Browse: Departments Dates Agencies
DOCUMENT ID: [Release No. 34-56917; File No. SR-NASDAQ-2007-085]
SUBJECT CATEGORY: Self-Regulatory Organizations; the NASDAQ Stock Market LLC; Order Approving Proposed Rule Change, as Modified By Amendment No. 1 Thereto, Amending Nasdaq's Membership Application Rules
DOCUMENT SUMMARY: December 6, 2007.
On October 30, 2007, The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC (``Nasdaq'') filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission''), pursuant
to section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'')
\1\ and Rule 19b4 thereunder,\2\ a proposed rule change to modify
Nasdaq's membership application procedures. The proposed rule change
was published for comment in the Federal Register on November 6,
2007.\3\ On December 4, 2007, Nasdaq filed Amendment No. 1 to the
proposed rule change.\4\ The Commission received no comment letters on
the proposed rule change. This order approves the proposed rule change, as modified by Amendment No. 1 thereto.
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b4.
\3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 56722 (October 31, 2007), 72 FR 62709 (``Notice'').
\4\ In Amendment No. 1, Nasdaq corrected typographical errors
and clarified that in Rule 1013(a)(1), an applicant should file an
amendment to its membership application no later than 15 days after
the applicant ``knew or should have known'' about facts and
circumstances that gave rise to the need for the amendment. Because
Amendment No. 1 is technical in nature, it is not subject to notice and comment.
Nasdaq is proposing to amend its 1000 Series rules governing its
membership application process to tailor the rules to proprietary
trading firms. Under the proposed rule, a ``proprietary trading firm''
is defined as an applicant: (1) That is not required to become a member
of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (``FINRA'') by section
15(b)(8) of the Act \5\ but is a member of another registered
securities exchange not registered solely under section 6(g) of the
Act; (2) whose source of funds or proposed source of funds to be used
for trading are the applicant's own capital, traded through the
applicant's own accounts; (3) that does not, and will not have
``customers'' \6\; and (4) whose principals and representatives acting or
[[Page 70633]]
to be acting in the capacity of a trader must be owners of, employees of, or contractors to the applicant.\7\
\5\ 15 U.S.C. 78o(b)(8).
\6\ The term ``customer'' does not include a broker or dealer. See Nasdaq Rule 0120(g).
\7\ See proposed Nasdaq Rule 1011(o).
Under the new application process, an applicant would be required
to submit certain information in its application.\8\ This information includes the following:
\8\ See proposed Nasdaq Rules 1013(a)(1)(A)(V). A more detailed
description of the required information is described in the Notice, supra note 3.
Applicants must keep their application current by submitting
amendments if facts and circumstances change.\10\ Nasdaq proposes to
amend Rule 1013(a)(1) to require applicants to file amendments with
Nasdaq no later than 15 business days after the applicant or Nasdaq
member knew or should have known about the facts or circumstances
giving rise to the need for the amendment. Nasdaq also amended Rule
1013(a)(1) to add that an applicant must promptly notify the Nasdaq
Membership Department (``Department'') \11\ of any material adverse change in financial condition.
\10\ See Nasdaq Rule 1013(a)(1).
\11\ The term includes FINRA staff acting on Nasdaq's behalf. B. Membership Admission Standard
Nasdaq proposes to amend the admission standard in Rule 1014.
Currently, the Department must make specific findings in order to admit
an applicant as a Nasdaq member. The proposed rule would allow the
Department to approve an application unless there is a basis for
denying or conditioning approval.\12\ The proposed rule further
provides that the Department may deny (or condition) approval of an
applicant for the same reasons that the Commission may deny or revoke a
brokerdealer's registration and for those reasons required or allowed
under the Act. The proposed rule lists specific bases upon which the
Department may deny (or condition) approval of an applicant which
include: \13\ (1) inability of the applicant to satisfactorily
demonstrate the capacity to adhere to applicable Nasdaq and Commission
policies, rules, and regulations, including, those concerning record
keeping, reporting, finance, and trading procedures; (2) past rule
violations by the applicant and a reasonable likelihood that the
applicant will again engage in acts or practices that violate any
Nasdaq or Commission policies, rules, or regulations; (3) behavior in
which the applicant engaged and the existence of a reasonable
likelihood that the applicant will again engage in, acts or practices
inconsistent with just and equitable principles of trade; (4) factors
indicative of financial difficulties, such as not being in compliance
with the Commission's net capital rule or having financial difficulties
involving an amount that is more than 5% of the applicant's net worth;
(5) the applicant is the subject of a current or recent bankruptcy
proceeding; (6) the applicant has an established pattern of failure to
pay just debts; (7) failure to have required governmental and SRO
registrations; or (8) inability to demonstrate reasonably adequate systems capability and capacity.
\12\ A similar change would be made in Nasdaq Rule
1017(g)(1)(A), providing that an application for a material change
in business operations will be approved unless there is a basis for denying it under the standards in Rule 1014.
The proposed rule would provide the Department with the discretion
to conduct a membership interview if it determines an interview is
necessary to clarify aspects of an application.\14\ The proposed rule
change also reduces the time allotted for various aspects of review,
both for initial applications and for changes of ownership, control and [[Page 70634]]
business operations under Nasdaq Rule 1017.
\14\ See proposed Nasdaq Rule 1013(b)(1).
Currently, Nasdaq Rule 1017(a) provides that if there is a material change in business operations, the member will be required to file an application for approval that describes in detail the change in ownership, control, or business operations and include a business plan, pro forma financials, an organizational chart, and written supervisory procedures reflecting the change. The proposed rule change amends the definition of ``material change in business operations'' in Nasdaq Rule 1011(g) to include ``adding business activities that would cause a proprietary trading firm no longer to meet the definition of that term. * * *'' If a proprietary trading firm seeks to expand its activities to include dealings with customers, the member would be required to undergo an assessment and obtain approval of this change under Nasdaq Rule 1017.
If a firm is required to become a FINRA member due to a change in
ownership, control, or business operations, the amended rule provides
that the Department is not required to take action on an application
for approval under Rule 1017 until FINRA has acted on the application under its rule or the firm has become a FINRA member, as
applicable.\15\
\15\ See proposed Nasdaq Rule 1017(g)(4).
In addition, Nasdaq proposes to (1) amend Rule 1021 to provide that a proprietary trading firm with 25 or fewer registered representatives is required to have only one, rather than two registered principals; (2) eliminate the requirement that traders for proprietary trading firms register as equity traders under Nasdaq Rule 1032(f); (3) amend Rule 1150 to require that a firm's executive representative under Nasdaq rules be the same as its executive representative under FINRA rules; and (4) amend Nasdaq Rule 1130 to provide that the names and addresses of executive representatives will not be available to members or the general public. Finally, the proposed rule change also makes conforming changes to provisions of Nasdaq rules 1014, 1015, and 1017 that refer to the standards for admission in Nasdaq Rule 1014. III. Discussion and Commission Findings
After careful consideration, the Commission finds that the proposed
rule change, as amended, is consistent with the requirements of the Act
and the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to a national
securities exchange \16\ and, in particular, the requirements of
section 6 of the Act.\17\ Specifically, the Commission finds that the
proposed rule change is consistent with section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\18\
which requires, among other things, that the rules of a national
securities exchange be designed to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, to foster cooperation and coordination with
persons engaged in regulating, clearing, settling, and processing
information with respect to, and facilitating transactions in
securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a
free and open market and a national market system, and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest.
\16\ In approving this proposed rule change the Commission has
considered the proposed rule's impact on efficiency, competition, and capital formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
\17\ 15 U.S.C. 78f.
The Commission has reviewed the provisions of the proposed rule
change and believes that they are consistent with the requirements of
the Act. In particular, the Commission believes that the proposed rule
under which Nasdaq may deny or condition membership is reasonable and
consistent with section 6(b)(5) of the Act in that it promotes just and
equitable principles of trade and, in general, serves to protect
investors and the public interest, and is also consistent with the
grounds upon which an exchange may deny or condition membership under
section 6(c)(3) of the Act. The circumstances described in the proposed
rule under which the Exchange may deny or condition membership address
situations in which an applicant has failed to demonstrate the ability
to comply with the financial and regulatory responsibilities necessary
for Exchange membership. The Commission notes that these bases for
denial of membership are similar to those of NYSE Arca, Inc. (``NYSE
Arca'') and the International Securities Exchange, LLC (``ISE'') which
were approved by the Commission.\19\ The Commission also notes that an
applicant who has been denied membership would always have the right to appeal that decision.\20\
\19\ See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 42455 (February
24, 2000), 65 FR 11388 (March 2, 2000); and 49718 (May 17, 2004), 69
FR 29611 (May 24, 2004). See also ISE Rule 302 (Denial of and
Conditions of Becoming a Member); NYSE Arca Equities Rule 2.4 (Denial of or Conditions to ETPs).
In addition, the Commission believes that the proposal to amend the
current membership application requirements which focus on a member's
relationship with its customers is appropriate because a proprietary
trading firm, by definition, does not handle customer orders. Because
Nasdaq's rules provide that all applicants must already be a member
either of FINRA, if they transact business with the public, or of
another national securities exchange, which acts as an Examining
Authority for purposes of Rule 15c31 under the Act,\21\ the Commission
believes the level of information required in the amended membership
application is reasonable. As stated in the Nasdaq rules, if a Nasdaq
member undergoes a material change in ownership, control, or business
operations, the member will be required to file an application for
approval and may need to register as a member of FINRA. Further, based
on Nasdaq's representation that the proposal to reduce time allotted to
review applications (for both initial applications and for changes of
ownership, control and business operations) is due to centralizing the
review of applications as well as the less complex nature of the
applicant firms (i.e., proprietary trading firms and members of other
SROs), the Commission believes that the reduction in review time is reasonable.
\21\ 17 CFR 240.15c31.
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to section 19(b)(2) of the
Act,\22\ that the proposed rule change (File No. SRNASDAQ2007085),
as modified by Amendment No. 1 thereto, be, and it hereby is, approved. \22\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
\23\ 17 CFR 200.303(a)(12).
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.\23\
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E724045 Filed 121107; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 801101P
SUMMARY: NASDAQ Stock Market LLC,
DOCUMENT BODY 2: December 6, 2007.
On October 30, 2007, The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC (``Nasdaq'') filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission''), pursuant
to section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'')
\1\ and Rule 19b4 thereunder,\2\ a proposed rule change to modify
Nasdaq's membership application procedures. The proposed rule change
was published for comment in the Federal Register on November 6,
2007.\3\ On December 4, 2007, Nasdaq filed Amendment No. 1 to the
proposed rule change.\4\ The Commission received no comment letters on
the proposed rule change. This order approves the proposed rule change, as modified by Amendment No. 1 thereto.
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b4.
\3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 56722 (October 31, 2007), 72 FR 62709 (``Notice'').
\4\ In Amendment No. 1, Nasdaq corrected typographical errors
and clarified that in Rule 1013(a)(1), an applicant should file an
amendment to its membership application no later than 15 days after
the applicant ``knew or should have known'' about facts and
circumstances that gave rise to the need for the amendment. Because
Amendment No. 1 is technical in nature, it is not subject to notice and comment.
Nasdaq is proposing to amend its 1000 Series rules governing its
membership application process to tailor the rules to proprietary
trading firms. Under the proposed rule, a ``proprietary trading firm''
is defined as an applicant: (1) That is not required to become a member
of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (``FINRA'') by section
15(b)(8) of the Act \5\ but is a member of another registered
securities exchange not registered solely under section 6(g) of the
Act; (2) whose source of funds or proposed source of funds to be used
for trading are the applicant's own capital, traded through the
applicant's own accounts; (3) that does not, and will not have
``customers'' \6\; and (4) whose principals and representatives acting or
[[Page 70633]]
to be acting in the capacity of a trader must be owners of, employees of, or contractors to the applicant.\7\
\5\ 15 U.S.C. 78o(b)(8).
\6\ The term ``customer'' does not include a broker or dealer. See Nasdaq Rule 0120(g).
\7\ See proposed Nasdaq Rule 1011(o).
Under the new application process, an applicant would be required
to submit certain information in its application.\8\ This information includes the following:
\8\ See proposed Nasdaq Rules 1013(a)(1)(A)(V). A more detailed
description of the required information is described in the Notice, supra note 3.
Applicants must keep their application current by submitting
amendments if facts and circumstances change.\10\ Nasdaq proposes to
amend Rule 1013(a)(1) to require applicants to file amendments with
Nasdaq no later than 15 business days after the applicant or Nasdaq
member knew or should have known about the facts or circumstances
giving rise to the need for the amendment. Nasdaq also amended Rule
1013(a)(1) to add that an applicant must promptly notify the Nasdaq
Membership Department (``Department'') \11\ of any material adverse change in financial condition.
\10\ See Nasdaq Rule 1013(a)(1).
\11\ The term includes FINRA staff acting on Nasdaq's behalf. B. Membership Admission Standard
Nasdaq proposes to amend the admission standard in Rule 1014.
Currently, the Department must make specific findings in order to admit
an applicant as a Nasdaq member. The proposed rule would allow the
Department to approve an application unless there is a basis for
denying or conditioning approval.\12\ The proposed rule further
provides that the Department may deny (or condition) approval of an
applicant for the same reasons that the Commission may deny or revoke a
brokerdealer's registration and for those reasons required or allowed
under the Act. The proposed rule lists specific bases upon which the
Department may deny (or condition) approval of an applicant which
include: \13\ (1) inability of the applicant to satisfactorily
demonstrate the capacity to adhere to applicable Nasdaq and Commission
policies, rules, and regulations, including, those concerning record
keeping, reporting, finance, and trading procedures; (2) past rule
violations by the applicant and a reasonable likelihood that the
applicant will again engage in acts or practices that violate any
Nasdaq or Commission policies, rules, or regulations; (3) behavior in
which the applicant engaged and the existence of a reasonable
likelihood that the applicant will again engage in, acts or practices
inconsistent with just and equitable principles of trade; (4) factors
indicative of financial difficulties, such as not being in compliance
with the Commission's net capital rule or having financial difficulties
involving an amount that is more than 5% of the applicant's net worth;
(5) the applicant is the subject of a current or recent bankruptcy
proceeding; (6) the applicant has an established pattern of failure to
pay just debts; (7) failure to have required governmental and SRO
registrations; or (8) inability to demonstrate reasonably adequate systems capability and capacity.
\12\ A similar change would be made in Nasdaq Rule
1017(g)(1)(A), providing that an application for a material change
in business operations will be approved unless there is a basis for denying it under the standards in Rule 1014.
The proposed rule would provide the Department with the discretion
to conduct a membership interview if it determines an interview is
necessary to clarify aspects of an application.\14\ The proposed rule
change also reduces the time allotted for various aspects of review,
both for initial applications and for changes of ownership, control and [[Page 70634]]
business operations under Nasdaq Rule 1017.
\14\ See proposed Nasdaq Rule 1013(b)(1).
Currently, Nasdaq Rule 1017(a) provides that if there is a material change in business operations, the member will be required to file an application for approval that describes in detail the change in ownership, control, or business operations and include a business plan, pro forma financials, an organizational chart, and written supervisory procedures reflecting the change. The proposed rule change amends the definition of ``material change in business operations'' in Nasdaq Rule 1011(g) to include ``adding business activities that would cause a proprietary trading firm no longer to meet the definition of that term. * * *'' If a proprietary trading firm seeks to expand its activities to include dealings with customers, the member would be required to undergo an assessment and obtain approval of this change under Nasdaq Rule 1017.
If a firm is required to become a FINRA member due to a change in
ownership, control, or business operations, the amended rule provides
that the Department is not required to take action on an application
for approval under Rule 1017 until FINRA has acted on the application under its rule or the firm has become a FINRA member, as
applicable.\15\
\15\ See proposed Nasdaq Rule 1017(g)(4).
In addition, Nasdaq proposes to (1) amend Rule 1021 to provide that a proprietary trading firm with 25 or fewer registered representatives is required to have only one, rather than two registered principals; (2) eliminate the requirement that traders for proprietary trading firms register as equity traders under Nasdaq Rule 1032(f); (3) amend Rule 1150 to require that a firm's executive representative under Nasdaq rules be the same as its executive representative under FINRA rules; and (4) amend Nasdaq Rule 1130 to provide that the names and addresses of executive representatives will not be available to members or the general public. Finally, the proposed rule change also makes conforming changes to provisions of Nasdaq rules 1014, 1015, and 1017 that refer to the standards for admission in Nasdaq Rule 1014. III. Discussion and Commission Findings
After careful consideration, the Commission finds that the proposed
rule change, as amended, is consistent with the requirements of the Act
and the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to a national
securities exchange \16\ and, in particular, the requirements of
section 6 of the Act.\17\ Specifically, the Commission finds that the
proposed rule change is consistent with section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\18\
which requires, among other things, that the rules of a national
securities exchange be designed to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, to foster cooperation and coordination with
persons engaged in regulating, clearing, settling, and processing
information with respect to, and facilitating transactions in
securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a
free and open market and a national market system, and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest.
\16\ In approving this proposed rule change the Commission has
considered the proposed rule's impact on efficiency, competition, and capital formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
\17\ 15 U.S.C. 78f.
The Commission has reviewed the provisions of the proposed rule
change and believes that they are consistent with the requirements of
the Act. In particular, the Commission believes that the proposed rule
under which Nasdaq may deny or condition membership is reasonable and
consistent with section 6(b)(5) of the Act in that it promotes just and
equitable principles of trade and, in general, serves to protect
investors and the public interest, and is also consistent with the
grounds upon which an exchange may deny or condition membership under
section 6(c)(3) of the Act. The circumstances described in the proposed
rule under which the Exchange may deny or condition membership address
situations in which an applicant has failed to demonstrate the ability
to comply with the financial and regulatory responsibilities necessary
for Exchange membership. The Commission notes that these bases for
denial of membership are similar to those of NYSE Arca, Inc. (``NYSE
Arca'') and the International Securities Exchange, LLC (``ISE'') which
were approved by the Commission.\19\ The Commission also notes that an
applicant who has been denied membership would always have the right to appeal that decision.\20\
\19\ See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 42455 (February
24, 2000), 65 FR 11388 (March 2, 2000); and 49718 (May 17, 2004), 69
FR 29611 (May 24, 2004). See also ISE Rule 302 (Denial of and
Conditions of Becoming a Member); NYSE Arca Equities Rule 2.4 (Denial of or Conditions to ETPs).
In addition, the Commission believes that the proposal to amend the
current membership application requirements which focus on a member's
relationship with its customers is appropriate because a proprietary
trading firm, by definition, does not handle customer orders. Because
Nasdaq's rules provide that all applicants must already be a member
either of FINRA, if they transact business with the public, or of
another national securities exchange, which acts as an Examining
Authority for purposes of Rule 15c31 under the Act,\21\ the Commission
believes the level of information required in the amended membership
application is reasonable. As stated in the Nasdaq rules, if a Nasdaq
member undergoes a material change in ownership, control, or business
operations, the member will be required to file an application for
approval and may need to register as a member of FINRA. Further, based
on Nasdaq's representation that the proposal to reduce time allotted to
review applications (for both initial applications and for changes of
ownership, control and business operations) is due to centralizing the
review of applications as well as the less complex nature of the
applicant firms (i.e., proprietary trading firms and members of other
SROs), the Commission believes that the reduction in review time is reasonable.
\21\ 17 CFR 240.15c31.
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to section 19(b)(2) of the
Act,\22\ that the proposed rule change (File No. SRNASDAQ2007085),
as modified by Amendment No. 1 thereto, be, and it hereby is, approved. \22\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
\23\ 17 CFR 200.303(a)(12).
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.\23\
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E724045 Filed 121107; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 801101P
14 CFR Part 39 40 CFR Part 52 14 CFR Part 71 33 CFR Part 165 50 CFR Part 679 47 CFR Part 73 26 CFR Part 1 40 CFR Part 180 33 CFR Part 117 50 CFR Part 17 44 CFR Part 67 50 CFR Part 648 14 CFR Part 97 40 CFR Part 63 33 CFR Part 100 50 CFR Part 622 50 CFR Part 660 26 CFR Part 301 44 CFR Part 65 39 CFR Part 111 40 CFR Part 300 6 CFR Part 5 40 CFR Part 271 47 CFR Part 64 40 CFR Parts 52 and 81 50 CFR Part 665 10 CFR Part 50 44 CFR Part 64 49 CFR Part 571 39 CFR Part 3020