Federal Register: February 5, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 23)
DOCID: fr05fe07-67 FR Doc E7-1801
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
International Trade Commission
DOCUMENT ID: [Inv. No. 337-TA-591]
ACTION: Import investigations:
DOCUMENT ACTION: Institution of investigation pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337.
In the Matter of Certain Wireless Conference Calling Devices, Components Thereof, and Devices Containing Same; Notice of Investigation
Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the U.S. International Trade Commission on December 29, 2006, under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of Callpod, Inc. of Chicago, Illinois. A supplement to the complaint was filed on January 17, 2007. The complaint, as supplemented, alleges violations of section 337 in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain wireless conference calling devices, components thereof, and devices containing same by reason of infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,801,611. The complaint further alleges that an industry in the United States exists or is in the process of being established as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337.
The complainant requests that the Commission institute an investigation and, after the investigation, issue a permanent exclusion order and permanent cease and desist orders.
Wireless conference calling devices, components, and devices containing same,
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
David H. Hollander, Esq., Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, telephone (202) 2052746.
Authority: The authority for institution of this investigation is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and in section 210.10 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2006).
Scope of Investigation: Having considered the complaint, the U.S.
International Trade Commission, on January 30, 2007, Ordered that
(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of section 337 of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine whether
there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the
importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the
sale within the United States after importation of certain wireless
conference calling devices, components thereof, and devices containing
the same by reason of infringement of one or more of claims 1, 3, 6, 9,
10, 12, and 15 of U.S. Patent No. 6,801,611, and whether an industry in
the United States exists or is in the process of being established as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337;
(2) For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of investigation shall be served:
(a) The complainant isCallpod, Inc., 850 W Jackson Boulevard
(b) The respondents are the following entities alleged to be in violation of section 337, and are the parties upon which the complaint is to be served:
GN Netcom, Inc., 77 Northeastern Boulevard, Nashua, NH 03062. GN Netcom A/S, Metalbuen 66, 2750 Ballerup, Denmark.
GN Store Nord A/S, a/k/a GN Great Nordic, Ltd., Lautrupbjerg 7, P.O. Box 99, DK2570 Ballerup, Denmark.
(c) The Commission investigative attorney, party to this investigation, is David H. Hollander, Esq., Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Suite 401, Washington, DC 20436; and
(3) For the investigation so instituted, the Honorable Charles E. Bullock is designated as the presiding administrative law judge.
Responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be submitted by the named respondents in accordance with section 210.13 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(d) and 210.13(a), such responses will be considered by the Commission if received not later than 20 days after the date of service by the Commission of the complaint and the notice of investigation. Extensions of time for submitting responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation will not be granted unless good cause therefor is shown.
Failure of a respondent to file a timely response to each
allegation in the complaint and in this notice may be deemed to
constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations
of the complaint and this notice, and to authorize the administrative
law judge and the Commission, without further notice to the respondent,
to find the facts to be as alleged in the complaint and this notice and
to enter an initial determination and a final determination containing
such findings, and may result in the issuance of a limited exclusion
order or cease and desist order or both directed against the respondent.
Issued: January 31, 2007.
By order of the Commission.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E71801 Filed 2207; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 702002P