Browse: Departments Dates Agencies
Docket ID: [Docket ID OTS-2007-0007]
RIN ID: RIN 1550-AC10
SUBJECT CATEGORY: Permissible Activities of Savings and Loan Holding Companies
DOCUMENT SUMMARY: The Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS) is revising its regulations, at 12 CFR 584.2 and 584.22, to expand the permissible activities of savings and loan holding companies (SLHCs) to the full extent permitted under the Home Owners' Loan Act (HOLA). In addition, OTS is amending 12 CFR 584.4 to conform the regulation to the statute that it is intended to implement, and to set forth standards that OTS will use to evaluate applications submitted pursuant to the statutory application requirement.
SUMMARY: Savings and loan holding companies; permissible activities,
On March 27, 2007, OTS published a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPR) that proposed certain changes to the OTS Holding Company Regulations.\1\ In the NPR, OTS proposed to expand the activities permissible for SLHCs. In addition, OTS proposed to revise its regulations at 12 CFR 584.4 to: (i) Conform to the statute it implements by providing that OTS may approve acquisitions by SLHCs of more than five percent of the voting shares of a savings association that is not a subsidiary of the acquiring SLHC, or more than five percent of the voting shares of a SLHC that is not a subsidiary of the acquiring SLHC; (ii) provide approval standards for applications submitted under the regulation; and (iii) reorganize the regulation. \1\ 72 FR 14246 (Mar. 27, 2007).
With respect to holding company activities, under section 10(c)(9)
of the HOLA,\2\ SLHCs generally are permitted to engage only in
activities that are permissible for financial holding companies under
section 4(k) of the Bank Holding Company Act (BHCA),\3\ or activities
that are listed in section 10(c)(2) of the HOLA.\4\ Section 10(c)(2)(F)(i) permits SLHCs to engage in activities:
\2\ 12 U.S.C. 1467a(c)(9).
\3\ 12 U.S.C. 1843(k).
\4\ 12 U.S.C. 1467a(c)(2). SLHCs that were SLHCs on May 4, 1999,
and meet certain other requirements, are excepted from the
activities limitations of section 10(c)(9) of the HOLA. See 12 U.S.C. 1467a(c)(9)(C).
which the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, by
regulation, has determined to be permissible for bank holding
companies under section 1843(c) of this title, unless the Director,
by regulation, prohibits or limits any such activity for savings and loan holding companies. * * * \5\
As authorized by the statute, OTS limited the activities permitted for SLHCs under section 10(c)(2)(F)(i) of the HOLA. OTS regulations implementing section 10(c)(2)(F)(i) have limited the activities that are permissible under this authority to activities that the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (FRB) has permitted for bank holding companies under regulations implementing section 4(c)(8) of the BHCA.\6\
In the NPR, OTS observed that the regulatory scheme for SLHCs has changed significantly since the regulations were first promulgated in 1987. In 1987, most SLHCs were excepted from activities restrictions. After the passage of the GrammLeachBliley Act \7\ in 1999, all new SLHCs have been, with limited exceptions, subject to activities restrictions.
In addition, since 1987 many foreign entities have acquired, or have expressed interest in acquiring, a savings association. To the extent that sections 4(c)(9) and 4(c)(13) of the BHCA, and regulations that the FRB has promulgated thereunder, authorize bank holding companies with foreign operations to engage in certain activities, it would appear appropriate to provide the same authority to SLHCs.
For many years, bank holding companies have been permitted to engage in the activities described in section 4(c) of the BHCA, consistent with the regulations of the FRB. OTS is not aware of any safety and soundness or other reason why SLHCs should not be permitted to engage in the same activities.
Accordingly, OTS proposed to revise its regulations to enable SLHCs to engage in activities that the FRB has permitted under any regulation that the FRB has promulgated under section 4(c) of the BHCA. B. Approval Requirement for Certain Acquisitions by SLHCs
Section 10(e)(1)(A)(iii) of HOLA prohibits SLHCs from directly or
indirectly acquiring, without OTS approval, more than five percent of
the voting shares of a savings association that is not a subsidiary of
the acquiring SLHC, or more than five percent of the voting shares of a SLHC that is not a subsidiary of the acquiring SLHC.\8\
\8\ 12 U.S.C. 1467a(e)(1)(A)(iii). The statute establishes eight exceptions from the approval requirement. See 12 U.S.C.
1467a(e)(1)(A)(iii)(I)(VIII). In addition, section 10(e)(1)(A)(iii)
prohibits multiple SLHCs from acquiring or retaining more than five
percent of the voting shares of any company not a subsidiary that is
engaged in any business activity other than the activities specified in section 10(c)(2) of HOLA.
The Holding Company Regulations, at 12 CFR 584.4, implement section
10(e)(1)(A)(iii) of HOLA. The American Homeownership and Economic
Opportunity Act of 2000 \9\ (AHEO Act) amended section 10(e)(1)(A)(iii)
to replace the former absolute prohibition on SLHCs acquiring more than
five percent of the voting shares of a savings association or SLHC not
a subsidiary of the acquiring SLHC (subject to the exceptions noted
above), with a regulatory approval requirement. In the NPR, OTS
proposed to replace the absolute prohibition in the regulation with an
approval requirement, to make the regulation consistent with the statute.
\9\ Pub. L. 106569 (Dec. 27, 2000), at section 1202, 114 Stat. 3032.
In addition, although the AHEO Act established a regulatory approval requirement for the acquisitions in question, the statute did not establish approval standards for applications submitted as a result of the approval requirement. OTS proposed to amend the regulation to set forth approval standards for applications submitted under section 10(e)(1)(A)(iii) and Sec. 584.4.
Finally, in light of the amendments to Sec. 584.4 proposed above, OTS proposed to reorganize Sec. 584.4.
OTS received six comments regarding the NPR. Three were from trade associations in which savings associations are members, one was from a savings association, one was from an SLHC, and one was from a trade association in which credit unions are members.
All of the comments except one expressed support for the proposed
amendments. The comment that did not support the proposed amendments
did not object to the expansion of permissible holding company
activities or the revisions to section 584.4, but asserted that the
proposed regulation would provide ``insufficient transparency'' because
the provisions relating to permissible holding company activities did
not provide for public comment in the event an application was required.\10\
\10\ The same commenter also asserted that OTS should undertake
greater efforts to ensure that information regarding SLHC activities
and acquisitions is widely disseminated on a national basis to those
in the financial services industry who are interested in following
these activities. OTS considers this comment to be beyond the scope
of the NPR. In any event, information regarding acquisitions of
depository institutions by SLHCs is publicly available, and
information regarding the activities of SLHCs with securities
registered under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is publicly available.
The commenter also asserted that the OTS Application Processing
Regulations should be revised to require a meeting to occur where a
commenter raises an objection to a transaction. This comment also is
beyond the scope of the NPR. OTS recently amended 12 CFR 516.170 to
eliminate the requirement that a meeting be held under such
circumstances, and state, instead, that OTS will grant a meeting
request if it ``finds that written submissions are insufficient to
address facts or issues raised in an application, or otherwise determines that a meeting will benefit the decisionmaking
process.'' See 69 FR 68239, at 68242 (Nov. 24, 2004). The amendment
revised the meeting provisions to conform more closely to those of the other banking agencies.
OTS has considered the comment and has decided not to require public notice and comment for applications required under the holding company activities regulations. The application provisions of the holding company activities regulations have been in place since the 1980s, and have not required publication. OTS is not aware of any negative consequences that have resulted from the lack of a publication requirement. Moreover, the relevant statute, section 10(c)(4) of HOLA, does not require publication. Also, no public comment is required for SLHCs to engage in financial holding company activities, which generally are broader than bank holding company activities. Finally, in the event that OTS concludes that public comment is appropriate in a particular case, OTS may require public notice and comment.
Four of the remaining comments made specific suggestions regarding the proposed regulation.
One commenter requested that OTS clarify that any SLHC that seeks to exercise powers that the FRB has provided to bank holding companies pursuant to sections 4(c)(9) or 4(c)(13) of the BHCA must comply with the terms and conditions that the FRB has applied to bank holding companies under FRB regulations, including the Qualifying Foreign Banking Organization (QFBO) test, and 12 CFR 211.602.
It is OTS's position that SLHCs that exercise powers pursuant to section 4(c)(9) of the BHCA must comply with the QFBO test, and that SLHCs that exercise powers pursuant to section 4(c)(13) of the BHCA must comply with 12 CFR 211.602. OTS believes that the regulation, as proposed, and as promulgated today, makes clear that SLHCs that propose to engage in activities that are permissible for bank holding companies under section 4(c) of the BHCA generally must do so pursuant to the conditions set forth in the FRB's regulations. In this regard, the regulation provides that ``the services and activities permissible for bank holding companies pursuant to regulations that the [FRB] has promulgated pursuant to section 4(c) of the [BHCA] are permissible for [SLHCs and their nonsavings association subsidiaries].''
Another commenter asserted that, since 1999, the FRB has approved certain bank holding company activities that were not approved as of 1999 on an informal basis through the issuance of interpretations. The commenter urges OTS to confirm that if the ``activity has been approved by an interpretation of Section 4(c)(8) for bank holding companies, * * * the activity be considered approved for savings and loan holding companies.''
The HOLA and OTS regulations provide that if an activity has been permitted under the FRB's regulations, promulgated under section 4(c) of the BHCA, it is permissible for SLHCs. If the FRB has interpreted those regulations to permit certain activities, OTS would generally adhere to those interpretations. However, without knowing the facts and circumstances regarding a particular interpretation, OTS cannot confirm the commenter's position with respect to any particular interpretation.
The same commenter has requested that OTS clarify that OTS's procedures and requirements for SLHC activities remain separate and distinct from those of the FRB for bank holding companies. The commenter asserts that imposition of additional regulatory procedures and requirements for SLHCs would require further public notice and comment.
OTS regulations, at 12 CFR 584.22, set forth the procedures for filing with OTS for permission to engage in bank holding company activities.
As noted in the preamble to the NPR, Section 10(c)(4) of the HOLA
generally requires prior OTS approval with respect to the activities
described in section 10(c)(2)(F)(i) of the HOLA. Certain of these
activities are already permitted under other OTS regulations without
prior OTS approval, or are permitted under FRB regulations without
prior FRB approval. In the preamble to the NPR, OTS proposed, in order
to avoid imposing additional restrictions on currently permissible
activities, and to provide for parity between bank holding companies
and SLHCs to the extent possible, to provide in the regulation that
activities that are authorized under section 10(c)(2)(F)(i) of HOLA, but are also permissible under
[[Page 72237]]
other provisions of section 10(c) of the HOLA or under FRB regulations without prior FRB approval are preapproved.
OTS, in preparing this final regulation, has carefully considered the provisions of section 10(c)(4) of the HOLA, and of OTS regulations. Section 10(c)(4) of HOLA requires that OTS, in reviewing an application by an SLHC to engage in a bank holding company activity under authority of section 10(c)(2)(F)(i) of the HOLA, consider whether the performance of the activity in question can reasonably be expected to produce benefits to the public that outweigh possible adverse effects of such activity, the managerial resources of the companies involved, and the adequacy of the financial resources, including capital, of the companies involved. \11\
Because the standard requires OTS to consider factors relating to
the specific company and activity, OTS believes that preapproval of
such activities is not appropriate for all SLHCs. \12\ However, OTS
conducts comprehensive consolidated supervision of SLHCs, including
assessing financial and managerial resources at each holding company
examination, and on a routine basis through ongoing offsite monitoring.
OTS, therefore, believes that an SLHC that received a rating of
satisfactory or above prior to January 1, 2008, or a composite rating
of ``1'' or ``2'' thereafter, on its most recent examination, and is
not deemed to be in a troubled condition \13\ meets the statutory
criteria pertaining to managerial and financial resources. In addition,
OTS believes that, where an SLHC that has the requisite managerial and
financial resources proposes to commence an activity de novo, the
activity would not lead to undue concentration of resources, decreased
or unfair competition, conflicts of interest, or unsound financial
practices. \14\ Accordingly, OTS is amending the Holding Company
Regulation to provide that where any SLHC that proposes to engage in an
activity on a de novo basis is rated satisfactory or above and is not in a troubled condition, the activity is preapproved. \15\
\12\ The final regulation provides that if the activity is
permissible for an SLHC under authority other than section
10(c)(2)(F)(i) of the HOLA, the application requirements of Sec. 584.22 are inapplicable.
\13\ ``Troubled condition'' is defined at 12 CFR 563.555. An SLHC is deemed to be in a troubled condition if it has an
unsatisfactory rating under OTS's holding company rating system, or
has been informed in writing by OTS that it has an adverse effect on
its subsidiary savings association; is subject to a capital
directive, a ceaseanddesist order, a consent order, a formal
written agreement, or a prompt corrective action directive relating
to the safety and soundness or financial viability of the savings
association; or is informed in writing by OTS that it is in troubled condition.
\14\ OTS believes that the de novo activity would, by its
nature, add a competitor to any relevant market, and also reduce the
concentration of resources; also, where the SLHC meets the
managerial and financial resources standards, it will have the means
to avoid harmful conflicts, and unsound financial practices.
\15\ This treatment of activities is consistent with section
10(c)(4)(C) of HOLA, which provides that: In prescribing any
regulation or considering any application under this paragraph, the
Director may differentiate between activities commenced de novo and
activities commenced by the acquisition, in whole, or in part, of a going concern.
Finally, one commenter, a savings association subsidiary of a mutual holding company (MHC), requested that OTS clarify one of the effects of the proposal on permissible activities for MHCs.
Under 12 CFR 575.11(a), an MHC may engage in any business activity specified in section 10(c)(2) or section 10(c)(9) of the HOLA. Because OTS previously limited the bank holding company activities that SLHCs may engage in under section 10(c)(2)(F)(i) to the section 4(c)(8) activities, activities described in other subsections of section 4(c) generally have not been permissible for MHCs.
Section 4(c)(6) of the BHCA permits bank holding companies to hold less than five percent of the outstanding shares of any company. Today's amendment to the holding company activities regulations results in Sec. 575.11(a) authorizing mutual holding companies to engage in the activity of holding less than five percent of the stock of any entity.
The comment notes that a separate section of the MHC regulations, 12 CFR 575.10(a)(6), includes language that appears to contradict this result. Section 575.10(a)(6) provides that an MHC may make controlling or noncontrolling investments in the stock of entities other than savings associations or SLHCs only under certain circumstances. One of the requirements is that the company in which the investment is made be engaged exclusively in activities that are permissible for MHCs pursuant to section 575.11(a), or that the stock may be purchased by a federal savings association under the OTS subordinate organization regulations or by a state savings association under the law of the relevant state.
The commenter's concern is that while Sec. 10(c)(2) and Sec. 575.11(a), by their terms, permit MHCs to hold up to five percent of the voting stock of any entity, Sec. 575.10(a)(6) appears to indicate that even where the investment in a company's stock is less than five percent, the company's activities must be permissible under Sec. 575.11.
Assume, for example, that an MHC proposes to acquire 3.9 percent of the stock of a retail store. The acquisition of the shares would be permissible under Sec. 575.11(a), because section 10(c)(2) of HOLA (through the reference to section 4(c) of the BHCA, under section 10(c)(2)(F)(i)) allows an MHC to hold less than five percent of the voting stock of any company. The activity raises an issue under Sec. 575.10(a)(6), because, while the MHC itself may be engaged in a permissible activity under Sec. 575.11, certain language in Sec. 575.10(a)(6) appears to require the company in which the investment is made to be engaged only in permissible activities. Since the company is engaged in retail activities, there is an issue as to whether the investment is outside the scope of Sec. 575.10(a)(6).
OTS concludes that it is appropriate to interpret Sec. 575.10(a)(6) as not prohibiting an MHC from making noncontrolling investments in another entity where that investment includes less than five percent of the entity's voting stock, regardless of the specific activities in which the entity engages. Otherwise, the ability of MHCs to engage in activities within the scope of section 4(c)(6) of the BHCA would be meaningless for MHCs. In addition, Sec. 575.10(a) implements section 10(o)(5) of HOLA, which, by its terms, allows MHCs to engage in, among other things, the activities described in section 10(c)(2) of the HOLA. Furthermore, section 10(o)(7) of HOLA provides that, unless the context otherwise requires, an MHC is subject to the requirements of section 10 regarding SLHCs.
The commenter also requested that OTS confirm that no prior notice or application to OTS is required under the MHC regulations for an MHC to engage in activities that are authorized for bank holding companies under section 4(c) of the BHCA, including investments in less than five percent of the stock of another entity.
Section 10(o)(7) of the HOLA provides that, unless the context
otherwise requires, MHCs are subject to the other requirements of
section 10 of the HOLA regarding regulation of SLHCs. Accordingly, MHCs
are subject to the filing requirements under section 10(c)(4) of the
HOLA discussed above, regarding activities that are permissible under
section 4(c) of the BHCA, which are set forth in section 584.22(a).
Moreover, under section 575.11(a), MHCs are required to file with OTS
to engage in any activity, and would be required to file under section 575.11(a) to engage in an activity, even when the
[[Page 72238]]
activity is excepted from the holding company filing requirements under
the proviso in section 584.22(a). OTS may reconsider this requirement
in a subsequent rulemaking. Revisions to the MHC filing requirement,
however, are beyond the scope of this rulemaking. Finally, OTS has
informally taken the position that an application is not required under
section 575.11(a) where an MHC proposes to hold less than five percent of the voting stock of another entity.
IV. Findings and Certifications
In accordance with the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, OTS may not conduct or sponsor, and the respondent is not required to respond to, an information collection unless it displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget (OMB) control number. The proposed collection of information was submitted to OMB for review and approval (44 U.S.C. 3507(d)). None of the public comments suggested that the information collection should be modified. Any material modifications will be submitted to OMB for review and approval.
Estimated Number of Respondents: 4.
Estimated Burden Hours per Response: 2 hours.
Estimated Total Burden: 8 hours.
Average Annual
Number of Number of annual burden disclosure &
Rule section Subject respondents responses per hours per recordkeeping
respondent response burden
584.22................. Application to engage 2 1 2 4 in certain activities.
584.4................... Application by SLHC to 2 1 2 4 acquire non
controlling interest
exceeding five
percent of non
subsidiary savings
association or SLHC.
The Director of OTS has determined that this final rule does not constitute a significant regulatory action for the purposes of Executive Order 12866.
In accordance with section 605(b) of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), the Director of OTS has certified that this final rule will not have a significant impact on a substantial number of small entities within the meaning of the RFA. 5 U.S.C. 603.
Section 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 requires an agency to prepare a budgetary impact statement before promulgating a rule that includes a Federal mandate that may result in expenditure by state, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100 million or more in any one year. 2 U.S.C. 1532. OTS has determined that this final rule would not have such an impact. Rather, the rule would provide that nonexempt SLHCs have broader authority to engage in activities than are specified under current regulations. Accordingly, OTS has not prepared a budgetary impact statement for this rule or specifically addressed the regulatory alternatives considered.
Administrative practice and procedure, Holding companies, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements, Savings associations, Securities.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, the Office of Thrift Supervision amends 12 CFR part 584 as follows:
PART 584SAVINGS AND LOAN HOLDING COMPANIES
1. The authority citation for part 584 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 12 U.S.C. 1462, 1462a, 1463, 1464, 1467a, 1468.
2. Revise the part heading for part 584 to read as shown above. 3. Revise Sec. 584.2(b)(6)(i) to read as follows:
Sec. 584.2 Prohibited activities.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(6) * * *
(i) That the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System has
permitted for bank holding companies pursuant to regulations
promulgated under section 4(c) of the Bank Holding Company Act; or * * * * *
4. Revise Sec. 584.22(a) to read as follows:
Sec. 584.22 Permissible bank holding company activities of savings and loan holding companies.
(a) General. For purposes of Sec. 584.2(b)(6)(i) of this part, the
services and activities permissible for bank holding companies pursuant
to regulations that the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System has promulgated pursuant to section 4(c) of the Bank Holding
Company Act are permissible for savings and loan holding companies, or
subsidiaries thereof that are neither savings associations nor service
corporation subsidiaries of subsidiary savings associations: Provided,
That no savings and loan holding company shall commence any activity
described in this paragraph (a) without the prior approval of this Office pursuant to paragraph (b) of this section, unless
(1) The holding company received a rating of satisfactory or above
prior to January 1, 2008, or a composite rating of ``1'' or ``2''
thereafter, in its most recent examination, and is not in a troubled
condition as defined in Sec. 563.555, and the holding company does not
propose to commence the activity by an acquisition (in whole or in part) of a going concern; or
(2) The activity is permissible under authority other than section
10(c)(2)(F)(i) of the HOLA without prior notice or approval. Where an
activity is within the scope of both Sec. 584.21 of this part and
this section, the procedures of Sec. 584.21 of this part shall govern.
* * * * *
5. Revise Sec. 584.4 to read as follows:
Sec. 584.4 Certain acquisitions by savings and loan holding companies.
(a) Acquisitions by a savings and loan holding company of more than
five percent of a nonsubsidiary savings association or savings and
loan holding company. No savings and loan holding company, directly or
indirectly, or through one or more subsidiaries or through one or more
transactions, shall, without prior written OTS approval, acquire by
purchase or otherwise, or retain, more than five percent of the voting
stock or shares of a savings association not a subsidiary, or of a savings and loan holding company not
[[Page 72239]]
a subsidiary. A savings and loan holding company seeking approval of an
acquisition under this section must file an application under 12 CFR
part 516, subpart A. Applications filed under this section are subject
to the publication, public comment, and meeting provisions of 12 CFR
part 516, subparts B, C, and D. OTS will review applications filed
under this section under the review standards set forth for savings and
loan holding company applications in section 10(e)(2) of the HOLA,
Sec. 574.7(c) of this chapter, and Sec. 563e.29(a) of this chapter.
(b) Certain acquisitions by multiple savings and loan holding
companies. No multiple savings and loan holding company (other than a
savings and loan holding company described in Sec. 584.2a(a)(1)(ii) of
this part) may, directly or indirectly, or through one or more
subsidiaries or through one or more transactions, acquire or retain
more than five percent of the voting shares of any company that is not
a subsidiary that is engaged in any business activity other than those specified in Sec. 584.2(b) of this part.
(c)(1) Exception for certain acquisitions of voting shares of
savings associations and savings and loan holding companies. Paragraphs
(a) and (b) of this section do not apply to voting shares of a savings association or of a savings and loan holding company
(i) Held as a bona fide fiduciary (whether with or without the sole discretion to vote such shares);
(ii) Held temporarily pursuant to an underwriting commitment in the normal course of an underwriting business;
(iii) Held in an account solely for trading purposes or over which
no control is held other than control of voting rights acquired in the normal course of a proxy solicitation;
(iv) Acquired in securing or collecting a debt previously
contracted in good faith, for two years after the date of acquisition
or for such additional time (not exceeding three years) as the Office
may permit if, in the Office's judgment, such an extension would not be detrimental to the public interest;
(v) Acquired under section 13(k)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Deposit
Insurance Act (or section 408(m) of the National Housing Act as in
effect immediately prior to the enactment of the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery and Enforcement Act of 1989);
(vi) Held by any insurance companies as defined in section 2(a)(17)
of the Investment Company Act of 1940: Provided, That all shares held
by all insurance company affiliates of such savings association or
savings and loan holding company may not, in the aggregate, exceed five
percent of all outstanding shares or of the voting power of the savings
association or savings and loan holding company, and such shares are
not acquired or retained with a view to acquiring, exercising, or
transferring control of the savings association or savings and loan holding company; and
(vii) Acquired pursuant to a qualified stock issuance if such a
purchase is approved pursuant to Sec. 574.8 of this chapter.
(2) The aggregate amount of shares held under this paragraph (c)
(other than pursuant to paragraphs (c)(1)(i) through (iv) and
(c)(1)(vi) may not exceed 15 percent of all outstanding shares or the
voting power of a savings association or savings and loan holding company.
(d) Acquisitions of uninsured institutions. No savings and loan
holding company may, directly or indirectly, or through one or more
subsidiaries or through one or more transactions, acquire control of an
uninsured institution or retain, for more than one year after the date
any savings association subsidiary becomes uninsured, control of such association.
Dated: December 14, 2007.
By the Office of Thrift Supervision
John M. Reich,
Director.
[FR Doc. E724676 Filed 121907; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 672001P
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT Donald W. Dwyer, Director, Applications, Examination and SupervisionOperations, (202) 9066414; or Kevin A. Corcoran, (202) 9066962, Deputy Chief Counsel for Business Transactions, Office of Chief Counsel; Office of Thrift Supervision, 1700 G Street, NW., Washington, DC 20552.
14 CFR Part 39 40 CFR Part 52 14 CFR Part 71 33 CFR Part 165 50 CFR Part 679 26 CFR Part 1 40 CFR Part 180 47 CFR Part 73 50 CFR Part 17 33 CFR Part 117 44 CFR Part 67 50 CFR Part 648 14 CFR Part 97 33 CFR Part 100 40 CFR Part 63 50 CFR Part 622 26 CFR Part 301 39 CFR Part 111 40 CFR Part 300 50 CFR Part 660 44 CFR Part 65 40 CFR Parts 52 and 81 40 CFR Part 271 47 CFR Part 64 50 CFR Part 665 47 CFR Part 76 50 CFR Part 229 14 CFR Part 23 14 CFR Part 25 21 CFR Part 522