Browse: Departments Dates Agencies
Docket ID: [Docket No. 021017238-2314-02; I.D. 092602I]
RIN ID: RIN 0648-AQ31
SUBJECT CATEGORY: Fisheries of the Northeastern United States; 2003 Fishing Quotas for Atlantic Surfclams, Ocean Quahogs, and Maine Mahogany Ocean Quahogs
DOCUMENT SUMMARY: NMFS issues final quotas for the Atlantic surfclam, ocean quahog, and Maine mahogany ocean quahog fisheries for 2003. These regulations specify allowable harvest levels of Atlantic surfclams and ocean quahogs from the exclusive economic zone and an allowable harvest level of Maine mahogany ocean quahogs from the waters north of 43[deg] 50' N. lat. in 2003.
SUMMARY: Northeastern United States fisheries—; Atlantic surfclams, ocean quahogs, and Maine mahogany ocean quahogs,
Detailed background information regarding the development of these
quotas for 2003 was provided in the preamble to the proposed rule
published in the Federal Register at 67 FR 65938, October 29, 2002, and
is not repeated here. The comment period for that rule ended on
November 27, 2002. No comments were received during the comment period,
and the final quotas for 2003, which are unchanged from those in the
proposed rule, are shown in the table below. The 2003 quotas for both
ocean quahogs and Maine mahogany quahogs are the same as the 2002
quotas. However, the 2003 surfclam quota is 4 percent higher than the 2002 quotas.
[[Page 79888]]
FINAL 2003 SURFCLAM/OCEAN QUAHOG QUOTAS
2003 final 2003 final
Fishery quotas (bu) quotas (hL)
\1\Surfclam 3,250,000 1,730,000
\1\Ocean quahog 4,500,000 2,396,000
\2\Maine mahogany quahog 100,000 35,240 \1\ 1 bushel = 1.88 cubic ft = 53.24 L
\2\ 1 bushel = 1.2445 cubic ft = 35.24 L
This final rule has been determined to be not significant for purposes of Executive Order 12866.
A delay in the effective date of this rule would cause a disruption
in the ordinary commerce of the surfclam and ocean quahog fisheries.
Each individual transferable quota shareholder receives a portion of
the overall quota for these two species. An allocation holder receives
an amount of cage tags equivalent to his/her share of the overall
quota. Fishing for surfclams and ocean quahogs begins on January 1,
regardless of the publication of the annual quota. Historically,
allocations have been transferred either permanently or temporarily to
meet changing economic circumstances in the fishery right from the
commencement of these fisheries. For example, vessel owners who enter
into a supply contract with a processor may experience vessel
breakdowns that thwart performance of their contractual obligations. In
this situation, the vessel owner must be able to request that NMFS
transfer temporarily part of his/her allocation to another harvester
who is willing to fulfill the terms of the supply contract. Further,
allocation holders, at times, pledge their allocation as security for a
loan. This entails the permanent transfer of the individual allocation
to the lending institution for the pendency of the loan. Without an
effective quota, NMFS cannot make a partial or full transfer of such an
allocation effective, either permanently or temporarily. This inability
on the part of NMFS to make such transfers effective would have a
negative economic impact on the surfclam and ocean quahog fisheries.
Therefore, there is good cause under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3) to waive a portion of the 30day delayed effectiveness period for the
implementation of the 2003 surfclam, ocean quahog, and Maine mahogany quahog quotas.
NMFS and the Council prepared an FRFA for this action, which is available from the Council (see ADDRESSES) as required by section 604 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA). The preamble to the proposed rule and specifications included a detailed summary of the analysis contained in the initial regulatory flexibility analysis (IRFA), which is not repeated here. A summary of the FRFA, focusing upon the impacts of the final measures, follows:
A description of the reasons why this action is being taken by the Agency and the objectives of this final rule are explained in the preambles of the proposed rule and this final rule. This action does not contain any collectionofinformation, reporting, or recordkeeping requirements. It does not duplicate, overlap, or conflict with any other Federal rules. This action is taken under the authority of the MagnusonStevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (Magnuson Stevens Act) and regulations at 50 CFR part 648. There are no new compliance costs associated with this final rule.
There were no public comments received in response to the IRFA's analysis of the expected impacts of the proposed regulations on small entities.
These specifications establish a 4percent increase in the surfclam quota and continue the ocean quahog and Maine mahogany quahog quota without change from the 2002 quotas. Since 2001 harvest levels of surf clams (2.855 million bu (1.520 million hL)) and ocean quahogs (3.691 million bu (1.965 million hL)) were substantially less than the 2003 quotas implemented by this action, NMFS and the Council believe that it is likely that the 2003 quotas will yield a surplus quota available to vessels participating in all these fisheries. This is especially likely to occur in the ocean quahog fishery. In the case of a surplus quota, vessels would not be constrained from harvesting additional product, thus allowing them to increase their revenues.
In 2001, a total of 51 vessels reported harvesting surfclams or ocean quahogs from Federal waters under an ITQ system. Average 2001 gross income for surfclam harvests was $753,682 per vessel, and $678,885 per vessel for ocean quahog harvests. In the small artisanal fishery for ocean quahogs in Maine, 31 vessels reported harvests in the clam logbooks, with an average value of $113,181 per vessel. All of these vessels fall within the definition of a small entity.
For ocean quahogs, the proposed 2003 quota is 4.500 million bu (2.396 million hL). The other alternatives considered included 4.000, 4.250, 4.750, and 6.000 million bu (2.129, 2.263, 2.529, and 3.195 million hL). Of these, 4.750 and 6.0 million bu. would have been less constraining on small entities than the selected alternative of 4.5 million bu. Adopting the maximum allowable quota of 6.000 million bu (3.195 million hL) for ocean quahogs would represent a 33percent increase in allowable harvest and a 63percent increase in landings from 2001, assuming all the quota were harvested. However, the industry does not have a market available to absorb such a large increase in landings and may not have the vessel capacity necessary to harvest a quota this large. Because the alternative of 4.75 million bu is so much larger than the 2001 landing amount of 3.69 million bu for ocean quahogs, the Council felt that 4.5 million bu rather than 4.75 mil bu is a high enough quota for 2003 to ensure that the fishery is not unnecessarily constrained. Therefore, the proposed quota provides ample opportunity for fishermen to gain increased revenues in the ocean quahog fishery in 2003.
For surfclams, the proposed 2003 quota is 3.250 million bu (1.730
million hL). Other alternatives analyzed included 1.850, 2.850, 3.135,
and 3.400 million bu (0.985, 1.517, 1.669, and 1.810 million hL). Of
these, only the maximum quota considered would have been less
constraining than the selected action. Adopting the maximum allowable
quota of 3.400 million bu (1.810 million hL) for surfclams would allow
for an 8percent increase in the surfclam quota. The Council did not recommend a quota increase of this
[[Page 79889]]
magnitude at this time, due to uncertainties in the stock assessment.
The preferred alternative allows for a 4percent increase, from 3.135
million bu (1.669 million hL) to 3.25 million bu (1.730 million hL).
The resource can support the 4percent increase in landings, and the
industry believes it can utilize this additional product and thus have a beneficial impact for the Nation.
The proposed quota for Maine mahogany ocean quahogs is 100,000 Maine bu (35,240 hL), the maximum allowed under the FMP. The FMP specifies that upward adjustments to the quota would require a scientific survey and stock assessment of the Maine mahogany ocean quahog resource. However, no survey or assessment has been conducted. The Council considered two alternative quotas for the Maine mahogany fishery, in addition to the preferred alternative of 100,000 bu (35,240 hL), including 50,000 bu and 72,466 bu (17,620 and 25,537 hL). Any quota the Council would have recommended below the 1999 landing level of 93,938 Maine bu (33,104 hL) would most likely have resulted in a decrease in revenues to individual vessels.
In 2001, 13 processors participated in the surfclam and ocean quahog fisheries, and 10 companies bought ocean quahogs directly from vessels from within the State of Maine. Of the 13 processors, approximately 5 are responsible for the vast majority of purchases in the exvessel market and sale of processed clam products in appropriate wholesale markets. Impacts to surfclam and ocean quahog processors would most likely mirror the impacts of the various quotas to vessels, as discussed above. Revenues earned by processors would be derived from the wholesale market for clam products and, since a large number of substitute products (i.e., other food products) are available, the demand for processed clam products is likely to be pricedependant. Allocation Holders
In 2002, there were 99 surfclam allocation holders totaled 99, while 63 firms or individuals held ocean quahog allocation. Under the 2003 quotas, (that is, no change from 2002 quotas on ocean quahogs, Maine mahogany ocean quahogs, and a slight increase of 4 percent for surfclams), it is likely that impacts to allocation holders or buyers will be minimal. Theoretically, increases in quota would most likely benefit those who purchase quota (through lower prices, or values) and affect negatively sellers of quota because of reduction in value. Decreases in quota would most likely have an opposite effect. Small Entity Compliance Guide
Section 212 of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Act of
1996 (SBREFA) states that for each rule or group of related rules for
which an agency is required to prepare a FRFA, the agency shall publish
one or more guides to assist small entities in complying with the rule,
and shall designate such publications as ``small entity compliance
guides.'' The agency shall explain the actions a small entity is
required to take to comply with a rule or group of rules. As part of
this rule making process, a letter to permit holders that also serves
as the small entity compliance guide (the guide) was prepared. Copies
of this final rule are available from the Northeast regional Office,
and the guide, that is, permit holder letter, will be sent to all
holders of permits issued for mackerel, squid, and butterfish
fisheries. The guide and this final rule will be available upon request (see ADDRESSES).
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
Dated: December 23, 2002.
William T. Hogarth,
Assistant Administrator for Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 0233033 Filed 122602; 3:49 pm]
BILLING CODE 351022S
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT Douglas W. Christel, Fishery Management Specialist, 9782819141.
14 CFR Part 39 40 CFR Part 52 14 CFR Part 71 33 CFR Part 165 26 CFR Part 1 50 CFR Part 679 40 CFR Part 180 47 CFR Part 73 33 CFR Part 117 50 CFR Part 17 44 CFR Part 67 50 CFR Part 648 14 CFR Part 97 33 CFR Part 100 40 CFR Part 63 26 CFR Part 301 50 CFR Part 622 39 CFR Part 111 40 CFR Part 300 50 CFR Part 660 44 CFR Part 65 40 CFR Parts 52 and 81 40 CFR Part 271 47 CFR Part 64 14 CFR Part 23 14 CFR Part 25 21 CFR Part 522 50 CFR Part 665 47 CFR Part 76 27 CFR Part 9