Browse: Departments Dates Agencies
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
Federal Communications Commission
CFR Citation: 47 CFR Part 64
Docket ID: [CG Docket No. 02-386; FCC 07-221]
NOTICE: RULES
DOCUMENT ACTION: Final rule.
SUBJECT CATEGORY: Rules and Regulations Implementing Minimum Customer Account Record Exchange Obligations on All Local and Interexchange Carriers
DATES: Effective December 21, 2007.
DOCUMENT SUMMARY: In this document, the Commission declines to adopt rules and regulations implementing minimum customer account record exchange obligations on all local carriers. This action is necessary because the Commission does not believe mandating the exchange of customer account information between LECs is appropriate at this time.
SUMMARY: Rules and Regulations Implementing Minimum Customer Account Record Exchange Obligations on All Local and Interexchange Carriers.,
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
This is a summary of the Commission's Rules and Regulations Implementing[[Page 1298]]
Minimum Customer Account Record Exchange Obligations on All Local and Interexchange Carriers, Report and Order, document FCC 07221, adopted December 18, 2007, released December 21, 2007, declining to adopt rules and regulations implementing minimum customer account record exchange obligations on all local carriers.
Copies of document FCC 07221 and any subsequently filed documents
in this matter will be available for public inspection and copying
during regular business hours at the FCC Reference Information Center,
Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW., Room CYA257, Washington, DC 20554.
Document FCC 07221 and any subsequently filed documents in this matter
may also be purchased from the Commission's duplicating contractor at
Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW., Room CYB402, Washington, DC 20554.
Customers may contact the Commission's duplicating contractor at their
Web site: http://www.bcpiweb.com or call 18003783160. To request
materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (Braille,
large print, electronic files, audio format), send an email to
fcc504@fcc.gov or call the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau at
(202) 4180530 (voice) or (202) 4180432 (TTY). Document FCC 07221 can
also be downloaded in Word and Portable Document Format (PDF) at:
http://www.fcc.gov/cgb/policy. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 Analysis
The Report and Order does not contain new information collection requirements subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA), Public Law 10413. In addition, it does not contain any new or modified ``information collection burden for small business concerns with fewer than 25 employees,'' pursuant to the Small Business Paperwork Relief Act of 2002, Public Law 107198. See 47 U.S.C. 3506(c)(4).
Synopsis
In 2005, the Commission released a Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (Further Notice), FCC 0529 published at 70 FR 32258, June 2, 2005, in which the Commission sought comment on whether to require the exchange of customer account information between local exchange carriers (LECs). In response to the Further Notice, BellSouth filed comments urging the Commission to adopt standards for LECtoLEC migrations. BellSouth urged the Commission to adopt information exchange requirements for all LECs and require carriers to respond to customer record requests within 24 hours.
Upon a review of the record, the Commission declines to adopt mandatory minimum standards for the exchange of customer account information between LECs. The Commission does not believe mandating the exchange of customer account information between LECs is appropriate at this time for several reasons.
First, a number of commenters note that Alliance for Telecommunications Industry Solutions (ATIS), Ordering and Billing Forum (OBF) has developed Local Service Migration Guidelines that are specifically designed to facilitate the sharing of customer service records among LECs. Because ATIS OBF is an established industry forum that includes representatives of both incumbent LECs and competitive LECs, the Commission encourages carriers to adhere to the industry established guidelines and, where necessary, to work with the OBF industry forum to further develop and refine them.
Second, the Commission notes that a number of state commissions have addressed issues relating to local service migrations. Unlike LEC tointerexchange carrier (IXC) information sharing requirements, for which states and a broad coalition of carriers supported nationwide standards for the exchange of information, the record here suggests that the problems with LECtoLEC exchanges may not be as widespread and, therefore, may be more appropriately addressed by individual state commissions, which are wellsuited to address local service matters between LECs operating in their states.
Third, the Commission disagrees with those commenters that maintain LECtoLEC information sharing raises the same issues as LECtoIXC information sharing. Access to information makes LECtoLEC migrations different. In the LECtoIXC context, the Commission noted that certain transactions affecting an IXC's ability to provide service and manage customers' accounts, including the execution of customer preferred interexchange carrier (PIC) requests, are carried out, not by the customer's IXC, but by the customer's LEC. Because a LEC's exclusive control of the local switch could enable a LEC to place a customer on an IXC's network without the IXC's knowledge, the Commission determined that effective communications between LECs and IXCs is critical to an IXC's ability to maintain accurate billing records and to honor customer PIC selections and other customer requests. In the LECtoLEC situation, it does not appear that the new LEC is operating in the same information vacuum, or that the information needed could not be obtained from the LEC's new customer.
Finally, to the extent that critical customer account information cannot reasonably be obtained from a LEC's own customer and the customer's former LEC fails to provide such information in a timely manner thus causing unreasonable delay in a local service migration, the Commission notes that such conduct may constitute a violation of the Act and the Commission's rules. The Commission encourages carriers to bring such matters to our attention through the Commission's formal complaint procedures, which allow us to review them on a casebycase basis to determine the scope and seriousness of the issues presented. Congressional Review Act
Because no new rules are adopted in this order, the Commission will not send a copy of the Report and Order in a report to Congress and the Government Accountability Office pursuant to the Congressional Review Act, see 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A).
Ordering Clauses
Pursuant to the authority contained in sections 14, 201, 202, 222, 258, and 303(r) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended; 47 U.S.C. 151154, 201, 202, 222, 258, and 303(r), the Report and Order is adopted.
The Commission's Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau,
Reference Information Center, shall send a copy of this Report and
Order to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration.
Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8118 Filed 1708; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 671201P
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT David Marks, Consumer and Governmental
Affairs Bureau at (202) 4180347 (voice), or email
David.Marks@fcc.gov.
Common CFR Searches
14 CFR Part 39 40 CFR Part 52 14 CFR Part 71 33 CFR Part 165 26 CFR Part 1 50 CFR Part 679 40 CFR Part 180 33 CFR Part 117 50 CFR Part 17 44 CFR Part 67 47 CFR Part 73 50 CFR Part 648 14 CFR Part 97 26 CFR Part 301 33 CFR Part 100 40 CFR Part 63 50 CFR Part 622 39 CFR Part 111 44 CFR Part 65 40 CFR Parts 52 and 81 40 CFR Part 271 40 CFR Part 300 50 CFR Part 660 47 CFR Part 64 14 CFR Part 23 47 CFR Part 76 21 CFR Part 522 50 CFR Part 229 33 CFR Part 110 7 CFR Part 301