Federal Register: March 18, 2003 (Volume 68, Number 52)
DOCID: FR Doc 03-6309
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Environmental Protection Agency
CFR Citation: 40 CFR Part 52
MO ID: [MO 171-1171a; FRL-7468-1]
ACTION: Air quality implementation plans; approval and promulgation; various States:
DOCUMENT ACTION: Direct final rule.
Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; State of Missouri
DATES: This direct final rule will be effective May 19, 2003, unless EPA receives adverse comments by April 17, 2003. If adverse comments are received, EPA will publish a timely withdrawal of the direct final rule in the Federal Register informing the public that the rule will not take effect.
EPA is announcing it is approving a revision to the Missouri State Implementation Plan (SIP) which pertains to the rescission of two outdated opacity rules for the Kansas City and St. Louis areas and the revision of the statewide opacity rule. Approval of this revision will simplify the SIP, ensure consistency between the state and federally approved rules, and ensure Federal enforceability of the revised state rule.
Throughout this document whenever ``we,''
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean EPA. This section provides
additional information by addressing the following questions: What Is a SIP?
What is the Federal approval process for a SIP?
What does Federal approval of a state regulation mean to me? What is being addressed in this document?
Have the requirements for approval of a SIP revision been met? What action is EPA taking?
What Is a SIP?
Section 110 of the Clean Air Act (CAA) requires states to develop air pollution regulations and control strategies to ensure that state air quality meets the national ambient air quality standards established by EPA. These ambient standards are established under section 109 of the CAA, and they currently address six criteria pollutants. These pollutants are: carbon monoxide, nitrogen dioxide, ozone, lead, particulate matter, and sulfur dioxide.
Each state must submit these regulations and control strategies to us for approval and incorporation into the Federallyenforceable SIP.
Each Federallyapproved SIP protects air quality primarily by addressing air pollution at its point of origin. These SIPs can be extensive, containing state regulations or other enforceable documents and supporting information such as emission inventories, monitoring networks, and modeling demonstrations.
What Is the Federal Approval Process for a SIP?
In order for state regulations to be incorporated into the Federallyenforceable SIP, states must formally adopt the regulations and control strategies consistent with state and Federal requirements. This process generally includes a public notice, public hearing, public comment period, and a formal adoption by a stateauthorized rulemaking body.
Once a state rule, regulation, or control strategy is adopted, the state submits it to us for inclusion into the SIP. We must provide public notice and seek additional public comment regarding the proposed Federal action on the state submission. If adverse comments are received, they must be addressed prior to any final Federal action by us.
All state regulations and supporting information approved by EPA under section 110 of the CAA are incorporated into the Federally approved SIP. Records of such SIP actions are maintained in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) at Title 40, Part 52, entitled ``Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans.'' The actual state regulations which are approved are not reproduced in their entirety in the CFR outright but are ``incorporated by reference,'' which means that we have approved a given state regulation with a specific effective date. What Does Federal Approval of a State Regulation Mean to Me?
Enforcement of the state regulation before and after it is
incorporated into the Federallyapproved SIP is primarily a state responsibility. However, after the
regulation is Federally approved, we are authorized to take enforcement action against violators. Citizens are also offered legal recourse to address violations as described in section 304 of the CAA.
What Is Being Addressed in This Document?
In an ongoing effort to simplify and consolidate its air program rules, and SIP, the Missouri Department of Natural Resources (MDNR) adopted a statewide rule pertaining to visible air contaminants in 1999. This rule was approved in the SIP on October 26, 2000 (65 FR 64145).
With the adoption of this statewide rule, there was no longer any need to retain similar rules which applied to the Kansas City and St. Louis areas. Consequently, the MDNR has requested that rules 10 CSR 10 2.080 Emission of Visible Air Contaminants From Internal Combustion Engines, applicable to the Kansas City metropolitan area, and 10 CSR 105.180 Emission of Visible Air Contaminants From Internal Combustion Engines, applicable to the St. Louis metropolitan area, be rescinded from the Missouri SIP.
Since rule 10 CSR 106.220 contained a reference to these two rules in subsection (1)(A), it has been revised to delete these references, and language was added to maintain the applicability and exemptions that were provided for in the rescinded rules. Finally, one minor clerical correction was made to subsection (1)(F). These revisions were state effective on November 30, 2002.
The state submittal has met the public notice requirements for SIP submissions in accordance with 40 CFR 51.102. The submittal also satisfied the completeness criteria of 40 CFR part 51, appendix V. In addition, as explained above and in more detail in the technical support document which is part of this document, the revision meets the substantive SIP requirements of the CAA, including section 110 and implementing regulations.
What Action Is EPA Taking?
We are approving as an amendment to the Missouri SIP the rescission of state rules 10 CSR 102.080 and 10 CSR 105.180, and a revision to rule 10 CSR 106.220.
We are processing this action as a final action because the revisions make routine changes to the existing rules which are noncontroversial. Therefore, we do not anticipate any adverse comments. Please note that if EPA receives adverse comment on part of this rule and if that part can be severed from the remainder of the rule, EPA may adopt as final those parts of the rule that are not the subject of an adverse comment.
Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' and therefore is not subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget. For this reason, this action is also not subject to Executive Order 13211, ``Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001). This action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and imposes no additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. Accordingly, the Administrator certifies that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because this rule approves preexisting requirements under state law and does not impose any additional enforceable duty beyond that required by state law, it does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Public Law 1044).
This rule also does not have tribal implications because it will not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This action also does not have Federalism implications because it does not have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government, as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999). This action merely approves a state rule implementing a Federal standard, and does not alter the relationship or the distribution of power and responsibilities established in the CAA. This rule also is not subject to Executive Order 13045, ``Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks'' (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997), because it is not economically significant.
In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. In this context, in the absence of a prior existing requirement for the State to use voluntary consensus standards (VCS), EPA has no authority to disapprove a SIP submission for failure to use VCS. It would thus be inconsistent with applicable law for EPA, when it reviews a SIP submission, to use VCS in place of a SIP submission that otherwise satisfies the provisions of the CAA. Thus, the requirements of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply. This rule does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by May 19, 2003. Filing a petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Particulate matter, Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: March 3, 2003.
James B. Gulliford,
Regional Administrator, Region 7.
Chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended as follows:
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
2. In Sec. 52.1320(c) the tables for Chapters 2, 5, and 6 are amended by:
a. In Chapter 2 removing the entry for 102.080,
b. In Chapter 5 removing the entry for 105.180, and
c. In Chapter 6 revising the entry for 106.220.
The revision reads as follows:
Sec. 52.1320 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
EPAApproved Missouri Regulations State EPA Missouri citation Title effective approval Explanation date date Missouri Department of Natural Resources * * * * * * *
Chapter 6Air Quality Standards, Definitions, Sampling and Reference Methods, and Air Pollution Control
Regulations for the State of Missouri
* * * * * * *
106.220.......................... Restriction of Emission 11/30/02 3/18/03 and .......................
of Visible Air FR citation Contaminants..
* * * * * * * * * * * *
[FR Doc. 036309 Filed 31703; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 656050P
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
Wayne Kaiser at (913) 551-7603.