Browse: Departments   Dates   Agencies  

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Securities and Exchange Commission

DOCUMENT ID: [Release No. IC-26263; 812-12966]

NOTICE: NOTICES

ACTION: Investment Company Act of 1940:

DOCUMENT ACTION: Notice of application for a permanent order under section 9(c) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (``Act'').

SUBJECT CATEGORY: Lehman Brothers Inc., et al.; Notice of Application

DOCUMENT SUMMARY: November 24, 2003.

SUMMARY: Order applications—; Lehman Brothers Inc. et al,

DOCUMENT BODY 2: November 24, 2003.

SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

The following is summary of the application. The complete application may be obtained for a fee at the Commission's Public Reference Branch, 450 Fifth Street, NW., Washington, DC 20549 0102 (telephone 2029428090).

Applicants' Representations

1. Lehman, a Delaware corporation, is a full service investment banking firm, which, among other activities, engages in securities offerings, including initial public offerings, secondary offerings and debt financings, and provides merger and acquisition and other services. LBAM serves as investment adviser to one registered investment company (``Fund''), Lincoln Capital serves as investment subadviser for eight Funds, and the Neuberger Applicants serve as investment adviser, subadviser, principal underwriter, or depositor to one or more Funds. Lehman acts as the depositor or principal underwriter for one or more Funds.\3\
\3\ Any registered unit investment trusts (``UIT'') or registered face amount certificate company for which Applicants may serve as principal underwriter or depositor are also included in the defined term Funds.

2. On October 31, 2003, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York entered an injunction (the ``Federal Injunction'') against Lehman in
[[Page 67230]]
a matter brought by the Commission.\4\ The Commission alleged in the complaint (``Complaint'') that Lehman violated certain Conduct Rules of the National Association of Securities Dealers (``NASD'') and Rules of the New York Stock Exchange (``NYSE'') (the NASD Conduct Rules and NYSE Rules together, the ``Exchange Rules'') by engaging in acts and practices that created or maintained inappropriate influence by Lehman's investment banking business (the ``Investment Banking Department'') over the research analysts in Lehman's research department (the ``Research Department''). The Federal Injunction enjoined Lehman directly or through its officers, directors, agents and employees, from violating the specific rules cited in the Complaint. Without admitting or denying the allegations in the Complaint, Lehman consented to the entry of the Federal Injunction as well as the payment of disgorgement and penalties and other equitable relief. Applicants state that Lehman expects to enter into settlement agreements relating to the activities referred to in the Complaint with certain state and territorial agencies which may result in an injunction by a court of competent jurisdiction that is based on the same conduct and the same facts as the Complaint (each, a ``State Injunction,'' and, together with the Federal Injunction, the ``Injunctions''). Applicants request that this application cover any disqualifications of the Applicants under section 9(a) of the Act resulting from the Injunctions. \4\ Securities and Exchange Commission v. Lehman Brothers Inc., 03 Civ. 2940 (WHP) (S.D.N.Y., filed April 28, 2003) (the
``Action'').

Applicants' Legal Analysis

1. Section 9(a)(2) of the Act, in relevant part, prohibits a person who has been enjoined from engaging in or continuing any conduct or practice in connection with the purchase or sale of a security from acting, among other things, as an investment adviser or depositor of any registered investment company or a principal underwriter for any registered openend investment company, registered UIT or registered faceamount certificate company. Section 9(a)(3) of the Act makes the prohibition in section 9(a)(2) applicable to a company, any affiliated person of which has been disqualified under the provisions of section 9(a)(2). Section 2(a)(3) of the Act defines ``affiliated person'' to include any person directly or indirectly controlling, controlled by, or under common control with, the other person. Lehman is an affiliated person of each of LBAM, Lincoln Capital, and the Neuberger Applicants within the meaning of section 2(a)(3) of the Act. Applicants further state that the entry of the Injunctions would result in Applicants being subject to the disqualification provisions of section 9(a) of the Act.

2. Section 9(c) of the Act provides that the Commission shall grant an application for exemption from the disqualification provisions of section 9(a) if it is established that these provisions, as applied to Applicants, are unduly or disproportionately severe or that the Applicants' conduct has been such as not to make it against the public interest or the protection of investors to grant the application. Applicants filed an application pursuant to section 9(c) seeking temporary and permanent orders exempting them from the disqualification provisions of section 9(a) of the Act.\5\
\5\ On October 31, 2003, the Commission issued the Temporary Order exempting Applicants, including the Neuberger Applicants, from the provisions of section 9(a) until the date the Commission takes final action on their application for a permanent order or, if earlier, October 31, 2005 (Investment Company Act Release No. 26241).

3. Applicants believe they meet the standard for exemption specified in section 9(c). Applicants state that the prohibitions of section 9(a) as applied to them would be unduly and disproportionately severe and that the conduct of Applicants has been such as not to make it against the public interest or the protection of investors to grant the exemption from section 9(a).

4. Applicants state that the conduct giving rise to the Injunctions did not involve any of the Applicants acting in the capacity of investment adviser, subadviser, depositor, or principal underwriter for a Fund.\6\ Applicants state that the Complaint did not expressly reference the conduct of any current or former officer or employee of Lehman who is or was involved in providing underwriting services to the Funds underwritten by Lehman.\7\ While LBAM's, Lincoln Capital's, and the Neuberger Applicants' portfolio managers may have had access to research reports issued by the Research Department, there is no indication that the portfolio managers relied on these research reports more than any other data that would have been considered by the portfolio managers in making investment decisions for the Funds.\8\ Although some of the Funds held securities in their portfolios at the time that Lehman issued research reports concerning the issuers of such securities, Applicants state that Lincoln Capital and the Neuberger Applicants were not acquired by Lehman Holdings, and LBAM did not begin serving as investment adviser to any Fund, until after the time period covering the conduct that forms the basis for the Injunctions. As far as Lehman is aware, none of the current or former officers, employees, portfolio managers, or any other investment personnel employed by Lehman, who is or was involved in providing principal underwriting services to the Funds, acted in their capacity as such based on any nonpublic information relating to the conduct underlying the Injunctions. In addition, each of the Applicants that serve or may serve as an investment adviser or subadviser to Funds has adopted policies regarding information barriers designed to protect the Funds from any conflict of interest that may arise between portfolio managers and other employees of Lehman.
\6\ Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. (``Lehman Holdings''), the ultimate parent company of the Applicants, acquired Lincoln Capital on January 31, 2003, and acquired the Neuberger Applicants on October 31, 2003. The only Fund advised by LBAM was first registered on May 7, 2003. Each of these events occurred after the conduct giving rise to the Injunctions.
\7\ The Complaint also refers to general practices regarding the relationship between the Investment Banking and Research
Departments. It is possible that one or more current or former officers or employees of the Applicants, who is or was involved in providing advisory, subadvisory or underwriting services to the Funds, was at some time an officer or employee of the Investment Banking or Research Departments.
\8\ Lehman states that it acts as principal underwriter to certain UITs whose portfolio securities were selected by an unaffiliated third party depositor based on information published by the Research Department.

5. The Applicants have or will distribute written materials, including an offer to meet in person to discuss the materials, to the board of directors or trustees of each Fund that it advises, subadvises, or principally underwrites (each, a ``Board''), including the directors or trustees who are not ``interested persons,'' as defined in section 2(a)(19) of the Act, of the Fund, and their independent legal counsel, if any, regarding the Injunctions, any impact on the Funds, and this application.\9\ The Applicants will provide the Boards with all information concerning the Injunctions and this application that is necessary for the Funds to fulfill their disclosure and
[[Page 67231]]
other obligations under the federal securities laws.
\9\ The Applicants also will advise the Boards of any State Injunctions that are issued. With respect to the UITs discussed in footnote 6, Lehman states that it has provided or will provide written notification to the trustees for each of these UITs and their independent depositor concerning the Injunctions, any impact on the UITs, and this Application, and will provide any other related information that may be requested by the trustees or independent depositors.

6. Applicants state that the inability to continue providing advisory services to the Funds and the inability to continue serving as principal underwriter to the Funds would result in potentially severe hardships for the Funds and their shareholders. Applicants also assert that, if they were barred from providing services to the Funds, the effect on their businesses and employees would be severe. The Applicants state that they have committed substantial resources to establish an expertise in advising and distributing Funds. Lehman and certain affiliated persons of Lehman previously have received exemptions under section 9(c) as the result of conduct that triggered section 9(a) as described in greater detail in the Application. Applicants' Condition

Applicants agree that any order granting the requested relief will be subject to the following condition:

Any temporary exemption granted pursuant to the application shall be without prejudice to, and shall not limit the Commission's rights in any manner with respect to, any Commission investigation of, or administrative proceedings involving or against, Applicants, including without limitation, the consideration by the Commission of a permanent exemption from section 9(a) of the Act requested pursuant to the application or the revocation or removal of any temporary exemptions granted under the Act in connection with the application.

For the Commission, by the Division of Investment Management, under delegated authority.
Margaret H. McFarland,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 0329799 Filed 112803; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 801001P

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT Marc R. Ponchione, Senior Counsel, at (202) 9427927, or Todd F. Kuehl, Branch Chief, at 2029420564 (Division of Investment Management, Office of Investment Company Regulation).