Browse: Departments Dates Agencies
SUBJECT CATEGORY: Notice of Final Changes to SAMHSA's Discretionary Grant Announcements
DOCUMENT SUMMARY: On August 21, 2003, the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) announced plans to change its approach to announcing and soliciting applications for its discretionary grant programs in Fiscal Year (FY) 2004. These changes involved the publication of four standard grant announcements that would provide the basic program design and application instructions for four types of grants `` Services Grants, Infrastructure Grants, Best Practices Planning and Implementation Grants, and ServicetoScience Grants. The four announcements were made available for public review and comment for 60 days, with the comment period closing on October 20, 2003. This notice describes the comments received on the draft standard grant announcements and changes made to the standard grant announcements. This notice is followed by four notices that provide the final text for SAMHSA's four standard grant announcements.
Authority: Sections 509, 516, and 520A of the Public Health Service Act.
SUMMARY: Health and Human Services Department, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration,
The Notices of Funding Availability (NOFAs) announcing the
availability of funds for specific grant funding opportunities will be
published separately in the Federal Register, and posted on the Federal
grants Web site (http://www.grants.gov) and on the SAMHSA Web site
(http://www.samhsa.gov). The NOFAs will:
[sbull] Identify any specific target population or issue for the specific grant funding opportunity,
[sbull] Identify which of the four standard announcements applicants must use to prepare their applications,
[sbull] Specify total funding available for the first year of the grants and the expected size and number of awards,
[sbull] Specify the application deadline,
[sbull] Note any specific program requirements for each funding opportunity, and
[sbull] Include any limitations or exceptions to the general provisions in the standard announcement.
Applicants will need to have both the NOFA and the appropriate standard announcement to prepare their applications. Both documents will be provided, along with application materials, in the application kits available from SAMHSA's clearinghouses as well as on SAMHSA's Web site.
SAMHSA anticipates that the four standard grant announcements will be used for the majority of its grant funding opportunities. However, there will be some funding opportunities that do not fit the standard announcements. In those instances, separate standalone grant announcements will be published and provided to applicants as they have been in the past (i.e., in the Federal Register, on the SAMHSA Web site, on the Federal grants Web site, and through SAMHSA's clearinghouses).
SAMHSA published the draft standard grant announcements in the
Federal Register for public review and comment on August 21, 2003.
SAMHSA received over 50 comments on the standard grant announcements,
along with numerous requests for additional information about how the
standard grant announcements would function. The vast majority of the
comments were positive, indicating that the proposed process could be
helpful to applicants in laying the groundwork for their applications
prior to the announcement of specific funding opportunities. At the
same time, commentors identified several areas where the announcements
could be clarified and strengthened. The following are key themes
expressed in the comments received on the standard grant announcements:
[sbull] Cultural Competence and Consumer ParticipationSeveral
commentors expressed concern that the standard grant announcements did
not clearly require applicants to address cultural competence and
consumer participation. This has been a hallmark of SAMHSA grant
announcements and many commentors were concerned that these important
values appeared to have been lost. SAMHSA has revised the standard
grant announcements to more explicitly address cultural competence in
each of the standard grant announcements, particularly in the
requirements for the Project Narrative of the applications.
[sbull] Clarification of the Evidence StandardWhile commentors
generally agreed that it was important to require evidencebased
practices in the Services Grants and Best Practices Planning and
Implementation (BPPI) Grants announcements, they did not feel that the
evidence standard articulated in the draft announcements was clear.
Commentors requested that SAMHSA clarify to what extent practices
could be adapted/modified and that SAMHSA require applicants to justify
the use of the practice for the target population. SAMHSA agrees that
this is critical and has, therefore, deleted the ``twolevel'' review
that was initially proposed for Services and BPPI grants. Instead, the
justification of the evidencebased practice has been incorporated as a
scored item in the Project Narrative. Applicants will be required not
only to provide evidence that the practice is effective, but also to justify its use for the target population and justify any
[[Page 65769]]
adaptations/modifications to the practice.
Commentors requested that SAMHSA clarify what, precisely, applicants
had to say to justify the evidencebase for a practice selected from
among those SAMHSA has already determined to have met the evidence
standard. This has been clarified in the revised announcements. Some
commentors requested that SAMHSA limit evidencebased practices to only
those documented in the peerreviewed literature. SAMHSA had considered
this standard in early (i.e., prepublication) drafts of the
announcements and decided not to do so, because there are relatively
few practices that have been wellresearched and documented for a wide
variety of target populations and in a widevariety of settings.
Many commentors requested that SAMHSA provide a definition of the
``recognized experts'' whose opinions (in the form of consensus
documents) may be considered acceptable evidence of effectiveness in
situations where there is little/no researchbased evidence of
effectiveness. Some commentors wanted to see a very broad definition,
while others wanted SAMHSA to delete consensus documents as acceptable
evidence of effectiveness. SAMHSA has retained consensus documents as
acceptable evidence of effectiveness, but has clarified that ``local
recognition of an individual as a respected or influential person at
the community level is not considered a `recognized expert' for this purpose.''
[sbull] Clarify Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA) and
Performance Measurement RequirementsThe draft announcements included
preliminary GPRA/performance indicators, and many comments were
received requesting clarification of the data collection requirements
that would accompany these preliminary GPRA/performance indicators.
This work is still under development. Therefore, SAMHSA has deleted
reference to the draft indicators in the standard grant announcements.
The data collection and performance measurement requirements for each
funding opportunity will be specified in the NOFA. SAMHSA expects to
issue modified standard grant announcements once the performance
indicators and related data collection requirements are finalized.
[sbull] Award CriteriaSome commentors expressed concern about the
award criterion limiting awards to no more than two per States. SAMHSA
has revised the award criteria to be more flexible and indicate that
SAMHSA will consider a ``balance of awards in terms of geography
(including urban, rural and remote settings), target populations, and program size.''
[sbull] Ensure adequate application periodCommentors requested
that SAMHSA distribute publication of NOFAs and receipt dates
throughout the Fiscal Year in order to minimize the burden on
applicants. While this is not an issue that is directly addressed in
the standard grant announcements, SAMHSA does intend to distribute
publication of NOFAs and receipt dates throughout the Fiscal Year.
SAMHSA expects that one benefit of publishing brief NOFAs for each
funding opportunity (rather than full Requests for Application) is that
SAMHSA will be able to provide applicants with more time to prepare their applications.
[sbull] Submission of Documentation that Projects are Consistent
with State PrioritiesReaction to this requirement was mixed among
commentors. While many commentors felt that it was a positive
requirement, others were concerned about the feasibility of meeting the
requirement and/or the burden on the State. SAMHSA has modified the
requirement to include documentation that projects are consistent with State or county priorities.
[sbull] Tribal CommentsSAMHSA received comments from several
tribal organizations towards the end of the comment period. Many of
them requested additional time to prepare their comments. However,
because the timely publication of the FY 2004 NOFAs depends on timely
finalization and publication of the standard grant announcements by the
end of November 2003, SAMHSA was not able to extend the comment period.
SAMHSA has attempted to incorporate the comments received into the
standard grant announcements and will work with tribal organizations to
address other comments in future versions of the standard grant
announcements. While SAMHSA intends the grants to be available on an
ongoing basis, it is likely that SAMHSA will need to make some
adjustments for FY 2005, based on the first year of experience in FY
2004. SAMHSA therefore declined to extend the comment period.
[sbull] Minor Technical EditsSAMHSA received numerous comments
regarding minor technical edits on the standard grant announcements. SAMHSA has incorporated those comments where possible.
SAMHSA greatly appreciates the interest and support expressed by
the field in the comments on the standard grant announcements. The
comments received were very helpful in clarifying and finalizing the
announcements, and SAMHSA is hopeful that the final standard grant
announcements will help potential applicants prepare applications for SAMHSA's FY 2004 grant funding opportunities.
Dated: November 13, 2003.
Daryl Kade,
Director, Office of Policy, Planning and Budget, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.
[FR Doc. 0328873 Filed 112003; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 416220P
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT Cathy Friedman, M.A., Office of Policy, Planning and Budget, 5600 Fishers Lane, Room 12C26, Rockville, Maryland, 20857. Fax: (3015946159) Email: cfriedma@samhsa.gov. Phone: (301) 4431910.
14 CFR Part 39 40 CFR Part 52 14 CFR Part 71 33 CFR Part 165 50 CFR Part 679 47 CFR Part 73 26 CFR Part 1 40 CFR Part 180 33 CFR Part 117 50 CFR Part 17 44 CFR Part 67 50 CFR Part 648 14 CFR Part 97 33 CFR Part 100 40 CFR Part 63 50 CFR Part 622 44 CFR Part 65 50 CFR Part 660 26 CFR Part 301 39 CFR Part 111 40 CFR Part 300 6 CFR Part 5 40 CFR Part 271 47 CFR Part 64 40 CFR Parts 52 and 81 50 CFR Part 665 44 CFR Part 64 10 CFR Part 50 49 CFR Part 571 47 CFR Part 76