Browse: Departments   Dates   Agencies  

The Federal Register

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

CFR Citation: 14 CFR Part 39

Docket ID: [Docket No. FAA-2007-0258; Directorate Identifier 2007-CE-090-AD]

RIN ID: RIN 2120-AA64

NOTICE: PROPOSED RULES

ACTION: Airworthiness directives:

DOCUMENT ACTION: Supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM); Extension of the comment period.

SUBJECT CATEGORY: Airworthiness Directives; Air Tractor, Inc. AT-400, AT-500, AT- 600, and AT-800 Series Airplanes

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by February 29, 2008 (an additional 30 days after the comment close date for the NPRM, which was January 30, 2008).

DOCUMENT SUMMARY: We are revising an earlier proposed airworthiness directive (AD) that applies to certain Air Tractor, Inc. (Air Tractor) AT400, AT500, AT600, and AT800 series airplanes. The earlier NPRM proposed to supersede Airworthiness Directive (AD) 20071317, which applies to certain Air Tractor Models AT602, AT802, and AT802A airplanes. AD 20071317 currently requires you to repetitively inspect the engine mount for any cracks, repair or replace any cracked engine mount, and report any cracks found to the FAA. The earlier NPRM proposed to retain the inspection actions of AD 20071317 for Models AT602, AT802, and AT802A airplanes, including the compliance times and effective dates; [[Page 71087]]
establish new inspection actions for the AT400 and AT500 series airplanes; incorporate a mandatory terminating action for all airplanes; and terminate the reporting requirement of AD 20071317. The earlier NPRM resulted from a Model AT502B with a crack located where the lower engine mount tube is welded to the engine mount ring, and the manufacturer developing gussets that, when installed according to their service letter, terminate the repetitive inspection requirement. Since issuance of the NPRM, the manufacturer revised the service information and the FAA has determined that it is necessary to address the unsafe condition. Therefore, we are incorporating the service letter revision into the proposed AD, and we are extending the comment period to allow the public additional time to comment.

SUMMARY: Air Tractor, Inc.,


SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

Comments Invited

We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or arguments regarding this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include the docket number, ``FAA 20070258; Directorate Identifier 2007CE090AD'' at the beginning of your comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory, economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the proposed AD. We will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend the proposed AD in light of those comments.

We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://www.regulations.gov , including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we receive concerning this proposed AD.

Discussion

On November 23, 2007, we issued a proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) to include an AD that would apply to all Air Tractor AT400, AT500, AT600, and AT800 series airplanes. This proposal was published in the Federal Register as a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) on November 30, 2007 (72 FR 67687). The NPRM proposed to supersede AD 20071317 with a new AD that would retain the inspection actions of AD 20071317 for Models AT602, AT802, and AT802A airplanes, including the compliance times and effective dates; establish new inspection actions for the AT400 and AT500 series airplanes; incorporate a mandatory terminating action for all airplanes; and terminate the reporting requirement of AD 200713 17. That proposed AD would have required you to use Snow Engineering Co. Service Letter 253 Rev. A, dated October 16, 2007.

Since issuance of the NPRM, Snow Engineering Company revised the Snow Engineering Co. Service Letter 253, Rev. A to the Rev. B level (dated November 30, 2007).

FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD

We have carefully reviewed the available data and determined that:

  • The unsafe condition referenced in this document exists or could develop on other products of the same type design;
  • Doing the actions following the revised service letter is necessary to address the unsafe condition; and
  • We should take AD action to correct this unsafe condition.

    Therefore, we are incorporating the service letter revision into the proposed AD, and we are issuing a supplemental NPRM and extending the comment period to allow the public additional time to comment. Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this proposed AD would affect 1,264 airplanes in the U.S. registry, including those airplanes affected by AD 20071317.

    We estimate the following costs to do the proposed inspection: Total cost per Total cost on Labor cost Parts cost airplane U.S. operators 1.5 workhours x $80 per hour = $120......................... $0 $120 $151,680

    We estimate the following costs to do the repair/modification: Total cost per Total cost on Labor cost Parts cost airplane U.S. operators 24 workhours x $80 per hour = $1,920........................ $80 $2,000 $2,528,000

    The estimated total cost on U.S. operators includes the cumulative costs associated with AD 20071317 and those airplanes and actions being added in this proposed AD.

    Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Section 106 describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority. [[Page 71088]]

    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, ``General requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.

    Regulatory Findings

    We have determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.

    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that the proposed regulation:

    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866;

    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and

    3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

    We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket. Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket that contains the proposed AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and other information on the Internet at http://dms.dot.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The Docket Office (telephone (800) 6475227) is located at the street address stated in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt. List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety. The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows: PART 39AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

    1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

    Sec. 39.13 [Amended]

    2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by removing Airworthiness Directive (AD) 20071317, Amendment 3915121 (72 FR 36863, July 6, 2007), and adding the following new AD:
    Air Tractor, Inc.: Docket No. FAA20070258; Directorate Identifier 2007CE090AD.
    Comments Due Date
    (a) We must receive comments on this airworthiness directive (AD) action by February 29, 2008 (an additional 30 days after the comment close date for the NPRM of January 30, 2008).
    Affected ADs
    (b) This AD supersedes AD 20071317, Amendment 3915121.
    Applicability
    (c) This AD applies to the following airplane models and serial numbers that are certificated in any category:
    Model Serial Nos. AT400, AT400A, AT402, AT402A, 0001 through 1175.
    and AT402B.
    AT502, AT502A, AT502B, and AT 0001 through 2597.
    503A.
    AT602........................... 0001 through 1141.
    AT802 and AT802A............... 0001 through 0227.
    Unsafe Condition
    (d) This AD results from a report of a Model AT502B airplane with a crack located where the lower engine mount tube is welded to the engine mount ring. The airplane had 8,436 total hours timein service (TIS). We are issuing this AD to detect and correct cracks in the engine mount, which could result in failure of the engine mount. Such failure could lead to separation of the engine from the airplane.
    Compliance
    (e) To address this problem, you must do the following, unless already done:
    (1) For all airplanes with less than 5,000 hours total TIS that do not have gussets installed on the engine mount in accordance with Snow Engineering Co. Service Letter #253 Rev. A, dated October 16, 2007: Visually inspect the engine mount as follows:
    Affected airplanes Compliance Procedures (i) For all Models AT602, Initially before the Follow one of the AT802, and AT802A airplane reaches a following: airplanes. total of 1,300 (A) Snow Engineering hours TIS or within Co. Service Letter the next 100 hours 253, Rev. TIS after August B, dated November 10, 2007 (the 30, 2007; effective date of (B) Snow Engineering AD 20071317), Co. Service Letter whichever occurs 253, Rev. later. Repetitively A, dated October thereafter at 16, 2007; or intervals not to (C) Snow Engineering exceed 300 hours Co. Service Letter TIS. 253, revised January 22, 2007.
    (ii) For all Model AT502A Initially before the Follow Snow airplanes. airplane reaches a Engineering Co. total of 1,300 Service Letter hours TIS or within 253 Rev. the next 100 hours B, dated November TIS after the 30, 2007. effective date of
    this AD, whichever
    occurs later.
    Repetitively
    thereafter at
    intervals not to
    exceed 300 hours
    TIS.
    [[Page 71089]]
    (iii) For all Models AT400, Initially within the Follow Snow AT400A, AT402, AT402A, next 12 months Engineering Co. AT402B, AT502, AT502B, after the effective Service Letter and AT503A airplanes. date of this AD. 253 Rev. Repetitively B, dated November thereafter at 30, 2007. intervals not to
    exceed 12 months.
    (2) For all airplanes: Before further flight after any inspection required by paragraph (e)(1) of this AD where crack damage is found, repair and modify the engine mount by installing gussets following Snow Engineering Co. Service Letter 253 Rev. B, dated November 30, 2007. This modification terminates the repetitive inspections required in paragraphs (e)(1)(i), (e)(1)(ii), and (e)(1)(iii) of this AD.
    (3) For all airplanes: Before the airplane reaches 5,000 hours total TIS after the effective date of this AD or within the next 100 hours TIS after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs later; inspect, repair if cracked, and modify the engine mount by installing gussets following Snow Engineering Co. Service Letter 253 Rev. B, dated November 30, 2007. This modification terminates the repetitive inspections required in paragraphs (e)(1)(i), (e)(1)(ii), and (e)(1)(iii) of this AD.

    Note: As a terminating action to the repetitive inspections required in paragraphs (e)(1)(i), (e)(1)(ii), and (e)(1)(iii) of this AD, you may install the gussets before finding cracks or reaching 5,000 hours total TIS.
    Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
    (f) The Manager, Forth Worth Aircraft Certification Office, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to ATTN: Andy McAnaul, Aerospace Engineer, ASW150, FAA San Antonio MIDO43, 10100 Reunion Place, San Antonio, Texas 78216; phone: (210) 3083365; fax: (210) 3083370. Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify your appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the FAA Flight Standards District Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local FSDO.
    Related Information
    (g) To get copies of the service information referenced in this AD, contact Air Tractor Inc., P.O. Box 485, Olney, Texas 76374; telephone: (940) 5645616; fax: (940) 5645612. To view the AD docket, go to U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, or on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov .

    Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on December 10, 2007. John R. Colomy,
    Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
    [FR Doc. E724215 Filed 121307; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 491013P

    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT Andy McAnaul, Aerospace Engineer, 10100 Reunion Pl., San Antonio, Texas 78216; telephone: (210) 3083365; fax: (210) 3083370.


  • ©2004,2005,2006 theFederalRegister.com