Browse: Departments Dates Agencies
DOCUMENT ID: [Release No. 34-56943; File No. SR-CBOE-2007-133]
SUBJECT CATEGORY: Self-Regulatory Organizations; Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Relating to Class Quoting Limits
DOCUMENT SUMMARY: December 12, 2007.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on November 29, 2007, the Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated
(``Exchange'' or ``CBOE'') filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in
Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been substantially
prepared by the Exchange. The Exchange filed the proposal as a ``non controversial'' proposed rule change pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \3\ and Rule 19b4(f)(6) thereunder.\4\ The
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b4.
\3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
\4\ 17 CFR 240.19b4(f)(6).
I. SelfRegulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change
The CBOE proposes to amend CBOE Rule 8.3A pertaining to Class
Quoting Limits. The text of the proposed rule change is available on
the Exchange's Web site (http://www.cboe.org/Legal), at the Exchange's Office of the Secretary, and at the Commission.
II. SelfRegulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of those statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant parts of such statements.
A. SelfRegulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
CBOE Rule 8.3A, Interpretation and Policy .01, establishes the
upper limit, i.e., Class Quoting Limit (``CQL''), on the number of
members that may quote electronically in a particular product traded on
CBOE's Hybrid Trading System or Hybrid 2.0 Platform. CBOE determined to
establish the current CQLs in 2005 to ensure that it has the ability to
effectively handle all quotes generated by its members, and because
CBOE does not have systems bandwidth capacity to support an unlimited
number of electronic quoters in every class.\5\ The CQLs that CBOE
established varied from 25 to 40, with the CQL for all Hybrid Trading
Classes being 25, and the CQLs for products trading on the Hybrid 2.0
Platform ranging from 25 to 40 depending on the trading volume of the product in the preceding calendar quarter.
\5\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51366 (March 14,
2005), 70 FR 13217 (March 18, 2005) (approving SRCBOE200475).
CBOE now proposes to amend Rule 8.3A, Interpretation and Policy
.01, to increase to fifty the CQL for products trading on the Hybrid
Trading System or Hybrid 2.0 Platform.\6\ CBOE does not believe
maintaining the existing CQL levels is appropriate and necessary, and
represents that it has the systems bandwidth capacity to support this
increase in the CQLs. Additionally, CBOE believes that establishing a
CQL level of 50 for products traded on CBOE's Hybrid Trading System or
Hybrid 2.0 Platform will alleviate the operational burden of having to
calculate and assign different CQLs each quarter for products traded on
the Hybrid 2.0 Platform based on revised trading volume statistics, and
maintaining lists of classes that have ``increased CQLs'' because the
number of quoters in a product on the last trading day of the quarter exceeded the product's new CQL.
\6\ Presently, all products traded on CBOE except three are traded on the Hybrid 2.0 Platform.
If CBOE's President previously had determined to increase the CQL
in a particular product due to exceptional circumstances in accordance
with Interpretation and Policy .01(c) of Rule 8.3A, then the product
will continue to maintain the increased CQL notwithstanding this rule
change provided the increased CQL exceeded 50. If the increased CQL was
less than 50, then pursuant to this rule change the product's CQL would now be set at 50.\7\
\7\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 56772 (November 8,
2007), 72 FR 64261 (November 15, 2007) (increasing the CQL in
fourteen option classes due to exceptional circumstances). The CQL
in Goldman Sachs Group will continue to be 60, whereas the CQL in
the other option classes will now be set at 50 pursuant to this rule filing.
Finally, because paragraph (a)(ii) of Interpretation .01 of Rule 8.3A is proposed to be deleted in connection with this rule change, CBOE proposes to incorporate the language of paragraph (a)(ii) in new paragraph (b) of Interpretation .01 which pertains to the authority of the President to increase the CQL in a particular class due to exceptional circumstances. In that regard, if the President (or his designee) later determines to reduce the CQL upon cessation of the exceptional circumstances, any reduction must be undertaken in accordance with the following procedure. If a member changes his/her appointment and ceases quoting electronically in that class after the President (or his designee) has determined to decrease the CQL, the ``increased'' CQL will decrease by one until such time that the number of remaining members quoting electronically in the product equals the ``reduced CQL.'' From that point forward, the number of members quoting electronically in the product may not exceed the ``reduced CQL.'' 2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with
the Act and the rules and regulations under the Act applicable to a
national securities exchange and, in particular, the requirements of
Section 6(b) of the Act.\8\ Specifically, the Exchange believes the
proposed rule change is consistent with the Section 6(b)(5) Act \9\ requirements
[[Page 71727]]
that the rules of an exchange be designed to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest.
\8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
B. SelfRegulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
CBOE does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any
burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
C. SelfRegulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange neither solicited nor received comments on the proposal.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action
Because the foregoing rule does not (i) significantly affect the
protection of investors or the public interest; (ii) impose any
significant burden on competition; and (iii) become operative for 30
days from the date on which it was filed, or such shorter time as the
Commission may designate if consistent with the protection of investors
and the public interest, provided that the selfregulatory organization
has given the Commission written notice of its intent to file the
proposed rule change at least five business days prior to the date of
filing of the proposed rule change or such shorter time as designated
by the Commission,\10\ the proposed rule change has become effective
pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \11\ and Rule 19b4(f)(6)
thereunder.\12\ At any time within 60 days of the filing of such
proposed rule change, the Commission may summarily abrogate such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
\10\ CBOE fulfilled this requirement.
\11\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
Under Rule 19b4(f)(6) of the Act,\13\ the proposal does not become
operative for 30 days after the date of its filing, or such shorter
time as the Commission may designate if consistent with the protection
of investors and the public interest. The Exchange represents that
there currently is a waitlist in some option classes traded on the
Exchange and that the Exchange has not filed a proposed rule change to
increase the CQL in these classes in light of the current filing.\14\
The Exchange has requested that the Commission waive the 30day
operative date, so that the proposal may become operative upon filing,
enabling parties currently on the waitlist to begin quoting an option
without delay. The Commission agrees and, consistent with the
protection of investors and the public interest, has determined to
waive the 30day operative date so that the proposal may become operative upon filing.\15\
\13\ Id.
\14\ Telephone conversation between Patrick Sexton, Associate
General Counsel, CBOE, and Sonia Trocchio, Special Counsel, Division of Trading and Markets, Commission (December 6, 2007).
\15\ For purposes only of accelerating the operative date of
this proposal, the Commission has considered the proposed rule's
impact on efficiency, competition, and capital formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods:
Electronic Comments
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.\16\
\16\ 17 CFR 200.303(a)(12).
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E724468 Filed 121707; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 801101P
SUMMARY: Chicago Board Options Exchange, Inc.,
DOCUMENT BODY 2: December 12, 2007.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on November 29, 2007, the Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated
(``Exchange'' or ``CBOE'') filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in
Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been substantially
prepared by the Exchange. The Exchange filed the proposal as a ``non controversial'' proposed rule change pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \3\ and Rule 19b4(f)(6) thereunder.\4\ The
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b4.
\3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
\4\ 17 CFR 240.19b4(f)(6).
I. SelfRegulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change
The CBOE proposes to amend CBOE Rule 8.3A pertaining to Class
Quoting Limits. The text of the proposed rule change is available on
the Exchange's Web site (http://www.cboe.org/Legal), at the Exchange's Office of the Secretary, and at the Commission.
II. SelfRegulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of those statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant parts of such statements.
A. SelfRegulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
CBOE Rule 8.3A, Interpretation and Policy .01, establishes the
upper limit, i.e., Class Quoting Limit (``CQL''), on the number of
members that may quote electronically in a particular product traded on
CBOE's Hybrid Trading System or Hybrid 2.0 Platform. CBOE determined to
establish the current CQLs in 2005 to ensure that it has the ability to
effectively handle all quotes generated by its members, and because
CBOE does not have systems bandwidth capacity to support an unlimited
number of electronic quoters in every class.\5\ The CQLs that CBOE
established varied from 25 to 40, with the CQL for all Hybrid Trading
Classes being 25, and the CQLs for products trading on the Hybrid 2.0
Platform ranging from 25 to 40 depending on the trading volume of the product in the preceding calendar quarter.
\5\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51366 (March 14,
2005), 70 FR 13217 (March 18, 2005) (approving SRCBOE200475).
CBOE now proposes to amend Rule 8.3A, Interpretation and Policy
.01, to increase to fifty the CQL for products trading on the Hybrid
Trading System or Hybrid 2.0 Platform.\6\ CBOE does not believe
maintaining the existing CQL levels is appropriate and necessary, and
represents that it has the systems bandwidth capacity to support this
increase in the CQLs. Additionally, CBOE believes that establishing a
CQL level of 50 for products traded on CBOE's Hybrid Trading System or
Hybrid 2.0 Platform will alleviate the operational burden of having to
calculate and assign different CQLs each quarter for products traded on
the Hybrid 2.0 Platform based on revised trading volume statistics, and
maintaining lists of classes that have ``increased CQLs'' because the
number of quoters in a product on the last trading day of the quarter exceeded the product's new CQL.
\6\ Presently, all products traded on CBOE except three are traded on the Hybrid 2.0 Platform.
If CBOE's President previously had determined to increase the CQL
in a particular product due to exceptional circumstances in accordance
with Interpretation and Policy .01(c) of Rule 8.3A, then the product
will continue to maintain the increased CQL notwithstanding this rule
change provided the increased CQL exceeded 50. If the increased CQL was
less than 50, then pursuant to this rule change the product's CQL would now be set at 50.\7\
\7\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 56772 (November 8,
2007), 72 FR 64261 (November 15, 2007) (increasing the CQL in
fourteen option classes due to exceptional circumstances). The CQL
in Goldman Sachs Group will continue to be 60, whereas the CQL in
the other option classes will now be set at 50 pursuant to this rule filing.
Finally, because paragraph (a)(ii) of Interpretation .01 of Rule 8.3A is proposed to be deleted in connection with this rule change, CBOE proposes to incorporate the language of paragraph (a)(ii) in new paragraph (b) of Interpretation .01 which pertains to the authority of the President to increase the CQL in a particular class due to exceptional circumstances. In that regard, if the President (or his designee) later determines to reduce the CQL upon cessation of the exceptional circumstances, any reduction must be undertaken in accordance with the following procedure. If a member changes his/her appointment and ceases quoting electronically in that class after the President (or his designee) has determined to decrease the CQL, the ``increased'' CQL will decrease by one until such time that the number of remaining members quoting electronically in the product equals the ``reduced CQL.'' From that point forward, the number of members quoting electronically in the product may not exceed the ``reduced CQL.'' 2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with
the Act and the rules and regulations under the Act applicable to a
national securities exchange and, in particular, the requirements of
Section 6(b) of the Act.\8\ Specifically, the Exchange believes the
proposed rule change is consistent with the Section 6(b)(5) Act \9\ requirements
[[Page 71727]]
that the rules of an exchange be designed to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest.
\8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
B. SelfRegulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
CBOE does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any
burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
C. SelfRegulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange neither solicited nor received comments on the proposal.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action
Because the foregoing rule does not (i) significantly affect the
protection of investors or the public interest; (ii) impose any
significant burden on competition; and (iii) become operative for 30
days from the date on which it was filed, or such shorter time as the
Commission may designate if consistent with the protection of investors
and the public interest, provided that the selfregulatory organization
has given the Commission written notice of its intent to file the
proposed rule change at least five business days prior to the date of
filing of the proposed rule change or such shorter time as designated
by the Commission,\10\ the proposed rule change has become effective
pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \11\ and Rule 19b4(f)(6)
thereunder.\12\ At any time within 60 days of the filing of such
proposed rule change, the Commission may summarily abrogate such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
\10\ CBOE fulfilled this requirement.
\11\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
Under Rule 19b4(f)(6) of the Act,\13\ the proposal does not become
operative for 30 days after the date of its filing, or such shorter
time as the Commission may designate if consistent with the protection
of investors and the public interest. The Exchange represents that
there currently is a waitlist in some option classes traded on the
Exchange and that the Exchange has not filed a proposed rule change to
increase the CQL in these classes in light of the current filing.\14\
The Exchange has requested that the Commission waive the 30day
operative date, so that the proposal may become operative upon filing,
enabling parties currently on the waitlist to begin quoting an option
without delay. The Commission agrees and, consistent with the
protection of investors and the public interest, has determined to
waive the 30day operative date so that the proposal may become operative upon filing.\15\
\13\ Id.
\14\ Telephone conversation between Patrick Sexton, Associate
General Counsel, CBOE, and Sonia Trocchio, Special Counsel, Division of Trading and Markets, Commission (December 6, 2007).
\15\ For purposes only of accelerating the operative date of
this proposal, the Commission has considered the proposed rule's
impact on efficiency, competition, and capital formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods:
Electronic Comments
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.\16\
\16\ 17 CFR 200.303(a)(12).
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E724468 Filed 121707; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 801101P
14 CFR Part 39 40 CFR Part 52 14 CFR Part 71 33 CFR Part 165 50 CFR Part 679 47 CFR Part 73 26 CFR Part 1 40 CFR Part 180 33 CFR Part 117 50 CFR Part 17 44 CFR Part 67 50 CFR Part 648 14 CFR Part 97 40 CFR Part 63 33 CFR Part 100 50 CFR Part 622 50 CFR Part 660 26 CFR Part 301 44 CFR Part 65 39 CFR Part 111 40 CFR Part 300 6 CFR Part 5 40 CFR Part 271 47 CFR Part 64 40 CFR Parts 52 and 81 50 CFR Part 665 10 CFR Part 50 44 CFR Part 64 49 CFR Part 571 39 CFR Part 3020