Browse: Departments Dates Agencies
RIN ID: RIN 0648-AM23
DOCUMENT ID: [I.D. 080403B]
SUBJECT CATEGORY: Fisheries of the Caribbean, Gulf of Mexico, and South Atlantic; Shrimp Fishery of the Gulf of Mexico; Amendment 10
DOCUMENT SUMMARY: NMFS announces that the Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council (Council) has submitted Amendment 10 to the FMP for the shrimp fishery of the Gulf of Mexico (Amendment 10) for review, approval, and implementation by NMFS. Amendment 10 would establish a requirement, with limited exceptions, for the use of bycatch reduction devices (BRDs) in each shrimp trawl used in the Gulf of Mexico exclusive economic zone (EEZ) east of 85[deg]30' West Longitude (the approximate location of Cape San Blas, Florida); establish a criterion whereby NMFS would certify BRDs for use in this area of the eastern Gulf of Mexico EEZ; and establish bycatch reporting requirements for the shrimp fishery of the Gulf of Mexico. Written comments on the proposed actions are requested from the public.
SUMMARY: Caribbean, Gulf, and South Atlantic fisheries—; Gulf of Mexico shrimp,
NMFS partially approved the Council's Generic SFA Amendment on
November 17, 1999. NMFS recognized that BRD requirements, implemented
through Amendment 9 to the FMP (63 FR 1813, April 14, 1998), adequately
addressed bycatch reduction requirements for areas west of Cape San
Blas, Florida (western Gulf of Mexico). However, NMFS determined that [[Page 48593]]
bycatch was not reduced to the extent practicable for the entire Gulf
of Mexico shrimp fishery because no additional bycatch reduction
methods had been proposed for the areas east of Cape San Blas, Florida
(eastern Gulf of Mexico). NMFS urged the Council to develop additional
management actions to address bycatch in the shrimp fishery of the
eastern Gulf of Mexico to be in compliance with National Standard 9.
NMFS also did not approve that portion of the Council's Generic SFA
Amendment regarding bycatch reporting methodologies, and urged the
Council to develop standardized procedures that would comply with provisions of the MagnusonStevens Act.
Amendment 10, if implemented, would establish a requirement for shrimp vessels fishing in the EEZ in the eastern Gulf of Mexico (east of 85[deg]30' North Longitude) to use BRDs capable of reducing at least 30 percent of the total finfish catch by weight. This measure is intended to complete the Council's responsibilities to meet Magnuson Stevens Act requirements to reduce bycatch in the Gulf of Mexico shrimp fishery to the extent practicable.
Additional alternatives considered but rejected by the Council included effort reductions and area and seasonal closures. The Council concluded that effort reduction is not a viable option until the Federal permit system, implemented through Amendment 11 (67 FR 51074, August 7, 2002), is operational and more detailed analyses can be conducted on the current size, distribution, and effort of the shrimp fishery of the Gulf of Mexico. The Council also concluded that limited area and season closures, which may shift effort instead of reducing it, would not provide the magnitude of bycatch reduction that would be achieved from the use of BRDs in all areas all year.
Amendment 10, if implemented, also would establish a method of reporting and estimating the bycatch in the shrimp fishery of the Gulf of Mexico by using data collected by an existing fishery independent survey, the Southeast Area Monitoring and Assessment Program (SEAMAP), combined with NMFS' best available estimates of shrimp fishing effort. The Council determined that this method would provide the most practicable solution to meet MagnusonStevens Act bycatch reporting requirements.
Additional alternatives considered but rejected by the Council included the expanded use of observers or establishment of a logbook reporting system. The Council determined that an observer program that would document only five percent of the fishing effort would be too expensive ($1357 million) to implement, and still would require substantial extrapolations of bycatch for the remaining 95 percent of all shrimp fishing effort. The Council rejected a logbook alternative to record bycatch because it would require a substantial time commitment and burden on the part of vessel captains and crews, and because quality control in the logbook data would be difficult to maintain. Over 450 species have been identified in Gulf of Mexico shrimp trawls, which would require extensive training in species identification for vessel crews.
A proposed rule that would implement measures outlined in Amendment 10 has been received from the Council. In accordance with the Magnuson Stevens Act, NMFS is evaluating the proposed rule to determine whether it is consistent with the FMP, the MagnusonStevens Act, and other applicable law. If that determination is affirmative, NMFS will publish the proposed rule in the Federal Register for public review and comment.
Comments received by October 14, 2003 will be considered by NMFS in
its decision to approve, disapprove, or partially approve the
amendment. Comments received after that date will not be considered by
NMFS in this decision. All comments received by NMFS on the amendment
or the proposed rule during their respective comment periods will be addressed in the final rule.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
Dated: August 7, 2003.
Bruce C. Morehead,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 0320681 Filed 81303; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 351022S
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT Dr. Steven Branstetter, 727-570-5305; fax 7275705583; email: steve.branstetter@noaa.gov.
14 CFR Part 39 40 CFR Part 52 14 CFR Part 71 33 CFR Part 165 50 CFR Part 679 26 CFR Part 1 40 CFR Part 180 47 CFR Part 73 50 CFR Part 17 33 CFR Part 117 44 CFR Part 67 50 CFR Part 648 14 CFR Part 97 33 CFR Part 100 40 CFR Part 63 26 CFR Part 301 50 CFR Part 622 39 CFR Part 111 40 CFR Part 300 44 CFR Part 65 50 CFR Part 660 40 CFR Part 271 40 CFR Parts 52 and 81 47 CFR Part 64 50 CFR Part 665 49 CFR Part 571 44 CFR Part 64 21 CFR Part 522 14 CFR Part 23 47 CFR Part 76