Browse: Departments Dates Agencies
DOCUMENT ID: [I.D. 112603A]
SUBJECT CATEGORY: Pelagic Fisheries Managed Under the Fishery Management Plan, for the Pelagic Fisheries of the Western Pacific Region
DOCUMENT SUMMARY: In an NOI published on October 17, 2003, the Western Pacific
Fishery Management Council (Council) and NMFS announced their intent to [[Page 67641]]
prepare an SEIS in accordance with the National Environmental Policy
Act of 1969 (NEPA) on the Federal management of pelagic fishery
resources in the Western Pacific Region. The Council and NMFS
supplement that NOI and now announce their intent to phase, upon
completion of the public scoping period identified in the October 17,
2003 NOI, the SEIS and associated NEPA processes into two separate
SEISs and two separate NEPA processes. The Council and NMFS also
announce their intent to apply alternative procedures approved by the
CEQ that will allow for expedited completion of one of the SEISs,
specifically, on proposed management measures for the Hawaiibased
longline fishery and it's potential impact on protected sea turtle
populations. The remaining management issues identified in the public
scoping process will be addressed in a separate SEIS made available for
comment and review under normally applicable NEPA procedures.
Notwithstanding these new intents, the public scoping process and
schedule identified in the October 17, 2003, NOI, including the times
and locations of public scoping meetings, remain in effect and apply to
both NEPA processes identified above.
SUMMARY: Pelagic fisheries; environmental impact statement,
The pelagic fisheries that occur in the EEZ and on the high seas of the Western Pacific Region have been managed under the Fishery Management Plan for the Pelagics Fisheries of the Western Pacific Region (FMP) and its amendments since 1986. Managed resources include both marketable (primarily billfish and tuna), and nonmarketable (primarily sharks) species. Fisheries managed include pelagic longline, troll, handline, poleandline (bait boat), and charter boat fisheries. Management measures employed include gear restrictions, vessel size limitations, time and area closures, access limitations and other measures.
The largest fishery managed under the FMP is the Hawaiibased, limitedaccess pelagic longline fishery. Regulations imposed on this fishery in 2001 eliminated the ``shallow set'' component of this fishery that targeted swordfish. The remaining component of this fishery is a ``deep set'' tunatargeting fishery. On August 31, 2003, the Memorandum Opinion issued in Hawaii Longline Assoc. v. NMFS (D. D.C., Civ No. 01765), invalidated the June 12, 2002 (67 FR 40232) rules as well as the November 15, 2002, Biological Opinion for Pelagic Fisheries of the Western Pacific and the associated incidental take statement. On October 6, 2003, the Court stayed the August 31, 2003 Order, and reinstated the regulations and BiOp until April 1, 2004 (D.D.C. Civ No. 010765).
The October 17, 2003, NOI (68 FR. 59771) highlighted a number of issues concerning pelagic fisheries management in the Western Pacific Region. Particular issues mentioned included pelagic longline fisheries interactions with protected species, billfishrelated issues, fish aggregation devices, and an emerging industrialscale squid fishery. However, as a result of Court orders affecting management of the fishery, the Council and NMFS are considering management measures and regulations that must be in place by April 1, 2004.
Consequently, two SEISs, both supplementing the March 30, 2001 Final EIS on the Fishery Management Plan for Pelagic Fisheries of the Western Pacific Region, will be developed. The SEIS being developed under alternative procedures will address the Hawaiibased longline fishery and it's potential impact on endangered and threatened sea turtle populations. The other issues mentioned in the October 17, 2003, NOI, such as seabird interactions, billfishrelated issues, fish aggregation devices, and industrialscale squid fishing, will be addressed in a separate SEIS prepared in accord with standard NEPA procedures.
Without compressing the schedule, the agency is not able to comply with prescribed time periods required by NEPA. Specifically, based on a schedule accommodating all regulatory requirements, the agency is not able to provide the full public comment period of 45 days for a draft SEIS (40 CFR 1506.10(2)(d)), or the full review period for the final SEIS prior to the agency decision (40 CFR 1506.10(b)(12)).
Consequently, NMFS proposed alternative procedures to CEQ. As a matter of practice, the CEQ looks at three factors in the context of requests for alternative procedures for a SEIS(s): (a) Whether the agency can show that it faces extremely difficult timing considerations that it could not have reasonably foreseen; (b) whether considerations of reflected national policy concerns outweigh any burden to the public caused by a deviation from the normal process; and (c) whether the agency is committed to providing effective alternative means for insuring public and agency review. NMFS satisfied the CEQ's criteria for alternative procedures and on November 20, 2003, the CEQ approved NMFS's request. The alternative procedures include that the standard 45day public comment period for the SEIS will be shortened to 30 days, and the standard 30day review period between the final SEIS and the agency's Record of Decision may be reduced by as much as 26 days.
As part of the alternative procedures for public input, the Council
and NMFS have coordinated several opportunities for public involvement
in the NEPA process. Examples include public scoping meetings conducted
throughout the Western Pacific Region from October 21, 2003 through
December 4, 2003. In addition, opportunities for public involvement and
comment have been solicited at several meetings, including the 119th
Council meeting, 120th Council meeting, the 121st Council meeting, and at a series of public
[[Page 67642]]
meetings convened by the Council's Sea Turtle Conservation Special Advisory Committee.
The SEIS will analyze, among other things, additional alternatives that include an abolition or modification to the southern area closure; the restoration of the swordfish fishery at some reduced level; mitigation measures such as circle hooks and mackerel bait known to reduce interaction rates of sea turtles with longline gear; international conservation measures to increase sea turtle recruitment; and an analysis on the potential impact of such alternatives on the continued existence of endangered and threatened sea turtles.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
Dated: November 26, 2003.
Bruce C. Morehead,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 0330135 Filed 12203; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 351022S
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT Kitty Simonds, Executive Director, WPFMC, (808) 5228220 or Samuel Pooley, Acting Regional Administrator, NMFS, (808) 9732937.
14 CFR Part 39 40 CFR Part 52 14 CFR Part 71 33 CFR Part 165 50 CFR Part 679 26 CFR Part 1 40 CFR Part 180 47 CFR Part 73 50 CFR Part 17 33 CFR Part 117 44 CFR Part 67 50 CFR Part 648 14 CFR Part 97 33 CFR Part 100 40 CFR Part 63 26 CFR Part 301 50 CFR Part 622 39 CFR Part 111 40 CFR Part 300 44 CFR Part 65 50 CFR Part 660 40 CFR Part 271 40 CFR Parts 52 and 81 47 CFR Part 64 50 CFR Part 665 49 CFR Part 571 44 CFR Part 64 21 CFR Part 522 14 CFR Part 23 47 CFR Part 76