Browse: Departments Dates Agencies
SUBJECT CATEGORY: The Central Valley Project-Rate Order No. WAPA-128
DOCUMENT SUMMARY: The Western Area Power Administration (Western) is proposing to revise the transmission revenue requirement (TRR) for existing formula rates associated with Reactive Power and Voltage Control from the Central Valley Project (CVP) and other nonFederal Generation Sources Service (VAR Support). The TRRs for transmission service from the CVP transmission system, the Pacific Alternating Current Intertie (PACI), and the CaliforniaOregon Transmission Project (COTP) are assigned a portion of the VAR Support costs under Rate Schedules CVT1, CVNWT3, PACIT1, and COTPT1 which extend through September 30, 2009. The proposed revision to the TRRs will remove the VAR Support costs from the TRRs. This formula rate will provide sufficient revenue to repay all annual costs, including interest expense, and repay required investment within the allowable period. Western will prepare a rate brochure that provides detailed information on the impact of this rate adjustment to all interested parties. This proposal is scheduled to go into effect on September 1, 2006, and will remain in effect through September 30, 2009. Publication of this Federal Register notice begins the formal process for the proposed revisions to the applicable revenue requirements.
SUMMARY: Central Valley Project, CA, et al.,
The Deputy Secretary of Energy approved Rate Schedules CVT1, CV NWT3, PACIT1, and COTPT1 for transmission service and CVF11 for Base Resource and First Preference Power on November 18, 2004 (Rate Order No. WAPA115, 69 FR 70510, December 6, 2004), and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) confirmed and approved the rate schedules on October 11, 2005, under FERC Docket No. EF05011000 (113 FERC 61,026). Rate Schedules CVT1, CVNWT3, PACIT1, COTPT1, and CV F11 began January 1, 2005, and end on September 30, 2009.
The December 1, 2004, update of the approved rates resulted in annual CVP VAR Support costs of $336,070. Western currently estimates its annual costs associated with CVP and other nonFederal generator VAR Support to be $1,486,558. This cost was pro rata assigned to the respective transmission systems on a capacity basis and is one of the costs contained in Component 1 of the CVP, PACI, and COTP formula rates.
As part of the implementing of Western's Open Access Transmission Tariff, Western separated its merchant function from Western's reliability function. It has come to Western's attention, that by including the CVP and other nonFederal generation sources' reactive power and voltage control costs in Western's TRR, Western, in certain circumstances, may be treating its merchant in a manner that is not comparable with other transmission customers. Under Western's current rates, all transmission customers would pay Western for VAR Support. As a result, a transmission customer who also has a generator that is directly connected to Western's system and who has an obligation to provide reactive power within the bandwidth (commonly referred to as the deadband) would also pay Western for VAR Support. Western believes that both Federal generators and nonFederal generators should be treated comparably when they provide VAR Support.
To treat both Federal and nonFederal generators comparably, Western could either: (1) Roll all the VAR Support costs from both types of generators into Western's TRR or (2) Western could exclude all VAR Support from both types of generators from Western's TRR. Western's proposal is the latter.
Based on Western's understanding of the Commission's comparability
requirements, Western has agreed to compensate the Calpine Construction
Finance Company (CCFC), a nonFederal generator connected to the CVP
transmission system, for reactive power costs subject to the outcome of this rate proceeding. Western will compensate
[[Page 10667]]
CCFC from December 2005 until new rates are in effect regardless of the
outcome of this rate proceeding. At a minimum, such payments increase
Western's annual costs for reactive power from approximately $341,000
to almost $1.2 million. While CCFC is the only entity that has
currently sought to charge Western for reactive power, Western intends
to treat every generator directly connected to Western's transmission
system in a comparable fashion. Western cannot determine the cost
associated with all such facilities. The obligation to provide such
payments could create an open, indefinite, and undefined future
liability for Western. Such costs could likely exceed $1.2 million. On
the other hand, if Western excludes both the Federal and nonFederal
generator costs for VAR Support in the TRR, it would ultimately fall to
the customers who purchase power from the generator to pay for such
costs. Customers who receive power from Western through Rate Schedule
CVF11 currently pay VAR Support costs in the PRR including the VAR
Support associated with network service. Also included are VAR Support
costs associated with the Rate Schedules PACIT1 and COTPT1 if not
recovered from contracted sales. By excluding the VAR Support component
from the TRR, Western can accurately determine the costs associated
with transmission service. Furthermore, while Western's statutory
customers, such as preference power customers, would be obligated to
pay Western for all of the costs associated with reactive power from
the United States generators in its power rates, the overall cost to
Western's statutory customers would be lower and more predictable since
they are paying for only the costs associated with the Federal generators.
As a result, Western seeks comments from all interested parties on Western's rate proposal. In addition, Western seeks particular comments on the following: (1) Whether Western should not make any changes to its rates (no action) and if Western takes no action, whether Western's current rates result in noncomparable treatment; (2) whether Western should remove the VAR Support component from Western's TRR and apply to the PRR for the CVP; Schedule of Rates for Base Resource and First Preference Power (CVF11); and (3) whether including the costs associated with VAR Support in its TRR would be consistent with Western's statutory obligation to provide power at the lowest rates possible consistent with sound business principles. While Western seeks particular comments on the above, Western invites all interested parties to submit other comments related to the proposal. As part of Western's final decision, Western will evaluate all comments received before the end of the consultation and comment period.
Under the 2004 Power Marketing Plan, Base Resource and First Preference power is primarily CVP hydrogeneration available subject to water conditions and operating constraints. The Base Resource and First Preference power formula rates recover a PRR through percentages of costs to First Preference and Base Resource Customers.
Component 1 of the PRR for Base Resource and First Preference Power, as approved in the rate schedule (CVF11), includes operations and maintenance (O&M), purchased power for project use and First Preference Customer loads, interest expense, annual expenses (including any other statutorily required costs or charges), investment repayment for the CVP, and the Washoe Project annual PRR that remains after project use loads are met. Revenues from project use, transmission, ancillary services, and other services are applied to the total PRR, and the remainder is collected from Base Resource and First Preference Customers.
The proposed rate formula change for CVF11 for the Base Resource and First Preference PRR is listed in Table 1.
Table 1.Proposed Formula Rate Change for Base Resource and First Preference PRR (CVF11)
Existing rates Proposed rates
($000)\1\ ($000)\2\ Percent change
Base Resource and First Preference PRR....................... 53,032 52,966 0.13
Note 1: Includes the VAR Support costs from the CVP and CCFC. Note 2: Includes only the CVP VAR Support costs.
The proposed revision to the revenue requirements described above constitutes a minor rate adjustment. Western has determined that it is not necessary to hold a public information or comment forum for this proposed minor rate adjustment as defined by 10 CFR part 903. After review of public comments, and possible amendments or adjustments, Western will recommend the Deputy Secretary of Energy approve the proposed rates on an interim basis.
Western is establishing TRRs and a PRR for the formula rates for CVT1, CVNWT3, PACIT1, and COTPT1 transmission service and CVF11 for Base Resource and First Preference Power under the Department of Energy Organization Act (42 U.S.C. 7152); the Reclamation Act of 1902 (ch. 1093, 32 Stat. 388), as amended and supplemented by subsequent laws, particularly section 9(c) of the Reclamation Project Act of 1939 (43 U.S.C. 485h(c)); and other acts that specifically apply to the project involved.
By Delegation Order No. 00037.00, effective December 6, 2001, the Secretary of Energy delegated: (1) The authority to develop power and transmission rates to Western's Administrator; (2) the authority to confirm, approve, and place such rates into effect on an interim basis to the Deputy Secretary of Energy; and (3) the authority to confirm, approve, and place into effect on a final basis, to remand or to disapprove such rates to the Commission. Existing Department of Energy (DOE) procedures for public participation in power rate adjustments (10 CFR part 903) were published on September 18, 1985.
All brochures, studies, comments, letters, memorandums, or other
documents that Western initiates or uses to develop the proposed rates
are available for inspection and copying at the Sierra Nevada Regional
Office, located at 114 Parkshore Drive, Folsom, California. Many of
these documents and supporting information are also available on the
Web site under the ``Current Rates'' section located at http://www.wapa.gov/sn/customers/rates/#currentrates/ .
Regulatory Procedure Requirements
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (5 U.S.C. 601, et seq.)
requires Federal agencies to perform a regulatory flexibility analysis
if a final rule is likely to have a significant economic impact [[Page 10668]]
on a substantial number of small entities and there is a legal
requirement to issue a general notice of proposed rulemaking. This
action does not require a regulatory flexibility analysis since it is a
rulemaking of particular applicability involving rates or services applicable to public property.
In compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321, et seq.); Council on Environmental Quality Regulations (40 CFR parts 15001508); and DOE NEPA Regulations (10 CFR part 1021), Western has determined this action is categorically excluded from preparing an environmental assessment or an environmental impact statement.
Western has an exemption from centralized regulatory review under Executive Order 12866; accordingly, no clearance of this notice by the Office of Management and Budget is required.
Western has determined this rule is exempt from congressional
notification requirements under 5 U.S.C. 801 because the action is a
rulemaking of particular applicability relating to rates or services and involves matters of procedure.
Dated: February 16, 2006.
Michael S. Hacskaylo,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. E62956 Filed 3106; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 645001P
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT Mr. Sean Sanderson, Rates Manager, Sierra Nevada Customer Service Region, Western Area Power
Administration, 114 Parkshore Drive, Folsom, CA 956304710, telephone
(916) 3534466, email ssander@wapa.gov.
14 CFR Part 39 40 CFR Part 52 14 CFR Part 71 33 CFR Part 165 50 CFR Part 679 47 CFR Part 73 26 CFR Part 1 40 CFR Part 180 33 CFR Part 117 50 CFR Part 17 44 CFR Part 67 50 CFR Part 648 14 CFR Part 97 40 CFR Part 63 33 CFR Part 100 50 CFR Part 622 50 CFR Part 660 26 CFR Part 301 44 CFR Part 65 39 CFR Part 111 40 CFR Part 300 6 CFR Part 5 40 CFR Part 271 47 CFR Part 64 40 CFR Parts 52 and 81 50 CFR Part 665 10 CFR Part 50 44 CFR Part 64 49 CFR Part 571 39 CFR Part 3020