Browse: Departments Dates Agencies
RIN ID: RIN 1625-AA97
CGD ID: [CGD09-03-246]
SUBJECT CATEGORY: Safety Zone; Sailing Vessels Red Witch, Pride of Baltimore II, Larinda, True North, Nina, HMS Bounty, Fair Jeanne--Kenosha, WI
DOCUMENT SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary moving safety zone of 100 yards around the sailing vessels RED WITCH, PRIDE of BALTIMORE II, LARINDA, TRUE NORTH, NINA, HMS BOUNTY, and FAIR JEANNE. This safety zone is necessary to protect the RED WITCH, PRIDE of BALTIMORE II, LARINDA, TRUE NORTH, NINA, HMS BOUNTY, and FAIR JEANNE from other vessels that may impede their safe navigation. This safety zone is intended to restrict vessel traffic within the vicinity of the sailing vessels RED WITCH, PRIDE of BALTIMORE II, LARINDA, TRUE NORTH, NINA, HMS BOUNTY, and FAIR JEANNE while they are underway on Lake Michigan.
SUMMARY: Lake Michigan—; Kenosha, WI; safety zone,
We did not publish a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) for this regulation. Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B) and (d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause exists for not publishing an NPRM and for making the rule effective less than 30 days after publication. The permit application was not received in time to publish an NPRM followed by a final rule before the effective date. Delaying this rule would be contrary to the public interest of ensuring the safety of spectators and vessels during this event and immediate action is necessary to prevent possible loss of life or property. The Coast Guard has not received any complaints or negative comments previously with regard to this event.
This Safety Zone is established to safeguard the vessel and the public. The size of the zone was determined by the necessities of safe navigation in the Captain of the Port (COTP) zone and local knowledge about wind, waves, and currents in this particular area.
The safety zone is effective from 12:01 a.m. (CST) on August 6,
2003 until 11:59 p.m. (CST) on August 10, 2003. This rule will be
enforced when the RED WITCH, PRIDE of BALTIMORE II, LARINDA, TRUE NORTH, NINA, HMS
[[Page 47244]]
BOUNTY, and FAIR JEANNE are underway, on Lake Michigan in the COTP
Milwaukee zone, and are within 3 nautical miles of shore. This zone will be a moving safety zone.
The Coast Guard will implement a safety zone around the sailing vessels RED WITCH, PRIDE of BALTIMORE II, LARINDA, TRUE NORTH, NINA, HMS BOUNTY, and FAIR JEANNE in vicinity of Kenosha, WI. Vessels are not to come within 100 yards of the sailing vessels RED WITCH, PRIDE of BALTIMORE II, LARINDA, TRUE NORTH, NINA, HMS BOUNTY, and FAIR JEANNE while they are underway for the purposes of safe navigation for the sailing vessels as well as other vessels. The Coast Guard will notify the public, in advance, by way of Ninth Coast Guard District Local Notice to Mariners, marine information broadcasts, and for those who request it from Marine Safety Office Milwaukee, by facsimile (fax).
All persons and vessels shall comply with the instructions of the Captain of the Port Milwaukee or his designated onscene
representative. Entry into, transiting through, or anchoring within the
safety zone is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the Port
Milwaukee or his designated on scene representative. The Captain of the Port Milwaukee may be contacted via VHF Channel 16.
This rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not reviewed it under that Order. It is not ``significant'' under the regulatory policies and procedures of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS).
We expect the economic impact of this proposed rule to be so minimal that a full Regulatory Evaluation under the regulatory policies and procedures of DHS is unnecessary. This determination is based on the minimal time that vessels will be restricted from the zone and that the zone is an area where the Coast Guard expects insignificant adverse impact to mariners from the zone's activation.
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601612), we considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities'' comprises small businesses, notforprofit organizations that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
This rule will affect the following entities: The owners or operators of vessels intending to transit or anchor in the vicinity of the sailing vessels RED WITCH, PRIDE of BALTIMORE II, LARINDA, TRUE NORTH, NINA, HMS BOUNTY, and FAIR JEANNE, while underway on Lake Michigan, from 12:01 a.m. (CST) on August 6, 2003 until 11:59 p.m. (CST) on August 10, 2003.
This safety zone will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities for the following reasons: This rule will be enforced for only a few hours to safeguard the navigation of the boating public and the navigation of the RED WITCH, PRIDE of BALTIMORE II, LARINDA, TRUE NORTH, NINA, HMS BOUNTY, and FAIR JEANNE, while the vessels are underway on Lake Michigan. In addition, commercial vessels transiting the area can transit around the safety zone. The Coast Guard will give notice to the public via a Broadcast to Mariners that the regulation is in effect. Vessel traffic may enter or transit through the safety zone with the permission of the Captain of the Port Milwaukee or his designated on scene representative. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (Public Law 104121), we offer to assist small entities in understanding the rule so that they can better evaluate its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking process. If the rule would affect your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please contact Marine Safety Office Milwaukee (See ADDRESSES.)
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1888REGFAIR (18887343247).
This rule calls for no new collection of information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 35013520).
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for federalism.
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 15311538) requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble.
This rule will not effect a taking of private property or otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property Rights.
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not concern an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian
[[Page 47245]]
tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian
tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use of energy. It has not been designated by the Administrator of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs as a significant energy action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects under Executive Order 13211.
We have analyzed this rule under Commandant Instruction M16475.1D, which guides the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 43214370f), and have concluded that there are no factors in this case that would limit the use of a categorical exclusion under section 2.B.2. of the Instruction. Therefore, this rule is categorically excluded, under figure 21, paragraph (34)(g) of the Commandant Instruction M16475.1D, from further environmental documentation.
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, and Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33 CFR Part 165 as follows:
PART 165REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701; 50
U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.051(g), 6.041, 6.046, and 160.5; Pub.
L. 107295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. A new temporary Sec. 165.T09246 is added to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T09246 Safety Zone; Sailing Vessels RED WITCH, PRIDE of
BALTIMORE II, LARINDA, TRUE NORTH, NINA, HMS BOUNTY, and FAIR JEANNE, Kenosha, WI.
(a) Location. (a) The following area is designated a safety zone:
the waters of Lake Michigan in the Captain of the Port Milwaukee Zone,
within a 100 yard radius of the sailing vessels RED WITCH, PRIDE of
BALTIMORE II, LARINDA, TRUE NORTH, NINA, HMS BOUNTY, and FAIR JEANNE,
while the vessels are underway and within 3 nautical miles of shore.
(b) Effective period. This section is effective from 12:01 a.m.
(CST) on August 6, 2003 until 11:59 p.m. (CST) on August 10, 2003. This
section will be enforced when the RED WITCH, PRIDE of BALTIMORE II,
LARINDA, TRUE NORTH, NINA, HMS BOUNTY, and FAIR JEANNE are underway, on Lake Michigan, and are within 3 nautical miles of shore.
(c) Regulations. (1) The general regulations contained in 33 CFR 165.23 apply.
(2) All persons and vessels shall comply with the instructions of
the Coast Guard Captain of the Port Milwaukee or the designated on
scene representative. Coast Guard patrol personnel include
commissioned, warrant or petty officers of the U.S. Coast Guard. Upon
being hailed by a U.S. Coast Guard vessel via siren, radio, flashing
light, or other means, the operator shall proceed as directed.
(3) This safety zone should not adversely affect shipping. However,
commercial vessels may request permission from the Captain of the Port
Milwaukee to enter or transit the safety zone. Approval will be made on
a casebycase basis. Requests must be in advance and approved by the
Captain of the Port Milwaukee before transits will be authorized. The
Captain of the Port Milwaukee may be contacted via U.S. Coast Guard Group Milwaukee on Channel 16, VHFFM.
Dated: July 29, 2003.
H.M. Hamilton,
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Milwaukee. [FR Doc. 0320330 Filed 8503; 4:07 pm]
BILLING CODE 491015P
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT Marine Science Technician Michael Schmidtke, Marine Safety Office Milwaukee, (414) 7477155.
14 CFR Part 39 40 CFR Part 52 14 CFR Part 71 33 CFR Part 165 50 CFR Part 679 47 CFR Part 73 26 CFR Part 1 40 CFR Part 180 33 CFR Part 117 50 CFR Part 17 44 CFR Part 67 50 CFR Part 648 14 CFR Part 97 33 CFR Part 100 40 CFR Part 63 50 CFR Part 622 44 CFR Part 65 50 CFR Part 660 26 CFR Part 301 39 CFR Part 111 40 CFR Part 300 6 CFR Part 5 40 CFR Part 271 47 CFR Part 64 40 CFR Parts 52 and 81 50 CFR Part 665 44 CFR Part 64 10 CFR Part 50 49 CFR Part 571 47 CFR Part 76