Federal Register: April 3, 2003 (Volume 68, Number 64)
DOCID: FR Doc 03-8088
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Docket ID: [Docket No. ER00-1737-004, et al.]
NOTICE: NOTICES
ACTION: Electric rate and corporate regulation filings:
SUBJECT CATEGORY:
Virginia Electric and Power Company, et al.; Electric Rate and Corporate Filings
DOCUMENT SUMMARY:
March 26, 2003.
The following filings have been made with the Commission. The filings are listed in ascending order within each docket
classification.
1. Virginia Electric and Power Company
[Docket No. ER001737004]
Take notice that, on March 24, 2003, Dominion Resources, Inc. (DRI)
submitted a threeyear market update for its regulated subsidiary,
Virginia Electric and Power Company (Dominion Virginia Power), which
has the authorization to sell power at marketbased rates for sales
outside its service territory. DRI asks that the next threeyear update
for Dominion Virginia Power be due three years from the date of acceptance of this filing.
Comment Date: April 14, 2003.
2. New York Independent System Operator, Inc.
[Docket No. ER0318001]
Take notice that on March 21, 2003, the New York Independent System [[Page 16277]]
Operator, Inc. (NYISO) together with Astoria Generating Company, L.P.
(Astoria) and Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. (Con
Edison) jointly tendered for filing a compliance filing in connection
with the Commission's December 3, 2002, Order Rejecting Proposed Tariff in the abovereferenced docket.
NYISO states that copies of this filing have been served on all
parties listed on the official service list maintained by the Secretary
of the Commission in these proceedings. The NYISO states that they have
also served a copy of this filing to all parties that have executed
Service Agreements under the NYISO's OpenAccess Transmission Tariff or
Services Tariff, the New York State Public Service Commission, and to
the electric utility regulatory agencies in New Jersey and Pennsylvania.
Comment Date: April 11, 2003.
3. Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc.
[Docket
Nos. ER03366003 and ER03368004]
Take notice that on March 24, 2003, the Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc. (Midwest ISO) tendered for filing with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) proposed revisions to the Midwest ISO Open Access Transmission Tariff (Tariff), FERC Electric Tariff, Second Revised Volume No. 1, in compliance with the Commission's Order in Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc., 102 FERC ] 61,181. The Midwest ISO respectfully requests that the Commission grant the original effective date of January 1, 2003, for the proposed revisions to the Midwest ISO Tariff submitted herewith.
The Midwest ISO states it has served copies of its filing on all affected customers. In addition, the Midwest ISO also states, that it has electronically served a copy of this filing, without attachments, upon all Midwest ISO Members, Member representatives of Transmission Owners and NonTransmission Owners, the Midwest ISO Advisory Committee participants, Policy Subcommittee participant, as well as all state commissions within the region. In addition, Midwest ISO advises that the filing has been electronically posted on the Midwest ISO's Web site at http://www.midwestiso.org under the heading ``Filings to FERC'' for other interested parties in this matter. The Midwest ISO states that it will provide hard copies to any interested parties upon request.
Comment Date: April 14, 2003.
4. Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc.
[Docket No. ER03422002]
Take notice that on March 24, 2003, the Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc., (Midwest ISO) tendered for filing proposed revisions to Schedule 10 (ISO Cost Recovery Adder) of the Midwest ISO Open Access Transmission Tariff, FERC Electric Tariff, Second Revised Volume No. 1. The Midwest ISO requests an effective date of March 25, 2003.
The Midwest ISO has requested waiver of the requirements set forth
in 18 CFR 385.2010. The Midwest ISO states it has electronically served
a copy of this filing, with attachments, upon all Midwest ISO Members,
Member representatives of Transmission Owners and NonTransmission
Owners, the Midwest ISO Advisory Committee participants, Policy
Subcommittee participants, as well as all state commissions within the
region. In addition, Midwest ISO states that the filing has been
electronically posted on the Midwest ISO's Web site at http://www.midwestiso.org under the heading ``Filings to FERC'' for other
interested parties in this matter.
Comment Date: April 14, 2003.
5. DTE East China, LLC; DTE Energy Trading, Inc.
[Docket No. ER03470001]
Take notice that on March 24, 2003, DTE East China, LLC and DTE
Energy Trading, Inc., tendered for filing a compliance filing pursuant
to the Commission's Order dated February 28, 2003, in the above captioned docket.
Comment Date: April 14, 2003.
6. Westar Energy, Inc.
[Docket ER03578001]
Take notice that on March 24, 2003, Kansas Gas & Electric Company, Inc. and Westar Energy, Inc. (collectively Westar) submitted for filing First Revised Sheet No. 1 for Rate Schedule FERC Nos.166, 167, 210, 212 and 246, in the format required by Order 614.
Westar states that copies of this filing were served on the City of
Iola, Kansas; City of Fredonia, Kansas; City of Waterville, Kansas;
City of Scranton, Kansas; City of Alma, Kansas and the Kansas Corporation Commission.
Comment Date: April 14, 2003.
7. Duke Energy St. Lucie, LLC
[Docket No. ER03643000]
Take notice that, on March 24, 2003, Duke Energy St. Lucie, LLC,
tendered for filing a Notice of Cancellation pursuant to 18 CFR 35.15,
in order to reflect the cancellation of its marketbased rate tariff,
designated as FERC Electric Tariff, Original Volume No. 1, originally accepted for filing in Docket No. ER002225000.
Comment Date: April 24, 2003.
8. Southern California Edison Company
[Docket No. ER03644000]
Take notice that on March 24, 2003, Southern California Edison Company (SCE) tendered for filing a revised Reliability Management System Agreement (Revised RMS Agreement) between SCE and High Desert Power Project, LLC (HDPP). SCE respectfully requests the Revised RMS Agreement to become effective on April 18, 2003. SCE states that the Revised RMS Agreement supersedes in its entirety the Reliability Management System Agreement between SCE and High Desert Power Trust (HDPT) which previously has been accepted for filing by the Commission as FERC Electric Tariff, First Revised Original Volume No. 6, Service Agreement No. 14 (Existing RMS Agreement). SCE states that the only substantive difference between the Existing RMS Agreement and the Revised RMS Agreement is the contracting party.
SCE states that the Revised RMS Agreement sets forth terms and
conditions intended to maintain the reliable operation of the Western
Interconnection through the generator's commitment to comply with
certain reliability standards.SCE also states, that copies of this
filing were served upon the Public Utilities Commission of the State of California and HDPP.
Comment Date: April 14, 2003.
9. Duquesne Light Company
[Docket No. ER03645000]
Take notice that on March 24, 2003, Duquesne Light Company tendered for filing amendments to its Open Access Transmission Tariff to implement revised credit review procedures for transmission customers.
Comment Date: April 14, 2003.
10. MidAmerican Energy Company
[Docket No. ER03646000]
Take notice that on March 24, 2003, MidAmerican Energy Company
(MidAmerican), filed with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
(Commission) an amended Interconnection, Interchange and Joint
Construction Agreement originally dated August 21, 1968, entered into
by MidAmerican's predecessor, Iowa Power and Light Company, with
Interstate Power and Light Company's predecessor, Iowa Southern Utilities Company, and amended by First
[[Page 16278]]
Amendment to the Agreement, dated November 21, 2002.
MidAmerican states it has served a copy of the filing on the Iowa
Utilities Board, the Illinois Commerce Commission and the South Dakota Public Utilities Commission.
Comment Date: April 14, 2003.
11. Victory Garden Phase IV Partnership
[Docket No. QF9043006]
Take notice that on March 20, 2003, Victory Garden Phase IV
Partnership (VGIV) filed with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
(Commission) an application for recertification of a facility as a
qualifying small power production facility pursuant to Section 292.207
of the Commission's regulations. No determination has been made that
the submittal constitutes a complete filing. VGIV states that the
facility is a 22 MW wind energy generating facility in the Tehachapi
Mountains, Kern County, California. VGIV also states that the facility
is interconnected with the Southern California Edison Company. VGIV
further states that recertification is sought to reflect a change in the upstream ownership of the Facility.
Comment Date: April 21, 2003.
12. Sky River Partnership
[Docket No. QF9159007]
Take notice that on March 20, 2003, Sky River Partnership (Sky
River) filed with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission)
an application for recertification of a facility as a qualifying small
power production facility pursuant to section 292.207 of the
Commission's regulations. No determination has been made that the
submittal constitutes a complete filing. Sky River states that the
facility is a 77.5 MW wind energy generating facility in the Tehachapi
Mountains, Kern County, California. Sky River also states that the
facility is interconnected with the Southern California Edison Company.
Sky River further states that recertification is sought to reflect a change in the upstream ownership of the Facility.
Comment Date: April 21, 2003.
13. Cabazon Power Partners LLC
[Docket No. QF95186006]
Take notice that on March 20, 2003, Cabazon Power Partners LLC
(Cabazon) filed with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
(Commission) an application for recertification of a facility as a
qualifying small power production facility pursuant to section 292.207
of the Commission's regulations. No determination has been made that
the submittal constitutes a complete filing. Cabazon states that the
facility is a 39.75 MW wind energy generating facility in Cabazon,
Riverside County, California. Cabazon also states that the facility is
interconnected with the Southern California Edison Company. Cabazon
further states that recertification is sought to reflect a change in the upstream ownership of the Facility.
Comment Date: April 21, 2003.
14. Victory Garden Power Partners I LLC
[Docket No. QF9992002]
Take notice that on March 20, 2003, Victory Garden Power Partners I
LLC (VGI) filed with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
(Commission) an application for recertification of a facility as a
qualifying small power production facility pursuant to section 292.207
of the Commission's regulations. No determination has been made that
the submittal constitutes a complete filing. VGI states that the
facility is a 6.75 MW wind energy generating facility in the Tehachapi
Mountains, Kern County, California. VGI also states that the facility
is interconnected with the Southern California Edison Company. VGI
further states that recertification is sought to reflect a change in the upstream ownership of the Facility.
Comment Date: April 21, 2003.
15. PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
[Docket No. RT012006]
Take notice that on March 20, 2003, PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. (PJM) tendered for filing with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) in compliance with the Commission's order of December 20, 2002, in the captioned proceeding, 100 FERC ] 61,345, (1) revised pages to the Amended and Restated Operating Agreement of PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. and to the PJM Open Access Transmission Tariff, and (2) complete, revised volumes of the PJM Tariff, Operating Agreement, Reliability Assurance Agreement Among Load Serving Entities in the PJM Control Area and the PJM West Reliability Assurance Agreement.
PJM states that copies of this filing, excluding the full revised
PJM Tariff, Operating Agreement, RAA and West RAA, have been served on
all parties, as well as on all PJM Members and the state electric
utility regulatory commissions in the PJM region. PJM states that it
will promptly post the complete revised volumes of the PJM Tariff,
Operating Agreement, RAA and West RAA on PJM's Web site (http://www.pjm.com ) and will deliver a hard copy of any or all of those
documents to any person upon request. PJM requests that the Commission
waive the service requirements of its Rule 2010(a), 18 CFR 385.2010(a), to the extent necessary to accommodate these arrangements.
Comment Date: April 21, 2003.
Standard Paragraph
Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing should
file with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street,
NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and
385.214). Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining
the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make
protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a
party must file a motion to intervene. All such motions or protests
should be filed on or before the comment date, and, to the extent
applicable, must be served on the applicant and on any other person
designated on the official service list. This filing is available for
review at the Commission or may be viewed on the Commission's Web site
at http://www.ferc.gov , using the ``FERRIS'' link. Enter the docket
number excluding the last three digits in the docket number field to
access the document. For assistance, contact FERC Online Support at
FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov or tollfree at (866)2083676, or for TTY,
contact (202)5028659. Protests and interventions may be filed
electronically via the Internet in lieu of paper; see 18 CFR
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web site
under the ``eFiling'' link. The Commission strongly encourages electronic filings.
Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 038088 Filed 4203; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 671701P
SUMMARY:
Virginia Electric & Power Co. et al.,
DOCUMENT BODY 2:
March 26, 2003.
The following filings have been made with the Commission. The filings are listed in ascending order within each docket
classification.
1. Virginia Electric and Power Company
[Docket No. ER001737004]
Take notice that, on March 24, 2003, Dominion Resources, Inc. (DRI)
submitted a threeyear market update for its regulated subsidiary,
Virginia Electric and Power Company (Dominion Virginia Power), which
has the authorization to sell power at marketbased rates for sales
outside its service territory. DRI asks that the next threeyear update
for Dominion Virginia Power be due three years from the date of acceptance of this filing.
Comment Date: April 14, 2003.
2. New York Independent System Operator, Inc.
[Docket No. ER0318001]
Take notice that on March 21, 2003, the New York Independent System [[Page 16277]]
Operator, Inc. (NYISO) together with Astoria Generating Company, L.P.
(Astoria) and Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. (Con
Edison) jointly tendered for filing a compliance filing in connection
with the Commission's December 3, 2002, Order Rejecting Proposed Tariff in the abovereferenced docket.
NYISO states that copies of this filing have been served on all
parties listed on the official service list maintained by the Secretary
of the Commission in these proceedings. The NYISO states that they have
also served a copy of this filing to all parties that have executed
Service Agreements under the NYISO's OpenAccess Transmission Tariff or
Services Tariff, the New York State Public Service Commission, and to
the electric utility regulatory agencies in New Jersey and Pennsylvania.
Comment Date: April 11, 2003.
3. Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc.
[Docket
Nos. ER03366003 and ER03368004]
Take notice that on March 24, 2003, the Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc. (Midwest ISO) tendered for filing with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) proposed revisions to the Midwest ISO Open Access Transmission Tariff (Tariff), FERC Electric Tariff, Second Revised Volume No. 1, in compliance with the Commission's Order in Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc., 102 FERC ] 61,181. The Midwest ISO respectfully requests that the Commission grant the original effective date of January 1, 2003, for the proposed revisions to the Midwest ISO Tariff submitted herewith.
The Midwest ISO states it has served copies of its filing on all affected customers. In addition, the Midwest ISO also states, that it has electronically served a copy of this filing, without attachments, upon all Midwest ISO Members, Member representatives of Transmission Owners and NonTransmission Owners, the Midwest ISO Advisory Committee participants, Policy Subcommittee participant, as well as all state commissions within the region. In addition, Midwest ISO advises that the filing has been electronically posted on the Midwest ISO's Web site at http://www.midwestiso.org under the heading ``Filings to FERC'' for other interested parties in this matter. The Midwest ISO states that it will provide hard copies to any interested parties upon request.
Comment Date: April 14, 2003.
4. Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc.
[Docket No. ER03422002]
Take notice that on March 24, 2003, the Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc., (Midwest ISO) tendered for filing proposed revisions to Schedule 10 (ISO Cost Recovery Adder) of the Midwest ISO Open Access Transmission Tariff, FERC Electric Tariff, Second Revised Volume No. 1. The Midwest ISO requests an effective date of March 25, 2003.
The Midwest ISO has requested waiver of the requirements set forth
in 18 CFR 385.2010. The Midwest ISO states it has electronically served
a copy of this filing, with attachments, upon all Midwest ISO Members,
Member representatives of Transmission Owners and NonTransmission
Owners, the Midwest ISO Advisory Committee participants, Policy
Subcommittee participants, as well as all state commissions within the
region. In addition, Midwest ISO states that the filing has been
electronically posted on the Midwest ISO's Web site at http://www.midwestiso.org under the heading ``Filings to FERC'' for other
interested parties in this matter.
Comment Date: April 14, 2003.
5. DTE East China, LLC; DTE Energy Trading, Inc.
[Docket No. ER03470001]
Take notice that on March 24, 2003, DTE East China, LLC and DTE
Energy Trading, Inc., tendered for filing a compliance filing pursuant
to the Commission's Order dated February 28, 2003, in the above captioned docket.
Comment Date: April 14, 2003.
6. Westar Energy, Inc.
[Docket ER03578001]
Take notice that on March 24, 2003, Kansas Gas & Electric Company, Inc. and Westar Energy, Inc. (collectively Westar) submitted for filing First Revised Sheet No. 1 for Rate Schedule FERC Nos.166, 167, 210, 212 and 246, in the format required by Order 614.
Westar states that copies of this filing were served on the City of
Iola, Kansas; City of Fredonia, Kansas; City of Waterville, Kansas;
City of Scranton, Kansas; City of Alma, Kansas and the Kansas Corporation Commission.
Comment Date: April 14, 2003.
7. Duke Energy St. Lucie, LLC
[Docket No. ER03643000]
Take notice that, on March 24, 2003, Duke Energy St. Lucie, LLC,
tendered for filing a Notice of Cancellation pursuant to 18 CFR 35.15,
in order to reflect the cancellation of its marketbased rate tariff,
designated as FERC Electric Tariff, Original Volume No. 1, originally accepted for filing in Docket No. ER002225000.
Comment Date: April 24, 2003.
8. Southern California Edison Company
[Docket No. ER03644000]
Take notice that on March 24, 2003, Southern California Edison Company (SCE) tendered for filing a revised Reliability Management System Agreement (Revised RMS Agreement) between SCE and High Desert Power Project, LLC (HDPP). SCE respectfully requests the Revised RMS Agreement to become effective on April 18, 2003. SCE states that the Revised RMS Agreement supersedes in its entirety the Reliability Management System Agreement between SCE and High Desert Power Trust (HDPT) which previously has been accepted for filing by the Commission as FERC Electric Tariff, First Revised Original Volume No. 6, Service Agreement No. 14 (Existing RMS Agreement). SCE states that the only substantive difference between the Existing RMS Agreement and the Revised RMS Agreement is the contracting party.
SCE states that the Revised RMS Agreement sets forth terms and
conditions intended to maintain the reliable operation of the Western
Interconnection through the generator's commitment to comply with
certain reliability standards.SCE also states, that copies of this
filing were served upon the Public Utilities Commission of the State of California and HDPP.
Comment Date: April 14, 2003.
9. Duquesne Light Company
[Docket No. ER03645000]
Take notice that on March 24, 2003, Duquesne Light Company tendered for filing amendments to its Open Access Transmission Tariff to implement revised credit review procedures for transmission customers.
Comment Date: April 14, 2003.
10. MidAmerican Energy Company
[Docket No. ER03646000]
Take notice that on March 24, 2003, MidAmerican Energy Company
(MidAmerican), filed with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
(Commission) an amended Interconnection, Interchange and Joint
Construction Agreement originally dated August 21, 1968, entered into
by MidAmerican's predecessor, Iowa Power and Light Company, with
Interstate Power and Light Company's predecessor, Iowa Southern Utilities Company, and amended by First
[[Page 16278]]
Amendment to the Agreement, dated November 21, 2002.
MidAmerican states it has served a copy of the filing on the Iowa
Utilities Board, the Illinois Commerce Commission and the South Dakota Public Utilities Commission.
Comment Date: April 14, 2003.
11. Victory Garden Phase IV Partnership
[Docket No. QF9043006]
Take notice that on March 20, 2003, Victory Garden Phase IV
Partnership (VGIV) filed with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
(Commission) an application for recertification of a facility as a
qualifying small power production facility pursuant to Section 292.207
of the Commission's regulations. No determination has been made that
the submittal constitutes a complete filing. VGIV states that the
facility is a 22 MW wind energy generating facility in the Tehachapi
Mountains, Kern County, California. VGIV also states that the facility
is interconnected with the Southern California Edison Company. VGIV
further states that recertification is sought to reflect a change in the upstream ownership of the Facility.
Comment Date: April 21, 2003.
12. Sky River Partnership
[Docket No. QF9159007]
Take notice that on March 20, 2003, Sky River Partnership (Sky
River) filed with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission)
an application for recertification of a facility as a qualifying small
power production facility pursuant to section 292.207 of the
Commission's regulations. No determination has been made that the
submittal constitutes a complete filing. Sky River states that the
facility is a 77.5 MW wind energy generating facility in the Tehachapi
Mountains, Kern County, California. Sky River also states that the
facility is interconnected with the Southern California Edison Company.
Sky River further states that recertification is sought to reflect a change in the upstream ownership of the Facility.
Comment Date: April 21, 2003.
13. Cabazon Power Partners LLC
[Docket No. QF95186006]
Take notice that on March 20, 2003, Cabazon Power Partners LLC
(Cabazon) filed with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
(Commission) an application for recertification of a facility as a
qualifying small power production facility pursuant to section 292.207
of the Commission's regulations. No determination has been made that
the submittal constitutes a complete filing. Cabazon states that the
facility is a 39.75 MW wind energy generating facility in Cabazon,
Riverside County, California. Cabazon also states that the facility is
interconnected with the Southern California Edison Company. Cabazon
further states that recertification is sought to reflect a change in the upstream ownership of the Facility.
Comment Date: April 21, 2003.
14. Victory Garden Power Partners I LLC
[Docket No. QF9992002]
Take notice that on March 20, 2003, Victory Garden Power Partners I
LLC (VGI) filed with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
(Commission) an application for recertification of a facility as a
qualifying small power production facility pursuant to section 292.207
of the Commission's regulations. No determination has been made that
the submittal constitutes a complete filing. VGI states that the
facility is a 6.75 MW wind energy generating facility in the Tehachapi
Mountains, Kern County, California. VGI also states that the facility
is interconnected with the Southern California Edison Company. VGI
further states that recertification is sought to reflect a change in the upstream ownership of the Facility.
Comment Date: April 21, 2003.
15. PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
[Docket No. RT012006]
Take notice that on March 20, 2003, PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. (PJM) tendered for filing with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) in compliance with the Commission's order of December 20, 2002, in the captioned proceeding, 100 FERC ] 61,345, (1) revised pages to the Amended and Restated Operating Agreement of PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. and to the PJM Open Access Transmission Tariff, and (2) complete, revised volumes of the PJM Tariff, Operating Agreement, Reliability Assurance Agreement Among Load Serving Entities in the PJM Control Area and the PJM West Reliability Assurance Agreement.
PJM states that copies of this filing, excluding the full revised
PJM Tariff, Operating Agreement, RAA and West RAA, have been served on
all parties, as well as on all PJM Members and the state electric
utility regulatory commissions in the PJM region. PJM states that it
will promptly post the complete revised volumes of the PJM Tariff,
Operating Agreement, RAA and West RAA on PJM's Web site (http://www.pjm.com ) and will deliver a hard copy of any or all of those
documents to any person upon request. PJM requests that the Commission
waive the service requirements of its Rule 2010(a), 18 CFR 385.2010(a), to the extent necessary to accommodate these arrangements.
Comment Date: April 21, 2003.
Standard Paragraph
Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing should
file with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street,
NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and
385.214). Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining
the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make
protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a
party must file a motion to intervene. All such motions or protests
should be filed on or before the comment date, and, to the extent
applicable, must be served on the applicant and on any other person
designated on the official service list. This filing is available for
review at the Commission or may be viewed on the Commission's Web site
at http://www.ferc.gov , using the ``FERRIS'' link. Enter the docket
number excluding the last three digits in the docket number field to
access the document. For assistance, contact FERC Online Support at
FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov or tollfree at (866)2083676, or for TTY,
contact (202)5028659. Protests and interventions may be filed
electronically via the Internet in lieu of paper; see 18 CFR
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web site
under the ``eFiling'' link. The Commission strongly encourages electronic filings.
Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 038088 Filed 4203; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 671701P