Browse: Departments Dates Agencies
Docket ID: [Docket No. 2002-NM-39-AD]
RIN ID: RIN 2120-AA64
SUBJECT CATEGORY: Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A300 B4-600, B4-600R, and F4-600R (Collectively Called A300-600) Series Airplanes; and Model A310 Series Airplanes; Equipped With Pratt & Whitney JT9D-7R4 or 4000 Series Engines
DOCUMENT SUMMARY: This document proposes the supersedure of an existing airworthiness directive (AD), applicable to certain Airbus Model A300 600 and A310 series airplanes, that currently requires deactivating both thrust reversers and revising the airplane flight manual (AFM) to ensure safe and appropriate performance during certain takeoff conditions. This action would require installing modifications that will add an independent third line of defense on the thrust reversers, which would enhance their redundancy and terminate the requirements of the existing AD. The actions specified by the proposed AD are intended to prevent inflight deployment of the thrust reversers, which could result in reduced controllability of the airplane. This action is intended to address the identified unsafe condition.
SUMMARY: Airbus,
Interested persons are invited to participate in the making of the
proposed rule by submitting such written data, views, or arguments as
they may desire. Communications shall identify the Rules Docket number
and be submitted in triplicate to the address specified above. All
communications received on or before the closing date for comments,
specified above, will be considered before taking action on the
proposed rule. The proposals contained in this action may be changed in light of the comments received.
Submit comments using the following format:
[sbull] Organize comments issuebyissue. For example, discuss a
request to change the compliance time and a request to change the service bulletin reference as two separate issues.
[sbull] For each issue, state what specific change to the proposed AD is being requested.
[sbull] Include justification (e.g., reasons or data) for each request.
Comments are specifically invited on the overall regulatory, economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the proposed rule. All comments submitted will be available, both before and after the closing date for comments, in the Rules Docket for examination by interested persons. A report summarizing each FAApublic contact concerned with the substance of this proposal will be filed in the Rules Docket.
Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments submitted in response to this action must submit a selfaddressed, stamped postcard on which the following statement is made: ``Comments to Docket Number 2002NM39AD.'' The postcard will be date stamped and returned to the commenter.
Any person may obtain a copy of this NPRM by submitting a request to the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, ANM114, Attention: Rules Docket No. 2002NM39AD, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 980554056.
On December 15, 1998, the FAA issued AD 982551, amendment 39 10952 (63 FR 70637, December 22, 1998), applicable to certain Airbus Model A300600 and A310 series airplanes. That AD requires deactivating both thrust reversers and revising the airplane flight manual (AFM) to ensure safe and appropriate performance during certain takeoff conditions. That action was prompted by a report indicating that the thrust reverser of engine number 1 on an Airbus Model A300600 series airplane deployed during climb. The requirements of that AD are intended to prevent inflight deployment of a thrust reverser, which could result in reduced controllability of the airplane.
Since AD 982551 was issued, Airbus issued service information that provides instructions for reactivating the thrust reversers through the implementation of a program that involves parts replacement and repetitive inspections of the thrust reversers. The FAA approved this program as an alternative method of compliance (AMOC) with the requirements of AD 982551, allowing for reactivation of the thrust reversers and removal of the AFM limitations.
The actions required by AD 982551 and the reactivation program
are considered ``interim action.'' Since issuance of that AD and the
AMOC, the manufacturer has developed a modification to address the unsafe
[[Page 17894]]
condition, and the FAA has determined that further rulemaking action is
necessary; this proposed AD follows from that determination. Explanation of Relevant Service Information
Airbus has issued the following service bulletins:
Service Bulletins
Airbus service bulletin For Airbus model Equipped with model
A300786017, dated August 6, 2001..... A300 B4620 airplanes..... PWJT9D7R4 series engines.
A300786018, dated July 17, 2001...... A300 B4622R airplanes.... PW4000 series engines.
A300786020, dated August 10, 2001.... A300 B4622 airplanes..... PW4000 series engines.
A310782018, dated June 1, 2001....... A310222 and 322 series PWJT9D7R4 series engines. airplanes.
A310782019, dated May 2, 2001........ A310324 and 325 series PW4000 series engines. airplanes.
A310782020, dated June 1, 2001....... A310221 and 222 series PWJT9D7R4 series engines. airplanes.
These service bulletins describe procedures for installing
modifications that will add an independent third line of defense on the
thrust reverser system and consequently enhance its redundancy. The
actions are intended to preclude a single/dual thrust reverser
deployment due to failure of the first two lines of defense, or failure
of mechanical retention means. The modifications comprise five parts:
[sbull] Retrofit of the new electrical circuit between the avionics
compartment and the forward cargo compartment at frame (FR) 38.2.
[sbull] Retrofit of the new electrical circuit between the forward
cargo compartment at FR 38.2 and the wing/pylon interfaces.
sbull Retrofit of the new electrical circuit in the engine pylons.
[sbull] Retrofit of the new electrical circuit in the avionics compartment.
[sbull] Installation of the synchronous shaft lock system and connection to the new electrical circuit.
Accomplishment of the actions specified in the service bulletins is intended to adequately address the identified unsafe condition. The Direction Generale de l'Aviation Civile (DGAC), which is the airworthiness authority for France, classified these service bulletins as mandatory and issued French airworthiness directive 2001523(B), dated October 31, 2001, to ensure the continued airworthiness of these airplanes in France.
These airplane models are manufactured in France and are type certificated for operation in the United States under the provisions of section 21.29 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 21.29) and the applicable bilateral airworthiness agreement. Pursuant to this bilateral airworthiness agreement, the DGAC has kept the FAA informed of the situation described above. The FAA has examined the findings of the DGAC, reviewed all available information, and determined that AD action is necessary for products of this type design that are certificated for operation in the United States.
Since an unsafe condition has been identified that is likely to exist or develop on other airplanes of the same type design registered in the United States, the proposed AD would supersede AD 982551 to continue to require deactivating both thrust reversers and revising the airplane flight manual (AFM) to ensure that safe and appropriate performance is achieved during certain takeoff conditions. (The AMOC described previously allows for reactivation of the thrust reversers and removal of the AFM limitations.) The proposed AD would also require installing modifications involving retrofit of a new electrical circuit at four locations and installation of the synchronous shaft lock system and connection to the new electrical circuit. The modifications would terminate the requirements of the existing AD, as well as the associated AMOC, which allows reactivation of the thrust reversers. The modifications would be required to be accomplished in accordance with the applicable service bulletins described previously. Cost Impact
There are approximately 38 airplanes of U.S. registry that would be
affected by this proposed AD. The FAA provides the following cost estimates for the actions specified in this proposed AD:
Cost Estimates
Hourly Cost per
Action Model/series Work hours labor rate Parts cost airplane
Actions currently required by AD 982551
Thrust reverser deactivation........ All................... 2 $60 $0 $120
AFM revision........................ All................... 1 60 0 60
Proposed modification, per Service Bulletin
A310782018........................ A310222 and 322..... 1,433 60 16,234 102,214
A310782019........................ A310324 and 325..... 1,395 60 15,061 98,761
A310782020........................ A310221 and 222..... 1,267 60 14,848 90,868
A300786017........................ A300 B4620........... 817 60 13,810 62,830
A300786018........................ A300 B4622R.......... 1,198 60 15,141 87,021
A300786020........................ A300 B4622........... 817 60 10,760 59,780 [[Page 17895]]
The cost impact figures discussed above are based on assumptions that no operator has yet accomplished any of the proposed requirements of this AD action, and that no operator would accomplish those actions in the future if this AD were not adopted. The cost impact figures discussed in AD rulemaking actions represent only the time necessary to perform the specific actions actually required by the AD. These figures typically do not include incidental costs, such as the time for planning, gaining access and closing up, or performing other administrative actions.
The regulations proposed herein would not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, it is determined that this proposal would not have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this proposed regulation (1) is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) if promulgated, will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. A copy of the draft regulatory evaluation prepared for this action is contained in the Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained by contacting the Rules Docket at the location provided under the caption ADDRESSES. List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety. The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration proposes to amend part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
2. Section 39.13 is amended by removing amendment 3910952 (63 FR
70637, December 22, 1998), and by adding a new airworthiness directive (AD), to read as follows:
Airbus: Docket 2002NM39AD. Supersedes AD 982551, Amendment 39 10952.
Applicability: The following airplanes; certificated in any category:
Table 1.Applicability
Except those modified Or modified in
in accordance with accordance with Airbus
Model Equipped with Airbus service production
bulletin modification
A300 B4620.......................... PWJT9D7R4 series A300786017, dated 12261, 12264, and
engines. August 6, 2001. 12265.
A300 B4622.......................... PW4000 series engines.. A300786020, dated 12262, 12263, 12265,
August 10, 2001. and 12377; or 12262,
12263, and 12266.
A300 B4622R......................... PW4000 series engines.. A300786018, dated 12262, 12263, 12265,
July 17, 2001. and 12377; or 12262,
12263, and 12266.
A310221............................. PWJT9D7R4 series A310782020, dated 12261, 12264, and
engines. June 1, 2001. 12265.
A310222............................. PWJT9D7R4 series A310782020 or A31078 12261, 12264, and
engines. 2018, both dated June 12265.
1, 2001.
Airbus Model A310324 and 325....... PW4000 series engines.. A310782019, dated May 12262, 12263, 12265,
2, 2001. and 12377; or 12262,
12263, and 12266.
Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been otherwise modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified, altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (d)(1) of this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to address it.
Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished previously.
To prevent inflight deployment of a thrust reverser, which
could result in reduced controllability of the airplane, accomplish the following:
Restatement of Requirements of AD 982551
(a) Within the next 4 flight cycles after December 28, 1998 (the
effective date of AD 982551, amendment 3910952), deactivate both
thrust reversers in accordance with Airbus All Operators Telex (AOT) 7808, dated November 30, 1998.
(b) Within the next 4 flight cycles after December 28, 1998,
revise the Limitations Section of the FAAapproved Airplane Flight Manual (AFM) to include the following:
``The takeoff performance on wet and contaminated runways with
thrust reversers deactivated shall be determined in accordance with
Airbus Flight Operations Telex (FOT) 999.0124/98, dated November 30, 1998, as follows:
For takeoff on wet runways, use performance data in accordance with paragraph 4.1 of the FOT.
For takeoff on contaminated runways, use performance data in accordance with paragraph 4.2 of the FOT.
(Note: This supersedes any relief provided by the Master Minimum Equipment List (MMEL).)
Note 2: The ``FCOM'' referenced in Airbus Flight Operations
Telex (FOT) 999.0124/98, dated November 30, 1998, is Airbus
Industrie Flight Crew Operating Manual (FCOM), Revision 27 for
Airbus Model A310 series airplanes and Revision 22 for A300600
series airplanes. (The revision number is indicated on the List of Effective Pages (LEP) of the FCOM.)
New Requirements of This AD
Modification
(c) Within 1 year after the effective date of this AD, install
modifications related to an independent third line of defense on the
thrust reversers, in accordance with the applicable service bulletin
listed in Table 2 of this AD. The modifications involve retrofit of
a new electrical circuit at four locations and installation of the
synchronous shaft lock system and connection to the new electrical circuit. After the modifications have been
[[Page 17896]]
installed, the thrust reversers may be reactivated, and the AFM
limitation specified by paragraph (b) of this AD may be removed from the AFM. Table 2 follows:
Table 2.Service Information for Modification
Install the
modification in
For Airbus model Equipped with accordance with
model Airbus service
bulletin
A300 B4620 airplanes........... PWJT9D7R4 series A300786017,
engines. dated August 6,
2001.
A300 B4622 airplanes........... PW4000 series A300786020,
engines. dated August 10,
2001.
A300 B4622R airplanes.......... PW4000 series A300786018,
engines. dated July 17,
2001.
A310221 series airplanes....... PWJT9D7R4 series A310782020,
engines. dated June 1,
2001.
A310222 series airplanes....... PWJT9D7R4 series A310782020 or
engines. A310782018,
both dated June
1, 2001.
A310322 series airplanes....... PWJT9D7R4 series A310782018,
engines. dated June 1,
2001.
Airbus Model A310324 and 325 PW4000 series A310782019,
series airplanes. engines. dated May 2,
2001. Alternative Methods of Compliance
(d)(1) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the
compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used if approved by the Manager, International Branch, ANM116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA. Operators shall submit their
requests through an appropriate FAA Principal Maintenance Inspector,
who may add comments and then send it to the Manager, International Branch, ANM116.
(2) Alternative methods of compliance, approved previously in
accordance with AD 982551, amendment 3910952, are approved as
alternative methods of compliance with the requirements of paragraphs (a) and (b) of this AD.
Note 3: Information concerning the existence of approved
alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be obtained from the International Branch, ANM116.
Special Flight Permits
(e) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with
sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14
CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
Note 4: The subject of this AD is addressed in French airworthiness directive 2001523(B), dated October 31, 2001.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on April 8, 2003.
Vi L. Lipski,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 039015 Filed 41103; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 491013P
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT Tim Backman, Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, ANM116, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 980554056; telephone (425) 2272797; fax (425) 2271149.
14 CFR Part 39 40 CFR Part 52 14 CFR Part 71 33 CFR Part 165 50 CFR Part 679 47 CFR Part 73 26 CFR Part 1 40 CFR Part 180 33 CFR Part 117 50 CFR Part 17 44 CFR Part 67 50 CFR Part 648 14 CFR Part 97 33 CFR Part 100 40 CFR Part 63 50 CFR Part 622 44 CFR Part 65 50 CFR Part 660 26 CFR Part 301 39 CFR Part 111 40 CFR Part 300 6 CFR Part 5 40 CFR Part 271 47 CFR Part 64 40 CFR Parts 52 and 81 50 CFR Part 665 44 CFR Part 64 10 CFR Part 50 49 CFR Part 571 47 CFR Part 76