Browse: Departments Dates Agencies
Docket ID: [Docket No. 2003-NM-07-AD]
RIN ID: RIN 2120-AA64
SUBJECT CATEGORY: Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-10-10, DC- 10-10F, DC-10-15, DC-10-30, DC-10-30F (KC-10A and KDC-10), DC-10-40, DC-10-40F, MD-10-10F, and MD-10-30F Airplanes; and Model MD-11 and MD- 11F Airplanes
DOCUMENT SUMMARY: This document proposes the adoption of a new airworthiness directive (AD) that is applicable to certain McDonnell Douglas Model DC1010, DC1010F, DC1015, DC1030, DC1030F (KC10A and KDC10), DC1040, DC1040F, MD1010F, and MD1030F airplanes; and Model MD 11 and MD11F airplanes. This proposal would require replacement of the left and right number one passenger door bolted lower sealtoretainer and girt bar view window assemblies with new, doubleflush riveted assemblies. This action is intended to prevent the number one passenger door slide from inflating before it has cleared the slide cover, which could result in the slide being unusable during an emergency evacuation and consequent injury to passengers or airplane crewmembers. This action is intended to address the identified unsafe condition.
SUMMARY: McDonnell Douglas,
Interested persons are invited to participate in the making of the
proposed rule by submitting such written data, views, or arguments as
they may desire. Communications shall identify the Rules Docket number
and be submitted in triplicate to the address specified above. All
communications received on or before the closing date for comments,
specified above, will be considered before taking action on the
proposed rule. The proposals contained in this action may be changed in light of the comments received.
Submit comments using the following format:
[sbull] Organize comments issuebyissue. For example, discuss a
request to change the compliance time and a request to change the service bulletin reference as two separate issues.
[sbull] For each issue, state what specific change to the proposed AD is being requested.
[sbull] Include justification (e.g., reasons or data) for each request.
Comments are specifically invited on the overall regulatory, economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the proposed rule. All comments submitted will be available, both before and after the closing date for comments, in the Rules Docket for examination by interested persons. A report summarizing each FAApublic contact concerned with the substance of this proposal will be filed in the Rules Docket.
Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments submitted in response to this action must submit a selfaddressed, stamped postcard on which the following statement is made: ``Comments to Docket Number 2003NM07AD.'' The postcard will be date stamped and returned to the commenter.
Any person may obtain a copy of this NPRM by submitting a request to the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, ANM114, Attention: Rules Docket No. 2003NM07AD, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 980554056.
The FAA has received reports of the number one passenger door slide not deploying properly when the door was activated on two McDonnell Douglas Model MD11 airplanes. Although the exact cause of the improper deployment has not been determined, it may be possible for the inflation lanyard of the evacuation slide to hang up on the ends of certain fasteners. These fasteners are used in the door bottom sealto retainer assembly and the view window assembly. If the lanyard hangs up on the fasteners as the passenger door moves upward during emergency use, it may be possible for the slide to begin inflating before it has cleared the slide cover. This action is intended to prevent the number one passenger door slide from inflating before it has cleared the slide cover, which could result in the slide being unusable during an emergency evacuation and consequent injury to passengers or airplane crewmembers.
The subject area on certain McDonnell Douglas Model DC1010, DC 1010F, DC1015, DC1030, DC1030F (KC10A and KDC10), DC1040,
DC1040F, MD1010F, and MD1030F airplanes is almost identical to
that on the affected Model MD11 and MD11F airplanes. Therefore, all
of these models may be subject to the same unsafe condition. Explanation of Relevant Service Information
The FAA has reviewed and approved Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
DC1025A378 dated November 27, 2002 (for Model DC1010, DC1010F, DC 1015, DC1030, DC1030F (KC10A and KDC10), DC1040, DC1040F,
MD1010F, MD1030F series airplanes). The FAA has also reviewed and
approved Boeing Alert Service Bulletin MD1125A262, Revision 01, dated
February 11, 2003 (for Model MD11 and MD11F series airplanes). These
service bulletins describe procedures for replacing the passenger door
seal and view window retainer assemblies on the door lower cover with
new, doubleflush riveted assemblies. Accomplishment of the actions
specified in the service bulletins is intended to adequately address the identified unsafe condition.
Since an unsafe condition has been identified that is likely to exist or develop on other products of this same type design, the proposed AD would require accomplishment of the actions specified in the applicable service bulletin described previously.
On July 10, 2002, the FAA issued a new version of 14 CFR part 39 (67 FR 47997, July 22, 2002), which governs the FAA's airworthiness directives system. The regulation now includes material that relates to altered products, special flight permits, and alternative methods of compliance (AMOCs). Because we have now included this material in part 39, only the office authorized to approve AMOCs is identified in each individual AD.
We have reviewed the figures we have used over the past several years to calculate AD costs to operators. To account for various inflationary costs in the airline industry, we find it necessary to increase the labor rate used in these calculations from $60 per work hour to $65 per work hour. The cost impact information, below, reflects this increase in the specified hourly labor rate.
There are approximately 350 Model DC10 airplanes, and approximately 195 Model MD11 and 11F airplanes of the affected design in the worldwide fleet. The FAA estimates that 263 Model DC10 airplanes and 81 Model MD11 and 11F airplanes of U.S. registry would be affected by this proposed AD.
The following table shows the estimated cost impact for airplanes affected by this proposed AD:
[[Page 54684]]
Table.Cost Impact
Labor cost per Parts cost per Maximum fleet
Model Work hours airplane airplane cost
(estimated) (estimated) (estimated) (estimated)
DC10 and MD10 airplanes....................... 2 $130 $6,024 $1,618,502
MD11 and 11F airplanes........................ 1 65 6,024 493,209
The cost impact figures discussed above are based on assumptions that no operator has yet accomplished any of the proposed requirements of this AD action, and that no operator would accomplish those actions in the future if this proposed AD were not adopted. The cost impact figures discussed in AD rulemaking actions represent only the time necessary to perform the specific actions actually required by the AD. These figures typically do not include incidental costs, such as the time required to gain access and close up, planning time, or time necessitated by other administrative actions.
The regulations proposed herein would not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, it is determined that this proposal would not have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this proposed regulation (1) is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) if promulgated, will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. A copy of the draft regulatory evaluation prepared for this action is contained in the Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained by contacting the Rules Docket at the location provided under the caption ADDRESSES. List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety. The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration proposes to amend part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding the following new airworthiness directive:
Applicability: Model DC1010, DC1010F, DC1015, DC1030, DC1030F (KC10A and KDC10), DC1040, DC1040F, MD1010F, and
MD1030F airplanes, as listed in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
DC1025A378, dated November 27, 2002; and Model MD11 and MD11F
airplanes, as listed Boeing Alert Service Bulletin MD1125A262,
Revision 01, dated February 11, 2003; certificated in any category.
Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished previously.
To prevent the number one passenger door slide from inflating
before it has cleared the slide cover, which could result in the
slide being unusable during an emergency evacuation and consequent
injury to passengers or airplane crewmembers, accomplish the following:
Replacement
(a) Within 18 months after the effective date of this AD,
replace the left and right number one passenger door bolted lower
sealtoretainer and girt bar view window assemblies with the new,
doubleflush riveted assemblies, per the Accomplishment Instructions
of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin DC1025A378, dated November 27, 2002 (for Model DC1010, DC1010F, DC1015, DC1030, DC1030F
(KC10A and KDC10), DC1040, DC1040F, MD1010F, and MD1030F
airplanes), or Boeing Alert Service Bulletin MD1125A262, Revision
01, dated February 11, 2003 (for Model MD11 and MD11F airplanes); as applicable.
Replacements Accomplished Per Previous Issue of Service Bulletin
(b) Replacements accomplished before the effective date of this
AD per Boeing Alert Service Bulletin MD1125A262, dated November 27, 2002, are considered acceptable for compliance with the
corresponding action specified in this AD.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(c) In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, the Manager, Los Angeles
Aircraft Certification Office, FAA, is authorized to approve alternative methods of compliance for this AD.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on September 11, 2003. Vi L. Lipski,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 0323821 Filed 91703; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 491013P
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT Ken Sujishi, Aerospace Engineer, Systems and Equipment Branch, ANM130L, FAA, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office, 3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, California 907124137; telephone (562) 6275353; fax (562) 6275210.
14 CFR Part 39 40 CFR Part 52 14 CFR Part 71 33 CFR Part 165 50 CFR Part 679 47 CFR Part 73 26 CFR Part 1 40 CFR Part 180 33 CFR Part 117 50 CFR Part 17 44 CFR Part 67 50 CFR Part 648 14 CFR Part 97 33 CFR Part 100 40 CFR Part 63 50 CFR Part 622 44 CFR Part 65 50 CFR Part 660 26 CFR Part 301 39 CFR Part 111 40 CFR Part 300 6 CFR Part 5 40 CFR Part 271 47 CFR Part 64 40 CFR Parts 52 and 81 50 CFR Part 665 44 CFR Part 64 10 CFR Part 50 49 CFR Part 571 47 CFR Part 76