Federal Register: December 5, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 233)
DOCID: fr05de07-34 FR Doc E7-23526
COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS
Civil Rights Commission
NOTICE: NOTICES
DOCID: fr05de07-34
ACTION: Reports and guidance documents; availability, etc.:
DOCUMENT ACTION: Final Information Quality Guidelines.
SUBJECT CATEGORY:
Information Quality Guidelines
DOCUMENT SUMMARY:
The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) directed Federal agencies to make available on their Web sites guidelines that ensure and maximize the quality, objectivity, utility, and integrity of information (including statistical information) they disseminate. Federal agencies should also make available on their Web sites administrative mechanisms that allow affected persons to seek and obtain correction of information that the agency maintains and disseminated that does not comply with the guidelines. The U.S. Commission on Civil Rights (Commission) now publishes the following guidelines covering predissemination information quality control and an administrative mechanism for requests for correction of information the Commission publicly disseminates. These guidelines were published in the Federal Register on July 24, 2006 at 71 FR 41762 and provided that the Commission would receive public comments through August 23, 2006 to be considered in the formulation of these final guidelines. No comments were received. OMB provided the Commission with suggested revisions, which the Commission used in preparing these final guidelines.
SUMMARY:
Information quality guidelines,
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
In response to the draft guidelines, the Commission received suggested revisions from OMB. The Commission changed the draft guidelines to address these suggestions as follows:
1. Commissionsponsored testimony of Commission officials is now subject to the guidelines if it contains information not previously disseminated by the agency.
2. Statements reasonably expected to become the subject of litigation or other dispute resolution proceedings are now not automatically outside the scope of the guidelines.
3. Petitions for correction of information must now describe the specific corrective action sought.
4. The Commission's corrective actions may now take a number of forms and not simply the issuance of an errata page.
5. Postings of the quality information requests to the Commission's Web site now include: a copy of the requests to seek and obtain correction of information, the Commission's formal response(s), and any communications regarding appeals.
All other OMB suggested changes that were accepted by the Commission were nonsubstantive (i.e., typographical or grammatical) in nature.
The Commission also substituted the email address provided in Section VII.02(c) of the draft guidelines with qualityinfo@usccr.gov and corrected section references to Administrative Instruction 16, National Project Development and Implementation.
For the reasons discussed in the summary, the Commission proposes
to issue these guidelines pursuant to Section 515 of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3502(1), et seq.).
Dated: November 29, 2007.
David P. Blackwood,
General Counsel, United States Commission on Civil Rights.
Section I. The U.S. Commission on Civil Rights' Mission and Mandate
.01 The Commission is an independent, bipartisan, factfinding
Federal agency of the executive branch established under the Civil
Rights Act of 1957 to monitor and report on the status of civil rights
in the nation. As the nation's conscience on matters of civil rights,
the Commission strives to keep the President, Congress, and the public
informed about civil rights issues that deserve concerted attention. .02 The Commission is mandated to:
(a) Investigate complaints alleging that citizens are being
deprived of their right to vote by reason of their race, color,
religion, sex, age, disability, or national origin, or by reason of fraudulent practices;
(b) Study and collect information relating to discrimination or a
denial of equal protection of the laws under the Constitution because
of race, color, religion, sex, age, disability, or national origin, or in the administration of justice;
(c) Appraise Federal laws and policies with respect to
discrimination or denial of equal protection of the laws because of
race, color, religion, sex, age, disability, or national origin, or in the administration of justice;
(d) Serve as a national clearinghouse for information in respect to
discrimination or denial of equal protection of the laws because of
race, color, religion, sex, age, disability, or national origin;
(e) Submit reports, findings, and recommendations to the President and Congress;
(f) Issue public service announcements to discourage discrimination or denial of equal protection of the laws.
.03 The Commission's National Office is in Washington, DC. Its six Regional Offices are located throughout the nation:
(a) The Eastern Regional Office, Washington, DC;
(b) Southern Regional Office, Atlanta, Georgia;
(c) Midwestern Office, Chicago, Illinois;
(d) Central Regional Office, Kansas City, Kansas;
(e) Rocky Mountain Office, Denver, Colorado; and
(f) Western Regional Office, Los Angeles, California.
.04 State Advisory Committees (SACs) are established in each State and
[[Page 68558]]
in Washington, DC. SACs advise the Commission on matters pertaining to
discrimination or denials of equal protection of the laws because of
race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, disability, or in the
administration of justice. They also assist the Commission in its
statutory obligation to serve as a national clearinghouse for
information on those subjects. SACs present advice to the Commission in
a variety of forms, including formal factfinding reports and briefing memoranda.
Section II. The Office of Management and Budget Governmentwide Guideline
.01 Section 515 of the Treasury and General Government
Appropriation Act for Fiscal Year 2001 (Pub. L. 106554) directs OMB to
issue to Federal agencies subject to the Paper Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 3502(1) et seq.) governmentwide guidelines that provide policy
and procedural guidance for ensuring and maximizing the quality,
objectivity, utility, and integrity of the information (including
statistical information) that they disseminate. Specifically, the OMB guidelines direct agencies to:
(a) Issue their own guidelines, consistent with governmentwide
guidelines, to ensure and maximize the quality, objectivity, utility,
and integrity of information (including statistical information) the agency disseminates;
(b) Establish administrative mechanisms allowing affected persons
to seek and obtain correction of information the agency maintains and disseminates that does not comply with OMB guidelines; and
(c) Report annually to the OMB Director the number and nature of
complaints the agency received regarding compliance with OMB guidelines
on quality, objectivity, utility, and integrity of information and how such complaints were resolved.
.02 The OMB guidelines offer three underlying principles. Agencies should ensure that the guidelines:
(a) Are sufficiently flexible to be applied to a wide variety of
information activities that range in importance and scope, and to fit all forms of media;
(b) Meet basic information quality standards, although some
information may require higher or more specific standards. Agencies
should weigh the costs and benefits of higher information quality in
the context of their mission, budget constraints, and timeliness in dissemination; and
(c) Are applied in a commonsensical and workable manner. Agencies
should incorporate quality information guideline standards and
procedures into exisiting processes and procedures. Application of
these guidelines should not impose unnecessary administrative burdens.
Section III. The Commission's Existing Policies and Procedures that Ensure and Maximize Information Quality
.01 The Commission disseminates information on civil rights through:
(a) Reports to Congress and the President, including an annual
report on civil rights enforcement as required by statute and other reports as considered appropriate;
(b) Program activities, such as hearings, briefings, conferences, and consultations; and
(c) Provision of civil rights information to the public through its clearinghouse function.
.02 In order to ensure the accuracy and the impartiality of the
information it provides, the Commission has in place various mechanisms
to correct the information it disseminates. OMB's Information Quality
Guidelines urge agencies to integrate into existing guidelines for
dissemination of information the standards for information quality
embodied in the Data Quality Act. The Commission shall improve the
quality of the information it disseminates as it seeks to achieve the
strategic goals of its mission while adhering to budget and resource priorities.
.03 The mechanisms the Commission uses to ensure information quality are:
(a) Defame and Degrade Review. Commission regulations provide
procedural guidelines when statements made at Commission hearings or in
reports will defame, degrade or incriminate persons or institutions.
A statement defames and degrades if its probable effect is to damage the person or institution criticized in reputation, business, or otherwise. In determining whether damage is likely to result, it is necessary to consider the substance of the allegations, all the circumstances surrounding it, and the community perception and reaction that is likely to result. All this must all be considered in light of the applicable legal standards governing defamation of public versus private persons and entities.
When in advance of a hearing the Commission determines that certain evidence may tend to defame, degrade, or incriminate any person at any hearing, it shall receive such evidence or testimony, or a summary of such evidence or testimony in executive session. The Commission affords such persons defamed, degraded, or incriminated by such evidence or testimony an opportunity to appear and be heard in executive session with a reasonable number of additional witnesses they request, before deciding to use such evidence or testimony. If the Commission decides to make this information public, it will give the person the opportunity to appear as a voluntary witness or submit a sworn statement. Procedures for addressing evidence presented at a hearing that may tend to defame, degrade, or incriminate any person are specified at 45 CFR 702.11.
If a Commission report tends to defame, degrade, or incriminate any person, the report or relevant portions thereof shall be delivered to such person at least thirty (30) days before the report is published to allow such person the opportunity to make a timely verified answer to the report, or relevant portions thereof. Administrative Instruction 7 1, Procedures for Providing an Opportunity for Response to Persons Criticized by Commission Publications and Audiovisual Products, at section 6 provides that whenever a publication, other than a statutory report, contains material that tends to defame and degrade, such person must be provided a full and fair opportunity to respond to such material. Section 7 of Administrative Instruction 71 provides for a defame and degrade review of State Advisory Committee reports. Section 8 of Administrative Instruction 71 provides for a defame and degrade review of the Civil Rights Journal.
(b) Legal Sufficiency Review.
Administrative Instruction 16, National Project Development and Implementation, at section 16 provides for legal sufficiency review by the Office of General Counsel of draft reports and national office publications that are provided to the public. The purpose of the legal sufficiency review is to ensure the adequate interpretation and citation of legal materials and compliance with statutory requirements. SAC reports also will be subject to a legal sufficiency review. (c) Editorial Policy Review.
Administrative Instruction 16, National Project Development and
Implementation, at section 15 provides that the Staff Director will
appoint members of an editorial policy board to review draft national
reports to determine the adequacy and accuracy of the substantive
information in the draft document (for example, conceptual soundness,
adherence to Commission policy, quality of research, argumentation, and
documentation of major points). The project staff revises the draft document in accordance with
[[Page 68559]]
the editorial board comments. The appropriate office director apprises
the Staff Director by memorandum of areas upon which agreement was not
reached and changes were not made. Once the substantive changes are
made, the new material must be submitted for an expedited legal sufficiency review.
The Regional Directors are responsible for ensuring that such reports are unbiased, methodologically sound, well written, appropriately organized, and properly formatted. SACs are ultimately responsible for the substance of their reports and memoranda. A report is forwarded to the Staff Director following formal approval from the appropriate State Advisory Committee.
(d) Affected Agency Review.
Administrative Instruction 16, National Project Development and
Implementation, at section 17 provides that after completing any
revisions occasioned by legal and editorial reviews, the director of
the appropriate office sends the sections of the draft report that
pertain to a government agency to the affected agency for review and
comment on the accuracy of the material contained therein. The
Commission's draft findings, conclusions, and recommendations are not
submitted to the affected agency. Nongovernmental organizations receive
pertinent material for review where appropriate. Upon receipt of
comments, the project staff prepares the appropriate revisions. SAC reports also are subject to an affected agency review.
.04 Information Technology and Systems Management. Administrative
Instruction 418, Information Technology and Systems Management,
provides guidance for the appropriate management of information
technology resources and systems throughout their life cycle, in
accordance with federal regulations, policies and guidelines. It also
provides for the establishment and maintenance of a strategic
information resources management planning process that includes:
(a) An uptodate fiveyear plan that has, among others, document
linkages between mission needs and information technology capabilities; and
(b) An uptodate security and disaster preparedness plan for
information systems that provides adequate assurances of the
availability, confidentiality and integrity of the information systems.
.05 The Staff Director is the Chief Information Officer (CIO) of
the agency and has primary responsibility for managing the Commission's
information resources. The Deputy CIO will manage the Commission's
security systems and procedures, and monitor Commission compliance with
appropriate federal policies, principles, standards, guidelines, rules, and administrative instructions.
.06 Data Collection from the Public.
(a) Administrative Instruction 16, National Project Development
and Implementation, at section 9 provides that the Chief of the
Administrative Services and Clearinghouse Division (ASCD) is the
Commission's designated paperwork reduction officer, and as such, is
responsible for reviewing proposed data collection procedures as
required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980. It provides that when
collecting information from ten or more persons or organizations, the
Commission must receive prior approval from OMB. The appropriate
documents are submitted to the ASCD Chief at least fifty (50) days
before the anticipated administration of a questionnaire or interview schedule.
(b) The Civil Rights Commission Amendments Act of 1994, Public Law
103419, 108 Stat. 4338, at 42 U.S.C. 1975a(e) provides that the
Commission may issue subpoenas for the attendance of witnesses and the
production of written or other matter in a hearing approved by the
Commission. In addition, the Commission may use depositions and written
interrogatories to obtain information and testimony about matters that are the subject of a Commission hearing or report.
Further, data also are collected at briefings, conferences,
hearings, and during consultation and interviews by staff. Staff shall
submit the Commission's Privacy Act notice to potential data sources at these prior to collecting the data.
Section IV. Scope and Applicability of the Commission's Quality Information Guidelines
.01 Consistent with OMB guidance, the definitions of information
and dissemination set the scope and applicability of the Commission's
quality information guidelines. For the purposes of these guidelines,
information means any communication or representation of facts or data,
in any medium or form, including textual, numerical, graphic,
cartographic, narrative, or audiovisual forms. This definition includes
information that the Commission disseminates from a Web page, but does
not include the provision of hyperlinks to information that others disseminate.
.02 This definition of information does not include:
(a) Opinions or policies, where the presentation makes clear that
the statements are subjective opinions, rather than facts. Underlying
information upon which the opinion or policy is based may be subject to
these guidelines only if the Commission publishes that information;
(b) Information originated by and attributed to nonCommission
sources, provided the Commission does not expressly rely upon it.
Examples include nonU.S. government information reported and duly
attributed in materials the Commission prepared and disseminated,
hyperlinks on the Commission's Web site to information that others
disseminate, and reports of advisory committees published on the
Commission's Web site that are not explicitly endorsed by the Commission;
(c) Statements relating solely to the Commission's internal
personnel rules and practices and other materials produced for the Commission's employees, contractors, or agents;
(d) Descriptions of the Commission, its responsibilities, and organizational components;
(e) Statements, the modification of which might cause harm to the
national security, including harm to the national defense or foreign relations of the United States;
(f) Statements of Commission policy; however, any underlying
information the Commission published upon which a statement is based may be subjected to these guidelines;
(g) Testimony or comments of Commission officials before courts,
administrative bodies, Congress, or the media, unless such testimony
contains new, substantive information not previously disseminated;
(h) Investigatory material compiled pursuant to U.S. law or for law enforcement purposes in the United States; or
.03 Dissemination means Commission initiated or sponsored
distribution of information to the public (see 5 CFR 1320.3(d) ``Conduct or Sponsor'').
.04 This definition of dissemination does not include distributions of information or other materials that are:
(a) Produced in response to requests for Commission records under
the Freedom of Information Act, the Privacy Act, the Federal Advisory Committee Act, or similar law; or
(b) Archival records, public filings, responses to subpoena or
compulsory document productions, or documents prepared and released in
the context of adjudicative processes. These guidelines do not impose
any additional requirements on the Commission during adjudicative proceedings and do not
[[Page 68560]]
provide parties to such adjudicative proceedings any additional rights of challenge or appeal; and
(c) Limited to Commission employees or Commission contractors or
grantees, as well as intra or interagency use or sharing of government information.
.05 Consistent with OMB guidance, the Commission's guidelines apply
to any covered information the Commission disseminated on or after
October 1, 2002. The Commission's administrative mechanism shall apply
to information that it disseminates on or after October 1, 2002, regardless of when it first disseminated the information.
Section V. The Commission's Guidelines for Ensuring and Maximizing Information Quality
.01 In accordance with OMB guidelines, quality encompasses utility,
objectivity, and integrity. These four statutory terms sometimes are
collectively referred to as quality. The Commission shall adopt a basic
standard of quality and take appropriate steps to ensure that all
offices in the National Office and each Regional Office incorporate
quality criteria into its information dissemination practices. .02 Utility of Information
(a) Utility means the usefulness of the disseminated information to
its intended users, including the public. The Commission is committed
to disseminating quality information. Basic to achieving utility is an
understanding of what information is needed as the Commission seeks to
fulfill its mission and mandate. The Commission shall identify civil
rights issues in which there is a critical need for information and
shall develop and implement plans to provide such information.
(b) The Commission shall assess the utility of the information it
will produce from original research and secondary analysis of existing
data. It shall also assess the utility of the information it
disseminates that is provided by or obtained from outside sources and which it adopts, endorses, or uses.
(c) When reproducibility and transparency of information are
essential for determining information utility, the Commission shall
ensure the reproducibility and transparency of the research design and
analytic methods. In this context, reproducibility means that the
information is capable of being reproduced, subject to an acceptable
degree of imprecision. With respect to analytic results, ``capable of
being substantially reproduced'' means that independent analysis of the
original or supporting data using identical methods would generate
similar analytic results, subject to an acceptable degree of imprecision.
(d) In order to enhance further the utility of information, the
Commission shall ensure that the information it will disseminate is
clearly written in plain English, grammatically correct, and free of
spelling or typographical errors. Where appropriate, the Commission
shall include contact information for intended users and the public who
may wish to obtain supplementary information, seek further elucidation, or provide comments.
.03 Objectivity of Information
Objectivity concerns substance and presentation of disseminated
information. Substance focuses on whether the content of the
disseminated information is accurate, reliable, unbiased, and balanced.
Presentation concerns whether the disseminated information is presented
in an accurate, clear, complete, and unbiased manner. The Commission is
committed to disseminating information that reflects these two elements.
(a) In the course of fulfilling its mission and mandate, the
Commission conducts social science studies and evaluates federal civil
rights enforcement programs, reports on findings and conclusions, and
makes recommendations. The Commission strives for a research process
that embodies methodological and statistical rigor, intellectual
honesty in analysis, and presentation of findings and conclusions in
full and proper context in order to achieve accurate, reliable, and
unbiased reports. In this respect, the Commission's Administrative
Instruction 16, National Project Development and Implementation at
sections 7 and 8 is instructive. Consistent with it, the Commission
shall ensure that the program office primarily responsible for reports:
(1) Develops methodologically strong and practically feasible research designs capable of judging the issues addressed;
(2) Makes explicit the assumptions underlying research efforts;
(3) Conducts thorough review of the literature representing a wide
range of perspectives on the subject of study or evaluation;
(4) Uses appropriate and sound research methods to gather information;
(5) Uses appropriate and sound statistical techniques to analyze collected information;
(6) Ensures that the analysis is unbiased;
(7) Presents disseminated information within a full and proper context, including supporting data as appropriate;
(8) Identifies data sources (to the extent possible, consistent with confidentiality protections); and
(9) Specifies limitations of the study or evaluation, including error sources that affect data quality.
The Staff Director is responsible for reviewing national office
project designs and proposals to ensure that they reflect objectivity
and balance. The Staff Director also reviews State Advisory Committee reports for balance and objectivity.
.04 In conducting social science studies and evaluation of federal
civil rights enforcement programs, the Commission may combine original
research with secondary analysis of existing data or may rely solely on
the latter. The sources of existing data may be other federal
government agencies, advisory committees, or other organizations and
individuals. The Commission expects that these entities will subject
information they submit to adequate quality control measures. Prior to
using existing data from outside sources, the responsible program
office shall review and verify the data as necessary and appropriate.
Data collected at briefings may be verified by requiring the outside
sources to submit testimony upon oath or affirmation. Being subject to
these guidelines does not necessarily mean that the material the
Commission publishes is a policy statement of the United States government.
.05 When the responsible program office determines that the
information it will disseminate is influential social science,
financial, legal, or statistical information, it shall take extra care
to include a high degree of transparency about data and research
methods to meet OMB's requirement for the reproducibility of such
information. In this context, influential means that such information
will have or does have a clear and substantial impact on important
public policies pertaining to civil rights issues or important private
sector decisions that have civil rights implications. A high degree of
transparency for disseminated information here means that the
methodology used to derive the results is readily understandable to
persons experienced in the appropriate field of study. In determining
the appropriate level of transparency, the responsible program office
will consider the types of data that can be practically subjected to a reproducibility requirement given ethical, feasibility,
confidentiality, and national security constraints. In making this
determination, the responsible program office will hold analytical results to an even higher standard than
[[Page 68561]]
original data. It is important that analytic results have a high degree of transparency regarding:
(a) The source of the data used;
(b) The various assumptions employed;
(c) The analytic methods applied; and
(d) The statistical procedures employed.
.06 The Commission may contract, from time to time, with
organizations or individuals to conduct research and analysis in
support of its mission and mandate, but Commission policy does not
influence their results. The responsible program office that
disseminates contractorprepared information will maintain records on
data sources, data collection methods, and statistical techniques used
in analysis, and retain all data and documents employed in preparing
contractor reports. The Commission expects that contractors will adhere
to research standards set forth in section V.03 and .04 above. When the
Lead Office anticipates that the contractorprepared information it
will disseminate is influential social science, financial, or
statistical information, it will ensure that the contractor adheres to section V.05 above.
.07 The clearance process contributes in important ways to the objectivity of disseminated information. The Commission's
Administrative Instruction 16, National Project Development and
Implementation, at sections 14, 15, 16, 17 and 18 provides a rigorous,
multiphased quality control clearance. Where appropriate, the
Commission will seek substantive input from other government agencies,
nongovernment organizations, scholars, and the public. The Commission
also will determine if peer review is appropriate and, if necessary, the Lead Office will coordinate such review;
.08 Public dissemination of hardbound information and all
information published in final form on the Commisson's Web site at
http://www.usccr.gov shall occur only after clearances are obtained
from the Office of the Staff Director, and, if appropriate, with the approval of the Commissioners.
.09 These guidelines focus on procedures for the dissemination of
information, as those terms are defined herein. Accordingly, procedures
specifically applicable to forms of communication outside the scope of
these guidelines, such as those for correspondence, press releases, or
to other federal employees, among others, are not included. .10 Integrity of Information
(a) Integrity refers to security, that is, the protection of
information from unauthorized access or revision in order to ensure
that it is not compromised through corruption or falsification.
Information technology is essential to the Commission as it seeks to
fulfill its mission and mandate. A critical component of information
integrity is protecting information technology systems from
unauthorized access that could compromise information stored therein.
.11 Consistent with Administrative Instruction 418, Information
Technology and Systems Management, the Commission shall ensure that
ASCD coordinates and works with all offices in the National Office, the
Regional Offices, and SACs to guarantee the integrity of information residing in its technology systems.
.12 To assist in fulfilling its mission, the Commission's Office of
Civil Rights Evaluation and Office of General Counsel conduct studies
on issues with civil rights implications. They may collect information
for analysis and/or obtain existing information from other sources.
These program offices shall protect such information from unauthorized,
unanticipated, or unintentional modification. They shall use
appropriate controls to safeguard draft reports and confidential
information, such as interrogatory responses, from improper dissemination.
Section VI. Administrative Procedures for PreDissemination Review
.01 Each Commission's program office in the National Office and
each Regional Office shall incorporate OMB and Commission information
quality principles into their existing predissemination review procedures as appropriate.
Section VII. Administrative Mechanism for Correction of Information
.01 The Commission shall allow any affected person to request the
correction of Commissiondisseminated information that does not comply
with applicable OMB and Commission information quality guidelines. An
affected person is an individual or an entity that may use, benefit
from, or be harmed by the disseminated information at issue. .02 Information Correction Requests
(a) In the Commission's correction request process the burden of
proof rests with the requester. An affected person who believes that
information the Commission disseminates does not adhere to the
information quality guidelines of OMB or the Commission, and who would
like to request correction of specific information, needs to submit a Petition for Correction with the following information.
(1) Name, mailing address, email address, telephone number, and
organizational affiliation (if any) of the individual or organization submitting a petition;
(2) Detailed description of the information the requester believes
does not comply with the Commission's guidelines, including the exact
name of the report or publication, the date, and a description of the specific item in question;
(3) Description of the requester's interest in the information and
how the requester is affected by the information in question;
(4) Description of reason(s) that the information should be
corrected, including the elements of the information quality guidelines that were not followed; and
(5) The specific corrective action sought, including (if
applicable) temporary corrective action pending full resolution of the complaint.
(b) The Petition for Correction should be sent to the Deputy Chief
Information Officer (DCIO) for Information Management at the following
address: Deputy Chief Information Officer, U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, 624 Ninth Street, NW., Washington, DC 20425.
(c) Alternatively, requesters may submit an email request to the
following address: qualityinfo@usccr.gov. Requesters should indicate
that they are submitting an Information Quality Request in the subject line of the email.
.03 The DCIO will review the request and determine whether it
contains all the information required for a Petition. If the request is
unclear or incomplete, he/she will seek clarification from the requester.
.04 If the request is complete, the DCIO will forward it to the
appropriate program office(s) for a response. The responsible office(s)
will determine whether a correction is warranted, and if so, what
corrective action it will take. The answer will take into consideration
the importance of the information involved, the magnitude of the error, and the cost of undertaking the correction.
.05 The Commission is not required to change the content or status
of information simply based on the receipt of a Petition for
Correction. The Commission may reject a request that appears to be made
in bad faith or without justification, and is only required to
undertake the degree of correction that is appropriate for the nature
and timeliness of the information involved. In addition, the Commission [[Page 68562]]
need not respond to requests involving information not covered by the information quality guidelines.
.06 The Commission will respond to all Petitions for Correction
within sixty (60) calendar days of the receipt of the request by the
DCIO, unless there is a reasonable basis for an extension. The
requester will be told of the right to appeal the decision. .07 Appeal
(a) If the requester is not satisfied with the Commission's
decision on the request, he/she may appeal to the Commission's CIO
within thirty (30) calendar days of the receipt of the Commission's
decision. This administrative appeal must include a copy of the initial
request, a copy of the Commission's decision, and a written narrative
explaining why the requester believes the Commission's decision was inadequate, incomplete, or in error.
(b) This appeal will be sent to the Commission's CIO at the
following address: The Chief Information Officer, Staff Director's
Office, RE: Information Quality Appeal, Room 700, 624 Ninth Street, NW., Washington, DC 20425.
(c) All appeals will be impartially reviewed by parties other than
those who prepared the Commission's decision. The Commission will
respond to all appeals within sixty (60) calendar days of the CIO's receipt of the appeal.
(d) If the appropriate Commission official, whether at the initial
or appeal stage, decides that the requester is correct and the
information should be corrected, he/she will notify the Staff Director
who will instruct the official to take appropriate corrective actions.
Appropriate corrective actions may take a number of forms, including
(but not limited to): Errata pages, personal contacts via letter or
telephone, form letters, press releases or postings on the Commission's
Web site. Corrective measures, where appropriate, should be designed to
provide reasonable notice to affected persons of such correction.The
Commission will also post information quality correction requests to
its Web site. The specific information will include a copy of each
correction request, the Commission's formal response(s), and any communications regarding appeals.
[FR Doc. E723526 Filed 12407; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 633501P
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
Contact David P. Blackwood, Esq., General Counsel, United States Commission on Civil Rights, 624 Ninth Street, NW., Suite 620, Washington, DC 20425, (202) 3768351; Facsimile: (202) 3761163.