Browse: Departments Dates Agencies
Docket ID: [Docket No. 030917233-3304-02; I.D. 082703A]
RIN ID: RIN 0648-AP50
SUBJECT CATEGORY: Fisheries of the Gulf of Mexico; Coastal Migratory Pelagic Resources; Stock Status Determination Criteria
DOCUMENT SUMMARY: In accordance with the framework procedure for adjusting management measures of the Fishery Management Plan for the Coastal Migratory Pelagic Resources of the Gulf of Mexico and South Atlantic (FMP), NMFS issues this final rule to incorporate into the FMP biomass based stock status determination criteria consistent with the requirements of the MagnusonStevens Fisheries Conservation and Management Act (MagnusonStevens Act). Criteria that are incorporated include maximum sustainable yield (MSY), optimum yield (OY), minimum stock size threshold (MSST) and maximum fishing mortality threshold (MFMT) for king and Spanish mackerel and cobia stocks under the jurisdiction of the Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council (Council).
SUMMARY: Caribbean, Gulf, and South Atlantic fisheries—; Gulf of Mexico coastal migratory pelagic resources; stock status determination criteria,
In accordance with the FMP's framework procedure, the Council recommended, and NMFS published a proposed rule (68 FR 59151, October 14, 2003), to establish biomassbased stock status criteria for Gulf migratory groups of king and Spanish mackerel and for a Gulf migratory group of cobia (to be designated via subsequent plan amendment). The most recent scientific evidence indicates that the cobia stock is comprised of separate migratory groups in the Gulf of Mexico and Atlantic. However, the FMP identifies only a single cobia stock. The establishment of separate migratory groups of cobia will require that the FMP be amended. Therefore, implementation of the stock status criteria for a Gulf migratory group of cobia would be deferred pending the development of an amendment to the FMP.
Section 303 of the MagnusonStevens Act requires that the regional
fishery management councils: (1) assess the condition of managed
stocks, (2) specify within their fishery management plans objective and
measurable criteria for identifying when the stocks are overfished and
when overfishing is occurring (referred to by NMFS as stock status
determination criteria), and (3) amend their fishery management plans
to include measures to rebuild overfished stocks and maintain them at
healthy levels capable of producing MSY. NMFS' national standard
guidelines (NSGs) direct the councils to meet these statutory
requirements by incorporating into each FMP estimates of certain
biomassbased parameters for each stock, including a designation of the stock biomass that will produce MSY (B
On November 17, 1999, NMFS notified the Council that it had partially approved the Council's Generic Sustainable Fisheries Act Amendment. In that notification, NMFS approved the designation and definition of an MFMT for CMP fish stocks managed under the jurisdiction of the Council, but disapproved the proposed designations of MSY, OY, and MSST because they were not biomassbased, as recommended by the NSGs. Since that time, NMFS has worked cooperatively with the Council to develop acceptable stock status criteria for the Gulf migratory groups of those CMP stocks.
Accordingly, this final rule establishes biomassbased reference
points, as identified in the table below, for MSY, OY, and MSST, and
amends the existing designations of MFMT for Gulf migratory group king
mackerel, Gulf migratory group Spanish mackerel, and a (to be designated) Gulf migratory group of cobia.
Gulf group king Gulf group Gulf group
mackerel Spanish mackerel cobia\1\
MSY\2\ Yield at F
While these population parameters are part of the FMP, they will not appear in codified text. The parameters establish the bounds within which the Council and NMFS will operate in managing the stock. The parameters themselves are not of general applicability and legal effect in that they do not bind the general public, but rather guide the Council and NMFS in establishing more specific measures, which are codified in the Code of Federal Regulations and do bind the general public.
On October 14, 2003, NMFS published the proposed rule on which this final rule is based; comments on the proposed rule were requested through November 13, 2003 (68 FR 59151). No comments were received. [[Page 16500]]
This final rule has been determined to be not significant for purposes of Executive Order 12866.
The Chief Counsel for Regulation of the Department of Commerce
certified to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration that the proposed rule for this action, if adopted,
would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities. The factual basis for the certification was published
in the proposed rule. No comments were received regarding the
certification or the economic impacts of this action. As a result, no regulatory flexibility analysis was prepared.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
Dated: March 25, 2004.
Rebecca Lent,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 047091 Filed 32904; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 351022S
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT Dr. Steve Branstetter, telephone: 727- 5705796, fax: 7275705583, email: Steve.Branstetter@noaa.gov.
14 CFR Part 39 40 CFR Part 52 14 CFR Part 71 33 CFR Part 165 50 CFR Part 679 47 CFR Part 73 26 CFR Part 1 40 CFR Part 180 33 CFR Part 117 50 CFR Part 17 44 CFR Part 67 50 CFR Part 648 14 CFR Part 97 33 CFR Part 100 40 CFR Part 63 50 CFR Part 622 44 CFR Part 65 50 CFR Part 660 26 CFR Part 301 39 CFR Part 111 40 CFR Part 300 6 CFR Part 5 40 CFR Part 271 47 CFR Part 64 40 CFR Parts 52 and 81 50 CFR Part 665 44 CFR Part 64 10 CFR Part 50 49 CFR Part 571 47 CFR Part 76