Federal Register: December 29, 2004 (Volume 69, Number 249)
DOCID: FR Doc 04-28443
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Securities and Exchange Commission
NOTICE: NOTICES
ACTION: Self-regulatory organizations; proposed rule changes:
SUBJECT CATEGORY:
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change by the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. To Extend an Existing Pilot Relating to Manning Price-Improvement Standards
DOCUMENT SUMMARY:
December 20, 2004.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on December 2, 2004, the National Association of Securities Dealers,
Inc. (``NASD'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change, as described in Items I, II,
and III below, which Items have been prepared by NASD. NASD has filed
this proposed rule change pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act
\3\ and Rule 19b4(f)(6) thereunder,\4\ which renders the proposal
effective upon filing with the Commission. The Commission is publishing
this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b4.
\3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\4\ 17 CFR 240.19b4(f)(6).
I. SelfRegulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change
NASD is proposing to extend through June 30, 2005, the current
pilot priceimprovement standards for decimalized securities contained
in NASD Interpretive Material 21102, ``Trading Ahead of Customer Limit
Order'' (``Manning Interpretation'' or ``Manning''). Without such an
extension, these standards will expire on December 31, 2004. NASD
proposes to extend the pilot's expiration date to June 30, 2005,\5\
NASD does not propose to make any substantive changes to the pilot. The
text of the proposed rule change is available at the NASD's Office and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.
\5\ NASD understands that the Commission's proposed Regulation
NMS may have an impact on this pilot program. Accordingly, NASD has
represented that it will undertake to work with the Commission to
ensure that the pilot program would be consistent with the rules and
regulations contained in Regulation NMS, if and when it is adopted.
Telephone Conversation between Andrea Orr, Assistant General
Counsel, NASD, and Ronesha A. Butler, Special Counsel, Division of Market Regulation, Commission, on December 20, 2004.
II. SelfRegulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, NASD included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. NASD has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements. A. SelfRegulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
NASD's Manning Interpretation requires an NASD member firm to
provide a minimum level of price improvement to an incoming order in an
NMS or SmallCap security if the firm chooses to trade as principal with
the incoming order at a price superior to a customer limit order that
it currently holds. If the firm fails to provide the minimum level of
price improvement to the incoming order, the firm must execute the held
customer limit order. Generally, if a firm fails to provide the
requisite amount of price improvement and also fails to execute the held
[[Page 78079]]
customer limit order, it is in violation of the Manning Interpretation.
On April 6, 2001, the Commission approved, on a pilot basis, price
improvement standards for decimalized securities contained in
Manning.\6\ Since approval, these standards continue to operate on a
pilot basis which terminates on December 31, 2004.\7\ NASD has
determined to seek an extension of its current Manning pilot until June
30, 2005. NASD believes that such an extension provides for an
appropriate continuation of the current Manning priceimprovement
standard while the Commission continues to analyze the issues related
to customer limit order protection in a decimalized environment. NASD
is not proposing any other changes to the pilot at this time.
\6\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 3444165 (April 6, 2001), 66 FR 19268 (April 13, 2001).
\7\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 3448876 (December 4, 2003), 68 FR 69103 (December 11, 2003).
2. Statutory Basis
NASD believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with the
provisions of Section 15A of the Act,\8\ in general, and with Section
15A(b)(6) of the Act,\9\ in particular, which requires, among other
things, that NASD rules must be designed to prevent fraudulent and
manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest.
\8\ 15 U.S.C. 78o3
\9\ 15 U.S.C. 78o3(b)(6).
B. SelfRegulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
NASD does not believe that the proposed rule change will result in
any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act, as amended.
C. SelfRegulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
Written comments were neither solicited nor received by NASD. III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action
NASD asserts that the proposed rule change is immediately effective
pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \10\ and Rule 19b4(f)(6)
thereunder \11\ because it: (i) does not significantly affect the
protection of investors or the public interest; (ii) does not impose
any significant burden on competition; and (iii) does not become
operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or such
shorter time as the Commission may designate if consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest.\12\
\10\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\11\ 17 CFR 240.19b4(f)(6).
\12\ In addition, to submit a filing pursuant to Rule 19b
4(f)(6) under the Act, paragraph (f)(6)(iii) thereof also requires
the Exchange to give the Commission written notice of its intent to
file the proposed rule change, along with a brief description and
text of the proposed rule change, at least five business days prior
to the date of filing of the proposed rule change, or such shorter
time as designated by the Commission. NASD complied with this requirement.
NASD proposes to make the proposed rule change operative on January 1, 2005, and requests that the Commission waive the 30day operative date. The Commission hereby grants this request.\13\ The Commission believes that waiving the 30day preoperative period is consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest because it will allow the benefits of investors resulting from the pilot to continue uninterrupted. At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule change, the Commission may summarily abrogate such proposed rule change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. \13\ For purposes only of accelerating the operative date of this proposal, the Commission has considered the proposed rule's impact on efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Paper Comments
All submissions should refer to File Number SRNASD2004176. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used.
To help the Commission process and review your comments more
efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all
comments on the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml ). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments,
all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that
are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating
to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person,
other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance
with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection
and copying in the Commission's Public Reference Section, 450 Fifth
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20549. Copies of such filing also will be
available for inspection and copying at the principle office of NASD.
All comments received will be posted without change; the Commission
does not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You
should submit only information that you wish to make available
publicly. All submissions should refer to the File Number SRNASD2004 176 and should be submitted on or before January 19, 2005.
For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated authority.\14\
\14\ 17 CFR 200.303(a)(12).
Margaret H. McFarland,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 0428443 Filed 122804; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 801001M
SUMMARY:
National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc.,
DOCUMENT BODY 2:
December 20, 2004.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on December 2, 2004, the National Association of Securities Dealers,
Inc. (``NASD'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change, as described in Items I, II,
and III below, which Items have been prepared by NASD. NASD has filed
this proposed rule change pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act
\3\ and Rule 19b4(f)(6) thereunder,\4\ which renders the proposal
effective upon filing with the Commission. The Commission is publishing
this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b4.
\3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\4\ 17 CFR 240.19b4(f)(6).
I. SelfRegulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change
NASD is proposing to extend through June 30, 2005, the current
pilot priceimprovement standards for decimalized securities contained
in NASD Interpretive Material 21102, ``Trading Ahead of Customer Limit
Order'' (``Manning Interpretation'' or ``Manning''). Without such an
extension, these standards will expire on December 31, 2004. NASD
proposes to extend the pilot's expiration date to June 30, 2005,\5\
NASD does not propose to make any substantive changes to the pilot. The
text of the proposed rule change is available at the NASD's Office and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.
\5\ NASD understands that the Commission's proposed Regulation
NMS may have an impact on this pilot program. Accordingly, NASD has
represented that it will undertake to work with the Commission to
ensure that the pilot program would be consistent with the rules and
regulations contained in Regulation NMS, if and when it is adopted.
Telephone Conversation between Andrea Orr, Assistant General
Counsel, NASD, and Ronesha A. Butler, Special Counsel, Division of Market Regulation, Commission, on December 20, 2004.
II. SelfRegulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, NASD included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. NASD has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements. A. SelfRegulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
NASD's Manning Interpretation requires an NASD member firm to
provide a minimum level of price improvement to an incoming order in an
NMS or SmallCap security if the firm chooses to trade as principal with
the incoming order at a price superior to a customer limit order that
it currently holds. If the firm fails to provide the minimum level of
price improvement to the incoming order, the firm must execute the held
customer limit order. Generally, if a firm fails to provide the
requisite amount of price improvement and also fails to execute the held
[[Page 78079]]
customer limit order, it is in violation of the Manning Interpretation.
On April 6, 2001, the Commission approved, on a pilot basis, price
improvement standards for decimalized securities contained in
Manning.\6\ Since approval, these standards continue to operate on a
pilot basis which terminates on December 31, 2004.\7\ NASD has
determined to seek an extension of its current Manning pilot until June
30, 2005. NASD believes that such an extension provides for an
appropriate continuation of the current Manning priceimprovement
standard while the Commission continues to analyze the issues related
to customer limit order protection in a decimalized environment. NASD
is not proposing any other changes to the pilot at this time.
\6\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 3444165 (April 6, 2001), 66 FR 19268 (April 13, 2001).
\7\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 3448876 (December 4, 2003), 68 FR 69103 (December 11, 2003).
2. Statutory Basis
NASD believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with the
provisions of Section 15A of the Act,\8\ in general, and with Section
15A(b)(6) of the Act,\9\ in particular, which requires, among other
things, that NASD rules must be designed to prevent fraudulent and
manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest.
\8\ 15 U.S.C. 78o3
\9\ 15 U.S.C. 78o3(b)(6).
B. SelfRegulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
NASD does not believe that the proposed rule change will result in
any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act, as amended.
C. SelfRegulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
Written comments were neither solicited nor received by NASD. III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action
NASD asserts that the proposed rule change is immediately effective
pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \10\ and Rule 19b4(f)(6)
thereunder \11\ because it: (i) does not significantly affect the
protection of investors or the public interest; (ii) does not impose
any significant burden on competition; and (iii) does not become
operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or such
shorter time as the Commission may designate if consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest.\12\
\10\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\11\ 17 CFR 240.19b4(f)(6).
\12\ In addition, to submit a filing pursuant to Rule 19b
4(f)(6) under the Act, paragraph (f)(6)(iii) thereof also requires
the Exchange to give the Commission written notice of its intent to
file the proposed rule change, along with a brief description and
text of the proposed rule change, at least five business days prior
to the date of filing of the proposed rule change, or such shorter
time as designated by the Commission. NASD complied with this requirement.
NASD proposes to make the proposed rule change operative on January 1, 2005, and requests that the Commission waive the 30day operative date. The Commission hereby grants this request.\13\ The Commission believes that waiving the 30day preoperative period is consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest because it will allow the benefits of investors resulting from the pilot to continue uninterrupted. At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule change, the Commission may summarily abrogate such proposed rule change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. \13\ For purposes only of accelerating the operative date of this proposal, the Commission has considered the proposed rule's impact on efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Paper Comments
All submissions should refer to File Number SRNASD2004176. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used.
To help the Commission process and review your comments more
efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all
comments on the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml ). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments,
all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that
are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating
to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person,
other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance
with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection
and copying in the Commission's Public Reference Section, 450 Fifth
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20549. Copies of such filing also will be
available for inspection and copying at the principle office of NASD.
All comments received will be posted without change; the Commission
does not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You
should submit only information that you wish to make available
publicly. All submissions should refer to the File Number SRNASD2004 176 and should be submitted on or before January 19, 2005.
For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated authority.\14\
\14\ 17 CFR 200.303(a)(12).
Margaret H. McFarland,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 0428443 Filed 122804; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 801001M