Browse: Departments Dates Agencies
DOCUMENT ID: [Release No. 34-48976; File No. SR-PCX-2003-68]
SUBJECT CATEGORY: Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change by the Pacific Exchange, Inc. Relating to Exchange Fees and Charges
DOCUMENT SUMMARY: December 23, 2003.
Pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'')\1\ and Rule 19b4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on December 16, 2003, the Pacific Exchange, Inc. (``PCX'' or
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission [[Page 75702]]
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II
and III below, which Items have been prepared by the PCX. The
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b4.
I. SelfRegulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange is proposing to amend the TradeRelated Charges
portion of its Schedule of Fees and Charges (``Schedule''). The text of
the proposed rule change is available at the Office of the Secretary, the PCX, and at the Commission.
II. SelfRegulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the PCX included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. The PCX has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements. A. SelfRegulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange is proposing to amend the TradeRelated Charges
portion of its Schedule in order to create an incentive program for
Market Makers with respect to transaction charges. Currently, Market
Maker transactions are assessed a charge of $0.21 per contract side for
all issues regardless of market share or Top 120 designation. As part
of its ongoing effort to secure existing volumes and attract higher
levels of liquidity, the PCX is proposing to adopt a threetiered rate
schedule that would lower transaction charges for Market Makers
(including Lead Market Makers) as the Exchange attains higher levels of market share on individual issues.\3\
\3\ The Exchange states that transaction charges will not change for Customer, Firm or Broker/Dealer transactions.
Specifically, the incentive program would lower marginal
transaction costs on an issuebyissue basis for those underlying
symbols that the PCX attained market share beyond certain tiers. The
threetiered system is based on the percentage of market share attained
for each issue and whether the issue is designated as a Top 120. The
table below shows the marginal Market Maker transaction rates for Top 120 Issues:
Market share tiers Marg rate
0.00% to 11.00%............................................ $0.21
11.00% to 20.00%........................................... 0.11
20.00% to 100.00%.......................................... ...........
Under the proposed rate schedule, the rates would be applied based on
market share at the end of the trade month. The PCX proposes that these
Market Maker transaction rates would be assessed in a fair and
equitable manner to ensure that all Market Makers trading in a
particular issue receive the same rate incentives. Accordingly, a Top
120 issue that had 1,000,000 contracts in national volume and a 30% PCX
market share (or 300,000 PCX contracts) would be billed in the
following manner. The first 11% in market share would be billed at a transaction rate of $0.21 per contract (11% x 1,000,000 x
$0.21=$23,100). The next 9% in market share would be billed at a
transaction rate of $.11 per contract (9% x 1,000,000 x $0.11 =
$9,900). The final 10% in market share would be billed at a transaction
rate of $0.00. The net effective rate on said issue would be $0.11 per
contract (total transaction charges/total PCX market maker contracts or
$33,000/300,000 contracts). All Market Makers would receive the same
rate incentive because all Market Maker volumes in that issue would be charged the same effective rate: $0.11 per contract.\4\
\4\ For purposes of simplicity, this example assumes that all
PCX contracts were executed by Market Makers. In the event this was
not the case, for example, the Exchange had the same contract
volumes but 100,000 contracts were customer contracts and 200,000
Market Maker contracts, Market Makers would still receive the same rate incentive: $0.11 per Market Maker contract.
Rates for issues that are not in the Top 120 in terms of national
volume will still benefit from the rate incentive, albeit employing a
different set of marginal rates. The table below summarizes those marginal transaction rates for Market Makers:
Market share tiers Marg rate
0% to 15%.................................................. $0.21
15% to 25%................................................. 0.15
25% to 100%................................................ 0.05
Using the previous example, an issue that was not in the Top 120 but
had the same contract volumes would receive the following billing
treatment. The first 15% in market share would be billed at a transaction rate of $0.21 per contract (15% x 1,000,000 x
$0.21=$31,500). The next 10% in market share would be billed at a
transaction rate of $.15 per contract (10% x 1,000,000 x $0.15 =
$15,000). The final 5% in market share would be billed at a transaction
rate of $0.05 (5% x 1,000,000 x $0.05 = $2,500). The net effective rate
on said issue would be $0.1633 per contract ($49,000 in charges divided
by 300,000 contracts). The PCX believes all Market Makers would receive
the same rate incentive because all Market Maker volumes in that issue
would be charged at the same effective rate: $0.1633 per contract.
Singly listed issues would continue to be billed at the current flat Market Maker transaction rate of $0.21 per contract.
The Exchange believes that the incentive program will help the PCX attract higher levels of liquidity and therefore enable the PCX to compete aggressively with other market centers. Moreover, the PCX believes the incentive program provides for a natural means of attracting more crowd participation on the trading floor. The incentive program will apply equally to issues traded on the POETS and the PCX Plus trading platforms.
The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to a
national securities exchange and, in particular, the requirements of
section 6(b) of the Act.\5\ Specifically, the Exchange believes the
proposed rule change is consistent with the section 6(b)(4)
requirements that the rules of the exchange provide for the equitable
allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and other charges among its members.
\5\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
B. SelfRegulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
C. SelfRegulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
Written comments on the proposed rule change were neither solicited nor received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action
The foregoing proposed rule change has become effective pursuant to section
[[Page 75703]]
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act \6\ and Rule 19b4(f)(2) \7\ thereunder,
because it establishes or changes a due, fee, or other charge imposed
by the Exchange. Accordingly, the proposal will take effect upon filing
with the Commission. At any time within 60 days of the filing of such
proposed rule change, the Commission may summarily abrogate such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
\6\ 15 U.S.C. 78(s)(b)(3)(A)(ii).
\7\ 17 CFR 240.19b4(f)(2).
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposal is consistent with the Act. Persons making written submissions should file six copies thereof with the Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 450 Fifth Street, NW., Washington, DC 20549. Comments may also be submitted electronically at the following email address: rule comments@sec.gov. All comment letters should refer to File No. SRPCX 200368. This file number should be included on the subject line if e mail is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, comments should be sent in hardcopy or by email but not by both methods. Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room. Copies of such filing will also be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the PCX. All submissions should refer to File No. SRPCX200368 and should be submitted by January 21, 2004.
For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated authority.\8\
\8\ 17 CFR 200.303(a)(12).
Margaret H. McFarland,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 0332175 Filed 123003; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 801001P
SUMMARY: Pacific Exchange, Inc.,
DOCUMENT BODY 2: December 23, 2003.
Pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'')\1\ and Rule 19b4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on December 16, 2003, the Pacific Exchange, Inc. (``PCX'' or
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission [[Page 75702]]
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II
and III below, which Items have been prepared by the PCX. The
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b4.
I. SelfRegulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange is proposing to amend the TradeRelated Charges
portion of its Schedule of Fees and Charges (``Schedule''). The text of
the proposed rule change is available at the Office of the Secretary, the PCX, and at the Commission.
II. SelfRegulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the PCX included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. The PCX has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements. A. SelfRegulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange is proposing to amend the TradeRelated Charges
portion of its Schedule in order to create an incentive program for
Market Makers with respect to transaction charges. Currently, Market
Maker transactions are assessed a charge of $0.21 per contract side for
all issues regardless of market share or Top 120 designation. As part
of its ongoing effort to secure existing volumes and attract higher
levels of liquidity, the PCX is proposing to adopt a threetiered rate
schedule that would lower transaction charges for Market Makers
(including Lead Market Makers) as the Exchange attains higher levels of market share on individual issues.\3\
\3\ The Exchange states that transaction charges will not change for Customer, Firm or Broker/Dealer transactions.
Specifically, the incentive program would lower marginal
transaction costs on an issuebyissue basis for those underlying
symbols that the PCX attained market share beyond certain tiers. The
threetiered system is based on the percentage of market share attained
for each issue and whether the issue is designated as a Top 120. The
table below shows the marginal Market Maker transaction rates for Top 120 Issues:
Market share tiers Marg rate
0.00% to 11.00%............................................ $0.21
11.00% to 20.00%........................................... 0.11
20.00% to 100.00%.......................................... ...........
Under the proposed rate schedule, the rates would be applied based on
market share at the end of the trade month. The PCX proposes that these
Market Maker transaction rates would be assessed in a fair and
equitable manner to ensure that all Market Makers trading in a
particular issue receive the same rate incentives. Accordingly, a Top
120 issue that had 1,000,000 contracts in national volume and a 30% PCX
market share (or 300,000 PCX contracts) would be billed in the
following manner. The first 11% in market share would be billed at a transaction rate of $0.21 per contract (11% x 1,000,000 x
$0.21=$23,100). The next 9% in market share would be billed at a
transaction rate of $.11 per contract (9% x 1,000,000 x $0.11 =
$9,900). The final 10% in market share would be billed at a transaction
rate of $0.00. The net effective rate on said issue would be $0.11 per
contract (total transaction charges/total PCX market maker contracts or
$33,000/300,000 contracts). All Market Makers would receive the same
rate incentive because all Market Maker volumes in that issue would be charged the same effective rate: $0.11 per contract.\4\
\4\ For purposes of simplicity, this example assumes that all
PCX contracts were executed by Market Makers. In the event this was
not the case, for example, the Exchange had the same contract
volumes but 100,000 contracts were customer contracts and 200,000
Market Maker contracts, Market Makers would still receive the same rate incentive: $0.11 per Market Maker contract.
Rates for issues that are not in the Top 120 in terms of national
volume will still benefit from the rate incentive, albeit employing a
different set of marginal rates. The table below summarizes those marginal transaction rates for Market Makers:
Market share tiers Marg rate
0% to 15%.................................................. $0.21
15% to 25%................................................. 0.15
25% to 100%................................................ 0.05
Using the previous example, an issue that was not in the Top 120 but
had the same contract volumes would receive the following billing
treatment. The first 15% in market share would be billed at a transaction rate of $0.21 per contract (15% x 1,000,000 x
$0.21=$31,500). The next 10% in market share would be billed at a
transaction rate of $.15 per contract (10% x 1,000,000 x $0.15 =
$15,000). The final 5% in market share would be billed at a transaction
rate of $0.05 (5% x 1,000,000 x $0.05 = $2,500). The net effective rate
on said issue would be $0.1633 per contract ($49,000 in charges divided
by 300,000 contracts). The PCX believes all Market Makers would receive
the same rate incentive because all Market Maker volumes in that issue
would be charged at the same effective rate: $0.1633 per contract.
Singly listed issues would continue to be billed at the current flat Market Maker transaction rate of $0.21 per contract.
The Exchange believes that the incentive program will help the PCX attract higher levels of liquidity and therefore enable the PCX to compete aggressively with other market centers. Moreover, the PCX believes the incentive program provides for a natural means of attracting more crowd participation on the trading floor. The incentive program will apply equally to issues traded on the POETS and the PCX Plus trading platforms.
The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to a
national securities exchange and, in particular, the requirements of
section 6(b) of the Act.\5\ Specifically, the Exchange believes the
proposed rule change is consistent with the section 6(b)(4)
requirements that the rules of the exchange provide for the equitable
allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and other charges among its members.
\5\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
B. SelfRegulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
C. SelfRegulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
Written comments on the proposed rule change were neither solicited nor received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action
The foregoing proposed rule change has become effective pursuant to section
[[Page 75703]]
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act \6\ and Rule 19b4(f)(2) \7\ thereunder,
because it establishes or changes a due, fee, or other charge imposed
by the Exchange. Accordingly, the proposal will take effect upon filing
with the Commission. At any time within 60 days of the filing of such
proposed rule change, the Commission may summarily abrogate such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
\6\ 15 U.S.C. 78(s)(b)(3)(A)(ii).
\7\ 17 CFR 240.19b4(f)(2).
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposal is consistent with the Act. Persons making written submissions should file six copies thereof with the Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 450 Fifth Street, NW., Washington, DC 20549. Comments may also be submitted electronically at the following email address: rule comments@sec.gov. All comment letters should refer to File No. SRPCX 200368. This file number should be included on the subject line if e mail is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, comments should be sent in hardcopy or by email but not by both methods. Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room. Copies of such filing will also be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the PCX. All submissions should refer to File No. SRPCX200368 and should be submitted by January 21, 2004.
For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated authority.\8\
\8\ 17 CFR 200.303(a)(12).
Margaret H. McFarland,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 0332175 Filed 123003; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 801001P
14 CFR Part 39 40 CFR Part 52 14 CFR Part 71 33 CFR Part 165 50 CFR Part 679 47 CFR Part 73 26 CFR Part 1 40 CFR Part 180 33 CFR Part 117 50 CFR Part 17 44 CFR Part 67 50 CFR Part 648 14 CFR Part 97 33 CFR Part 100 40 CFR Part 63 50 CFR Part 622 44 CFR Part 65 50 CFR Part 660 26 CFR Part 301 39 CFR Part 111 40 CFR Part 300 6 CFR Part 5 40 CFR Part 271 47 CFR Part 64 40 CFR Parts 52 and 81 50 CFR Part 665 44 CFR Part 64 10 CFR Part 50 49 CFR Part 571 47 CFR Part 76