Browse: Departments Dates Agencies
Docket ID: [Docket No. CE226, Special Condition 23-166-SC]
SUBJECT CATEGORY: Special Conditions; Tiger Aircraft, EFIS on the AG-5B; Protection of Systems for High Intensity Radiated Fields (HIRF)
DOCUMENT SUMMARY: These special conditions are issued to Tiger Aircraft, 266 Pilot Way, Martinsburg, WV, 25401, for a change to the Type Design of the Tiger AG5B. This airplane will have novel and unusual design features when compared to the state of technology envisaged in the applicable airworthiness standards. These novel and unusual design features include the installation of an electronic flight instrument system (EFIS) in the form of a Garmin G1000 integrated avionics system. The current applicable regulations do not contain adequate or appropriate airworthiness standards for the protection of the systems from the effects of high intensity radiated fields (HIRF). These special conditions contain the additional safety standards that the Administrator considers necessary to establish a level of safety equivalent to the airworthiness standards applicable to these airplanes.
SUMMARY: Special conditions—; Tiger AG-5B airplane,
Interested persons are invited to submit such written data, views, or arguments, as they may desire. Communications should identify the regulatory docket or notice number and be submitted in duplicate to the address specified above. All communications received on or before the closing date for comments will be considered by the Administrator. The special conditions may be changed in light of the comments received. All comments received will be available in the Rules Docket for examination by interested persons, both before and after the closing date for comments. A report summarizing each substantive public contact with FAA personnel concerning this rulemaking will be filed in the docket. Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments submitted in response to this notice must include a self addressed, stamped postcard on which the following statement is made: ``Comments to Docket No. CE226.'' The postcard will be date stamped and returned to the commenter.
Tiger Aircraft made application to the FAA for a change to the Type Design for the Tiger AG5B. The AG5B is currently approved under TC No. A16EA. It is a single engine airplane originally added to TC No. A16EA on September 21, 1990. The proposed modification to the AG5B incorporates a novel or unusual design feature, or the Garmin G1000 EFIS display system that may be vulnerable to HIRF external to the airplane.
Under the provisions of 14 CFR part 21, Sec. 21.101, Tiger Aircraft must show that the Tiger AG5B aircraft meets the original certification basis for the airplane, as listed on Type Data Sheet A16EA, the additional certification requirements added for the Garmin 1000, exemptions, if any; and the special conditions adopted by this rulemaking action. The regulations that were applied at a later amendment than the original certification basis for the AG5B to accommodate the Garmin G1000 EFIS include 23.1301 at amendment 20, 23.1309 at amendment 49, 23.1311 at amendment 49, 23.1322 at amendment 43, and 23.1353 at amendment 49. Further details of the certification basis for the installation of the G1000 EFIS are available on request. Discussion
If the Administrator finds that the applicable airworthiness standards do not contain adequate or appropriate safety standards because of novel or unusual design features of an airplane, special conditions are prescribed under the provisions of Sec. 21.16.
Special conditions, as appropriate, as defined in Sec. 11.19, are issued in accordance with Sec. 11.38 after public notice and become part of the type certification basis in accordance with Sec. 21.101.
Special conditions are initially applicable to the model for which they are issued. Should the applicant apply for a supplemental type certificate to modify any other model already included on the same type certificate to incorporate the same novel or unusual design feature, the special conditions would also apply to the other model under the provisions of Sec. 21.101.
Tiger Aircraft plans to incorporate certain novel and unusual design features into the AG5B airplane for which the airworthiness standards do not contain adequate or appropriate safety standards for protection from the effects of HIRF. These features include an EFIS, which may be susceptible to the HIRF environment, that was not envisaged by the existing regulations for this type of airplane.
Protection of Systems from High Intensity Radiated Fields (HIRF):
Recent advances in technology have given rise to the application in
aircraft designs of advanced electrical and electronic systems that
perform functions required for continued safe flight and landing. Due
to the use of sensitive solidstate advanced components in analog and
digital electronics circuits, these advanced systems are readily
responsive to the transient effects of induced electrical current and
voltage caused by the HIRF. The HIRF can degrade electronic systems performance by
[[Page 34311]]
Furthermore, the HIRF environment has undergone a transformation that was not foreseen when the current requirements were developed. Higher energy levels are radiated from transmitters that are used for radar, radio, and television. Also, the number of transmitters has increased significantly. There is also uncertainty concerning the effectiveness of airframe shielding for HIRF. Furthermore, coupling to cockpitinstalled equipment through the cockpit window apertures is undefined.
The combined effect of the technological advances in airplane design and the changing environment has resulted in an increased level of vulnerability of electrical and electronic systems required for the continued safe flight and landing of the airplane. Effective measures against the effects of exposure to HIRF must be provided by the design and installation of these systems. The accepted maximum energy levels in which civilian airplane system installations must be capable of operating safely are based on surveys and analysis of existing radio frequency emitters. These special conditions require that the airplane be evaluated under these energy levels for the protection of the electronic system and its associated wiring harness. These external threat levels, which are lower than previous required values, are believed to represent the worst case to which an airplane would be exposed in the operating environment.
These special conditions require qualification of systems that
perform critical functions, as installed in aircraft, to the defined
HIRF environment in paragraph 1 or, as an option to a fixed value using laboratory tests, in paragraph 2, as follows:
(1) The applicant may demonstrate that the operation and
operational capability of the installed electrical and electronic
systems that perform critical functions are not adversely affected when
the aircraft is exposed to the HIRF environment defined below:
Field strength
(volts per meter) Frequency
Peak Average
10 kHz100 kHz...................................... 50 50
100 kHz500 kHz..................................... 50 50
500 kHz2 MHz....................................... 50 50
2 MHz30 MHz........................................ 100 100
30 MHz70 MHz....................................... 50 50
70 MHz100 MHz...................................... 50 50
100 MHz200 MHz..................................... 100 100
200 MHz400 MHz..................................... 100 100
400 MHz700 MHz..................................... 700 50
700 MHz1 GHz....................................... 700 100
1 GHz2 GHz......................................... 2000 200
2 GHz4 GHz......................................... 3000 200
4 GHz6 GHz......................................... 3000 200
6 GHz8 GHz......................................... 1000 200
8 GHz12 GHz........................................ 3000 300
12 GHz18 GHz....................................... 2000 200
18 GHz40 GHz....................................... 600 200
The field strengths are expressed in terms of peak rootmeansquare (rms) values.
or,
(2) The applicant may demonstrate by a system test and analysis
that the electrical and electronic systems that perform critical
functions can withstand a minimum threat of 100 volts per meter,
electrical field strength, from 10 kHz to 18 GHz. When using this test
to show compliance with the HIRF requirements, no credit is given for signal attenuation due to installation.
A preliminary hazard analysis must be performed by the applicant for approval by the FAA to identify either electrical or electronic systems that perform critical functions. The term ``critical'' means those functions, whose failure would contribute to, or cause, a failure condition that would prevent the continued safe flight and landing of the airplane. The systems identified by the hazard analysis that perform critical functions are candidates for the application of HIRF requirements. A system may perform both critical and noncritical functions. Primary electronic flight display systems, and their associated components, perform critical functions such as attitude, altitude, and airspeed indication. The HIRF requirements apply only to critical functions.
Compliance with HIRF requirements may be demonstrated by tests, analysis, models, similarity with existing systems, or any combination of these. Service experience alone is not acceptable since normal flight operations may not include an exposure to the HIRF environment. Reliance on a system with similar design features for redundancy as a means of protection against the effects of external HIRF is generally insufficient since all elements of a redundant system are likely to be exposed to the fields concurrently.
As discussed above, these special conditions are applicable to the Tiger Aircraft AG5B. Should Tiger Aircraft apply at a later date for a supplemental type certificate to modify any other model on the same type certificate to incorporate the same novel or unusual design feature, the special conditions would apply to that model as well under the provisions of Sec. 21.101.
This action affects only certain novel or unusual design features on one model of airplane. It is not a rule of general applicability and affects only the applicant who applied to the FAA for approval of these features on the airplane.
The substance of these special conditions has been subjected to the
notice and comment period in several prior instances and has been
derived without substantive change from those previously issued. It is
unlikely that prior public comment would result in a significant change
from the substance contained herein. For this reason, and because a
delay would significantly affect the certification of the airplane,
which is imminent, the FAA has determined that prior public notice and
comment are unnecessary and impracticable, and good cause exists for
adopting these special conditions upon issuance. The FAA is requesting
comments to allow interested persons to submit views that may not have
been submitted in response to the prior opportunities for comment described above.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 23
Aircraft, Aviation safety, Signs and symbols.
Citation The authority citation for these special conditions is as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113 and 44701; 14 CFR 21.16 and 21.101; and 14 CFR 11.38 and 11.19.
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the following special conditions are issued as part of the type certification basis for the AG5B airplane modified by Tiger Aircraft, LLC to add the Garmin G1000 EFIS system.
1. Protection of Electrical and Electronic Systems from High Intensity Radiated Fields (HIRF). Each system that performs critical functions must be designed and installed to ensure that the operations, and operational capabilities of these systems to perform critical functions, are not adversely affected when the airplane is exposed to high intensity radiated electromagnetic fields external to the airplane.
2. For the purpose of these special conditions, the following
definition applies: Critical Functions: Functions whose failure would contribute to, or
[[Page 34312]]
cause, a failure condition that would prevent the continued safe flight and landing of the airplane.
Issued in Kansas City, Missouri on June 3, 2005. Kim Smith,
Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 0511669 Filed 61305; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 491013P
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT Wes Ryan, Aerospace Engineer, Standards Office (ACE110), Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service, Federal Aviation Administration, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri 64106; telephone (816) 3294127.
14 CFR Part 39 40 CFR Part 52 14 CFR Part 71 33 CFR Part 165 50 CFR Part 679 47 CFR Part 73 26 CFR Part 1 40 CFR Part 180 33 CFR Part 117 50 CFR Part 17 44 CFR Part 67 50 CFR Part 648 14 CFR Part 97 40 CFR Part 63 33 CFR Part 100 50 CFR Part 622 50 CFR Part 660 26 CFR Part 301 44 CFR Part 65 39 CFR Part 111 40 CFR Part 300 6 CFR Part 5 40 CFR Part 271 47 CFR Part 64 40 CFR Parts 52 and 81 50 CFR Part 665 10 CFR Part 50 44 CFR Part 64 49 CFR Part 571 39 CFR Part 3020