Browse: Departments Dates Agencies
DOCUMENT ID: [Release No. 34-48983; File No. SR-Phlx-2003-80]
SUBJECT CATEGORY: Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change by the Philadelphia Stock Exchange, Inc. To Revise Its Schedule of Dues, Fees and Charges To Provide a Rebate for Certain Trades Executed Pursuant to a Dividend Spread Strategy
DOCUMENT SUMMARY: December 23, 2003.
Pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'')\1\ and Rule 19b4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on December 15, 2003, the Philadelphia Stock Exchange, Inc. (``Phlx''
or ``Exchange'') submitted to the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change.
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b4.
I. SelfRegulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change
The Phlx proposes to amend its schedule of dues, fees and charges
to provide a rebate for certain trades executed pursuant to a dividend
spread strategy.\3\ The proposed rebate would be effective for trades clearing on and after December 17, 2003.
\3\ A ``dividend spread'' is any trade done within a defined
time frame in which a dividend arbitrage can be achieved between any two (2) deepinthemoney options.
The schedule of dues, fees and charges is available at the Office of the Secretary, the Phlx, and at the Commission.
II. SelfRegulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant parts of such statements.
A. SelfRegulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange states that the purpose of the proposed rule change is
to amend the Exchange's schedule of dues, fees and charges to adopt a
rebate for certain contracts executed in trades occurring as part of a
dividend spread strategy. Specifically, for those options contracts
executed pursuant to a dividend spread strategy by member registered
options traders (``ROT'') and options specialists who have not elected to have the specialist unit fixed monthly fee (``nonfixed
specialists'') \4\ be applicable on the business day before the
underlying stock's exdate,\5\ the Exchange would rebate $0.08 per
contract side for ROT executions and $0.07 per side for nonfixed
specialists executions. The proposed rebate would be effective for trades clearing on and after December 17, 2003.
\4\ Specialist units that have been active trading equity and
index option books in the capacity of a specialist unit for at least
one year from September 1, 2002 may elect to pay a fixed monthly
charge as described in the Exchange's fee schedule. A specialist
unit may, by the 15th day of the billing month, select the fixed
monthly fee methodology for subsequent months, which would be
continued until February 29, 2004. See Securities Exchange Act
Release No. 48459 (September 8, 2003), 68 FR 54034 (September 15, 2003).
\5\ The exdate is the date on or after which a security is
traded without a previously declared dividend or distribution. After the exdate, a stock is said to trade exdividend.
The Exchange's billing system is unable to distinguish between dividend spreads and other types of trades. The Exchange has therefore developed a manual procedure to implement the proposed rebate. Specifically, within thirty calendar days of the billing period (i.e., within thirty days from the issue date of the invoice) for these transactions, a Fee Reimbursement Form, including the appropriate documentation, must be completed and submitted to the Exchange. After the appropriate verification and subsequent acceptance, the Exchange would credit the appropriate member's account for the amount of the rebate (i.e., either $0.08 or $0.07 per contract side) charged on contracts executed in trades occurring as part of a dividend spread strategy.
The Exchange states that the primary reason for this fee is to
create a cost effective environment for a dividend spread strategy to
be executed. By keeping fees low, the Exchange believes that this
program should encourage specialists and registered options traders to provide liquidity for these
[[Page 75704]]
types of financial strategies and should permit the Exchange to remain competitive.
The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with section 6(b) of the Act \6\ in general, and furthers the
objectives of section 6(b)(4) of the Act \7\ in particular, because it
is designed to provide for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues,
fees, and other charges among its members. The Exchange notes that
although the rebate would result in a net transaction charge of $0.11
per contract side for a ROT and $0.14 per contract side for nonfixed
specialist executions, ROTs pay an additional comparison charge of
$0.03. Thus, both member organizationsROTs and nonfixed specialist would pay the same net per contract side charge.
\6\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
B. SelfRegulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any inappropriate burden on competition.
C. SelfRegulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were either solicited or received. III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action
The proposed rule change has become effective pursuant to section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act \8\ and subparagraph (f)(2) of Rule 19b4
thereunder \9\ because it establishes or changes a due, fee, or other
charge imposed by the Exchange. At any time within 60 days of the
filing of such proposed rule change, the Commission may summarily
abrogate such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the
protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
\8\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
\9\ 17 CFR 240.19b4(f)(2).
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act. Persons making written submissions should file six copies thereof with the Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 450 Fifth Street, NW., Washington, DC 205490609. Comments may also be submitted electronically at the following email address: rulecomments@sec.gov. All comment letters should refer to File No. SRPhlx200380. This file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, comments should be sent in hardcopy or by email but not by both methods. Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room. Copies of the filing will also be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Phlx. All submissions should refer to File No. SRPhlx200380 and should be submitted by January 21, 2004.
For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated authority.\10\
\10\ 17 CFR 200.303(a)(12).
Margaret H. McFarland,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 0332174 Filed 123003; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 801001P
SUMMARY: Philadelphia Stock Exchange, Inc.,
DOCUMENT BODY 2: December 23, 2003.
Pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'')\1\ and Rule 19b4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on December 15, 2003, the Philadelphia Stock Exchange, Inc. (``Phlx''
or ``Exchange'') submitted to the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change.
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b4.
I. SelfRegulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change
The Phlx proposes to amend its schedule of dues, fees and charges
to provide a rebate for certain trades executed pursuant to a dividend
spread strategy.\3\ The proposed rebate would be effective for trades clearing on and after December 17, 2003.
\3\ A ``dividend spread'' is any trade done within a defined
time frame in which a dividend arbitrage can be achieved between any two (2) deepinthemoney options.
The schedule of dues, fees and charges is available at the Office of the Secretary, the Phlx, and at the Commission.
II. SelfRegulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant parts of such statements.
A. SelfRegulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange states that the purpose of the proposed rule change is
to amend the Exchange's schedule of dues, fees and charges to adopt a
rebate for certain contracts executed in trades occurring as part of a
dividend spread strategy. Specifically, for those options contracts
executed pursuant to a dividend spread strategy by member registered
options traders (``ROT'') and options specialists who have not elected to have the specialist unit fixed monthly fee (``nonfixed
specialists'') \4\ be applicable on the business day before the
underlying stock's exdate,\5\ the Exchange would rebate $0.08 per
contract side for ROT executions and $0.07 per side for nonfixed
specialists executions. The proposed rebate would be effective for trades clearing on and after December 17, 2003.
\4\ Specialist units that have been active trading equity and
index option books in the capacity of a specialist unit for at least
one year from September 1, 2002 may elect to pay a fixed monthly
charge as described in the Exchange's fee schedule. A specialist
unit may, by the 15th day of the billing month, select the fixed
monthly fee methodology for subsequent months, which would be
continued until February 29, 2004. See Securities Exchange Act
Release No. 48459 (September 8, 2003), 68 FR 54034 (September 15, 2003).
\5\ The exdate is the date on or after which a security is
traded without a previously declared dividend or distribution. After the exdate, a stock is said to trade exdividend.
The Exchange's billing system is unable to distinguish between dividend spreads and other types of trades. The Exchange has therefore developed a manual procedure to implement the proposed rebate. Specifically, within thirty calendar days of the billing period (i.e., within thirty days from the issue date of the invoice) for these transactions, a Fee Reimbursement Form, including the appropriate documentation, must be completed and submitted to the Exchange. After the appropriate verification and subsequent acceptance, the Exchange would credit the appropriate member's account for the amount of the rebate (i.e., either $0.08 or $0.07 per contract side) charged on contracts executed in trades occurring as part of a dividend spread strategy.
The Exchange states that the primary reason for this fee is to
create a cost effective environment for a dividend spread strategy to
be executed. By keeping fees low, the Exchange believes that this
program should encourage specialists and registered options traders to provide liquidity for these
[[Page 75704]]
types of financial strategies and should permit the Exchange to remain competitive.
The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with section 6(b) of the Act \6\ in general, and furthers the
objectives of section 6(b)(4) of the Act \7\ in particular, because it
is designed to provide for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues,
fees, and other charges among its members. The Exchange notes that
although the rebate would result in a net transaction charge of $0.11
per contract side for a ROT and $0.14 per contract side for nonfixed
specialist executions, ROTs pay an additional comparison charge of
$0.03. Thus, both member organizationsROTs and nonfixed specialist would pay the same net per contract side charge.
\6\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
B. SelfRegulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any inappropriate burden on competition.
C. SelfRegulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were either solicited or received. III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action
The proposed rule change has become effective pursuant to section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act \8\ and subparagraph (f)(2) of Rule 19b4
thereunder \9\ because it establishes or changes a due, fee, or other
charge imposed by the Exchange. At any time within 60 days of the
filing of such proposed rule change, the Commission may summarily
abrogate such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the
protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
\8\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
\9\ 17 CFR 240.19b4(f)(2).
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act. Persons making written submissions should file six copies thereof with the Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 450 Fifth Street, NW., Washington, DC 205490609. Comments may also be submitted electronically at the following email address: rulecomments@sec.gov. All comment letters should refer to File No. SRPhlx200380. This file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, comments should be sent in hardcopy or by email but not by both methods. Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room. Copies of the filing will also be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Phlx. All submissions should refer to File No. SRPhlx200380 and should be submitted by January 21, 2004.
For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated authority.\10\
\10\ 17 CFR 200.303(a)(12).
Margaret H. McFarland,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 0332174 Filed 123003; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 801001P
14 CFR Part 39 40 CFR Part 52 14 CFR Part 71 33 CFR Part 165 50 CFR Part 679 47 CFR Part 73 26 CFR Part 1 40 CFR Part 180 33 CFR Part 117 50 CFR Part 17 44 CFR Part 67 50 CFR Part 648 14 CFR Part 97 33 CFR Part 100 40 CFR Part 63 50 CFR Part 622 44 CFR Part 65 50 CFR Part 660 26 CFR Part 301 39 CFR Part 111 40 CFR Part 300 6 CFR Part 5 40 CFR Part 271 47 CFR Part 64 40 CFR Parts 52 and 81 50 CFR Part 665 44 CFR Part 64 10 CFR Part 50 49 CFR Part 571 47 CFR Part 76