Browse: Departments Dates Agencies
EPA ID: [EPA-R05-OAR-2007-0957; FRL-8501-2]
SUBJECT CATEGORY: Adequacy Status of the Kewaunee County, Wisconsin, Submitted 8- Hour Ozone Redesignation and Maintenance Plan for Transportation Conformity Purposes
DOCUMENT SUMMARY: In this notice, EPA is notifying the public that we have found
that the motor vehicle emissions budgets (MVEBs) for 8hour ozone in
Kewaunee County, Wisconsin are adequate for conformity purposes. As a result of our finding, Kewaunee County
[[Page 68161]]
must use the MVEBs from the submitted 8hour ozone redesignation and
maintenance plan for future conformity determinations.
SUMMARY: State implementation plans; adequacy status for transportation conformity purposes—; Wisconsin,
Today's action is simply an announcement of a finding that we have already made. EPA Region 5 sent a letter to the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources on November 6, 2007, stating that the 2012 and 2018 MVEBs in Kewaunee County are adequate. Wisconsin submitted the budgets as part of the 8hour ozone redesignation request and maintenance plan for this area. This submittal was announced on EPA's conformity website, and received no comments: http://www.epa.gov/otaq/stateresources/transconf/adequacy.htm , (once there, click on ``What SIP
The 2012 and 2018 MVEBs, in tons per day (tpd), for volatile
organic compounds (VOC) and oxides of nitrogen (NO
2012 MVEB 2018 MVEB
(tpd) (tpd)
VOC........................................... 0.43 0.32
NOX........................................... 0.80 0.47
Transportation conformity is required by section 176(c) of the
Clean Air Act. EPA's conformity rule requires that transportation
plans, programs, and projects conform to state air quality
implementation plans and establishes the criteria and procedures for determining whether or not they do. Conformity to a State
Implementation Plan (SIP) means that transportation activities will not
produce new air quality violations, worsen existing violations, or
delay timely attainment of the national ambient air quality standards.
The criteria by which we determine whether a SIP's motor vehicle emission budgets are adequate for conformity purposes are outlined in 40 CFR 93.118(e)(4). We have described our process for determining the adequacy of submitted SIP budgets in our July 1, 2004, preamble starting at 69 FR 40038, and we used the information in these resources while making our adequacy determination. Please note that an adequacy review is separate from EPA's completeness review, and it also should not be used to prejudge EPA's ultimate approval of the SIP. Even if we find a budget adequate, the SIP could later be disapproved.
The finding and the response to comments are available at EPA's
conformity Web site: http://www.epa.gov/otaq/stateresources/transconf/adequacy.htm .
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 74017671q.
Dated: November 20, 2007.
Bharat Mathur,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5.
[FR Doc. E723493 Filed 12307; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 656050P
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT Anthony Maietta, Life Scientist, Criteria Pollutant Section (AR18J), Air Programs Branch, Air and Radiation Division, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 3538777, Maietta.anthony@epa.gov.
14 CFR Part 39 40 CFR Part 52 14 CFR Part 71 33 CFR Part 165 50 CFR Part 679 47 CFR Part 73 26 CFR Part 1 40 CFR Part 180 33 CFR Part 117 50 CFR Part 17 44 CFR Part 67 50 CFR Part 648 14 CFR Part 97 40 CFR Part 63 33 CFR Part 100 50 CFR Part 622 50 CFR Part 660 44 CFR Part 65 26 CFR Part 301 39 CFR Part 111 40 CFR Part 300 6 CFR Part 5 40 CFR Part 271 47 CFR Part 64 40 CFR Parts 52 and 81 50 CFR Part 665 10 CFR Part 50 44 CFR Part 64 49 CFR Part 571 39 CFR Part 3020