
listed in descending order of importance as codified at 10 CFR 605.10(d):
1. Scientific and/or Technical Merit of the Project;
2. Appropriateness of the Proposed Method or Approach;
3. Competency of Applicant's Personnel and Adequacy of Proposed Resources;
4. Reasonableness and Appropriateness of the Proposed Budget.
For renewals, progress on previous DOEfunded research will be an
important criterion for evaluation. The evaluation will include program policy
[[Page 72660]]
factors such as the relevance of the proposed research to the terms of
the announcement, the agency's programmatic needs, and the uniqueness
of approach. Note, external peer reviewers are selected with regard to
both their scientific expertise and the absence of conflictofinterest
issues. Both nonfederal and federal reviewers may be used, and
submission of an application constitutes agreement that this is
acceptable to the investigator(s) and the submitting institution.
Information about the development and submission of applications,
eligibility, limitations, evaluation, selection process, and other
policies and procedures may be found in 10 CFR part 605, and in the
Application Guide for the Office of Science Financial Assistance
Program. Electronic access to the Guide and required forms is made
available via the World Wide Web at: http://www.sc.doe.gov/production/grants/grants.html. DOE is under no obligation to pay for any costs
associated with the preparation or submission of applications if an award is not made.
The research project description must be 20 pages or less,
exclusive of attachments and must contain an abstract or summary of the
proposed research. Applicants who have had prior Ocean Carbon
Sequestration Research Program support must include a Progress Section
with a brief description of results and a list of publications derived
from that funding. On the SC grant face page, form DOE F 4650.2, in
block 15, also provide the PI's phone number, fax number and Email
address. Attachments include curriculum vitae, a listing of all current
and pending federal support, and letters of intent when collaborations
are part of the proposed research. Curriculum vitae should be submitted
in a form similar to that of NIH or NSF (two to three pages).
The Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number for this program
is 81.049, and the solicitation control number is ERFAP 10 CFR part 605.
Issued in Washington DC on December 2, 2002.
John Rodney Clark,
Associate Director of Science for Resource Management.
[FR Doc. 0230919 Filed 12502; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 645001P
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT Dr. Anna Palmisano, SC-74, Office of
Biological and Environmental Research, Germantown Building, U.S.
Department of Energy, 1000 Independence Ave., SW., Washington, DC 205851290, telephone: (301) 9039963, Email:
anna.palmisano@science.doe.gov, fax: (301) 9038519. The full text of Program
[[Page 72658]]
Notice 0315 is available via the Internet using the following Web site
address: http://www.sc.doe.gov/production/grants/grants.html.
14 CFR Part 39 40 CFR Part 52 14 CFR Part 71 33 CFR Part 165 50 CFR Part 679 47 CFR Part 73 26 CFR Part 1 40 CFR Part 180 33 CFR Part 117 50 CFR Part 17 44 CFR Part 67 50 CFR Part 648 14 CFR Part 97 40 CFR Part 63 33 CFR Part 100 50 CFR Part 622 50 CFR Part 660 26 CFR Part 301 44 CFR Part 65 39 CFR Part 111 40 CFR Part 300 6 CFR Part 5 40 CFR Part 271 47 CFR Part 64 40 CFR Parts 52 and 81 50 CFR Part 665 10 CFR Part 50 44 CFR Part 64 49 CFR Part 571 39 CFR Part 3020