Browse: Departments Dates Agencies
Docket ID: [Docket No. FAA-2007-0172; Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-225-AD]
RIN ID: RIN 2120-AA64
SUBJECT CATEGORY: Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A300 B4-600, A300 B4-600R, A300 C4-600R, and A300 F4-600R Series Airplanes
DOCUMENT SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This proposed AD results from mandatory
continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation
authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe
condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as:
[T]he FAA has published SFAR 88 (Special Federal Aviation Regulation 88). * * *
Under this regulation, all holders of type certificates for passenger transport aircraft * * * are required to conduct a design review against explosion risks.
The replacement of some types of Pclips and improvement of the electrical bonding of the equipment in the fuel tanks are rendered mandatory by this AD.
The unsafe condition is damage to wiring in the wing, center, and trim fuel tanks, due to failed Pclips used for retaining the wiring and pipes, which could result in a possible fuel ignition source in the wing, center, or trim fuel tanks. The proposed AD would require actions that are intended to address the unsafe condition described in the MCAI.
SUMMARY: Airbus,
We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA20070172; Directorate Identifier 2007NM225AD'' at the beginning of your comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory, economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend this proposed AD based on those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://www.regulations.gov , including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we receive about this proposed AD.
The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical
Agent for the Member States of the European Community, has issued EASA
Airworthiness Directive 20070233, dated August 27, 2007 (referred to
after this as ``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe condition for the specified products. The MCAI states:
[T]he FAA has published SFAR 88 (Special Federal Aviation
Regulation 88). In their letters referenced 04/00/02/07/01L296,
dated March 4th, 2002 and 04/00/02/07/03L024, dated February 3rd,
2003, the JAA (Joint Aviation Authorities) recommended the
application of a similar regulation to the National Aviation Authorities (NAA).
Under this regulation, all holders of type certificates for passenger transport aircraft with either a passenger capacity of 30 or more, or a payload capacity of 7,500 pounds (3402 kg) or more, which have received their certification since January 1st, 1958, are required to conduct a design review against explosion risks.
The replacement of some types of Pclips and improvement of the electrical bonding of the equipment in the fuel tanks are rendered mandatory by this AD.
Note: Initially, EASA AD 20060325, which addresses the same unsafe condition, also applied to A300600 aircraft. The approval holder subsequently introduced additional work at revision 1 of SB (service bulletin) A300286064 applicable to A300600 aircraft. [On September 21, 2007, the FAA issued parallel AD 20072004 for only Airbus Model A300 Airplanes and Model A310 Airplanes, which was published in the Federal Register (72 FR 56258, October 3, 2007).]
As a result, AD 20060325 has been revised to remove A300600 aircraft from applicability, and this new AD applicable to A300600 aircraft is issued.
The unsafe condition is damage to wiring in the wing, center, and
trim fuel tanks, due to failed Pclips used for retaining the wiring
and pipes, which could result in a possible fuel ignition source in the
wing, center, or trim fuel tanks. The corrective action is checking the
electrical bonding points of certain equipment in the center fuel tank
for the presence of a blue coat and doing related investigative and
corrective actions if necessary. The related investigative action is to
measure the electrical resistance between the equipment and structure, if a blue coat is not present. The corrective action is
[[Page 63504]]
to electrically bond the equipment, if the measured resistance is
greater than 10 milliohms. The corrective action also includes
installing new bonding leads and electrical bonding points on certain
equipment in the left and right wing fuel tanks and center fuel tank.
You may obtain further information by examining the MCAI in the AD docket.
The FAA has examined the underlying safety issues involved in fuel tank explosions on several large transport airplanes, including the adequacy of existing regulations, the service history of airplanes subject to those regulations, and existing maintenance practices for fuel tank systems. As a result of those findings, we issued a regulation titled ``Transport Airplane Fuel Tank System Design Review, Flammability Reduction and Maintenance and Inspection Requirements'' (66 FR 23086, May 7, 2001). In addition to new airworthiness standards for transport airplanes and new maintenance requirements, this rule included Special Federal Aviation Regulation No. 88 (``SFAR 88,'' Amendment 2178, and subsequent Amendments 2182 and 2183).
Among other actions, SFAR 88 requires certain type design (i.e., type certificate (TC) and supplemental type certificate (STC)) holders to substantiate that their fuel tank systems can prevent ignition sources in the fuel tanks. This requirement applies to type design holders for large turbinepowered transport airplanes and for subsequent modifications to those airplanes. It requires them to perform design reviews and to develop design changes and maintenance procedures if their designs do not meet the new fuel tank safety standards. As explained in the preamble to the rule, we intended to adopt airworthiness directives to mandate any changes found necessary to address unsafe conditions identified as a result of these reviews.
In evaluating these design reviews, we have established four criteria intended to define the unsafe conditions associated with fuel tank systems that require corrective actions. The percentage of operating time during which fuel tanks are exposed to flammable conditions is one of these criteria. The other three criteria address the failure types under evaluation: Single failures, single failures in combination with a latent condition(s), and inservice failure experience. For all four criteria, the evaluations included consideration of previous actions taken that may mitigate the need for further action.
The JAA has issued a regulation that is similar to SFAR 88. (The JAA is an associated body of the European Civil Aviation Conference (ECAC) representing the civil aviation regulatory authorities of a number of European States who have agreed to cooperate in developing and implementing common safety regulatory standards and procedures.) Under this regulation, the JAA stated that all members of the ECAC that hold type certificates for transport category airplanes are required to conduct a design review against explosion risks.
We have determined that the actions identified in this AD are necessary to reduce the potential of ignition sources inside fuel tanks, which, in combination with flammable fuel vapors, could result in fuel tank explosions and consequent loss of the airplane. Relevant Service Information
Airbus has issued Service Bulletins A300286064, Revision 01, dated April 3, 2007; A300286068, dated July 20, 2005; and A30028 6077, Revision 01, dated October 26, 2006. The actions described in this service information are intended to correct the unsafe condition identified in the MCAI.
This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, we have
been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service
information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because we
evaluated all pertinent information and determined an unsafe condition
exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same type design.
Differences Between This AD and the MCAI or Service Information
We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the information provided in the MCAI and related service information.
We might also have proposed different actions in this AD from those in the MCAI in order to follow FAA policies. Any such differences are highlighted in a NOTE within the proposed AD.
Based on the service information, we estimate that this proposed AD would affect about 114 products of U.S. registry. We also estimate that it would take about 632 workhours per product to comply with the basic requirements of this proposed AD. The average labor rate is $80 per workhour. Required parts would cost about $6,870 per product. Where the service information lists required parts costs that are covered under warranty, we have assumed that there will be no charge for these costs. As we do not control warranty coverage for affected parties, some parties may incur costs higher than estimated here. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of the proposed AD on U.S. operators to be $6,547,020, or $57,430 per product.
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in ``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.
We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed regulation:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities
[[Page 63505]]
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket. List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety. The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows: PART 39AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new AD:
Airbus: Docket No. FAA20070172; Directorate Identifier 2007NM 225AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) We must receive comments by December 10, 2007.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to the airplanes identified in paragraphs (c)(1) and (c)(2) of this AD.
(1) Airbus Model A300 B4600 series airplanes (without trim
tank), all serial numbers, certificated in any category, except
airplanes on which Airbus Modifications 12226, 12365, 12490, and
12308 have been incorporated in production, or Airbus Service
Bulletin A300286064, Revision 01, dated April 3, 2007; and A300
286068, dated July 20, 2005; have been performed in service.
(2) Airbus Model A300 B4600R, A300 C4600R, and A300 F4600R
series airplanes (fitted with a trim tank), all serial numbers,
certificated in any category, except airplanes on which Airbus
Modifications 12226, 12365, 12490, 12308, 12294, and 12476 have been
incorporated in production, or on which the service bulletins listed
in paragraphs (c)(2)(i), (c)(2)(ii), and (c)(2)(iii) of this AD have been performed in service.
(i) Airbus Service Bulletin A300286064, Revision 01, dated April 3, 2007.
(ii) Airbus Service Bulletin A300286068, dated July 20, 2005.
(iii) Airbus Service Bulletin A300286077, dated July 25, 2005; or A300286077, Revision 01, dated October 26, 2006.
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 28: Fuel. Reason
(e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) states:
[T]he FAA has published SFAR 88 (Special Federal Aviation
Regulation 88). In their letters referenced 04/00/02/07/01L296,
dated March 4th, 2002 and 04/00/02/07/03L024, dated February 3rd,
2003, the JAA (Joint Aviation Authorities) recommended the
application of a similar regulation to the National Aviation Authorities (NAA).
Under this regulation, all holders of type certificates for passenger transport aircraft with either a passenger capacity of 30 or more, or a payload capacity of 7,500 pounds (3402 kg) or more, which have received their certification since January 1st, 1958, are required to conduct a design review against explosion risks.
The replacement of some types of Pclips and improvement of the electrical bonding of the equipment in the fuel tanks are rendered mandatory by this AD.
Note: Initially, EASA AD 20060325, which addresses the same unsafe condition, also applied to A300600 aircraft. The approval holder subsequently introduced additional work at revision 1 of SB (service bulletin) A300286064 applicable to A300600 aircraft. [On September 21, 2007, the FAA issued parallel AD 20072004 for only Airbus Model A300 Airplanes and Model A310 Airplanes, which was published in the Federal Register (72 FR 56258, October 3, 2007).]
As a result, AD 20060325 has been revised to remove A300600 aircraft from applicability, and this new AD applicable to A300600 aircraft is issued.
The unsafe condition is damage to wiring in the wing, center,
and trim fuel tanks, due to failed Pclips used for retaining the
wiring and pipes, which could result in a possible fuel ignition
source in the wing, center, or trim fuel tanks. The corrective
action is checking the electrical bonding points of certain
equipment in the center fuel tank for the presence of a blue coat
and doing related investigative and corrective actions if necessary.
The related investigative action is to measure the electrical
resistance between the equipment and structure, if a blue coat is
not present. The corrective action is to electrically bond the
equipment, if the measured resistance is greater than 10 milliohms.
The corrective action also includes installing new bonding leads and
electrical bonding points on certain equipment in the left and right wing fuel tanks and center fuel tank.
Actions and Compliance
(f) Within 40 months after the effective date of this AD, unless already done, do the following actions.
(1) Remove NSA5516XXND or NSA5516XXNJ type Pclips, used in
the wing and center fuel tanks to retain wiring and pipes, and
replace them by NSA5516XXNF type Pclips in accordance with the
instructions of Airbus Service Bulletin A300286068, dated July 20, 2005.
(2) Check the electrical bonding points in the center tank and
do all applicable related investigative and corrective actions, and
install additional bonding leads and electrical bonding points in
the wing and center fuel tanks in accordance with the instructions
of Airbus Service Bulletin A300286064, Revision 01, dated April 3,
2007. Do all applicable related investigative and corrective actions before further flight.
(3) For airplanes fitted with a trim tank, in addition to the
actions defined in paragraphs (f)(1) and (f)(2) of this AD, install
bonding leads and electrical bonding points in the trim tanks, in
accordance with the instructions of Airbus Service Bulletin A30028 6077, Revision 01, dated October 26, 2006.
(4) Actions done before the effective date of this AD in
accordance with Airbus Service Bulletin A300286064, dated July 28,
2005, for aircraft under configuration 05, as defined in the service
bulletin, are considered acceptable for compliance with the requirements of paragraph (f)(2) of this AD.
(5) Actions done before the effective date of this AD in
accordance with Airbus Service Bulletin A300286077, dated July 25,
2005, for aircraft under configuration 05, as defined in the service
bulletin, are considered acceptable for compliance with the requirements of paragraph (f)(3) of this AD.
Note: This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service information
as follows: The applicability of the MCAI does not address Airbus
Modification 12490. We have added this Modification number to the
applicability of this AD, as requested by Airbus and coordinated with the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA).
Other FAA AD Provisions
(g) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Branch, ANM116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using
the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to ATTN: Tom
Stafford, Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, ANM116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 980573356; Telephone (425) 2271622; Fax (425) 2271149.
Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC
applies, notify your appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the FAA
Flight Standards District Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local FSDO.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAAapproved. Corrective actions are considered
FAAapproved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product is airworthy before it is returned to service.
(3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in
this AD, under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act, the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has approved the information
collection requirements and has assigned OMB Control Number 2120 0056.
[[Page 63506]]
Related Information
(h) Refer to MCAI EASA Airworthiness Directive 20070233, dated
August 27, 2007, and the service information listed in Table 1 of this AD, for related information.
Table 1.Service Information
Airbus Service Bulletin Revision level Date
A300286064........................... 01............................. April 3, 2007.
A300286068........................... Original....................... July 20, 2005.
A300286077........................... 01............................. October 26, 2006.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on November 2, 2007. Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E721997 Filed 11807; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 491013P
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT Tom Stafford, Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, ANM116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 980573356; telephone (425) 2271622; fax (425) 2271149.
14 CFR Part 39 40 CFR Part 52 14 CFR Part 71 33 CFR Part 165 50 CFR Part 679 47 CFR Part 73 26 CFR Part 1 40 CFR Part 180 33 CFR Part 117 50 CFR Part 17 44 CFR Part 67 50 CFR Part 648 14 CFR Part 97 40 CFR Part 63 33 CFR Part 100 50 CFR Part 622 50 CFR Part 660 26 CFR Part 301 44 CFR Part 65 39 CFR Part 111 40 CFR Part 300 6 CFR Part 5 40 CFR Part 271 47 CFR Part 64 40 CFR Parts 52 and 81 50 CFR Part 665 10 CFR Part 50 44 CFR Part 64 49 CFR Part 571 39 CFR Part 3020