Browse: Departments Dates Agencies
PA ID: [PA189-4300; FRL-7556-4]
SUBJECT CATEGORY: AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
EFFECTIVE DATES: This final rule is effective on October 14, 2003.
DOCUMENT SUMMARY: EPA is approving a request for Pennsylvania to redesignate the
Liberty Borough area of Allegheny County, Pennsylvania (the Liberty
Borough area) from nonattainment to attainment for the national ambient
air quality standard (NAAQS) for particulate matter with an aerodynamic
diameter less than or equal to a nominal 10 microns (PM
SUMMARY: Pennsylvania,
On July 18, 2003 (68 FR 42657), EPA published a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPR) for the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. The NPR proposed
to redesignate the Liberty Borough area of Allegheny County,
Pennsylvania (the Liberty Borough area) from nonattainment to
attainment for the national ambient air quality standard (NAAQS) for
particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter less than or equal to a
nominal 10 microns (PM
EPA is redesignating the Liberty Borough area of Allegheny County,
Pennsylvania from nonattainment to attainment for the national ambient
air quality standard (NAAQS) for particulate matter with an aerodynamic
diameter less than or equal to a nominal 10 microns (PM
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this
action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' and therefore is not
subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget. For this
reason, this action is also not subject to Executive Order 13211,
``Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy
Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001). This action
merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and imposes
no additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law.
Accordingly, the Administrator certifies that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because
this rule approves preexisting requirements under state law and does
not impose any additional enforceable duty beyond that required by
state law, it does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Public Law 1044). This rule also does not
have tribal implications because it will not have a substantial direct
effect on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes,
as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
This action also does not have Federalism implications because it does
not have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government, as specified in
[[Page 53516]]
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999). This action
merely approves a state rule implementing a Federal standard, and does
not alter the relationship or the distribution of power and
responsibilities established in the Clean Air Act. This rule also is
not subject to Executive Order 13045 ``Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks'' (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997), because it is not economically significant.
In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. In this context, in the absence of a prior existing requirement for the State to use voluntary consensus standards (VCS), EPA has no authority to disapprove a SIP submission for failure to use VCS. It would thus be inconsistent with applicable law for EPA, when it reviews a SIP submission, to use VCS in place of a SIP submission that otherwise satisfies the provisions of the Clean Air Act. Thus, the requirements of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply. This rule does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. This rule is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by November 10, 2003. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
which redesignates the Liberty Borough area to attainment for
PM
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements,
Air pollution control, National parks, Wilderness areas.
Dated: September 2, 2003.
James W. Newsom,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region III.
40 CFR parts 52 and 81 are amended as follows:
PART 52[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart NNPennsylvania
2. Section 52.2020 is amended by adding paragraph (c)(215) to read as follows:
Sec. 52.2020 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(215) The PM
nonattainment area submitted on October 28, 2002 by the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection:
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Letter of October 28, 2002 from the Pennsylvania Department of
Environmental Protection transmitting the redesignation request and
maintenance plan for the PM
(B) Maintenance Plan for the Liberty Borough PM
(ii) Additional material.
(A) Remainder of the October 28, 2002 State submittal(s) pertaining
to the revisions listed in paragraph (c)(215)(i) of this section.
(B) Additional material submitted by the State on June 20, 2003
which consisted of minor corrections to the PM
PART 81[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for Part 81 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart CSection 107 Attainment Status Designations
2. In Sec. 81.339, the table for ``PennsylvaniaPM10'' is amended by
revising the entry for Allegheny County to read as follows: Sec. 81.339 Pennsylvania.
* * * * *
PennsylvaniaPM10
Designation Classification Designated area
Date Type Date Type Allegheny County:
The area including Liberty, Lincoln, 10/14/03 Attainment............................... Port Vue, and Glassport Boroughs
and the City of Clairton.
[[Page 53517]]
* * * * * * * * * * * *
[FR Doc. 0323265 Filed 91003; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 656050P
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT Ruth Knapp, (215) 814-2191, or by e- mail at knapp.ruth@epa.gov.
14 CFR Part 39 40 CFR Part 52 14 CFR Part 71 33 CFR Part 165 50 CFR Part 679 47 CFR Part 73 26 CFR Part 1 40 CFR Part 180 33 CFR Part 117 50 CFR Part 17 44 CFR Part 67 50 CFR Part 648 14 CFR Part 97 33 CFR Part 100 40 CFR Part 63 50 CFR Part 622 44 CFR Part 65 50 CFR Part 660 26 CFR Part 301 39 CFR Part 111 40 CFR Part 300 6 CFR Part 5 40 CFR Part 271 47 CFR Part 64 40 CFR Parts 52 and 81 50 CFR Part 665 44 CFR Part 64 10 CFR Part 50 49 CFR Part 571 47 CFR Part 76