Browse: Departments Dates Agencies
RIN ID: RIN 1513-AA92
DOCUMENT ID: [Notice No. 79; Re: Notice No. 77]
SUBJECT CATEGORY: Proposed Establishment of the Calistoga Viticultural Area; Comment Period Extension
DOCUMENT SUMMARY: In response to industry member requests, we are extending the comment period for Notice No. 77, Proposed Establishment of the Calistoga Viticultural Area, a notice of proposed rulemaking published in the Federal Register on November 20, 2007, for an additional 90 days.
SUMMARY: Calistoga, Napa County, CA,
Also on November 20, 2007, TTB published Notice No. 78 (72 FR 65261), a notice of proposed rulemaking regarding our regulations on the establishment of American viticultural areas. The proposed amendments clarify rules for preparing, submitting, and processing viticultural area petitions. The proposals contained in Notice No. 78 also include an amendment to 27 CFR 4.39(i) that would establish a ``grandfather'' provision to protect wine labels using a viticultural area name, provided that the label in question was approved and in actual commercial use for a specified period of time preceding TTB's receipt of a perfected petition for establishment of the viticultural area. As originally published, comments on Notice No. 78 are due on or before January 22, 2008, 60 days after its publication.
After the publication of Notice No. 77, TTB received two requests from wine industry groups to extend that notice's comment period. Both the Napa Valley Vintners, a trade group representing over 300 Napa Valley (California) vintners, and the Wine Institute, a trade representing 1,100 California wineries and winerelated businesses, requested that the comment period for Notice No. 77 be extended an additional 90 days.
In support of its extension request, Napa Valley Vintners indicates that the proposed grandfather provision contained in Notice No. 77 ``is of great concern to our association'' and is ``inextricably linked'' to TTB's more general grandfathering proposal contained in Notice No. 78. The association believes that its decisions regarding the two notices ``should be made at the same time.'' Its requested 90day extension, the group states, will allow its Winegrower Appellation Committee to consider the grandfather provision and the specific questions posed by TTB in Notice No. 77. The Napa Valley Vintners' request notes that its appellation committee's recommendations must then be presented to the group's board of directors, which only meets once a month.
The Wine Institute, in its comment period extension request, also noted that Notice Nos. 77 and 78 deal with similar issues ``that call for consistent rather than staggered comment periods.'' In addition, the Wine Institute stated that, with the holiday season, its membership ``is engaged in one of its busiest months of the year.''
In response to these requests, TTB extends the original 30day comment period for Notice No. 77 for an additional 90 days, so that the comment period will equal 120 days. Therefore, comments on Notice No. 77 are now due on or before March 20, 2008.
Michael Hoover of the Regulations and Rulings Division drafted this notice.
John J. Manfreda,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. E724361 Filed 121407; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 481031P
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT Amy R. Greenberg, Regulations and Rulings Division, Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau, 1310 G Street, NW., Suite 200E, Washington, DC 20220; telephone 2029278210; or email Amy.Greenberg@ttb.gov.
14 CFR Part 39 40 CFR Part 52 14 CFR Part 71 33 CFR Part 165 50 CFR Part 679 47 CFR Part 73 26 CFR Part 1 40 CFR Part 180 33 CFR Part 117 50 CFR Part 17 44 CFR Part 67 50 CFR Part 648 14 CFR Part 97 40 CFR Part 63 33 CFR Part 100 50 CFR Part 622 50 CFR Part 660 26 CFR Part 301 44 CFR Part 65 39 CFR Part 111 40 CFR Part 300 6 CFR Part 5 40 CFR Part 271 47 CFR Part 64 40 CFR Parts 52 and 81 50 CFR Part 665 10 CFR Part 50 44 CFR Part 64 49 CFR Part 571 39 CFR Part 3020