Federal Register: August 2, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 148)
DOCID: fr02au07-63 FR Doc E7-15037
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
DOCUMENT ID: [A-570-846]
NOTICE: NOTICES
DOCID: fr02au07-63
ACTION: Antidumping:
SUBJECT CATEGORY:
Brake Rotors From the People's Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative and New Shipper Reviews and Partial Rescission of the 2005-2006 Administrative Review
EFFECTIVE DATES: August 2, 2007.
DOCUMENT SUMMARY:
On February 15, 2007, the Department of Commerce (``Department'') published Brake Rotors From the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Results of the 2005 2006 Administrative and New Shipper Reviews and Partial Rescission of the 2005 2006 Administrative Review, 72 FR 7405 (February 15, 2007) (``Preliminary Results''). The period of review (``POR'') is April 1, 2005, through March 31, 2006. The administrative review covers three mandatory respondents and 12 separaterate respondents. The new shipper review covers one new shipper.
We invited interested parties to comment on our Preliminary Results. Based on our analysis of the comments received, we made certain changes to our calculations. The final dumping margins for the administrative and new shipper reviews are listed in the ``Final Results of the Reviews'' section, below.
SUMMARY:
Brake rotors from—; China,
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
Background
On February 15, 2007, the Department published the Preliminary Results of the administrative and new shipper reviews of the antidumping duty order on brake rotors from the People's Republic of China (``PRC'').
On March 6, 2007, the Department issued a letter to all interested parties granting a 28day extension of time to submit publicly available information to value the factors of production for the final results of these reviews and postponed the briefing schedule pending the Department's release of the Shandong Huanri Group General Co., Laizhou Huanri Automobile Parts Co., Ltd, and Shandong Huanri Group Co., Ltd. (collectively, ``Huanri'') verification report.
From March 20 through March 22, 2007, the Department conducted a
verification of Huanri and released its verification report of Huanri
on May 4, 2007.\1\ On May 9, 2007, the Department issued a memorandum
stating that it would revise the surrogate value for steel strap to
include Indian import data from Ukraine for February and March 2006 for
the final results.\2\ See ``Surrogate Value'' section below. On May 10,
2007, the Department revised the deadline for submission of case and
rebuttal briefs to May 21 and May 29, 2007, respectively. On May 15,
2007, in response to a request filed by the Coalition for the
Preservation of American Brake Drum and Rotor Aftermarket Manufacturers
(``the petitioner''), the Department extended the deadline for
submission of rebuttal briefs until June 5, 2007. On May 21, 2007, the
Department received case briefs from Laizhou Auto Brake Equipment
Company (``LABEC''), Yantai Winhere AutoPart Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
(``Winhere''), Longkou Haimeng Machinery Co., Ltd. (``Haimeng''),
Laizhou Luqi Machinery Co., Ltd. (``Luqi''), Laizhou Hongda Auto
Replacement Co., Ltd. (``Hongda''), Qindgdao Meita Automotive Industry Co., Ltd. (``Meita'') (collectively, ``the Trade Pacific
respondents''), and the petitioner. On May 21, 2007, the Department
placed the supporting documentation regarding the Department's
calculation of the surrogate wage rate used in respondents' margin
calculations on the record of these reviews.\3\ On June 5, 2007, we
received rebuttal briefs from the petitioner and the Trade Pacific respondents.
\1\ See Memorandum from Eugene Degnan, Senior International
Trade Compliance Analyst, AD/CVD Operations, Office 8, and Paul
Stolz, International Trade Compliance Analyst, AD/CVD Operations, Office 8, through Robert Bolling, Program Manager, AD/CVD
Operations, Office 8 and Wendy J. Frankel, Director, AD/CVD
Operations, Office 8, to the File entitled, ``Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review of Brake Rotors from the People's Republic of
China: Verification of Section A and Quantity and Value Response of
Shandong Huanri Group Co., Ltd., Laizhou Huanri Automobile Parts
Co., Ltd., and Shandong Huanri Group General Co.,'' dated May 4, 2007 (``Huanri Verification Report'').
\2\ See Memorandum from Ann Fornaro, International Trade
Compliance Analyst, to the File entitled, ``20052006 Antidumping
Duty Administrative and New Shipper Reviews of Brake Rotors from the
People's Republic of China Surrogate Value Change for Final
Results,'' dated May 9, 2007 (``Surrogate Value Change Memo'').
\3\ See Memorandum from Ann Fornaro, International Trade
Compliance Analyst, to the File entitled, ``20052006 Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review of Brake Rotors from the People's
Republic of China Expected Wages of Selected NonMarket Economy Countries,'' dated May 21, 2007.
On June 11, 2007, the Department published a notice extending the time limit for the completion of the final results of these reviews until July 31, 2007. See Brake Rotors from the People's Republic of China: Extension of Time Limit for the Final Results of the 20052006 Administrative and New Shipper Reviews, 72 FR 32071 (June 11, 2007).
We conducted these reviews in accordance with sections 751 and 777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (``the Act''), and sections 19 CFR 351.213 and 19 CFR 351.221 of the agency's regulations. Period of Review
The POR is April 1, 2005, through March 31, 2006. Scope of the Order
The products covered by this order are brake rotors made of gray
cast iron, whether finished, semifinished, or unfinished, ranging in
diameter from 8 to 16 inches (20.32 to 40.64 centimeters) and in weight from 8 to 45 pounds (3.63
[[Page 42387]]
to 20.41 kilograms). The size parameters (weight and dimension) of the
brake rotors limit their use to the following types of motor vehicles:
automobiles, allterrain vehicles, vans and recreational vehicles under
``one ton and a half,'' and light trucks designated as ``one ton and a half.''
Finished brake rotors are those that are ready for sale and installation without any further operations. Semifinished rotors are those on which the surface is not entirely smooth, and have undergone some drilling. Unfinished rotors are those which have undergone some grinding or turning.
These brake rotors are for motor vehicles, and do not contain in
the casting a logo of an original equipment manufacturer (``OEM'')
which produces vehicles sold in the United States. (e.g., General
Motors, Ford, Chrysler, Honda, Toyota, Volvo). Brake rotors covered in
this order are not certified by OEM producers of vehicles sold in the
United States. The scope also includes composite brake rotors that are
made of gray cast iron, which contain a steel plate, but otherwise meet
the above criteria. Excluded from the scope of this order are brake
rotors made of gray cast iron, whether finished, semifinished, or
unfinished, with a diameter less than 8 inches or greater than 16
inches (less than 20.32 centimeters or greater than 40.64 centimeters)
and a weight less than 8 pounds or greater than 45 pounds (less than 3.63 kilograms or greater than 20.41 kilograms).\4\
\4\ On January 17, 2007, the Department determined the brake
rotors produced by FederalMogul and certified by the Ford Motor
Company to be excluded from the scope of the order. See Memorandum
from Blanche Ziv, Program Manager, AD/CVD Operations, Office 8,
through Wendy J. Frankel, Office Director, AD/CVD Operations, Office
8, to Stephen J. Claeys, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration, entitled, ``Scope Ruling of the Antidumping Duty
Order on Brake Rotors from the People's Republic of China; Federal Mogul Corporation,'' dated January 17, 2007.
Brake rotors are currently classifiable under subheadings 8708.39.5010, 8708.39.5030, and 8708.30.5030 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (``HTSUS'').\5\ Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the scope of this order is dispositive. \5\ As of January 1, 2005, the HTS classification for brake rotors (discs) changed from 8708.39.5010 to 8708.39.5030. As of January 1, 2007, the HTS classification for brake rotors (discs) changed from 8708.39.5030 to 8708.30.5030. See Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (2005), available at <http://www.usitc.gov>. See also Memorandum from Ann Fornaro, International Trade Compliance Analyst, through Blanche Ziv, Program Manager, to the File entitled, ``Brake Rotors from the People's Republic of China: Change in HTS Code for Subject Merchandise,'' dated February 6, 2007.
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs filed by parties
in these reviews are addressed in the Memorandum from Stephen J.
Claeys, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration, to David
M. Spooner, Assistant Secretary for Import Administration, ``Issues and
Decision Memorandum for the 20052006 Administrative and New Shipper
Reviews of Brake Rotors From the People's Republic of China,'' dated
July 27, 2007 (``Issues and Decision Memo''), which is hereby adopted
by this notice. A list of the issues that parties raised and to which
we responded in the Issues and Decision Memo follows as an appendix to
this notice. The Issues and Decision Memo is a public document which is
on file in the Central Records Unit (``CRU'') in room B099 of the main
Department building, and is also accessible on the Web at < http://ia.ita.doc.gov/frn/ >. The paper copy and electronic version of the
Issues and Decision Memo are identical in content.
Verification
In the Preliminary Results, we stated that we intended to verify
the information reported to the Department by Huanri in its separate
rate application.\6\ From March 20 through March 22, 2007, the
Department conducted a verification of Huanri at Huanri's headquarters
in Panjia Village, Laizhou, China. We used standard verification
procedures, including onsite inspection of the company's facilities
and examination of relevant sales and financial records to verify
Section A, and quantity and value information submitted by Huanri on
the record of the administrative review. The Department issued the
results of the verification on May 4, 2007. For further details on the verification, see the Huanri Verification Report.
\6\ See Preliminary Results, 72 FR at 7408.
Partial Rescission of Administrative Review
In the Preliminary Results, the Department issued a notice of
intent to rescind the administrative review with respect to Hongfa
Machinery (Dalian) Co., Ltd. (``Hongfa''), Laizhou Wally Automobile Co., Ltd. (``Wally''), Xianghe Xumingyuan Auto Parts Co.
(``Xumingyuan''), China National Automotive Industry Import & Export
Corporation (``CAIEC''), Shandong Laizhou CAPCO Industry (``CAPCO''),
Laizhou Luyuan Automobile Fittings Co. (``Luyuan''), and Shenyang
Honbase Machinery Co., Ltd. (``Honbase''), in accordance with 19 CFR
351.213(d)(3), because we found no evidence that any of these companies
made shipments of subject merchandise to the United States during the
POR. See Preliminary Results, 72 FR at 7409. The Department received no
comments on this issue, and we did not receive any further information
since the issuance of the Preliminary Results that provides a basis for
reconsideration of this determination. Therefore, the Department is
rescinding this administrative review with respect to Hongfa, Wally, Xumingyuan, CAIEC, CAPCO, Luyuan, and Honbase.
Separate Rates
In our Preliminary Results, we determined that Qingdao Rotec Auto
Parts Co., Ltd. (``Rotec'') and Xiangfen Hengtai Brake System Co., Ltd.
(``Hengtai'') did not qualify for a separate rate and, therefore, are
deemed to be included in the PRCwide entity, and subject to the PRC
wide rate. See Preliminary Results, 72 FR at 7410. The Department
received no comments on this issue, and we did not receive any further
information since the issuance of the Preliminary Results that provides
a basis for reconsideration of these determinations for the final
results. We also determined that the three mandatory (i.e., Haimeng,
Meita, and Winhere) and 12 separaterate respondents (i.e., non
selected respondents)\7\ met the criteria for the assignment of a
separate rate. Based on the results of Huanri's verification and the
Department's careful consideration of comments placed on the record by
parties, we have determined that Huanri is eligible for a separate rate
in the final results of the administrative review. See Issues and Decision Memo at Comment 11.
\7\ The nonselected respondents are as follows: China National
Industrial Machinery Import & Export Corporation (``CNIM''), LABEC,
Qingdao Gren Co. (``Gren''), Zibo Luzhou Automobile Parts Co., Ltd.
(``ZLAP''), Hongda, Longkou TLC Machinery Co., Ltd. (``Longkou
TLC''), Zibo Golden Harvest Machinery Limited Company (``ZGOLD''),
Luqi, Shenyang Yinghao Machinery Co., Longkou Jinzheng Machinery Co.
(``Jinzheng''), Shanxi Zhongding Auto Parts Co., Ltd. (``SZAP''), and Huanri.
The PRCWide Rate and Use of Facts Otherwise Available
In the Preliminary Results, we determined that the PRCwide entity
(including Hengtai and Rotec) received copies of the Department's
questionnaire but did not respond and, therefore, failed to cooperate to the best of their ability in the administrative
[[Page 42388]]
review. See Preliminary Results, 72 FR at 741012. Accordingly, we
determined that the use of facts otherwise available in reaching our
determination is appropriate pursuant to sections 776(a)(2)(A) and (B)
of the Act, and that the use of an adverse inference in selecting from
the facts available is appropriate pursuant to section 776(b) of the
Act. See Preliminary Results, 72 FR at 7410. In accordance with section
776(b)(1) of the Act, as adverse facts available, we assigned to the
PRCentity (including Hengtai and Rotec) the PRCwide rate of 43.32
percent. For detailed information on the Department's corroboration of
this rate, see Preliminary Results, 72 FR at 7411, and Memorandum from
Ann Fornaro, International Trade Analyst, through Blanche Ziv, Program
Manager, AD/CVD Enforcement Office 8, and Wendy J. Frankel, Office
Director, AD/CVD Enforcement Office 8, to the File, entitled,
``Corroboration of the PRCWide Adverse FactsAvailable Rate,'' dated February 9, 2007.
Changes Since the Preliminary Results
Based on our analysis of comments received from interested parties and information on the record of these reviews, we made changes to the margin calculations as noted below.
For the final results, we have corrected the calculation of freight values for Golrich's carton and steel buckle inputs by multiplying the distance from the domestic supplier to the factory by the surrogate value for truck freight, instead of adding those two values. For further details, see the Issues and Decision Memo at Comment 13, and Memorandum from Ann Fornaro, International Trade Analyst, through Blanche Ziv, Program Manager, AD/CVD Operations Office 8, to the File, entitled, ``Analysis for the Final Results of the 20052006 New Shipper Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Brake Rotors from the People's Republic of China: Qingdao Golrich Autoparts Co., Ltd.,'' dated July 27, 2007 (``Golrich Analysis Memo'').
For further details on companyspecific calculations, see the companyspecific analysis memoranda.\8\
\8\ Memorandum from Jennifer Moats, Senior International Trade
Analyst, through Blanche Ziv, Program Manager, AD/CVD Operations
Office 8, to the File, entitled, ``Analysis for the Final Results of
the 20052006 Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on
Brake Rotors from the People's Republic of China: Longkou Haimeng
Machinery Co., Ltd.,'' dated July 27, 2007; Memorandum from Frances
Veith, International Trade Compliance Analyst, through Blanche Ziv,
Program Manager, AD/CVD Operations Office 8, to the File, entitled,
``Analysis for the Final Results of the 20052006 Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review of Brake Rotors from the People's Republic of
China: Qingdao Meita Automotive Industry Co., Ltd.,'' dated July 27,
2007; Memorandum from Frances Veith, International Trade Compliance
Analyst, through Blanche Ziv, Program Manager, AD/CVD Operations
Office 8, to the File, entitled, ``Analysis for the Final Results of
the 20052006 Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of Brake Rotors
from the People's Republic of China: Yantai Winhere AutoPart
Manufacturing Co., Ltd.,'' dated July 27, 2007; and the Golrich Analysis Memo.
We have made certain changes to the financial ratio calculations for the final results. For further details, see the Issues and Decision Memo at Comment 3.
We determined that we inadvertently excluded Ukraine import data for February and March 2006 in the calculation of the surrogate value for steel strap in the Preliminary Results. Therefore, we recalculated the surrogate value for steel strap to include the Ukraine data for those two months for the final results.\9\ For further information on the calculation of this value, see Memorandum from Ann Fornaro, Trade Compliance Analyst, through Blanche Ziv, Program Manager, AD/CVD Operations Office 8, to the File entitled, ``20052006 Administration and New Shipper Reviews of the Antidumping Duty Order of Brake Rotors from the People's Republic of China Surrogate Values for the Final Results,'' dated July 27, 2007 (``Final Surrogate Value Memo''). \9\ See Surrogate Value Change Memo.
We have also made changes to the surrogate values for cartons. For further details, see the Issues and Decision Memo at Comment 9 and Final Surrogate Value Memo.
Final Results of the Reviews
We determine that the following final dumping margins exist for the period April 1, 2005, through March 31, 2006:
Individually Reviewed Exporters 20052006 WeightedAverage Percent
Administrative Review Margin
Longkou Haimeng Machinery Co., Ltd....... 4.22
Yantai Winhere AutoPart Manufacturing 0.03 (de minimis) Co., Ltd................................
Qingdao Meita Automotive Industry Co., 0.00 Ltd.....................................
SeparateRate Applicant Exporters 2005 WeightedAverage Percent
2006 Administrative Review Margin
China National Industrial Machinery I & E 4.22 Co.\10\.................................
Laizhou Auto Brake Equipment Co., Ltd.... 4.22
Qingdao Gren (Group) Co.\11\............. 4.22
Zibo Luzhou Automobile Parts Co., Ltd.... 4.22
Laizhou Hongda Auto Replacement Parts 4.22 Co., Ltd................................
Longkou TLC Machinery Co., Ltd........... 4.22
Zibo Golden Harvest Machinery Limited 4.22 Company.................................
Laizhou City Luqi Machinery Co., Ltd..... 4.22
Shenyang Yinghao Machinery Co............ 4.22
Longkou Jinzheng Machinery Co., Ltd...... 4.22
Shanxi Zhongding Auto Parts Co., Ltd..... 4.22
Shandong Huanri Group Co., Ltd........... 4.22
\10\ This company is also known as China National Industrial Machinery Import & Export Corporation.
\11\ This company is also known as Qingdao Gren Co. and Gren Group (Qingdao) Co.
WeightedAverage Percent
20052006 New Shipper Review Margin
Qingdao Golrich Autoparts Co., Ltd....... 0.00 [[Page 42389]]
PRCWide Rate Margin (Percent)
PRCWide Rate[ast]....................... 43.32 [ast] This includes Rotec and Hengtai.
The Department will disclose calculations performed for the final results to the parties within five days of the date of publication of this notice in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).
Assessment Rates
The Department has determined, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (``CBP'') shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by these reviews. The Department intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after the publication date of the final results of the reviews. In accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), for Winhere, Meita, Haimeng, and Golrich, we calculated an exporter/importer (or customer)specific assessment rate for the merchandise subject to these reviews. Where the respondent has reported reliable entered values, we calculated importer (or customer)specific ad valorem rates by aggregating the dumping margins calculated for all U.S. sales to each importer (or customer) and dividing this amount by the total entered value of the sales to each importer (or customer). See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). Where an importer (or customer)specific ad valorem rate is greater than de minimis, we will apply the assessment rate to the entered value of the importer's/customer's entries during the review period. See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). Where we do not have entered values for all U.S. sales, we calculated a perunit assessment rate by aggregating the antidumping duties due for all U.S. sales to each importer (or customer) and dividing this amount by the total quantity sold to that importer (or customer). See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). To determine whether the duty assessment rates are de minimis, in accordance with the requirement set forth in 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2), we calculated importer (or customer)specific ad valorem ratios based on the estimated entered value. Where an importer (or customer)specific ad valorem rate is zero or de minimis, we will instruct CBP to liquidate appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties. See 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2).
For the companies receiving a separate rate that were not selected for individual review (i.e., CNIM, LABEC, Gren, ZLAP, Hongda, Longkou TLC, ZGOLD, Luqi, Shenyang Yinghao Machinery Co., Jinzheng, SZAP, and Huanri), we will calculate an assessment rate based on the weighted average of the cash deposit rates calculated for the companies selected for individual review excluding any that are zero, de minimis, or based entirely on AFA pursuant to section 735(c)(5)(B) of the Act. CashDeposit Requirements
The following cash deposit rates will be effective upon publication
of this notice of final results for all shipments of subject
merchandise from Golrich entered or withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption on or after publication date: (1) zero cash deposit will be
required for subject merchandise manufactured and exported by
Golrich;\12\ and (2) for subject merchandise exported by Golrich but
not manufactured by Golrich, the cash deposit rate will be the PRCwide rate of 43.32 percent.
\12\ Due to an inadvertent typographical error, we incorrectly
stated Golrich's cash deposit rate as ``2.15 percent'' instead of
0.78 percent in the Preliminary Results. See Preliminary Results, 72
FR at 7416. See also the Memorandum from Ann Fornaro, Trade
Compliance Analyst through Blanche Ziv, Program Manager, AD/CVD
Operations, Office 8, and Wendy J. Frankel, Office Director, AD/CVD
Operations, Office 8, to the File, entitled, ``20052006 Antidumping
Duty Administrative and New Shipper Reviews of Brake Rotors from the
People's Republic of China (``PRC''),'' dated February 13, 2007.
The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of this notice of final results for all shipments of brake rotors from the PRC entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date, as provided by section 751(a)(1) of the Act: (1) the cash deposit rates for CNIM, LABEC, GREN, Winhere, Haimeng, ZLAP, Hongda, Meita, TLC, ZGOLD, Luqi Yinghao, Longkou Jinzheng, Zhongding and Huanri will be the companyspecific rate indicated above (except that if a rate is de minimis, i.e., less than 0.50 percent, zero cash deposit will be required); (2) the cash deposit rate for previously investigated or reviewed PRC and nonPRC exporters who received a separate rate in a prior segment of the proceeding (which were not reviewed in this segment of the proceeding) will continue to be the rate assigned in that segment of the proceeding; (3) the cash deposit rate for all PRC exporters of subject merchandise that have not been found to be entitled to a separate rate (including Rotec and Hengtai) will be the PRCwide rate of 43.32 percent; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all nonPRC exporters of subject merchandise which have not received their own rate will be the rate applicable to the PRC exporter that supplied that nonPRC exporter. These requirements shall remain in effect until further notice.
Notification to Interested Parties
This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.402(f)(3), failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of doubled antidumping duties.
This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (``APO'') of their responsibility concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under APO, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305 and as explained in the APO itself. Timely written notification of the return/destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation.
This notice of final results of the administrative and new shipper
reviews is issued and published in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: July 27, 2007.
David M. Spooner,
Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
Appendix
List of Comments and Issues in the Issues and Decisions Memorandum Comment 1 Valuation of Pig Iron
Comment 2 Selection of Financial Statements
Comment 3 Financial Ratios: Calculation of Factory Overhead, Selling, General, and Administrative Expenses and Profit
Comment 4 Revocation Eligibility of Nonselected Respondents Comment 5 Cash Deposit Rates of Nonselected Respondents
[[Page 42390]]
Comment 6 Voluntary Responses of Nonselected Respondents
Comment 7 Incorporation of Zeroing for Mandatory Respondents
Comment 8 Incorporation of Zeroing for Nonselected Respondents Comment 9 Valuation of Cartons
Comment 10 Rescission of Review: Shanxi Zhongding
Comment 11 Separate Rate: Huanri Group
Comment 12 Respondent Selection Methodology
Comment 13 Clerical Error Freight Expenses for Golrich's Buckles and Cartons
Comment 14 Clerical Error Valuation of Steel Strap
[FR Doc. E715037 Filed 8107; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510DSS
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
Jennifer Moats for Longkou Haimeng Machinery Co., Ltd. and Qingdao Golrich Autoparts Co., Ltd., or Frances Veith for Yantai Winhere AutoPart Manufacturing Co., Ltd. and Qingdao Meita Automotive, AD/CVD Operations, Office 8, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 2024825047 and 2024824295, respectively.