Federal Register: August 22, 2003 (Volume 68, Number 162)
DOCID: FR Doc 03-21543
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION
Federal Election Commission
CFR Citation: 11 CFR Part 111
DOCUMENT ID: [Notice 2003-15]
NOTICE: RULES
DOCUMENT ACTION: Statement of policy.
SUBJECT CATEGORY:
Statement of Policy Regarding Deposition Transcriptions in Nonpublic Investigations
EFFECTIVE DATES: August 22, 2003.
DOCUMENT SUMMARY:
The Federal Election Commission announces an alteration to its historic practice with regard to transcripts of depositions in enforcement matters to permit deponents to obtain a copy of the transcript of their own deposition so long as there is no good cause to limit the deponent to an opportunity to review and sign the transcript.
SUMMARY:
Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971; deposition transcripts in nonpublic investigations; policy statement,
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
When Federal Election Commission attorneys
take a deponent's sworn testimony at an enforcement deposition
authorized by 2 U.S.C. 437d(a)(4), only the deponent and his or her
counsel may attend. Under historic practice, the deponent has the right
to review and sign the transcript. 11 CFR 111.12(c) (applying Fed. R.
Civ. P. 30(e) to Commission enforcement depositions). However, a
deponent who is also a respondent is not currently allowed to obtain a
copy of, or take notes when reviewing, his or her own transcript unless
and until the General Counsel has transmitted, pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 437g(a)(3), a brief
[[Page 50689]]
recommending that the Commission find probable cause to believe that
the respondent has violated or is about to violate the Federal Election
Campaign Act of 1971, as amended (``the Act''), or Chapters 95 or 96 of
Title 26, U.S. Code. The Office of General Counsel does not currently
offer other deponents an opportunity to obtain their transcripts; once
the entire matter has been closed, other deponents can copy the
transcript at their own expense if the transcript is made part of the public record.
The Commission recently invited the public to comment on various aspects of the agency's enforcement practices, including whether and when transcripts of depositions should be released and to whom. See ``Enforcement Procedures,'' Notice 20039, 68 FR 23311 (May 1, 2003). One possible change in practice included in the notice was for the Office of General Counsel to routinely allow deponents who are also respondents to procure immediately a copy of their own transcripts unless, on a casebycase basis, the General Counsel concluded (or the Commission concluded, on the recommendation of the General Counsel) that it was necessary to the successful completion of the investigation to withhold the transcript until completion of the investigation.
On June 11, 2003, the Commission held a public hearing on its enforcement practices. At the hearing, counsel for the regulated community suggested changes to the agency's enforcement procedures, including its deposition policy. Some of those testifying suggested that deponents be allowed to obtain copies of their own depositions immediately after the deposition, contrary to the historic practice. Several of these commenters also noted that the Commission's practice regarding depositions contrasts with that of some other civil law enforcement agencies during the investigative stage of their proceedings.
The Commission is governed, in part, by the Administrative
Procedure Act (APA). Under the APA, ``[a] person compelled to submit
data or evidence is entitled to retain or, on payment of lawfully
proscribed costs, procure a copy or transcript thereof, except that in
a nonpublic investigatory proceeding the witness may for good cause be
limited to inspection of the official transcript of his testimony.'' 5
U.S.C. 555(c). One example of ``good cause'' recognized by courts is a
concern that witnesses still to be examined might be coached. See
Commercial Capital Corp. v. SEC, 360 F.2d 856, 858 (7th Cir. 1966). In
the past, all open investigations have been considered as falling
within the APA's goodcause exception based on the potential for
deponents to share their testimony with third parties. The Commission
and its Office of General Counsel have also been mindful of the Federal
Election Campaign Act's requirement that ongoing investigations be kept confidential.\1\
\1\ Under 2 U.S.C. 437g(a)(12): ``Any notification or
investigation made under this section shall not be made public by
the Commission or by any person without the written consent of the
person receiving such notification or the person with respect to
whom such investigation is made. Any member or employee of the
Commission, or any other person, who violates the provisions * * *
shall be fined not more than $2,000. Any such member, employee, or
other person who knowingly and willfully violates the provisions * * * shall be fined not more than $5,000.''
Other federal agencies that conduct nonpublic investigations have adopted policies that interpret the APA's goodcause exception more narrowly. For example, in 1964 the Federal Communications Commission adopted a policy whereby: ``In any matter pending before the Commission, any person submitting data or evidence, whether acting under compulsion or voluntarily, shall have the right to retain a copy thereof, or to procure a copy * * * of any transcript made of his testimony, upon payment of the charges therefor to the person furnishing the same, which person may be designated by the Commission. The Commission itself shall not be responsible for furnishing the copies.'' 47 CFR 1.10. In 1972, the Securities and Exchange Commission adopted its current rule on this subject, which is similar to the FCC's. See 17 CFR 203.6. Likewise, the practice of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission is governed by 17 CFR 11.7(b), which states: ``A person compelled to submit data or evidence in the course of an investigatory proceeding shall be entitled to retain or, upon payment of appropriate fees * * * procure a copy or transcript thereof, except that the witness may for good cause be limited to inspection of the official transcript of his testimony.''
After carefully reviewing the comments submitted to it on this matter and considering the experience of other federal agencies regarding deposition transcripts in nonpublic investigations, the Commission hereby announces that, from the date of publication of this notice, it will permit deponents in enforcement matters to obtain, upon request to the Office of General Counsel, a copy of the transcript of their own deposition. The Commission has determined that it can maintain the integrity of its investigations even if current practice is altered, so long as access to transcripts may still be denied upon determination that good cause exists for doing so, and so long as thirdparty witnesses (or deponents who are also respondents in matters with multiple respondents) are granted access to their transcripts subject to the confidentiality requirements of the Act.
Accordingly, in all matters open and pending before the Commission
on or after the date of publication of this notice, a deponent may, in
writing, request a copy of his or her own deposition transcript. The
request may be made at any time after the deposition concludes. The
Office of General Counsel will review the request and, absent good
cause to the contrary, it will notify the deponent and the court
reporter in writing that the deponent may obtain a copy of the
transcript, at his or her own cost, from the court reporter. If the
Associate General Counsel or her deputy determined that there was
reason to invoke the goodcause exception, this Office would notify the
deponent and the Commission. This change would not in any way affect 11 CFR 111.12(c).
Dated: August 18, 2003.
Michael E. Toner,
Commissioner, Federal Election Commission.
[FR Doc. 0321543 Filed 82103; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 671501P
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
Lawrence L. Calvert, Deputy Associate General Counsel for Enforcement, Federal Election Commission, 999 E Street NW., Washington, DC 20463, (202) 6941650 or (800) 4249530.