Browse: Departments   Dates   Agencies  

Docket ID: [Docket No. 50-286]

NOTICE: NOTICES

ACTION: Applications, hearings, determinations, etc.:

SUBJECT CATEGORY: Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit No. 3; Exemption

DOCUMENT SUMMARY: 1.0 Background

Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. (Entergy, the licensee) is the holder of Facility Operating License No. DPR64 which authorizes operation of the Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit No. 3 (IP3). The license provides, among other things, that the facility is subject to all rules, regulations, and orders of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC, the Commission) now or hereafter in effect.

The facility consists of a pressurizedwater reactor located in Westchester County in the State of New York.

2.0 Request/Action

Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), part 50, requires that reactor coolant system (RCS)
[[Page 68429]]
pressuretemperature (PT) limits be established for reactor pressure vessels (RPVs) during normal operating and hydrostatic or leak rate testing conditions. Specifically, Appendix G to 10 CFR part 50 states that ``[t]he appropriate requirements on both the pressuretemperature limits and the minimum permissible temperature must be met for all conditions.'' Furthermore, Appendix G to 10 CFR part 50 specifies that the requirements for these limits are based on the application of evaluation procedures given in Appendix G to Section XI of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code (ASME Code). Appendix G to 10 CFR part 50 also specifies that the Editions and Addenda of the ASME Code which are incorporated by reference in 10 CFR 50.55a apply to the requirements in Appendix G to 10 CFR part 50. In the 2003 Edition of 10 CFR, the NRC endorsed Editions and Addenda of the ASME Code through the 1998 Edition and 2000 Addenda. However, Entergy has currently incorporated the 1989 Edition of the ASME Code into the IP3 licensing basis for defining the ASME Code requirements which apply to the facility's ASME Code, Section XI program. Hence, with respect to the statements from Appendix G to 10 CFR part 50 referenced above, it is the 1989 Edition of Appendix G to Section XI of the ASME Code which continues to apply to IP3. Finally, 10 CFR 50.60(b) states that, ``[p]roposed alternatives to the described requirements in [Appendix G] of this part or portions thereof may be used when an exemption is granted by the Commission under [10 CFR 50.12].''

Entergy has requested, in a separate submittal dated May 28, 2003, an amendment to the IP3 Technical Specification (TS) PT limit curves. In order to address the provisions of this amendment, Entergy has also requested that the staff exempt IP3 from the application of specific requirements of Appendix G to 10 CFR part 50, and substitute the use of ASME Code Case N640. ASME Code Case N640 permits the use of an alternate reference fracture toughness curve for RPV materials when determining PT limits. The proposed exemption request is consistent with, and is needed to support, the proposed IP3 TS amendment that was provided in the separate submittal. The proposed IP3 TS amendment will revise the PT limits for heatup, cooldown, and inservice test limitations for the reactor coolant system (RCS) through 20 effective fullpower years of operation.

Code Case N640

The requested exemption would allow use of ASME Code Case N640 in conjunction with Appendix G to Section XI of the ASME Code, 10 CFR 50.60(a), and Appendix G to 10 CFR part 50 to establish PT limits for the IP3 RPV.

The licensee's proposed TS amendment to revise the PT limits for IP3 relies, in part, on the requested exemption. These revised PT limits have been developed using the lower bound KIC fracture toughness curve given in Appendix A to Section XI of the ASME Code, Figure A22001, in lieu of the lower bound KIA fracture toughness curve given in Appendix G to Section XI of the ASME Code, Figure G22101, as the basis fracture toughness curve for defining the IP3 PT limits. All other margins involved with the ASME Code, Section XI, Appendix G process of determining PT limit curves remain unchanged.

Use of the KIC curve as the basis fracture toughness curve for the development of PT operating limits is technically correct. The KIC curve appropriately implements the use of a relationship based on static initiation fracture toughness behavior to evaluate the controlled heatup and cooldown process of an RPV, whereas the KIA fracture toughness curve, as given in Appendix G to Section XI of the ASME Code, was developed from more conservative crack arrest and dynamic fracture toughness test data. The application of the KIA fracture toughness curve was initially codified in Appendix G to Section XI of the ASME Code in 1974 to provide a conservative representation of RPV material fracture toughness. This initial conservatism was necessary due to the limited knowledge of RPV material behavior in 1974. Since that time, however, additional knowledge about RPV materials has been gained, which demonstrates that the lower bound on fracture toughness, provided by the KIA fracture toughness curve, is well beyond the margin of safety required to protect the public health and safety from potential RPV failure.

In addition, PT limit curves based on the KIC fracture toughness curve will enhance overall plant safety by opening the PT operating window with the greatest safety benefit in the region of low temperature operations. The operating window through which the operator heats up and cools down the RCS is determined by the difference between the maximum allowable pressure, determined by Appendix G to Section XI of the ASME Code, and the minimum required pressure for the reactor coolant pump (RCP) seals adjusted for instrument uncertainties. A narrow operating window could potentially have an adverse safety impact by increasing the possibility of inadvertent overpressure protection system (OPPS) actuation due to pressure surges associated with normal plant evolutions such as RCS pump starts and swapping operating charging pumps with the RCS in a watersolid condition.

Since application of ASME Code Case N640 provides appropriate procedures to establish maximum postulated defects and to evaluate those defects in the context of establishing RPV PT limits, this application of the Code Case maintains an adequate margin of safety for protecting RPV materials from brittle failure. Therefore, the licensee concluded that these considerations were special circumstances pursuant to 10 CFR 50.12(a)(2)(ii), ``[a]pplication of the regulation in the particular circumstances would not serve the underlying purpose of the rule or is not necessary to achieve the underlying purpose of the rule.''

In summary, the ASME Code, Section XI, Appendix G procedure was conservatively developed based on the level of knowledge existing in 1974 concerning reactor coolant pressure boundary materials and the estimated effects of operation. Since 1974, the level of knowledge about the fracture mechanics behavior of RCS materials has been greatly expanded, especially in regard to the effects of radiation embrittlement and the understanding of fracture toughness properties under static and dynamic loading conditions.

3.0 Discussion

Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.12, the Commission may, upon application by any interested person or upon its own initiative, grant exemptions from the requirements of 10 CFR part 50 when (1) the exemptions are authorized by law, will not present an undue risk to the public health and safety, and are consistent with the common defense and security; and (2) when special circumstances are present.

Special circumstances, pursuant to 10 CFR 50.12(a)(2)(ii), are present because the continued operation of IP3 with the PT curves developed in accordance with Appendix G to Section XI of the ASME Code, without the relief provided by ASME Code Case N640, is not necessary to achieve the underlying purpose of Appendix G to 10 CFR part 50. Application of ASME Code Case N640 in lieu of the requirements of Appendix G to Section XI of the ASME Code provides an acceptable alternative evaluation procedure, which will
[[Page 68430]]
continue to meet the underlying purpose of Appendix G to 10 CFR part 50. The underlying purpose of the regulations in Appendix G to 10 CFR part 50 is to provide an acceptable margin of safety against brittle failure of the RCS during any condition of normal operation to which the pressure boundary may be subjected over its service lifetime.

The NRC staff examined the licensee's rationale to support the exemption request, and accepts the licensee's determination that an exemption would be required to approve the use of ASME Code Case N640. The staff has also concluded that the use of ASME Code Case N640 would meet the underlying intent of Appendix G to 10 CFR part 50. The NRC staff concluded that the application of the technical provisions of ASME Code Case N640 provided sufficient margin in the development of RPV PT limit curves such that the underlying purpose of the regulations contained in Appendix G to 10 CFR part 50 continued to be met. Therefore, the specific conditions required by the regulations; i.e., the use of all provisions in Appendix G to Section XI of the ASME Code, were not necessary. The NRC staff has, therefore, concluded that the exemption requested by Entergy is justified based on the special circumstances of 10 CFR 50.12(a)(2)(ii), ``[a]pplication of the regulation in the particular circumstances would not serve the underlying purpose of the rule or is not necessary to achieve the underlying purpose of the rule.''

Based upon a consideration of the conservatism that is explicitly incorporated into the methodologies of Appendix G to 10 CFR part 50 and Appendix G to Section XI of the ASME Code, the staff concluded that the application of ASME Code Case N640 would provide an adequate margin of safety against brittle failure of the RPV. This is also consistent with the determination that the staff has reached for other licensees under similar conditions based on the same considerations. The staff concludes that the exemption requested by Entergy is appropriate under the special circumstances of 10 CFR 50.12(a)(2)(ii), and the methodology of ASME Code Case N640 may be used to revise the PT limits for the IP3 RPV. Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.12(a)(1), the granting of this exemption is authorized by law, will not present undue risk to the public health and safety, and is consistent with the common defense and security. Therefore, the staff considers granting an exemption to 10 CFR 50.60(a) and Appendix G to 10 CFR part 50 to allow use of ASME Code Case N640 as part of the basis for generating the PT limit curves for IP3 is appropriate.

4.0 Conclusion

Accordingly, the Commission has determined that, pursuant to 10 CFR 50.12(a), the exemption is authorized by law, will not present an undue risk to the public health and safety, and is consistent with the common defense and security. Also, special circumstances are present. Therefore, the Commission hereby grants Entergy an exemption from the requirements of 10 CFR 50.60 and Appendix G to 10 CFR part 50, to allow for the application of ASME Code Case N640 in establishing TS requirements for the RPV PT limits for IP3.

Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.32, the Commission has determined that the granting of this exemption will not have a significant effect on the quality of the human environment (68 FR 67490).

This exemption is effective upon issuance.

Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 2nd day of December, 2003.

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Ledyard B. Marsh, Director,
Division of Licensing Project Management, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. 0330360 Filed 12503; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 759001P

SUMMARY: Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.,

DOCUMENT BODY 2: 1.0 Background

Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. (Entergy, the licensee) is the holder of Facility Operating License No. DPR64 which authorizes operation of the Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit No. 3 (IP3). The license provides, among other things, that the facility is subject to all rules, regulations, and orders of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC, the Commission) now or hereafter in effect.

The facility consists of a pressurizedwater reactor located in Westchester County in the State of New York.

2.0 Request/Action

Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), part 50, requires that reactor coolant system (RCS)
[[Page 68429]]
pressuretemperature (PT) limits be established for reactor pressure vessels (RPVs) during normal operating and hydrostatic or leak rate testing conditions. Specifically, Appendix G to 10 CFR part 50 states that ``[t]he appropriate requirements on both the pressuretemperature limits and the minimum permissible temperature must be met for all conditions.'' Furthermore, Appendix G to 10 CFR part 50 specifies that the requirements for these limits are based on the application of evaluation procedures given in Appendix G to Section XI of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code (ASME Code). Appendix G to 10 CFR part 50 also specifies that the Editions and Addenda of the ASME Code which are incorporated by reference in 10 CFR 50.55a apply to the requirements in Appendix G to 10 CFR part 50. In the 2003 Edition of 10 CFR, the NRC endorsed Editions and Addenda of the ASME Code through the 1998 Edition and 2000 Addenda. However, Entergy has currently incorporated the 1989 Edition of the ASME Code into the IP3 licensing basis for defining the ASME Code requirements which apply to the facility's ASME Code, Section XI program. Hence, with respect to the statements from Appendix G to 10 CFR part 50 referenced above, it is the 1989 Edition of Appendix G to Section XI of the ASME Code which continues to apply to IP3. Finally, 10 CFR 50.60(b) states that, ``[p]roposed alternatives to the described requirements in [Appendix G] of this part or portions thereof may be used when an exemption is granted by the Commission under [10 CFR 50.12].''

Entergy has requested, in a separate submittal dated May 28, 2003, an amendment to the IP3 Technical Specification (TS) PT limit curves. In order to address the provisions of this amendment, Entergy has also requested that the staff exempt IP3 from the application of specific requirements of Appendix G to 10 CFR part 50, and substitute the use of ASME Code Case N640. ASME Code Case N640 permits the use of an alternate reference fracture toughness curve for RPV materials when determining PT limits. The proposed exemption request is consistent with, and is needed to support, the proposed IP3 TS amendment that was provided in the separate submittal. The proposed IP3 TS amendment will revise the PT limits for heatup, cooldown, and inservice test limitations for the reactor coolant system (RCS) through 20 effective fullpower years of operation.

Code Case N640

The requested exemption would allow use of ASME Code Case N640 in conjunction with Appendix G to Section XI of the ASME Code, 10 CFR 50.60(a), and Appendix G to 10 CFR part 50 to establish PT limits for the IP3 RPV.

The licensee's proposed TS amendment to revise the PT limits for IP3 relies, in part, on the requested exemption. These revised PT limits have been developed using the lower bound KIC fracture toughness curve given in Appendix A to Section XI of the ASME Code, Figure A22001, in lieu of the lower bound KIA fracture toughness curve given in Appendix G to Section XI of the ASME Code, Figure G22101, as the basis fracture toughness curve for defining the IP3 PT limits. All other margins involved with the ASME Code, Section XI, Appendix G process of determining PT limit curves remain unchanged.

Use of the KIC curve as the basis fracture toughness curve for the development of PT operating limits is technically correct. The KIC curve appropriately implements the use of a relationship based on static initiation fracture toughness behavior to evaluate the controlled heatup and cooldown process of an RPV, whereas the KIA fracture toughness curve, as given in Appendix G to Section XI of the ASME Code, was developed from more conservative crack arrest and dynamic fracture toughness test data. The application of the KIA fracture toughness curve was initially codified in Appendix G to Section XI of the ASME Code in 1974 to provide a conservative representation of RPV material fracture toughness. This initial conservatism was necessary due to the limited knowledge of RPV material behavior in 1974. Since that time, however, additional knowledge about RPV materials has been gained, which demonstrates that the lower bound on fracture toughness, provided by the KIA fracture toughness curve, is well beyond the margin of safety required to protect the public health and safety from potential RPV failure.

In addition, PT limit curves based on the KIC fracture toughness curve will enhance overall plant safety by opening the PT operating window with the greatest safety benefit in the region of low temperature operations. The operating window through which the operator heats up and cools down the RCS is determined by the difference between the maximum allowable pressure, determined by Appendix G to Section XI of the ASME Code, and the minimum required pressure for the reactor coolant pump (RCP) seals adjusted for instrument uncertainties. A narrow operating window could potentially have an adverse safety impact by increasing the possibility of inadvertent overpressure protection system (OPPS) actuation due to pressure surges associated with normal plant evolutions such as RCS pump starts and swapping operating charging pumps with the RCS in a watersolid condition.

Since application of ASME Code Case N640 provides appropriate procedures to establish maximum postulated defects and to evaluate those defects in the context of establishing RPV PT limits, this application of the Code Case maintains an adequate margin of safety for protecting RPV materials from brittle failure. Therefore, the licensee concluded that these considerations were special circumstances pursuant to 10 CFR 50.12(a)(2)(ii), ``[a]pplication of the regulation in the particular circumstances would not serve the underlying purpose of the rule or is not necessary to achieve the underlying purpose of the rule.''

In summary, the ASME Code, Section XI, Appendix G procedure was conservatively developed based on the level of knowledge existing in 1974 concerning reactor coolant pressure boundary materials and the estimated effects of operation. Since 1974, the level of knowledge about the fracture mechanics behavior of RCS materials has been greatly expanded, especially in regard to the effects of radiation embrittlement and the understanding of fracture toughness properties under static and dynamic loading conditions.

3.0 Discussion

Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.12, the Commission may, upon application by any interested person or upon its own initiative, grant exemptions from the requirements of 10 CFR part 50 when (1) the exemptions are authorized by law, will not present an undue risk to the public health and safety, and are consistent with the common defense and security; and (2) when special circumstances are present.

Special circumstances, pursuant to 10 CFR 50.12(a)(2)(ii), are present because the continued operation of IP3 with the PT curves developed in accordance with Appendix G to Section XI of the ASME Code, without the relief provided by ASME Code Case N640, is not necessary to achieve the underlying purpose of Appendix G to 10 CFR part 50. Application of ASME Code Case N640 in lieu of the requirements of Appendix G to Section XI of the ASME Code provides an acceptable alternative evaluation procedure, which will
[[Page 68430]]
continue to meet the underlying purpose of Appendix G to 10 CFR part 50. The underlying purpose of the regulations in Appendix G to 10 CFR part 50 is to provide an acceptable margin of safety against brittle failure of the RCS during any condition of normal operation to which the pressure boundary may be subjected over its service lifetime.

The NRC staff examined the licensee's rationale to support the exemption request, and accepts the licensee's determination that an exemption would be required to approve the use of ASME Code Case N640. The staff has also concluded that the use of ASME Code Case N640 would meet the underlying intent of Appendix G to 10 CFR part 50. The NRC staff concluded that the application of the technical provisions of ASME Code Case N640 provided sufficient margin in the development of RPV PT limit curves such that the underlying purpose of the regulations contained in Appendix G to 10 CFR part 50 continued to be met. Therefore, the specific conditions required by the regulations; i.e., the use of all provisions in Appendix G to Section XI of the ASME Code, were not necessary. The NRC staff has, therefore, concluded that the exemption requested by Entergy is justified based on the special circumstances of 10 CFR 50.12(a)(2)(ii), ``[a]pplication of the regulation in the particular circumstances would not serve the underlying purpose of the rule or is not necessary to achieve the underlying purpose of the rule.''

Based upon a consideration of the conservatism that is explicitly incorporated into the methodologies of Appendix G to 10 CFR part 50 and Appendix G to Section XI of the ASME Code, the staff concluded that the application of ASME Code Case N640 would provide an adequate margin of safety against brittle failure of the RPV. This is also consistent with the determination that the staff has reached for other licensees under similar conditions based on the same considerations. The staff concludes that the exemption requested by Entergy is appropriate under the special circumstances of 10 CFR 50.12(a)(2)(ii), and the methodology of ASME Code Case N640 may be used to revise the PT limits for the IP3 RPV. Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.12(a)(1), the granting of this exemption is authorized by law, will not present undue risk to the public health and safety, and is consistent with the common defense and security. Therefore, the staff considers granting an exemption to 10 CFR 50.60(a) and Appendix G to 10 CFR part 50 to allow use of ASME Code Case N640 as part of the basis for generating the PT limit curves for IP3 is appropriate.

4.0 Conclusion

Accordingly, the Commission has determined that, pursuant to 10 CFR 50.12(a), the exemption is authorized by law, will not present an undue risk to the public health and safety, and is consistent with the common defense and security. Also, special circumstances are present. Therefore, the Commission hereby grants Entergy an exemption from the requirements of 10 CFR 50.60 and Appendix G to 10 CFR part 50, to allow for the application of ASME Code Case N640 in establishing TS requirements for the RPV PT limits for IP3.

Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.32, the Commission has determined that the granting of this exemption will not have a significant effect on the quality of the human environment (68 FR 67490).

This exemption is effective upon issuance.

Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 2nd day of December, 2003.

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Ledyard B. Marsh, Director,
Division of Licensing Project Management, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. 0330360 Filed 12503; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 759001P