Browse: Departments Dates Agencies
Docket ID: [Docket No. FR-4835-I-01]
RIN ID: RIN 2502-AI00
SUBJECT CATEGORY: FHA TOTAL Mortgage Scorecard
EFFECTIVE DATES: December 22, 2003.
Comment Due Date: January 20, 2004.
DOCUMENT SUMMARY: This interim rule would codify the procedures that mortgagees and automated underwriting system vendors must observe if they opt to use the ``Technology Open To Approved Lenders'' (TOTAL) mortgage scorecard offered by the Federal Housing Administration (FHA). This rule follows a December 6, 2000, Federal Register notice, which announced the Department's intention to deploy the TOTAL mortgage scorecard. The interim rule also clarifies that the underwriting requirements to which FHA mortgagees must adhere are not altered by this rule. This rule only provides the requirements and procedures for use of the TOTAL mortgage scorecard.
SUMMARY: Housing and Urban Development Department,
On December 6, 2000, the Department published a notice in the Federal Register (65 FR 76273), announcing its intention to deploy the FHA TOTAL (originally an acronym for ``Technology Open To All Lenders,'' but now more accurately standing for ``Technology Open To Approved Lenders'') Mortgage Scorecard for mortgage industry use. The TOTAL Mortgage Scorecard (or Scorecard), developed by HUD, assesses the credit worthiness of FHA mortgagors by evaluating certain mortgage application and mortgagor credit information that has been statistically proven to accurately predict the likelihood of mortgagor default. The TOTAL Mortgage Scorecard is not an automated underwriting system (AUS); rather, it is a mathematical equation intended for use within an automated underwriting system.
The December 6, 2000, notice (Notice) described the Department's purpose and objectives in deploying the TOTAL Mortgage Scorecard. The objectives for the use of the TOTAL Mortgage Scorecard, which were first stated in the Notice, are (1) to provide an improved credit evaluation system for FHA loans that has been statistically proven to accurately predict the likelihood of mortgagor default while providing a uniform system protective of borrowers; (2) to expand access to mortgage credit for low and moderateincome mortgagors and discourage unlawful discrimination against mortgagors protected by the Fair Housing Act and the Equal Credit Opportunity Act; (3) to facilitate access to, and reduce the cost and time associated with, originating HUD/FHAinsured mortgages; and (4) to encourage a standardized, industrywide capability for communication and exchange of information among members of the mortgage lending community.
The Notice also advised that approval would be rescinded for the two individual privately developed mortgage scorecards used in the processing of FHA mortgage loans, and that after deployment of the TOTAL Mortgage Scorecard, HUD would require use of the Scorecard in any AUS. The Notice also indicated that users of the TOTAL Mortgage Scorecard would receive documentation relief and credit policy waivers provided by HUD. Further, the Notice advised that HUD also had developed a Use Agreement that established the requirements and responsibilities for implementation and use of the TOTAL Mortgage Scorecard by qualified mortgagees and others that purchase, sell, underwrite, or document HUD mortgage loans for mortgagees under HUD's Direct Endorsement program. Two organizations have been working with HUD to test the use of the TOTAL Mortgage Scorecard. While HUD, through individual approvals, could authorize other organizations to use the TOTAL Mortgage Scorecard, HUD has decided that a more efficient course of action is to promulgate regulations for the use of the Scorecard consistent with the purpose and objectives announced in the Notice instead of executing individual approvals that establish the requirements and responsibilities for use of the Scorecard.
Current regulations at 24 CFR 203.255 describe the documentation requirements mortgagees must follow when underwriting mortgage loans to be insured by FHA, and state that for mortgage loans rated as acceptable risks by an approved AUS, a Direct Endorsement underwriter need not certify that he/she has personally reviewed the credit application. The regulations do not, however, describe the rules and procedures that mortgagees and automated underwriting system vendors must observe if they opt to use the TOTAL Mortgage Scorecard, and to receive the inherent benefits accompanying its use, including documentation relief and credit policy revisions.
This interim rule would revise HUD's regulation at 24 CFR 203.251
to add a definition for ``TOTAL,'' and Sec. 203.255(b)(5) would be
revised to remove the reference to ``an automated underwriting system
approved by the Secretary or Commissioner'' and substitute ``TOTAL
Mortgage Scorecard.'' The requirements governing the use of the TOTAL
Mortgage Scorecard would also be added to Sec. 203.255(b)(5). Any AUS
vendor that ``calls'' the TOTAL Mortgage Scorecard, and any FHA
approved mortgagee that obtains a risk assessment from the Scorecard,
must abide by the requirements set forth in this regulation. Only AUSs
developed, operated, owned, or used by FHAapproved Direct Endorsement
mortgages, Fannie Mae, or Freddie Mac will be able to access the
scorecard, and only FHAapproved mortgagees will be able to obtain risk
assessments using the TOTAL Mortgage Scorecard. The rule affirms that
Direct Endorsement mortgagees remain solely responsible for the
underwriting decision. Implementation of this regulation will rescind
Mortgagee Letters 9634, 9814, and 9926, which address FHA's review
of individual automated underwriting procedures. This rule does not
alter the underwriting requirements to which FHA mortgagees must
currently adhere. This rule only addresses the use of the TOTAL Mortgage Scorecard and the
[[Page 65825]]
requirements and procedures to which FHA mortgagees must adhere if they
opt to use the Scorecard. Specifically, this regulation establishes the conditions for use of the Scorecard.
The TOTAL Mortgage Scorecard is only a tool to assist the mortgagee in managing its workflow and expediting the endorsement process and is not a substitute for the mortgagee's reasonable consideration of risk and credit worthiness. The Department believes that the TOTAL Mortgage Scorecard is a valuable tool, but that value depends upon proper use of the Scorecard in accordance with HUD requirements and procedures. To help assure the TOTAL Mortgage Scorecard is not misused, the rule would require mortgagees to provide full manual underwriting for mortgage applicants when the scorecard returns a ``refer'' risk score. The Scorecard results must not be used as the basis for rejecting any mortgage applicant.
In addition, the rule would provide that both mortgagees and vendors must:
use the scorecard to process FHA and other loan products specified by the FHA Commissioner only, and for no other purpose;
implement quality control procedures for scorecard usage and provide,
at FHA's request, reports and loan samples that enable FHA to evaluate program operation;
not use the TOTAL Mortgage Scorecard to direct mortgagors into other
nonFHA product offerings (this requirement does not relieve a
mortgagee from its obligations under Sec. 203.10 concerning informed consumer choice for prospective FHA mortgagors);
not disassemble, decompile, reverse engineer, derive or otherwise
reproduce any part of the source code or algorithm in the TOTAL Mortgage Scorecard;
not provide feedback messages that conflict with the Equal Credit Opportunity Act; and
comply with any additional HUD/FHA requirements or procedures, that
are applicable to the TOTAL Mortgage Scorecard and may be issued
through handbooks, mortgagee letters, TOTAL User Guides, or TOTAL
Developers Guide following appropriate advance notification, where applicable.
Automated underwriting system vendors and mortgagees found to violate these conditions may have their access to the Scorecard terminated with appropriate notice. HUD will provide a vendor or mortgagee with a 30day notice of a violation and loss of privilege. The notice will state the nature of the violation, the effective date of the loss of privilege, and the duration of the loss of privilege. A party receiving such a notice may appeal to the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Single Family Housing (DASSFH), or the Deputy Assistant Secretary's designee, before the effective date by providing evidence to refute the violation. The loss of privilege is stayed until the DAS SFH notifies the party that the loss of privilege has been affirmed, rescinded, or modified. As an additional measure to ensure compliance with these requirements, access to the TOTAL Mortgage Scorecard by a FHA mortgagee will be conditioned upon the mortgagee's certification to comply with the requirements as provided in this rule.
In general, HUD publishes a rule for public comment before issuing a rule for effect, in accordance with HUD's own regulations on rulemaking at 24 CFR part 10. Part 10, however, does provide for exceptions for that general rule where HUD finds good cause to omit advance notice and public participation. The good cause requirement is satisfied when prior public procedure is determined ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest.''
HUD finds that good cause exists to publish this interim rule for effect without first soliciting public comment in that prior public procedure would be contrary to the public interest. Currently, loan originators underwrite FHA loans manually or through Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac's proprietary automated systems that employ scorecards that were built using data on FHA borrowers but with algorithms known only to the developers and not to FHA. Over the last four years, HUD has developed its own FHA TOTAL Scorecard and through validation determined that it provides an improved credit evaluation system for FHA loans that has been statistically proven to accurately predict the likelihood of mortgagor default while providing a uniform system protective of borrowers. Indeed, the TOTAL Scorecard, among other attributes, better predicts delinquencies that may occur under FHA loans than any other underwriting means currently available.
The release of the TOTAL Scorecard and its implementation without delay through the issuance of this rule will allow FHA to benefit immediately from this more refined, uniform instrument that will better measure the credit worthiness of potential borrowers and better protect the Government from financial losses. This is especially true in an environment of relatively low interest rates, increased demand for FHA insurance products, and historically high FHA delinquency rates. Additionally, because the scorecard is government property and HUD is prepared to accept data on TOTAL Scorecard performance, immediate deployment will allow HUD to efficiently track the performance of FHA loans and FHA lenders and quickly fix and refine the scorecard further.
For borrowers, immediate deployment of the TOTAL Scorecard will result in the institution of a single system nationwide that will offer uniform processing.
The interim rule enables, but does not require, FHA mortgage
lenders to use this new automated means of assessing the credit
worthiness of FHA mortgagors. Although use of the TOTAL Scorecard is
not required, the Department believes that this rule makes use of the
TOTAL Scorecard possible for a greater number of mortgagees, and for
the benefit of a greater number of mortgagors, at an earlier point in
time and in a more efficient manner than would execution of individual
approvals to use the TOTAL Scorecard issued in accordance with
outstanding mortgagee letter instructions. For FHA mortgagees that opt
to use the TOTAL Scorecard, use of the TOTAL Scorecard is subject to
several conditions to protect borrowers including that borrowers who
are classified ``refer'' will be processed through manual underwriting.
For the TOTAL Scorecard to provide the intended benefits of accurate
assessment, FHA mortgagees must abide by the terms and conditions for
use. Also, FHA mortgagees may not disassemble, decompile, reverse
engineer, derive or otherwise reproduce any part of the source code or
algorithm in the TOTAL Scorecard. Such tampering may render the TOTAL Scorecard inaccurate and unusable.
IV. Findings and Certifications
The proposed new information collection requirements contained in Sec. 203.255(b)(5) have been submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 35013520). Under this Act, an agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless the collection displays a valid control number. [[Page 65826]]
The public reporting burden for this new collection of information
is estimated to include the time for reviewing the instructions,
searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data
needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information.
Information on the estimated public reporting burden is provided in the following table:
Number of Responses per Total annual Hours per
Information collection respondents respondent responses response Total hours
6,000 1 6,000 1 6,000
In accordance with 5 CFR 1320.8(d)(1), HUD is soliciting comments
from members of the public and affected agencies concerning the proposed collection of information to:
(1) Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency,
including whether the information will have practical utility;
(2) Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information;
(3) Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and
(4) Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those
who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated
collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses.
Interested persons are invited to submit comments regarding the
information collection requirements in this proposal. Comments must be
received by January 20, 2004. Comments must refer to the proposal by name and docket number (FR4835I01) and must be sent to:
Lauren Wittenberg, HUD Desk Officer, Office of Management and Budget,
New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 205030009, Lauren_Wittenberg@omb.eop.gov, and
Gloria Diggs, Reports Liaison Officer, Office of the Assistant
Secretary for HousingFederal Housing Commissioner, Room 9116, U.S.
Department of Housing and Urban Development, 451 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC 204108000.
A Finding of No Significant Impact with respect to the environment for this rule has been made in accordance with HUD regulations at 24 CFR part 50, which implement section 102(2)(C) of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969. The Finding of No Significant Impact is available for public inspection between 7:30 a.m. and 5:30 p.m. weekdays in the office of the Rules Docket Clerk, Office of the General Counsel, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Room 10276, 451 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC 204100500.
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 15311538) establishes requirements for federal agencies to assess the effects of their regulatory actions on state, local, and tribal governments and the private sector. This interim rule does not impose a federal mandate that will result in expenditure by state, local, or tribal governments, within the meaning of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Secretary, in accordance with the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 605(b)), has reviewed this rule before publication and by approving it certifies that this rule would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. The rule governs access to, and use of, an automated, electronic tool to assist mortgagees in managing workflow and expediting the endorsement process. There are no anticompetitive discriminatory aspects of the rule with regard to small entities, and there are not any unusual procedures that would need to be complied with by small entities. Although HUD has determined that this interim rule would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities, HUD welcomes comments regarding any less burdensome alternatives to this rule that will meet HUD's objectives as described in this preamble.
Executive Order 13132 (entitled ``Federalism'') prohibits an agency from publishing any rule that has federalism implications if the rule either (1) imposes substantial direct compliance costs on state and local governments and is not required by statute, or (2) the rule preempts state law, unless the agency meets the consultation and funding requirements of section 6 of the Executive Order. This interim rule would not have federalism implications and would not impose substantial direct compliance costs on state and local governments or preempt state law within the meaning of the Executive Order. Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review
The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) reviewed this rule under Executive Order 12866 (entitled ``Regulatory Planning and Review''). OMB determined that this rule is a ``significant regulatory action,'' as defined in section 3(f) of the Order (although not economically significant, as provided in section 3(f)(1) of the Order). Any changes made to the interim rule subsequent to its submission to OMB are identified in the docket file, which is available for public inspection in the Regulations Division, Office of the General Counsel, Room 10276, Department of Housing and Urban Development, 451 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC 204100500.
The Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers for 24 CFR part 203 are 14.117 and 14.133.
Hawaiian Natives, Home improvement, Indianslands, Loan programs
housing and community development, Mortgage insurance, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Solar energy.
Accordingly, for the reasons described in the preamble, HUD proposes to amend 24 CFR part 203 to read as follows:
PART 203SINGLE FAMILY MORTGAGE INSURANCE
1. The authority citation for 24 CFR part 203 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 12 U.S.C. 1709, 1710, 1715b, and 1715u; 42 U.S.C. 3535(d).
2. Amend Sec. 203.251 by adding paragraph (t) to read as follows: Sec. 203.251 Definitions.
* * * * *
[[Page 65827]]
(t) TOTAL is an acronym that stands for ``Technology Open To
Approved Lenders.'' TOTAL is a mortgage scorecard based on a
mathematical equation that is to be used within an automated
underwriting system (AUS). TOTAL is a tool to assist the mortgagee in
managing its workflow and expediting the endorsement process, and is
not a substitute for the mortgagee's reasonable consideration of risk
and credit worthiness. Direct Endorsement mortgagees using TOTAL remain solely responsible for the underwriting decision.
3. Amend Sec. 203.255 by revising paragraph (b)(5) to read as follows: Sec. 203.255 Insurance of mortgage.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(5) An underwriter certification, on a form prescribed by the
Secretary, stating that the underwriter has personally reviewed the
appraisal report and credit application (including the analysis
performed on the worksheets) and that the proposed mortgage complies
with HUD underwriting requirements, and incorporates each of the
underwriter certification items that apply to the mortgage submitted
for endorsement, as set forth in the applicable handbook or similar
publication that is distributed to all Direct Endorsement mortgagees,
except that where the TOTAL Mortgage Scorecard is used by the
mortgagee, and the TOTAL Mortgage Scorecard has determined that the
application represents an acceptable risk under terms and conditions
agreed to by the FHA, a Direct Endorsement underwriter shall not be
required to certify that the underwriter has personally reviewed the
credit application (including the analysis performed on any
worksheets). The following requirements are also applicable to the use of the TOTAL Mortgage Scorecard:
(i) Mortgagees and vendors must certify to compliance with these requirements:
(A) Permissible users. Only FHAapproved automatic underwriting
systems (AUSs) developed, operated, owned, or used by FHAapproved
Direct Endorsement mortgages, Fannie Mae, or Freddie Mac, may access
TOTAL, and only FHAapproved mortgagees will be able to obtain risk assessments using TOTAL;
(B) Limitation on use. Results from TOTAL must not be used as the
basis for rejecting any mortgage applicant. Mortgagees must provide
full manual underwriting for mortgage applicants when TOTAL returns a ``refer'' risk score.
(C) Vendor and mortgagee requirements. Both mortgagees and vendors must:
(1) Use TOTAL to process FHA and other loan products specified by the FHA Commissioner only and for no other purpose;
(2) Implement quality control procedures for TOTAL usage and
provide, at FHA's request, reports and loan samples that enable FHA to evaluate program operation;
(3) Not use TOTAL to direct mortgagors into other nonFHA product
offerings (this requirement does not relieve a mortgagee from its
obligations under Sec. 203.10 concerning informed consumer choice for prospective FHA mortgagors);
(4) Not disassemble, decompile, reverse engineer, derive or
otherwise reproduce any part of the source code or algorithm in TOTAL;
(5) Not provide feedback messages that conflict with the Equal Credit Opportunity Act; and
(6) Comply with any additional HUD/FHA requirements or procedures
that are applicable to the Scorecard and may be issued through
handbooks, mortgagee letters, TOTAL User Guides, or TOTAL Developers
Guide following appropriate advance notification, where applicable.
(ii) Loss of privilege to use TOTAL. Mortgagees and AUS vendors
found to violate the requirements applicable to the use of TOTAL may
have their access to TOTAL and all associated privileges terminated
upon appropriate notice in accordance with the following procedure:
(A) Notice. HUD will provide a mortgagee or vendor with a 30day
notice of a violation and loss of privilege. The notice will state the
nature of the violation, the effective date of the loss of the
privilege, and the duration of the loss of the privilege. The notice
will become effective on the date provided in the notice, unless the
mortgagee or vendor appeals the violation and loss of privilege in accordance with paragraph (b)(5)(ii)(B) of this section.
(B) Appeal. A party receiving a notice of violation may appeal to
the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Single Family Housing (DASSFH), or
his or her designee, before the effective date of the notice by
providing evidence to refute the violation. The loss of privilege is
stayed until the DASSFH, or designee, notifies the party that the loss of privilege has been affirmed, rescinded, or modified.
* * * * *
Dated: October 29, 2003.
John C. Weicher,
Assistant Secretary for HousingFederal Housing Commissioner. [FR Doc. 0329055 Filed 112003; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 421027P
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT Vance T. Morris, Director, Office of Single Family Program Development, Room 9278, Department of Housing and Urban Development, 451 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC 204108000; telephone (202) 7082121. (This is not a tollfree number.) Hearing or speechimpaired persons may access this number by calling the tollfree Federal Information Relay Service number at 18008778339.
14 CFR Part 39 40 CFR Part 52 14 CFR Part 71 33 CFR Part 165 50 CFR Part 679 47 CFR Part 73 26 CFR Part 1 40 CFR Part 180 33 CFR Part 117 50 CFR Part 17 44 CFR Part 67 50 CFR Part 648 14 CFR Part 97 33 CFR Part 100 40 CFR Part 63 50 CFR Part 622 44 CFR Part 65 50 CFR Part 660 26 CFR Part 301 39 CFR Part 111 40 CFR Part 300 6 CFR Part 5 40 CFR Part 271 47 CFR Part 64 40 CFR Parts 52 and 81 50 CFR Part 665 44 CFR Part 64 10 CFR Part 50 49 CFR Part 571 47 CFR Part 76